How do we pressure the Senate?
Yesterday I received a call from the DSCC asking for money. Usually I just say that I support individual campaigns and hang up. But it was the day of the House vote and I was on edge. So I started berating the DSCC (with due apologies to the guy on the phone, who wasn't at fault). I said unless the DSCC makes clear to the Senators who refuse to vote for the reform bill that they will not receive a dime from the DSCC and no support from the President in their next election, I couldn't give any money to them.
Mary Landrieu is one of our senators. She is smart: she knows that she is in a position to extract promises in exchange for her vote. But no matter what promises she extracts, she's not going to vote with the Democrats. She is owned by the oil companies and the insurance companies. It is probably a political reality for her that she would lose votes if she voted for the bill. ( I don't know if she would lose the campaign funds from the oil companies.) But why should I give money to an organization that will turn money over to her just because she puts a D after her name and then continues to vote R? The DSCC rep told me that we have to work to retain our majority. I said we don't have a majority in the Senate except in name only. When I asked who the new head of the DSCC was, he didn't know! That's how visible the leadership in the Democratic party is right now.
Maybe Rahm Emmanuel is putting the squeeze on the Dem Senators: I hope so. But we need everyone in the party to put the squeeze on them. What can we do?
Let's start by telling the DSCC that we won't give them any money unless they align their campaign funding with the party's agenda.
Mary Landrieu is one of our senators. She is smart: she knows that she is in a position to extract promises in exchange for her vote. But no matter what promises she extracts, she's not going to vote with the Democrats. She is owned by the oil companies and the insurance companies. It is probably a political reality for her that she would lose votes if she voted for the bill. ( I don't know if she would lose the campaign funds from the oil companies.) But why should I give money to an organization that will turn money over to her just because she puts a D after her name and then continues to vote R? The DSCC rep told me that we have to work to retain our majority. I said we don't have a majority in the Senate except in name only. When I asked who the new head of the DSCC was, he didn't know! That's how visible the leadership in the Democratic party is right now.
Maybe Rahm Emmanuel is putting the squeeze on the Dem Senators: I hope so. But we need everyone in the party to put the squeeze on them. What can we do?
Let's start by telling the DSCC that we won't give them any money unless they align their campaign funding with the party's agenda.
Advertisement
















Hope you enjoy seeing your money go to CAO.
November 8, 2009 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I so agree with you and your message.
Appreciate. Rec'd!
November 8, 2009 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's how you pressure the Senate:
In a move that will intensify the coming war over how to treat abortion in the health care bill, more than three dozen House Dems have signed a letter to Nancy Pelosi firmly pledging to vote against the bill if it contains an anti-abortion amendment.
A source sends over a working copy of the letter without the signatories, and the source says it currently bears the signatures of 41 House Dems. They’re all vowing to vote No on a bill if it contains the Stupak amendment — enough to sink the bill:
Greg Sargent's Plum Line today.
November 9, 2009 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I also agree with your message.
November 9, 2009 6:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
It seems to me it's the fate of party-spawned campaign committees to always become coopted by insider interests who throw the power of that committee only towards certain candidates who are vetted by other power centers in the party.
None of this acknowledges or is significantly influenced by what voters actually want.
I think the only way to effectively influence the Senate is to organize as a bloc of voters who are not part of the official Democrat party organs, but can wield through their numbers and grass roots organization significant monetary and vote-getting clout. A counterpart, if you will, to the hordes of church-organized worker-bees who muster on behalf of the religious right and influence campaigns through the vehicle of the Christian Coalition and related groups.
Where is the Progressive (or Liberal, or whatever) Coalition that is an answer to that degree of boots-on-the-ground organization, with business ties as well as popular support? When we have that kind of structure in place, then we-the-people (not the Partycrats) will be in a position to arm wrestle with the Senate in terms that will be heard and heeded.
That, however, requires a structural (and attitudinal) change in how progressives pursue their politics.
November 9, 2009 8:54 PM | Reply | Permalink