« The Great Community | Lux Umbra Dei's Blog | As Goes the OMB... »

In Memory of Henry A Wallace


He died November 18, 1965 at age 77.  From an obituary written 43 years ago in the ILWU labor newspaper,  The Dispatcher:

Common Man's Prophet

by Sidney Roger

"Somewhat more than two decades past a Vice-President of the United States spoke---in the midst of a fearful war against fascism---to declare to all people of the world that this was "The Century of the Common Man."

He was Henry Agard Wallace.  He died November 18, at age 77 after a lifetime devoted to humanity--Vice-President under Franklin D. oosevelt 1941-1945, before that Secretary of Agriculture, publisher, editor, agricultural scientist--a man not afraid to dream of a better human condition.

Those who set property rights above human rights scoffed at Henry Wallace--a "bubblehead" they said, an "impractical idealist", even a "subversive".

He was called a "visionary" because he believed the US should use its vast food surpluses and productive ability to help feed the hungry world.  He was savagely attacked by the [Westbrook] Peglers and their ilk who sneered that Wallace "wants to give away quart of milk for every Hottentot."

While he campaigned, someone told Wallace the New Deal was dead.  "The New Deal is not dead," he answered. "The New Deal is as old as the wants of man."

There was almost nothing in the lexicon of mankind's aspirations that Wallace did not touch.  Many years before civil rights became a popular subject, and while Southern racists and reactionaries levelled their full measure of venom on him, Wallace delivered his famed December 28, 1947 "Ten Extra Years" speech [at the national convention of Alpha Phi Alpha, Tulsa, Oklahoma]

"I am haunted by one single grim fact...A Negro child born this day has a life expectancy ten years less than that of a white child born a few miles away.  I say that those ten extra years for millions of Americans are what we are fighting for."

---------------------------------------

He ran for president in the tumultuous 1948 election leading a revived version of the Progressive Party.  After Truman won, he retired to private life and agricultural researches that benefited millions of people around the world.

Today the life expectancy gap he spoke of is down to five years.  Because of Henry Wallace and great souls like him, millions of people live longer lives and don't fear to aspire to a brotherhood of the common man.  Not bad for someone the right wing of the day branded a dreamer and a failure. 

In memory ever green.  Henry Agard Wallace,  October 7, 1888 - November 18, 1965


12 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Henry Wallace was a true hero of progressives. I am reading a biography of J. K. Galbraith and I was struck by the passages around the time when Roosevelt picked Truman to be VP in 1944, and the beginnings of the cold war in 1946-1948, when Wallace was on the other side. We went down the wrong road!

In 1949, US military spending rose by nearly 40 percent over the previous year, to five times what it had been in 1940. In 1950, it surged upward again even before the Korean War broke out... Over the next two decades, until the end of the Vietnam War era, U.S. expenditures on weapons and warriors accounted for well over half of the entire federal budget, and for several years approached two thirds of all Washington's spending. In lockstep, the federal budget's share of the total economy grew dramatically and reached more than twice the size of Franklin Roosevelt's largest New Deal peacetime budget. Put another way, between the end of World War II and the year Dwight Eisenhower left office fifteen years later, the United States spent more annually on its Army, Navy, and Air Force (not counting the Korean War years, and adjusting for inflation) than it had in World War II itself. That transformation inevitably profoundly reshaped the entire country.

In 1998, the Brookings Institution published the most comprehensive independent estimate to date on the total cost of modern U.S. military spending... Money spent on nuclear weapons alone, the study noted, far exceeded the combined total spent on education; law enforcement; agriculture; natural resources and the environment; general science, space, and technology; job training, employment, and social services; community and regional development; and energy production and regulation since World War II.

-- Richard Parker, in John Kenneth Galbraith, His Life, His Politics, His Economics

If you want to know why we are where we are today, one need only look at those fateful years.

user-pic

Tigger, Wallace saw it coming. In his 1948 acceptance speech to the Progressive Party convention, "My Commitments" he told of the end of the New Deal after FDR's death:

"It was a time of comings and goings.

Into the Government came the ghosts of the great depression, the banking house boys and the oil-well diplomats.

In marched the generals—and out went the men who had built the TVA and the Grand Coulee, the men who had planned social security and built Federal housing, the men who had dug the farmer out of the dust bowl and the workman out of the sweatshop.

A time of comings and goings . . . the shadows of the past coming in fast—and the lights going out, slowly—the exodus of the torchbearers of the New Deal.

I was still in the Cabinet—hoping that we might yet return, somehow, to the course Franklin Roosevelt had charted for the nation in peace."
----------------
Excruciatingly sad to read. We made a fateful decision partially forced on us, but also partially generated by the eternal struggle between our two dominant parties--a struggle that forced both to embrace international confrontation and militarism for fear of losing adherents in a populace that wanted to be protected from the horrors of war.

user-pic

From the speech "that got him fired" (by Truman as Sec'y of Commerce)

... our primary objective is neither saving the British Empire nor purchasing oil in the Near East with the lives of American soldiers. We cannot allow national oil rivalries to force us into war. All of the nations producing oil, whether inside or outside of their own boundaries, must fulfill the provisions of the United Nations Charter and encourage the development of world petroleum reserves so as to make the maximum amount of oil available to all nations of the world on an equitable peaceful basis—and not on the basis of fighting the next war.

Just as he was advocating for desegragation 2 decades before the Civil Rights Act, he was warning us not to spill blood for oil. In so many ways he was ahead of his time.

user-pic

We have to get our priorities straight! People are the citizens. Not corporations. Not "the defense industry." Not "defense" as a concept unmoored from social protection. Real protection for our citizens should entail food, clothing, shelter, jobs, and health care for all - otherwise what are we "defending"? To me, anything which interferes with basic necessities, including a huge defense budget and endless weapon systems, actually undermines our long term safety.

Consider these facts. And how they might interact. Milwaukee has the highest rate of unemployment for AA males. Milwaukee also has the highest AA infant mortality. (just two stray facts that have been reported recently - but facts that indict us as a society)

Lux is pointing us to the failure - over and over - to protect the least among us. The least among us have little social leverage. They have no lobbyists. They are often alone and depressed, without hope, feeling helpless. We have lost our way for too long and spent money unquestioningly on pipe dreams and swagger, while neglecting our greatest resource - our people.

I agree with the analysis tiggers thotful spot. And I am extending that as well as extending Lux's post: We have become deranged in our insane focus on "defense" - like a civilization behind an impregnable wall - slowly starving to death on many levels - to fund the all-important wall.

We need to get our priorities straight.

More than anything, we need to examine ways and means and ends in terms of ethics and morality. I think we are currently engaged in that activity right here at TPM - as different posts and bloggers circle the crucial issues from a variety of perspectives.

user-pic

Very well argued TheraP. The priorities have been out of whack for so long... We as a country are actually falling behind, aren't we? In infant mortality rates, in average education, in literacy! In so many ways, we who rescued and revived Europe after the devastation of WWII are now lagging behind in so many communal areas.

Only in military power are we still uncontested. That and our superlative university system.

We need to turn some of our prodigous energies inward to repairing and strengthening our own house.

user-pic

I have become so tired (from ten consecutive work weeks of 89 hours plus) that most of the comments I have made in the past month -- maybe longer than that -- have been nothing more than embarrassing non sequiturs that disrupt threads with their inappropriate inanity.
Nonetheless, I am deeply moved by the themes of this thread, as I am inspired by Lux, who wrote it, and impressed by the insights of those who have responded to it so far.
It is a sadness too vast to compute to finally accept that our beloved country has been spiraling out of control -- in support of military spending at the cost of everything else -- since the year I was born. Terrifying to realize that the "grown-ups" who were in charge when I was a child were not grown up at all -- which on some level I and all my peers, knew: who but the childishly posturing, or frightenally inept, could conceive and implement nuclear war drills in schools, in which our "defense" was to sit on the floor, either under our desks or in the hallway, with our arms braced "protectively" over our heads? An entire generation of children and young adolescents was traumatized by this repeated exercise, even as we recognized, immediately, that it was insane.
But at least we actually remember the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the incredible whispered conversations among parents: to quickly build, or not to build, a backyard bomb shelter? To flee, or not to flee, from the East coast to the Heartland?
And at least we remember the decisions our own generation had to make, not that many years later: to serve, or to refuse to serve, in Vietnam? To protest, or not to protest, the War until it ended? To stay and work collaboratively for change, or to flee, to Canada or to Europe?
For all the mistakes the Baby Boom generation has made, for all the sell-outs and buy-ins to corporate greed, at least when we began we had context, and that context, during Vietnam, had moral fiber; we were engaged in ethical debate based on our clear understanding of what constitutes moral right and wrong, and our ferocity was based in our belief that it was important to stand up for the common good, every bit as much as it was also based in honestly acknowledging fear.
I don't know what happened to our generation, after Vietnam. The same young men we protested with against the war, the same young men we watched burning their draft cards at great personal risk, were the same young men who, just a few years later, got expensive graduate degrees in order to don expensive suits to march to an entirely different drummer in an entirely different cause -- that of personal aggrandizement and enrichment, without recourse to remembered principle, which was abandoned without a backward glance.
Much sadder, then, by far, is the experience of those of you who were born well after those pivotal episodes. The experience of those of you who have no memory of ethical discussions, other than those that have been used to mock ethics as an ivory tower pursuit for those not in the "trenches" of Wall Street. Those of you who grew up on a steady diet of make more and spend more to somehow be more, who learned to look at the bond traders and short sellers of both the Baby Boom and GenX as heros, along with their brethren sitting in obscenely luxurious corporate offices.
What context were you of GenY, or of the Millenium offered, ever?
So, yes, please talk about ethics, even if you perceive it as hieroglyphics that must be dusted off and decoded for meaning.
Your world, the world of your children, and of all creatures, great and small, depends on what you discussions you have, and what decisions you make, and what actions you take, from now on.

user-pic

WW, wow! Just wow! So well expressed! I recall all of it! You are so right. And I am concerned that you are having to work so many hours! Take care of yourself. I've seen your comments and they never seemed "inane" to me. Maybe you're disappointed that you had a lot you might have wished to say or to say better. But be kind to yourself. Give yourself a break here. And if you have time, turn this comment into a blog.

And thank you. Thank you for summarizing so well and expressing the sadness so poignantly.

user-pic

WW, I have never read an inane comment by you, but like TheraP, am worried by those insanely long hours! I have done 60 hour weeks often times and those are exhausting enough...

You rise to a stirring defense of the boomer generation (how I wish we had never isolated the group to set it up inevitably for endless criticism). A lot of us were faced with moral decisions and even the folksongs of the early sixties and late fifties (remember The Weavers?) prepared us to think in those terms. The nature of politics, community, the good life, war, peace, spirtuality...all were avidly discussed. The current stereotypes I read of flowers, granny glasses, drugs, and bunny rabbits are pretty laughable!

But we sold out, as you point out, in large numbers. Me too. But we did have the context you mention, and we did, years later, have the opportunities to revisit our old values and take concrete actions to bring them into being. We Boomers have a major role in the 2008 victory. Our sheer numbers counted, and the true and the sell-outs alike redeemed their earlier visions, so nothing is wasted after all.

But the torch always is held by multiple pairs of hands, young, middle-aged and old, so it doesn't pass in that simplistic image to the young in such a clean fashion. The wave of idealism represented in the New Deal, as HAW says, is old, but it is also ever-renewing. My whole point in this blog was to tell an old story around the campfire of a great soul of the past of our band of idealists who fought in times now seemingly so remote, but whose example is always relevant.

Besides, if you didn't know of him, how would you know, once you get to the Heaven where he surely still experiments with egg production and dreams of the rights of the common man....

how would you know to look him up?

user-pic

Lux, I have unexpected tears welling up right now, but they are good tears: generated by gratitude in recognizing the real good in us that was, when we were young and strong; generated by compassion for the forty years we collectively, but voluntarily spent in a wilderness of our own design; and generated in recognition of the blessed opportunity this election of Obama represented to us -- so that we might recall our better selves, so that we might reach for and find the energy required, no matter how tired we are, to once again simply do the next right thing -- NOT as an exercise in nostalgia, but instead, in the here and now.
Perhaps it was the exhaustion of my current circumstance that tempted me into the maudlin martyrdom of torch passing. But you are right, of course. We all elected Obama. So "God bless us, Everyone." Nor are we released, now that he is elected. On the contrary, he will need the support of everyone of us to move the country forward in a humane direction, not only for all of us but also for all other species of "being."
BTW -- and more to your point -- your fond remembrance of, and tribute to HAW is a gift to all of us, which I appreciate, personally. HAW was not only my grandfather's peer, he was also his personal hero. So I thank you for reminding me, not only of a public man who did so much to promote the common good, but also for reminding me to honor, anew, the memory of the extraordinary Everyman who shaped my views, more than any other.

user-pic

This was a happy exercise in commemoration WW, and once again the comments ennobled the thread! Your writing today feels like true gold gleaned from the fire and maybe "in weariness, truth" I find your (and TheraP's) comments to be almost like hearing myself..."birds of a feather".

The last two sentences in my reply above were not aimed at you, but the rhetorical "you". It seems to me that historical illiteracy ill-serves us in ways obvious and not-so-obvious.

Thanks WW. And thanks to your grandfather too.

user-pic

This is a thread to bow to with reverence.

user-pic

And there is not a word here that should go unread, as all of it touches the heart of those who never forgot the lessons learned as a "child of the '60's."

"We (were) obscene lawless hideous dangerous dirty violent... and young!"

May God Bless and keep you always, and may you stay forever young!

--------------
Thank you so very much Lux for starting this thread off with the ILWU tribute to Henry Wallace. There are indeed giants who walked among us showing the way to a more perfect world for those who would not be too blind to see. A Prophet, indeed!

Leave a comment

Lux Umbra Dei

user-pic

Following: 97
Followers: 47

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Portland
  • Party Democratic
  • Politics New Dealers/Henry Wallace/Fred R Harris/both Roosevelts

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs shtetl optimized
  • Favorite Books too many to mention, but like everyone else seemingly, I enjoyed and own all the Aubrey-Maturin novels
  • Favorite Quotes Practice Hard!

Bio

Gratitude! Gratitude!

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address