« Stop Them Now Before It's Too Late | Morgan Pardee's Blog | Apocalyptic Film Chronicles Truth About Iraq »

What I Will Ask of Congress on Constitution Day


As one of the TPMCafe Bloggers who is participating in the Constitution Day Redress Campaign, I've been thinking about what I will be asking of Congress and the nation on Sept. 17th. The list is so long, where to begin? What specifically do I want to see Congress do?

I had thought that much of our efforts would best be applied toward chipping away at the base of Bush’s "block" of GOP conservatives who protect him from this Democratic Congress, preventing it from doing The People’s business.

I even spent a day gathering names of GOP Senators and e-mail addresses of editors at major newspapers in their home states, thinking that thousands of e-mails bombarding the newspapers’ servers would have the same effect as “tagging” the front of their buildings. It would get their attention; it would be news worthy of at least a couple of paragraphs on the front page or an editorial.

Several members at Tom Wright’s “Seeking Redress En Masse” have gone to considerable effort developing a long laundry list of legitimate constitutional issues that need to be addressed by this Congress.

But I know how short is the attention span of the average reader. (TPMCafe readers are ABOVE average.) And as a former copy editor, I know how important headlines and lead paragraphs are. So, I’ve been looking for “something” that would put all the issues – Iraq, the Bill of Rights, spying, torture, abuse of power, etc. – into one nut graph within my personal message.

Today, while reading the news and columnists online, I found the words of a few others that helped me find what I intend to ask Congress on Constitution Day.

“If the Democrats Want to Win...” By Robert Parry, July 18, 2007

If the Democrats really want to prevail over George W. Bush on the Iraq War and on his authoritarian vision of presidential powers, they would put back on the table two options that their leaders have removed: a cut-off of war funding and impeachment. …

The Democrats would call on the American people to stand up at this dangerous moment in their history – when the president and vice president have become enemies of the constitutional system devised by the Founders, a Republic based on the idea that all people possess inalienable rights and governments must ensure those rights.

Why is it the Democrats' job to clean up the mess this Republican president, vice president and Republican controlled – and now blocked – Congress have made of our country and Constitution?

Do Republican leaders believe they get a “pass” because only Democratic leaders are questioning this administration’s interpretation of the Constitution? Are Democratic leaders waiting for Republicans to begin using the “I” word before they can then jump on the bandwagon?

Every American citizen, regardless of party, ought to be concerned about the threat to our Constitution. And if they're not, they either haven't read it or aren't paying attention to what this administration is doing.

Our nation – and the lives of our troops and the Iraqi people – can’t wait until hell freezes over. It’s obvious as tits on a hog that Bush isn’t going to change his position; and this Congress is petrified of taking any kind of decisive action against this administration until 60 members of senate agree on what kind of action to take and/or until 90 percent of the nation threatens to fire the whole damn lot of them – Democrats and all.

In his column on Truthout, Ray McGovern writes that Bush is guilty of wooden-headedness, which historian Barbara Tuchman defines as:

Wooden-headedness ... plays a remarkably large role in government. It consists of assessing a situation in terms of preconceived fixed notions while ignoring or rejecting any contrary signs. It is acting according to wish while not allowing oneself to be deflected by the facts."

And it appears as though several GOP members of Congress are suffering from wooden-headedness, too. While Democratic leaders try to "kill" this GOP impasse through death by a thousand papercuts issued from a blizzard of legislation and subpoenas, congressional and presidential approval ratings are sinking like petrified wood in Lake Erie, our troops as well as the Iraqis are dying or being blown apart, the world distrusts us, and Bush & Company are wiping their asses with the Constitution.

Americans are outraged. But what to do?

We have shown up at the polls in record numbers to elect people who said they would set things right. But that was eight months ago, and very little progress has been made because too many members of Congress have shown themselves to be more loyal to their party than to their country, and who have worked harder to defend this wooden-headed president than the Constitution.

And now we’re hearing rumors and rumblings that Bush & Company have more treacherous plans in the works and don’t give a damn about the Constitution or the Rule of Law or the Bill of Rights. They are now openly operating under their own set of rules. Meanwhile, Congress is playing by the rules our forefathers set up for them – well, except for one rule.

McGovern believes the Constitution holds the answers for dealing with this dangerously wooden-headed administration.

Thanks to the prescience and courage of those who crafted our Constitution, a wood tool is available. It is a precision tool that, with some courage, can be employed almost immediately. It is called impeachment, the orderly political process the Founders left to us for use when the president and/or vice president or other high official needs to be removed to save the Republic. (The emphasis is mine.)

Since Bill Moyers put impeachment back on the table this weekend and because nearly half the nation now wants impeachment proceedings, discussions are beginning in earnest.

A page right out of Karl Rove’s and Dick Cheney’s playbook says that when something is said three times, it becomes truth -- even when it’s a lie; and when something is repeated over and over again, it becomes policy.

Repeat after me: "Impeach. Impeach. Impeach. Impeach. Impeach." The more people talk up impeachment, the less frightening it sounds and the more likely it will become policy.

Perhaps dropping the political version of a nuclear bomb at the feet of the Republican Party will motivate its leaders in Congress to end all efforts at putting out individual "bushfires" and face the very real prospect that the survival of our nation is at stake. And maybe, just maybe, they'll remember the oath they took:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Bruce Fein said on Bill Moyers Journal, July 13, 2007, our nation needs congressional leaders who will stand up and say, “My country is more important than my party.”

Therefore, on Sept. 17, Constitution Day, I will be joining the growing chorus of Americans asking Congress to cut off funding of the Iraq war and to begin impeachment proceedings against President George Walker Bush and Vice-President Richard Cheney to save the Republic.

I want my children and my grandchildren to see that the wisdom and foresight of our forefathers who wrote the Constitution and the courage of our civilian and military leaders in upholding that Constitution can overcome any threat to our nation – even when that threat comes from INSIDE the White House.

TPMCafe Blogger, Tricia, has been working on this for a long time and has amassed a wealth of information in her post Impeachment Watch. Check it out.

And there's a new site, too: The Los Angeles National Impeachment Center

"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations."

-- James Madison

Morgan


25 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

~

My order (this is not a request) as a citizen of the United States, to my representatives has been and will remain to be, as provided and so ordered by the Constitution :

Immediately begin impeachment proceedings with HR 333 . . .

~OGD~

user-pic

With OGD here. We are really close to too late. The expected, transparently political move of preemptively refusing to honor contempt charges is just one more nail in the coffin of our democracy. (WaPo reports.) Congress can use inherent contempt, which does not need the DoJ to implement it.

When some of Clinton's impeachers, like Bob Barr and Bruce Fein, call for the same now, it's not just whistlin' Dixie. Now we have Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Treasury Sec under Reagan, saying, "Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran." 

He asks why would the WH risk, with their pig-headedness, the GOP losing really big in 2008? They can't be ignorant of the facts, he figures.

Roberts believes instead that Cheney and Rove intend to use a renewal of the War on Terror to rally the American people around the Republican Party. "Something's in the works," he said, adding that the Executive Orders needed to create a police state are already in place.

While he may have a paranoid streak, even paranoids can be right. It worries me that the WH announced its contempt immunity in advance. What was the hurry? If normal contempt was announced, that would have been the time to first, respond slowly, after a "careful reading of the constitutional provisions and applicable precedent", and then, "regretfully" determine that Congress is out of bounds.

This preemptive calling of immunity to contempt is itself contemptuous. This shall not stand. I don't want to wait and see if the WH is planning a coup, or is simply a bunch of obsessed idiots. I tend to think the latter, but as Roberts puts it, "It's so obvious to people like us who have long been associated in the corridors of power," he said. "There's no belief in the people or anything like that. They have agendas. The people are in the way. The Constitution is in the way. ... Americans need to comprehend and look at how ruthless Cheney is. ... A person like that would do anything."

user-pic

Tom, I sent Sen. Conyers a message after reading this paragraph buried in that same Washington Post article:

Both chambers also have an "inherent contempt" power, allowing either body to hold its own trials and even jail those found in defiance of Congress. Although widely used during the 19th century, the power has not been invoked since 1934 and Democratic lawmakers have not displayed an appetite for reviving the practice.

I wrote to Sen. Conyers, "Desparate times call for desparate measures; use the inherent contempt power. And ignore Rove's and Cheney's inevitible response of accusing the Democrats of picking on little old ladies. This president is not above throwing the bodies of our children, our troops, our disabled vets, the people of Iraq, Democrats, and little old ladies in front of him to deflect criticism or blame. We the People will support you."

Morgan

With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plea; but to tyrants I will give no quarter, nor waste arguments where they will certainly be lost.

-- William Lloyd Garrison (1805 - 1879)

user-pic

I told all three Senators to invoke that. John Dean was saying today that the Senate has procedures in place but the House does not, for trial. Hopefully Conyers has tasked some staffer with writing it up. 

user-pic

Another insightful piece, Morgan, on target and on message. Cross-referenced here.

So great to have you with us at the Cafe, teacher.

Tish

user-pic

Good stuff. Very good stuff. Excellent! Let's do it.

And thanks to all for the useful links... as if we need more backup?

The only backup we need now is for a majority of our fellow Americans to wake-up and get off their backsides.

user-pic

Am I the only bonehead in the room who thinks this is a liberal wet-dream?

It's not gonna happen, folks. Understand--I am absolutely with you on the need and the reasons. It's righteous and it's right.

But it ain't gonna happen. Sign all the petitions you want.

For one thing, we've got a congress that can't even get a war vote going. An impeachment vote? Not any time soon.

Indeed it is, too little too late. The congress was tied up for more than two years trying to get Clinton impeached and removed from office, and in spite of a powerful right-wing majority and a screaming salacious media salivating to see it happen...it didn't.

By the time two years of rancorous backbiting rip-tearing fighting over this were to take place (and it won't)...it will be time for the boy to go.

There are other, more accessible and probable ways to shut him down re the war. As far as the other, there just is not enough time.

If they want to get some steam going on impeaching Cheney...maybe...but I doubt it. The man has some VERY powerful friends.

I understand the sentiment behind the impeachment talk and I'm with you on it, but I do not think it is a practical matter that stands any realistic chance of actually taking place, not in this congress.

The still-powerful and still almost-a-majority Republicans are not going to lie down and give it over to the likes of Nancy Pelosi. Not in this lifetime and certainly not in the time remaining in his term.

Sorry.

user-pic

Despair is not an option, as they say.

Note that there was no groundswell of public clamoring for impeachment re Clinton. In spite of complete congressional control, the GOP couldn't swing a conviction, due mainly to the public saying "No".

Things are rather different now, without the help of an independent counsel to leak daily tidbits.

For sure, it won't happen if we don't ask for it.

user-pic

Well, Deanie. Tom's right. The only one sure way of NOT getting Bush & Company impeached is to NOT try. Kinda like trying to win the lotter without buying tickets.

Note that I'm asking for two things: stop funding the war and START impeachment hearings. Getting an actual impeachment wasn't the goal for impeaching Nixon nor was it for Clinton nor will it be for Bush and Cheney.

The goal was always to get the offending president to either resign or to cripple him so completely as to render him completely ineffective.

Bush & Company have until Jan. 20, 2009 to do even more damage to this country than they have in the last 7 years. Iran is the target, My Dear Friend Deanie.

Impeaching Bush would rip the lid off the top of the White House, and like flipping on the light in a kitchen full of cockroaches, those creeps will be so busy scurring around looking for cover, they'll leave Bush and Cheney high and dry and ISOLATED.

Sure they have powerful friends; and coming from Texas I'm sure you've seen just exactly how powerful those friends can be.

But we're not talking about Texas -- we're talking about AMERICA -- the entire nation. Does Bush & Company have enough friends in high places to get the entire country to cower in fear?

A majority of Americans who want to see this idiot stopped are ready to step up to these bullies and say, "Enough!"

And I'm willing to bet that if those powerful friends had to choose between saving their party or saving G.H.W. Bush's brat's butt, they'll chose the party. Hell, Daddy Bush has all but said, "Do what you have to do." If he were head of the mafia, Junior would be whacked by now, and Daddy would be the one shedding the most tears.

Nixon learned that lesson. The only reason Clinton survived is because he threw himself at the feet of his party and begged for forgiveness.

Bush could do that, too. But I doubt that he has the backbone to pull it off. Impeachment would be like giving him a box of tinker toys and saying, "Go play, while we clean up your mess."

It may not get the bastard tossed, but it sure would make many of us feel a whole lot safer if someone other than Bush & Cheney had their hands on the trigger.

Dare I repeat Condi's famous words, "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud. ..."

I say, let the games begin. What have we got to lose?

Morgan

With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plea; but to tyrants I will give no quarter, nor waste arguments where they will certainly be lost.

-- William Lloyd Garrison (1805 - 1879)

user-pic

~

Deanie:

Remember, you can contact your representative and direct them to do what you wish them to do on any issue you please.

And everyone else has that same right.

I only ask that people here keep in mind what 'background N015E' pointed out from the Bill Moyers interview over here in the cafe:

HERE'S THE BOTTOM LINE TAKE HOME TALKING POINTS:

1. Impeachment is not a constitutional crisis. It is the CURE for constitutional crisis. (Nichols)

2. Let unchallenged, these powers will be lying around like loaded weapons for future presidents. (Fein)

~OGD~

user-pic

Oh, come on Deanie ... you're hurtin' my feelings. I may not be Molly Ivins or Ann Richards or Lady Bird, or any other great dead Texas broad, but I am one bona fide American beauty queen -- and I sure as hell know 100% ugly, unadulterated, Republican horse ****.   

So ... will all the beautiful, talented, passionate, snakeshootin' Texas cowgirl writers now gracing this Cafe with their inimitable presence kindly report to the task at hand? ;D

P.S. We're not letting you go, so get used to it.

Love,

Tish

user-pic

~

I do note that there is one major point that I must take issue with. That point is the fact that this ol' decoy doesn't waste his dream time over political issues culminating in midnight emissions. [ahem..] Maybe back during the Watergate days, but as Zimmy once warbled, "Ahhh... but I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now."

~OGD~

user-pic

OGD, I wouldn't have the faintest notion what you are talking about. And being that our viewpoints on politics are sufficiently congruent to require mere telepathy for occasional fine tuning, I am not going to ask you to further elaborate on what you meant by that.

LOL. Good to see ya.

 

user-pic

~

Ticia:

Please pardon my bonehead mistake of placing that comment in the incorrect place. It was meant as a response to Deanie's comment that started this particular sub-thread. Please note Deanie's first sentence here.

I hope this clear up my faux pas ...

Please accept my sincerest apology.

~OGD~

user-pic

No problem, OGD. Ya big silly.

Tish

user-pic

Impeachment HEARINGS, maybe...That would uncover many worms if anybody could get past the blocking and obfuscation and exective privleging and smoke and mirrors and delays that the WH would throw up like a fog machine to confuse the main-stage action. As far as the time to actually git 'er done? Don't see it. Not with a congress that is only a hairline-majority and many of the new guys from conservative districts.

Now, about my congressman doing what I ask?

Well, I've got Kay Bailey Hutchison and JOHN CONYERS for my senators. My congressman is Mike Conaway, who was put into place by Tom DeLay after his redistricting scam completely redrew our district and therefore tossed out a fine conservative Democrat by the name of Charlie Stenholm, who not only had been there almost 25 years representing us with honor and grace, but would NOW BE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE but thanks to TOM DELAY WE GOT CONAWAY INSTEAD.

I can ask Conaway anything I want until I bleed from the eyeballs. Ditto either of my senators. From their end? No way, no how.

I am, however, offering my services to a fine young man from here who let me know he was thinking of challenging Conaway, and I'll do whatever I can to get his miserable Delay clone-ass out of office, but there is no way he would do anything more than laugh at impeachment.

I'm with you guys, really. I'm just not a True Believer.

user-pic

Conyers has made the point repeatedly that Reps and Senators have to hear the People asking for action. Let's oblige him.

user-pic

Oh, I send Conyers petitions all the time. Never hear back. Hutchison, I gotta say, sends a direct-mail letter in response to every petition, detailing her reasons for not agreeing, or, occasionally, her creds for backing it. Which is nice, even if you don't agree with her. She's not bad, for a conservative.

But neither will back an impeachment, not if Cheney sets his bald head on fire and streaks the Senate halls.

user-pic

Well, with THAT incredible visual in my head, let me just start out by saying, THANKS FOR HANGIN' IN THERE, DEANIE! You know we love you!

We also know you're living in the heart of Texas CONSERVATIVELAND. And more than once you've shared with us how desolate and lonely a Democrat can be there.

However, you are NOT without resources OR support. Actually, My Friend, you're in a key position -- you are living WITH this nation's political version of the "Hole in the Wall Gang."

You can help by just sharing what you're seeing and hearing from this GOP hideout. Hutchison (as polite as she is) and Conyers have to come out of "hiding" from time to time -- that's how the orginal Hole in the Wall Gang was eventually eliminated.

They can't stay there forever, because "hideouts," once known, become cages where, like lab rats, can be tested over and over again! OR starve to death.

Morgan

With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plea; but to tyrants I will give no quarter, nor waste arguments where they will certainly be lost.

-- William Lloyd Garrison (1805 - 1879)

user-pic

Interesting you should mention that, Morgan.

At HuffPost's "Off the Bus" page, they're discussing with me a regular beat, where I talk about how a given Democratic campaign is being viewed by conservatives, what they're saying when they talk amongst themselves, and why we Dems should care.

I was telling them that most of my progressive friends really don't fully grasp just how badly conservatives hate Hillary, how, for instance, they've been forwarding Hillary jokes to me now for ten years. Yeah, they didn't stop even when Bush took office.

At Off the Bus, they want me to examine WHY.

I said, "Okay. I'll ASK 'em."

My husband said, "You won't get an answer, because they don't KNOW why."

And I said, "Well, I do. They all have teenie little weenies and fear strong women," ha ha!!!

Seriously though, I think it will be interesting, providing this slant to the Off the Bus bunch.

user-pic

You GO GIRL!!

Morgan

With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plea; but to tyrants I will give no quarter, nor waste arguments where they will certainly be lost.

-- William Lloyd Garrison (1805 - 1879)

user-pic

~

Dear Deanie:

Please note that I had misplaced a comment directed to you located here and mistakenly connected to a Ticia comment. That in turn caused Ticia a moment of '...what in the world is OGD talking about...' here. That I replied to Ticia, by pointing to your first sentence here that began that sub-thread.

~OGD~

user-pic

Paging Morgan. Will Morgan please check in?

 Posted link to this blog at Impeachment Watch: August 4th.

See ya soon,

Tish

user-pic

Hey, I'm here. I have been out of town the last 10 days and just returned tonight. Scanning what I've missed here at TPMCafe before getting some sleep and saw your page ... it's good to be back!

I see you've been hard at work and, judging by what I've heard while on the road, people are starting to wake up to what's going on in Washington -- and they don't like it one bit.

We're nearing that tipping point....

Morgan

With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plea; but to tyrants I will give no quarter, nor waste arguments where they will certainly be lost.

-- William Lloyd Garrison (1805 - 1879)

user-pic

So great to see you, Morgan. Going to read in bed. I'll check for you tomorrow.

Hug,

Tish

Leave a comment

Morgan Pardee

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address