As late as last October, Hillary Clinton became the darling of the Defense Industrial Complex, something Dwight Eisenhower sternly warned would happen to corrupt democracy's defense. It has become an enduring pressure behind unnecessary wars as testing grounds for the shiny, expensive weaponry mill. It is a conflict of interest in sending troops and swearing the oath.
In addition, the Clinton Doctrine is related to Neocon doctrine of military internvention. Pick your interventionalist doctrine, it is an ideology of sending other peoples' young into combat for suspect visions instead of basic national defense. Did Hillary Clinton support the Clinton Doctrine? If so, why was it applied to Kosovo but not Rwanda?
She said she told Bill to bomb on the pretext of genocide in Kosovo. Did she advise similarly in Rwanda? And now the Serbian government has collapsed while the underlying conflict over Serbia's cradle of faith-culture remains in Kosovo under seige; for instance in the Decani Monastery and other holy sites since desecrated and vandalized.
Serb Orthodox holy sites in Kosovo are damaged by vandals but the US is not up in arms. Mosques are blown up in Iraq and the US is up in arms. The way the Clinton doctrine applied to Serbia may have been what pushed Russia back onto the neo-Soviet track. For it was after NATO bombed the Serbs that Yeltsin fast-tracked Putin the super-nationalist to replace him, and perhaps had to do so.
A 2-year civil war with 10,000 dead on both sides in Kosovo was genocide in Clinton's book, and so she advised Bill to bomb them. And yet, blunder of blunders, they even bombed them on Easter day whereas in Operation Desert Fox, Clinton ceased bombing for Ramadan. The message to Russians was clear. Joining NATO would be out of the question. And is that supposed to have been a wise foreign policy move?
The smaller combatant in Kosovo, the KLA, was also considered a narco-terrorist group which well may have funded al-Qaeda in exchange for its training of KLA fighters. How is misunderstanding an age old conflict between Serbs and Muslim forces, helping a drug cartel, and offending the entire Eastern Orthodox world with a false genocide charge considered good foreign policy?
What's the result? A man linked to and protected by Vladimir Putin, Viktor Bout the "Death Merchant," sends arms to Columbian rebels to try to destabilize the region with a little help from the big-Kalishnikov customer Hugo Chavez. Looks like proxy war feinting to me. Would it be happening but for the bombing of Serbs and the "independence" of Albanian dominated Kosovo?