Time For the Truth About the USS Liberty
This is the first time Ive ever written publicly about the issue of the USS Liberty, the American espionage vessel that was attacked by Israeli forces during the Six-Day War.
Ive never written about it before because there was scant substance to write about. The facts we have dont extend much beyond this: Israeli planes attacked the Liberty, followed by a sea attack by an Israeli ship. The incident left 34 American sailors dead and 170 more injured, some severely. Two US squadrons were mobilized after the attack on the Liberty started and were then called back. Israel claimed the attack was a case of mistaken identity and apologized, and a US investigation was pursued, but only a quick one, which ended with American acceptance of Israels excuse and the matter was closed.
Today, we really dont know much more than that. But the Chicago Tribune brought the incident back up this week, (http://www.chicagotribune.com/services/newspaper/printedition/tuesday/chi-liberty_tuesoct02,0,3737033,full.story) and so, despite the fact that the article really doesnt shed any new light on the episode, I feel the urge to say something about this.
The attack on the Liberty has provided great fodder for conspiracy theorists for the past four decades. The surviving sailors who have spoken publicly have all been unanimous in rejecting the Israeli claim that they did not see the American flag flying on the ship. The one major point the Tribune article provides is much more conclusive evidence that indeed, the Israeli pilots were fully aware that they were attacking an American ship. This isnt a big surprise, frankly; Israels explanation on this score was never all that credible. The Liberty was not off-course or in an unexpected place and there was no reason ever offered as to why the ship would not have been flying its colors.
But the conspiracy theorists have repeatedly used this incident to prove how much fealty the US gives to Israel, and frankly, that doesnt make a lot of sense. The US commitment to Israel in 1967 was a lot more tenuous and more slender than it is today. There is no credible evidence that Israel would be able to get away with an intentional attack on an American ship in those days, even if one wants to argue that their influence is so great today that they could (a claim I would not agree with, as is obvious from my recent post on the Israel Lobby). (http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/mitchell_plitnick/2007/sep/26/de_mystifying_american_middle_east_policy_a_response_to_steven_walt_and_john_mearsheimer)
But the fact is, Israels explanation for the incident is not credible as it stands, and the lack of serious investigation by the United States is also inexplicable based on the evidence we have now. The question, in particular, of why two squadrons were scrambled in response and then recalled (likely on direct instructions from Washington, possibly from as high a source as Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara) is an open one, not explained by any facts we have at hand, other than the mere fact of the event.
The mystery around this issue invites the worst kind of anti-Israel venom. It is obvious to anyone who looks at this incident with even a modicum of critical thinking that a secret or secrets are being kept. The conspiracy theorists have, fortunately, not come up with any explanations that are any more credible than the official ones. Just as the official version of the story has gaping holes, no one has explained what could possibly be of such great importance to Israel that they would risk making an enemy of the US by attacking the Liberty. This was, after all, an obvious possibility if Israel did indeed know that the ship was American.
The ongoing shroud of mystery about the Liberty is a real danger to Israel. Despite the Tribune article, most Americans are unaware that Israel attacked and crippled an American ship forty years ago in an unprovoked attack. It goes without saying that if this incident becomes public with the information we have now, Israels standing in the eyes of the American public will take an enormous hit. Maybe it should, but we dont have anything approaching the full story, and thus any backlash in any direction is not justified. It would, nonetheless, happen if the story was public.
The truth about the Liberty needs to come out. It is obvious form the behavior of the two squadrons of fighters from the US Sixth Fleet that someone somewhere in the American chain of command was as complicit in this as anyone in Israel. Moreover, Israel was at war and the way the Israeli military works, a great deal of power is in the hands of commanders of lesser stature especially during a war. It is entirely possible that whatever happened here was the result of decisions made well below the level of the Prime Minister, Defense Minister and even the most senior military officials. Its equally possible that Israeli leaders up to and including Prime Minister Levi Eshkol were involved.
The point is we dont know. Neither the official story nor any of the alternatives offered pass the laugh test. We should know what happened here. Should this story get more public traction, as it might, whether now or some day later, it will be explosive. The families of the sailors who were killed, those survivors who are living with the after-effects of this attack and the American and Israeli publics deserve more than they have gotten. The secrecy around the Liberty invites speculation of the rankest sort. Those involved are mostly dead or near the end of their lives. It is hard to imagine that the truth here will be as harmful as the cover-up has the potential to be.





I'm working on a SIGINT article for Wikipedia to which I can send you. A minor nit -- USN support was to have been sent to the Liberty, and USAF to the Pueblo. In both cases, no aircraft, not armed with nuclear weapons, were in range.
Contrast this with the DESOTO patrols in the Gulf of Tonkin, which, rather than converted and essentially unarmed merchant vessels, there were two-destroyer patrols, with a SIGINT van on one, with combat air patrols in the immediate area, and a major carrier task force in striking range.
--
Howard
*equal opportunity offense to both extremes*
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" [George Santayana]
October 7, 2007 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Is the Liberty episode being erased from history. So it would seem...What has happened to our prying journalistic corps and our editors, normally so indignant of attempted suppression of the news?...We believe that a joint select committee of Congress should investigate the strange case of the USS Liberty..."--William F. Buckley, journalist and publisher, National Review, June 27, 1967
The fact that Americans knowledge of the 40 year-old Israeli attacks on the USS Liberty would somehow affect their support for Israel bothers me a helluva lot less than the decision at the highest levels of the US government to order a stand down of the USN squadrons sent to defend her.
That so much effort was expended on the US side to purge information relating to this incident clearly shows the critical need for some serious ass-covering. The assumption that "the truth" would benefit either US and/or the Israelis is open to question. It could be devastating.
Absent pressure, "the truth" will not be forthcoming from the US side; particularily if the US Congress has anything to do with it. My guess is that if the real story ever surfaces, it will be from Israeli sources.
The caution that Americans shouldn't be exposed to this historical event until some miraculous breaking dawn reveals the whole tawdry tale in toto is, IMO, a call for the status quo of silence. (My apologies if I've misread you on this point, Mitchell)
For the real story to come out, pressure needs to be exerted and an ignorant US public can't apply it.
edited to change USAF to USN.
October 7, 2007 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
~
Time for the Truth?
Well here's as good a place to start as any-- link
~OGD~
October 8, 2007 3:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Chicago Tribune story says that prior to the attack, which happened around noon, there had been several fly-overs by Israeli planes of various sorts. This seems to contradict the claim that this was a case of mistaken identitification of the ship.
Mitchell, in the original post, states that there appears to be no explanation for what some always have claimed was a cover up, but the Counterpunch article which is linked in the other thread mentions upcoming arm sales to Israel, the first in the U.S.' ever-increasing military support that continues to the present day, which benefits American arms suppliers as well, as a possibility that might explain the desire of this country to supress the story and it certainly sounds plausible. It doesn't explain Israel's actions though.
Kudos to Mitchell for the effort to shed further light on this incident.
"If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail." ~~ Abraham Maslow
October 10, 2007 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mitchell - Another well reasoned post - Thanks. Truth is NOT the enemy of people, it is our friend. The USS Liberty story is an example of shutting our eyes and ears to truth just the same as shutting off Desmond Tutu from speaking at St. Thomas was. By the way, I agree with everything you and Cecilie wrote in this morning's Minneapolis Star Tribune op-ed about the Tutu situation. Nice work.
October 9, 2007 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lally wrote:
"The caution that Americans shouldn't be exposed to this historical event until some miraculous breaking dawn reveals the whole tawdry tale in toto is, IMO, a call for the status quo of silence. (My apologies if I've misread you on this point, Mitchell)"
You do misread me on this point, Lally. My point is that the status quo is bad for all concerned, Israel very much included as it leads only to rampant speculation and wild theories. Indeed, to the contrary of what you thought I said, I'm saying that the status quo is unacceptable and that the truth, however ugly, must come out. No doubt, the real story will not look good for Israel or for the US (indeed, I strongly suspect US actions will look particularly bad), but the truth must be known, for the sake of the survivors, to fight conspiracy theories with reality and so that we have a better understanding of the dealings between the US and Israel at that time.
October 10, 2007 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink