« Rev. Wright Ads-Who funded the Republican National Trust PAC to the tune of $6.6 million? | Mrs Panstreppon's Blog | National Republican Trust PAC's $5.2 Million Media Buys-$3.1 Million For TV Ads, $2.1 Million For ??? »

National Republican Trust PAC - Was $5.3 million media buy for vicious anti-Obama ads illegally guaranteed?


Stop Obama Now!

Stop His Plans To Ban Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly, Boortz 

That's the latest pitch from the the National  Republican Trust PAC. Send cash a.s.a.p. so Saxby Chambliss can win the GA senate runoff and stop Obama from re-instituting the Fairness Doctrine.  

The National Republican Trust PAC is the outfit responsible for the three sleaziest ads of the entire campaign. Among other things, Obama was accused of being a pro-terrorist black supremacist.  

From NPR's Secret Money project:

"You know you're bigtime when Factcheck.org dedicates a full article to debunking your ad. National Republican Trust got that distinction this week, with the added bonus of being accused of producing "one of the sleaziest false TV ads of the campaign."

The National Republican Trust PAC was only registered on 9/29/08 but somehow it managed to spend $6.8 million since then, most of which went to a $5.2 million media buy. According to the New York Times, $3.1 million went to broadcasting the despicable ads on television. That leaves $2.1 million unaccounted for as yet.  

After compiling all of the National Republican Trust PAC financial data filed with the FEC to date on a spreadsheet, my question now is whether National Republican Trust PAC raised  $5.2 million in less than three weeks or whether someone or some entity guarantee the debt.

Per FEC filings: 

Contributions:
9/29 to 10/15 - $463,000

Expenditures:
 9/29 to 10/15  - $379,000 (including $120,000 in debts)

Net cash on hand at 10/15 - $205,000

Expenditures:
10/16 to 11/3 - $6,371,000
Post-election day - $122,000

Total Expenditures through 11/14 - $6,872,000

(Note: Contributions after 10/15 do not have to reported until 12/4.)

How was a two-week old political action committee with $191k in the bank on 10/15 able to run $5.2 million in ads on television two weeks later?   

I'm not an expert in election law but if campaign debt is guaranteed, isn't the guarantee a constructive contribution? A $5 million guarantee certainly exceeds the $5k that can be legally contributed to a PAC within a single year.   

The $5.2 media buy was made by Philipse Brook Group, Inc. which was registered in NYS on 8/28/08 by Brooklyn attorney, Sherman F. Sosnow. The address for the group given in FEC filings, 53 Philipse Brook Road in Garrison NY, is the home of Joseph Mercurio, a long-time, oft-quoted political consultant identified sometimes as a Republican and other times as a  Democrat.

Mercurio owns National Political Services and Mercurio Consultants. He is best known in NYC for being fired by mayoral candidate, C. Virginia Fields, after a campaign photo was doctored to to include an Asian couple for diversity.   

Recently, Joe Mercurio has been telling some media outlets that he worked on Joe Biden's campaign but after checking a few of Biden's FEC filings, I couldn't find any evidence to support Mercurio's claim.

The National Republican Trust PAC also spent $1.2 million on NewsMax email blasts. NewsMax is owned by Christopher Ruddy, one of Richard Mellon's boys and a certifiable '90s style wingnut lunatic.      

The PAC was registered on 9/29/08 by Scott Wheeler, Peter M. Leitner and Joshua Ambush. Leitner and Wheeler both have business ties to NewsMax. Wheeler, a former "correspondent" for the Rev. Moon's Insight magazine,and Leitner, a former DoD employee, created a slanderous "documentary" about the Clinton administration peddling influence to the Chinese which was marketed by Jerry Falwell. That''s just for starters. 

Ambush, an attorney, and Leitner apparently collaborate on a lawsuit against the Saudis on behalf of John O'Neill's estate. Ambush is wired into the Orthodox community after having represented an Orthodox youth sent to an infamous disciplinary camp by his parents.

Dig deep enough and you can connect Wheeler and Leitner to Curt Weldon and every other crackpot GOP conspiracy theorist in the last twenty years.  

Sigh. It looks like I'm going to have to wait until 12/4, though, to find out if the wingnuts at the National Republican Trust PAC came up with the cash to run their slimy, racebaiting crap on network television.

11/16/08 Update: This post has been updated to reflect data from the National Repubican Trust PAC's most recent filings and correct minor errors.  

The information presented here has been summarized in a Daily Kos diary.


4 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

After looking through the National Republican Trust PAC FEC filings again, I noticed that the registration was hand-delivered to the FEC on 9/29/08 but the registration itself was dated 9/26/08.

Contributions for the period beginning 9/26/08 and ending 10/15/08 totaled $462,651. A number of those contributions are dated 10/01/08.

Wisconsin-based Maelstrom Technologies charged the PAC $21,017 through 10/15 to process credit cards.

In an amendment to the registration dated 10/29. the PAC added a bank in Wisconsin as a depositary.

Curious. More on accounting for the contributions later.

user-pic

Per FEC filings:
National Republican Trust PAC
Expenditures from 9/26 to 11/12

Philipse Brook Group Inc. - $5,204,000
NewsMax - $ 1,253,460
Intrepid Media - $ 99,365
Endeavor Media Group - $66,000
Eagle Publishing - $ 62,500
TownHall.com - $ 61,590
Maelstrom Technologies - $ 61,590
Triangulation Strategies (dickmorris.com)
- $19,500
Dionysus Consulting - $14,700
Verafast - $9,680
Integram - $ 7,090
Embassy Suites - $6,059
Intermarkets - $5,000
Scott Wheeler - $1,728
St Gregory Hotel - $427
Constant Contact - $85
Total through 11/12 - $6,832,286

As noted above, Joseph C. A. Mercurio, owner of Philipse Brook Group placed the media buys. Mercurio also owns
National Political Services Inc.

Christopher Ruddy, owner of NewsMax, ran the email blasts.

Rick Wilson, owner of Intrepid Media, produced at least one of the ads.

Bobby Eberle owns Endeavor Media and
GOPUSA
, a supposed news service that owns Talon News, Jeff Gannon's outfit.

Triangulation Strategies, of course, is owned by Dick Morris.

user-pic

Rick Wilson, a National Republican Trust PAC consultant, told Greg Sargent on 10/30 that the network attorneys had vetted the ads and they were good to go. (Wilson's company, Intrepid Media, produced the ads.)

Wilson also told Sargent that by the next day (10/31), the National Republican Trust PAC will have spent $2 million on the national buy. This is in addition to running ads previously in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Where did the cash come from to pay for the ads? After reading the FEC guidelines, I can't see how a two-week old committee could have legitmately qualified for a multi-million dollar loan.

Per FEC:

Loans
A loan to a committee is a contribution to the
extent that it remains outstanding. 100.52(b)(2).
(Loans from banks are not contributions if they
meet certain conditions; see page 16.)

Repayments made on a loan reduce the amount
charged against the lender’s contribution limit.
However, a loan that exceeds the lender’s limit is
unlawful even if repaid in full.

Endorsements and Guarantees of Bank Loans
An endorsement or guarantee of a bank loan is
a contribution. The amount guaranteed counts
against the endorser’s or the guarantor’s limit only to the extent that the loan remains outstanding. Repayments on the loan proportionally reduce the amount charged against each endorser’s (or guarantor’s)contribution limit.

If a loan agreement does not stipulate the amount
for which each endorser or guarantor is liable, then the contribution amount of each endorser or guarantor is determined by dividing the total amount of the loan by the number of endorsers or guarantors. 100.52(b)(3) and 100.82(c).

Bank Loans
Unlike other loans, a loan or line of credit from a bank is not considered a contribution if the conditions set forth below are satisfied. If a loan fails to meet any of these conditions, it is considered a prohibited contribution from the lending institution.

Conditions
A committee may obtain a loan or line of credit
from a bank provided that the loan:
1. Bears the bank’s usual and customary interest
rate for the category of loan involved;
2. Is evidenced by a written instrument;
3. Is subject to a due date or amortization schedule; and
4. Is made on a basis which assures repayment.
100.82(a)(1)-(4).

Methods of Assuring Repayment
A loan is made on a basis which assures repayment
if it is obtained using one or more of the following authorized methods of securing the loan:

Collateral. A loan may be secured using assets of
the committee, such as real estate, personal property,negotiable instruments and stocks. The fair market value of the assets pledged must, on the date of the loan, equal or exceed the amount of the loan and any senior liens. The committee must ensure that the bank has established a “perfected security interest” in the collateral (that is, taken steps to protect its interest in the collateral in the event that the committee defaults on the loan).
100.82(e)(1).

Guarantees or Endorsements. A loan may also
be secured using guarantors or endorsers, who
agree to repay the loan should the committee default. As previously stated, an endorsement or guarantee of a bank loan is considered a contribution by the endorser or guarantor and is therefore subject to the law’s prohibitions and limits on contributions.100.82(e)(1)(ii).

Pledge of Future Receipts. A committee may
pledge its future receipts as security for the loan; the amount of the loan must not exceed a reasonable estimate of anticipated receipts, based on documentation provided by the committee (such as cash flow charts or fundraising plans).

Future receipts may include, for example, anticipated contributions or interest income. The loan agreement must require the committee to deposit the pledged funds into a separate account established for this purpose. If the account is established at a depository other than the lending institution, the committee must assign the account’s funds to the lender and notify the depository of the assignment.
100.82(e)(2).

Other Methods of Assuring Repayment
The Commission may, on a case-by-case basis,
approve other methods of assuring repayment.
100.82(e)(3). A committee may wish to request
an advisory opinion from the Commission before
entering into an alternative repayment agreement

user-pic

Note: I incorporated most of the material presented here in a Daily Kos diary.)

Leave a comment

Mrs Panstreppon

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 7

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address