What are your favorite blogs?


I've been thinking that since we're about to have a hiatus here at TPM Cafe, it might be a good time to tell some others what you've read or written here that seems memorable to you for whatever reasons.  In thinking about my own writing, the policy blogs mostly seem dated and of less use now.  Oddly, it's some of the more "poetic" writing that seems to hold up after the healthcare "debate" , and financial "reform", and the "end" of the war in Iraq have come to pass. 

 

So three of my favorites from my own writing are as follows:

A reflection on the future of ours and perhaps all intelligent species, composed in a high fever in a spiral notebook while traveling in Mexico in 2009...

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/miguelitoh2o/2009/02/predation-landbridges-technolo.php

Some thoughts on consciousness, perception, and friendship composed after visiting a friend with Alzheimer's Disease...

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/miguelitoh2o/2009/10/memento.php

And a quasi-poetic takedown of the current corporate/business paradigm in the US and the world...

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/m/i/miguelitoh2o/2009/05/locusts.php

 

I've enjoyed innumerable blogs you all have written over the years, and would love it if you would share with us all some of the ones you've either written or read that speak to you.  So, if you would, share those thoughts, (and links), here so we all might have some additional reading material to ponder during the upcoming hiatus. 

 

I'm traveling this week, and may not be able to check in/comment before the Cafe goes dark, so if I don't get back to any comments/commenters in time, thanks in advance, and see you after the break, (hopefully).  Cheers!  -  Miguelitoh2o

Dandelion Wine


I first read Ray Bradbury's semi-autobiographical novel "Dandelion Wine" over 30 years ago.  It made an impression on me, and if asked during the interim what my favorite Bradbury story was, I would have answered, "Dandelion Wine", though I'd read it only once heretofore.  I've been reading it aloud with a friend this month over cigarettes and wine, a chapter or two a night.  It's a magical book, with Bradbury describing life growing up in a Midwestern town during the early 20th century through the eyes of a pre-adolescent boy.  It's almost more poetry than prose.  It has been remarked that the town Bradbury was writing about was the same town that Sinclair Lewis pilloried in his book, "The Jungle".  Clearly Lewis was not writing from the perspective of a 12 year old boy.  

The title of the book comes from the annual process of making dandelion wine from the weeds proliferating on the summer lawns of the neighborhood. 

Dandelion wine.  The words were summer on the tongue.  The wine was summer caught and stoppered.  And now that Douglas knew he was alive, and moved turning through the world to touch and see it all, it was only right and proper that some of his new knowledge, some of this special vintage day would be sealed away for opening on a January day with snow falling fast and sun unseen for weeks or months and perhaps some of the miracle by then forgotten and in need of renewal.  Since this was going to be a summer of unguessed wonders, he wanted it all salvaged and labeled so that any time he wished, he might tiptoe down in this dank twilight and reach up his fingertips.

And there, row upon row with the soft gleam of flowers opened at morning, with the light of this June sun glowing through a faint skin of dust, would stand the dandelion wine.Peer through it at the wintry day - the snow melted to grass, the trees were reinhabited with bird, leaf, and blossoms like a continent of butterflies breathing on the wind.  And peering through, color sky from iron to blue.

Hold summer in your hand, pour summer in a glass, a tiny glass of course, the smallest tingling sip, for children; change the season in your veins by raising glass to lip and tilting summer in.

I was struck last evening when we read a chapter dealing with the final day of the street trolley, and the advent of buses in Bradbury's boyhood town.  One sunny summer day, the old trolley came down the street, stopped, and the aging operator called the neighborhood boys and girls aboard for a last ride, free of charge.  When the vehicle reached the end of the line, and the kids expected Old Mr. Trillen to turn back to town, the operator told them that today, he was going to continue on, out of town, on tracks long abandoned, and he eventually stopped the trolley at an abandoned country park.  He then handed out pre-packed lunches, and they all enjoyed an afternoon in the country before returning to town.  On the return trip, the sound of the trolley's horn, the colors of its seats, the burnish of it's brass, and the patina of the woodwork were savored by the children as never before, knowing it would be their last opportunity to do so.  An end of an era was passing, perhaps the first these kids had ever witnessed, and they were shocked that the world they inhabited could change so abruptly, and without forewarning.  It's a theme that crops up more than once in the book.  Life changes, or is threatened in some way, fear intrudes, then some kind of personal resolution allows the characters to accept their fates and move on. 

It's kind of like that at TPMCafe right now, as Josh makes his decisions, (for whatever reasons), to keep the Cafe at all, or to change it in some fundamental way.  We as readers and writers look around and see the patina of this place's architecture, and the assemblage of characters that inhabit it, and wonder, "How could this not just keep going on forever?".  It feels not unike the first day of summer vacation when we were schoolboys and schoolgirls ourselves, when we bid goodbye to our friends and acquaintances who lived across town, and we wonder what life will be like without them for 3 months.  Will they still be there in the fall, or will happenstance transport them from our lives, to become one more memory of how things were before?  Will the vibe, gestalt, general bonhomie remain the same if any of our schoolmates fail to return after that summer break?   "Dandelion Wine" paints a poignant picture of just these kinds of events that surround all of our lives and intrude as inexorably as death itself into the most perfect, in-control life you could design for yourself. 

So, this hiatus which is about to be imposed on the community during whatever restructuring occurs here, (and I truly hope we are reincarnated in whatever format JMM sees fit), feels a little like that.  Community is a fragile thing to tamper with wholesale.  It feels like we're all going for that last trolley ride right now.  Senses are heightened.  We see each other more acutely, and recognize what a remarkable assemblage of voices have we have aggregated here over the years, and know that each one will be missed should he or she fail to make the return trip.  Not just missed, but that this whole online microcosm will be different were that to happen.  But maybe that's just life. 

So Josh, If you're going to keep this trolley running, do the fixes as quickly as possible.  Thanks.  And I hope I see the rest of you after the break.  And don't forget to vote should the hiatus extend past election day.

Esperar


I've often been struck by the two meanings of the Spanish verb "esperar" which means "to hope" or alternatively "to wait".  It seems to me that hoping and waiting is almost all that thinking Americans can do these days.  We hoped and waited for meaningful healthcare reform, and ended up with a system that will reduce overall costs of healthcare in this country by 1%-3%, while health/insurance companies will recognize a windfall increase in revenues of a much greater degree.  We hoped and waited for meaningful financial reform, and got a bill that that took some swipes at the financial industry, but keeps the "too big-to-fail" paradigm in place and will still allow the sort of gaming that lead to the financial collapse.  We hope and wait for a fiscal policy and bills that will be directed at helping out all Americans but we ended up with a system that entrenches the country in a paradigm that seems guaranteed to ensure the survival of the biggest financial institutions, while locking the average American into economic servitude.  Esperamos.  We wait.


Read more »

Afghanistan: We Have Met the Enemy and He is US.


From the NYT:
The military's intelligence network in Afghanistan, designed for identifying and tracking terrorists and insurgents, is increasingly focused on uncovering corruption that is rampant across Afghanistan's government, security forces and contractors, according to senior American officials.

They are also looking for insights on how to combat a widespread perversion of authority by Afghan power brokers, which senior officials describe as "a plague" on the American-backed effort to build an effective and competent government and win the support of the Afghan people.

I thought those "Afghan power brokers" were "the American-backed effort to build an effective and competent government"?

The United States and its NATO allies may find themselves following leads that point to the top levels of government, because even close family members of President Hamid Karzai have been accused of engaging in the drug trade and enriching themselves with lucrative business deals. American contractors are among those accused of wrongdoing, and some in the United States government have been known to look the other way rather than upset Mr. Karzai.

When we are seemingly incapable of controlling graft in our own government let alone Afghanistan how can we reach for such heights?  Upon retirement from US politics, our politicians campaign war chests, filled from the corporate exercise of free speech, get rolled over into charitable foundations, (with our pols' wives installed as the paid director).  The only difference between the kind of graft in Afghanistan and the US is that we openly permit it to happen in the first place here in the US. 

Feel teh stoopid?  Does it burn?  As  our President and the Democratic Congress attempt to prove once and for all that Democrats aren't pussies when it comes to "Defense" and that we can win this "war", just remember that we can always redefine our Afghanistan objective to something that is perhaps attainable.  I'm still trying to *think* what such an objective might be.  One thing we can count on is that we will be required to expend a lot more money and American lives in the pursuit of the ongoing Ionesco play in Afghanistan and Washington DC alike.  It's time to cut our losses and retreat.  Leave Afghanistan for the Afghans, and send the troops to the Gulf of Mexico where they might serve some useful purpose by helping to clean up the aftereffects of corporate malfeasance, lack of regulatory nerve, and our misguided energy policy. 


Dear TPM.... [amended with link to TPM explanation of glitches]


It's been great being together all this time.  I've learned a lot, and hope you got something in return as well.  I remember those first days we were together when you blew me away with your intelligence and wit.  I felt like I'd come home.  To a sanctuary where I was free to converse openly with people who were an inspiration and a reassurance to me.   Just knowing I wasn't alone out here, as the rest of the world seemed caught up in the sound bites of MSM white noise made living more sweet.  It was so easy for us to talk back then.

Now, you've shut me down.  Every time I open my mouth to say something, you tell me that my session has expired.  That I must "login or register as a new user" if I want to be heard.  That hurts.  After almost two years, you don't remember me and all those wonderful times we had.  Sometimes, I think I should register as a "new user".  Maybe then I could get a foot in the door with you instead of this continual deep freeze. 

I know it happened when you started going around with that new kid, "FaceBook".  All of a sudden, you wanted me to "Sign in or post a comment using Facebook" every time I had anything to add to the conversation.  You did it again when I went to save this very letter!  Then when I had acquiesced, you forgot whatever It was I'd previously written.  So, I've become a copy and paste artist of my own material just to preserve my sense of self.  It's not like I don't all ready wake up in the middle of the night and drag myself to the bathroom mirror just to reassure myself that I still exist.  I mean, what exactly is the message you want me to take away here?  It's beyond passive aggression now, and I don't know how much more I can take sweetie.  I mean I really care for you and all your friends, but it's becoming a self-destructive habit for me, when you act like I'm not even here.

Maybe you do this to all your other boyfriends too.  Maybe not.  I've been hearing different versions of the story.  Either way, it's clear that our time together isn't what it used to be back when your face lit up, eager to hear whatever I had to offer the conversation, (even my most gawdawful stoopidest comments you posted without asking me to verify who I am!).  So you just go on about your way and don't worry about me.  I'll be fine.  I think.  *Sob*

Fond regards and remembrances of the way we were,  Miguelitoh2o




Well, call it coincidence, or not, TPM just posted an explanation on the cafe: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/07/regarding_recent_snafus_with_tpmcafe/ 

Good Mornin' Life!


Are things going badly in the United States and the world in general, or what?  The economy is stagnant, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan seem to have a life of their own, and just keep going on and on.  The deficit hawks in government and the O.E.C.D. want responsible nations to cut back on expenditures in the midst of one of the worst unemployment cycles we've seen in recent history.  Of course no one ever broaches dialing back the War on Terror, but instead set their sights on cutting back Social Security benefits.  Our versions of banking and healthcare reform are every bit as beneficial to the regulated industries as they are to the American people, but that's just the way we roll.  Meanwhile corporate malfeasance in the Gulf of Mexico has resulted in what I believe will be the greatest environmental catastrophe since the meteor Chixulub crashed into the Yucatan Peninsula 65 million years ago.  On top of all of this Democracy and Capitalism's trajectories seem to be on a collision course wherein our political class no longer feels beholden to constituents, but instead operates as the political wing of the emerging corporate dynasties of our planet.  It's our 21st century return to the *New and Improved* Feudal State.  We still go to the polls, but actually changing society's direction seems wholly outside the realm of possibility, when our politicians simply morph into another shill for corporate interests following their election.  No wonder most of us are depressed.

 

Seems like all we can do is describe the illness, with nary a clue as to how to cure it.

Read more »

Deepwater Horizon vs Three Mile Island


Wednesday, March 28, 1979, Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station (TMI), operated by the Metropolitan Edison Corporation, due to a cooling system malfunction suffered a partial meltdown of the reactor core

This loss of coolant accident resulted in the release of a significant amount of radioactivity, estimated at 43,000 curies (1.59 PBq) of radioactive krypton gas, but less than 20 curies (740 GBq) of the especially hazardous iodine-131, into the surrounding environment.

I had the pleasure of spending 36 hours on Three Mile Island in the wake of the accident, as the company I worked for as a Quality Assurance engineer had accepted a contract to construct some of the equipment that would be used to purge the radionuclide contaminants from the Auxilliary building at TMI Unit 2.  So I was like one of those QA guys out on the Deepwater Horizon rig, part of an industry that I had little control over, but believing the system design of the BWR and PWR reactors in use at the time were designed in a a more or less fail-safe manner.  In comparison to the Soviets' plant at Chernobyl, TMI-2 functioned pretty close to as planned, with the containment building virtually suppressing the environmental effects by comparison.  Still, the accident rocked my understanding of, and confidence in the limits of the built-in redundancy of the nuclear plants I had been helping erect around the country.  The clean up pf TMI-2 took about 11 years and cost around $1B.   


In the fallout, (pun intended), from the TMI-2 accident, the United States Government adopted a moratorium on the building/licensing of new nuclear facilities.  The unintended reality of that moratorium has resulted in Nuclear plants that had been designed for a 30 year life span being refitted over and over again in order to keep them generating energy long past their design/shelf life.  Energy is very important to any civilized society that would seek to offset the devolution to entropy described in the second law of thermodynamics.

Oil wells aren't power plants.  They're raw energy in the process of being "harvested" from the Earth.  The utilization of fossil fuels as an energy source carries with it generally accepted scientific environmental burden in terms of the carbon load on the atmosphere.  On top of that if we factor in the environmental impact of oils spills such as the Exxon Valdez and the truly horrific ongoing gusher in the Gulf at the site of BP's former Deepwater horizon site, the environmental and societal costs of our continued dependence on oil has far exceeded the effects suffered as a result of our utilization of nuclear energy.  We can change this paradigm.

So my question is this:  How much more of this travesty in the Gulf of Mexico and other sites around the globe, must we bear witness to before we can agree to dial back our dependence on oil and start investing in the infrastructure and subsidization that will facilitate weaning ourselves from this greasy, toxic, teat?  The Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident brought the US nuclear power generating industry to its knees, how much more disaster must we endure before we redefine our energy policy in a way that does not grant concessions to corporations with vested interests in the status quo? 

"Fun" fact:  Look at the top 100  economies on Earth, of which 51 are corporations.  Now look at the corporations in that [outdated] list.  (Hint:  General Motors,  Exxon-Mobil, Ford Motor, Daimler-Chrysler, Mitsubishi, Toyota, Royal Dutch Shell, BP Amoco, Volkswagen, Honda, Nissan.)  While I don't consider the auto manufacturers as culpable as the Oil-harvesting corporations, I include them here to highlight the extent to which oil has insinuated itself into our lives. 

For what it's worth, I have more confidence in the nuclear industry and their "product" than I do the oil industry.  Apologies if this blog covers ground all ready covered here.  I haven't been able to spend much time lately at TPM.

Oh Brave New World/Fahrenheit 451


A quasi-book report and reflection on Bradbury's book published 57 years ago.

'Fahrenheit 451' , Ray Bradbury's dystopian novel of a future world in which books are banned, and society has devolved into a hedonistic and violent caricature of civilization was published over a half century ago.  In it the kind of critical thinking promoted by books is actively discouraged by the state, while people are fed a steady diet of cultural bromides via the television which is piped into every home.  The residents of this futuristic America are fed a stream of innuendo preparing them for their acquiescence and acceptance of an upcoming war.  The protagonist, Guy Montag, is a fireman.  Not one as we understand the profession, but a state employee charged with identifying homes which house these seditious books, then burning the books as well as the homes to the ground.

 

Early on in the story Montag's wife, a woman bereft of feeling, affection, and any joy attempts suicide, but is revived by medics after Montag discovers her.  Alienation is a dominant theme in Bradbury's future America. 

 

Read more »

Teabaggers, Obamabots and Firebaggers! Oh My!



Political discourse in the US long ago descended into sound bites and talking points in the Main Stream Media.  Like Rockem'-Sockem' Robots the pundits line up at 5PM weekdays and on Sunday morning to deliver their punches in a parody of what actual debate looks like.  Democrats and Republicans alike, appear to have assumed the mantle of distrust in which the electorate holds politicians in general.  Add to that the Dems failure to suggest let alone enact progressive legislation and policy, and a division within the left-leaning ranks of the electorate has formed and widened, so now we see those lefties criticizing the democrats caricatured as Firebaggers, while their counterparts who think Obama and the Dems are doing the best they can under the circumstances are labeled Obamabots by some.  Add to the mix the Republican Teabaggers, perhaps the least articulate of all these factions, and American politics assumes all the hallmarks of a clown show.  The blogosphere is just as susceptible, if not more so, to such oversimplification, as some bloggers strive to promote their own agenda, and squelch debate from their opposition.

Read more »

America's Chernobyl.



Photo courtesy of stuckincustoms

On April 26, 1986, reactor number four at the Chernobyl plant,in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic melted down as a result of design errors that allowed coolant to be displaced as the control rods were inserted, thus allowing the reactor to superheat.  Soviet nuclear engineers were convinced prior to the accident, that the reactor and operating procedures they were using were completely safe.  The reactor suffered two explosions, the first from superheated, (and radioactive), steam, which was followed by a nuclear explosion as the reactor core melted and achieved a critical mass of sorts.  The force of the first explosion tore off the 2,000 ton upper plate (to which the entire reactor assembly is fastened).  A radioactive plume spread out from the site, covering most of Europe.  I had worked in the nuclear industry upon graduation from university, and recall being amazed that the Soviets did not utilize a Containment structure surrounding their reactors as the ultimate fail-safe in the event of a loss of coolant to the reactor core.

There were 50 deaths directly attributable to the disaster.  Nine months after the plume spread out over Europe the incidence of Down's Syndrome increased significantly in human births. The incidence of structural anomalies in human fetuses nervous systems doubled the following year.  The incidence of thyroid cancer increased greatly in those exposed to the plume of radionuclides.  Four square kilometers of the surrounding forest turned brown and died.  Livestock and wildlife that remained after the evacuation of the area died, or suffered thyroid cancer.  The town of Chernobyl/Pripyat is now the largest ghost town in Europe, although some of the elderly former residents are moving back to the area contrary to official restrictions.  The disaster was a colossal mistake in foresight, planning, engineering, and policy on the part of the Soviets.


Photo courtesy of the US Coast Guard. Source: www.incidentnews.gov/incident/82 20 via SkyTruth

The unfolding disaster in the Gulf of Mexico will likely exceed the environmental costs of the Chernobyl accident.  Both disasters are hard for the average person to assess, at least so far.  The Chernobyl incident was invisible to those without access to radiation dosimeters, and the Deepwater Horizon disaster remains offshore and it's scope more nebulous in the public mind at present.  Both accidents were born of the search for, or generation of energy.  The etiology of events and official attitudes leading up to both disasters bear some commonality as well.  The officials and engineers responsible for both projects seemed to share a confidence in their own mastery of the technology to an extent at which they succumbed to an uncritical belief that such a disaster was all but impossible.  In accordance with those beliefs they chose to under-design the safety features of both the oil rig and the reactor.  As is so often the case, the little people pay the most dearly for these errors in planning and policy, (see: Union Carbide at Bhopal, 3000+dead). 

We have yet to see what the final cost of the Deepwater Horizon disaster will be.  The question that is foremost in my mind is what, if anything, will our policymakers learn from the errors made in licensing and regulating offshore oil exploration?  Does the granting of exemption from installing the $500,000 remote acoustic shutoff for a BOP seem like an economically sound policy now that we will be spending years and billions of dollars trying to contain this spill?  Does granting a waiver from producing a detailed EIS make sense for offshore drilling?  Assuming we continue to risk our continental shelf and shorelines with the exploration for oil,do we think it might be worthwhile to require audits of these facilities to ensure compliance with a set of national standards for construction and operation?  Should we re-evaluate a national energy policy that stifles development of alternative energy in favor of powerful traditional energy sources?  Should we pay for the entire mess to be cleaned up? (Hint:  by trimming Social Security payments and eligibility we should be able to do this!)  Or should we hold these corporations economically accountable? (Hint:  Yes.)   Should the potential loss of tourism, marine wildlife, and marine habitat factor into the instinctual urge of our legislators to tell us to grab our ankles and bend over for whatever industry lobbyist is offering the largest sum for their election campaigns? 

I would like our President and legislators to address all of these questions publicly.

You can contact your President here.

You can find contact info for your Senators here.

You can find contact info for your Representative here.




[Continental] Shelf Life




MODIS/Aqua satellite image taken May 11, 2010. Main body of slick is apparent, as is a small patch of slick to the west, but clouds obscure much of the image. Observable slick and sheen covers 3,908 square miles (10,122 km2).  Photo courtesy of SkyTruth.

This disaster and the preparedness of our country to deal with its effects as well as our national response, (or lack thereof), to containing it makes me sick to my stomach.  Why haven't we shut down production of all offshore wells until a comprehensive safety and environmental evaluation for each has been completed?  How about shutting down only BP's wells and wells that Halliburton has worked on until we determine whether there is a systemic risk to rigs these two companies have built?  How about shutting down just wells that Halliburton has performed contracts on?  Perhaps just shutting down wells owned or operated by BP might be a start?  Is this a moment of truth in which we will reevaluate and act on our oil addiction/energy policy or will we truly jump the shark on this issue?   

When the World Trade Center was taken out, we grounded all flights in the US for days in order to ensure no further such attacks occurred on US soil.  And now a corporation takes out a stretch of coastline, removing its beneficial use for decades, destroying marine habitat likely for decades if not for all time, and we act as if there is no clear and eminent danger waiting out there on those other rigs? 

President Obama, and members of Congress, this is a wake up call for all of you.  We need to suspend all off shore drilling until these wells and platforms have been evaluated for their safety and potential environmental impact lest similar accidents occur on them and we find ourselves yet again incapable of stemming the type of destruction we're witnessing now off the coast of Louisiana.  The US government must mandate that all wells within our territories minimally be retrofitted with a remote trigger to the BOP valve.  Then we need to institute real incentives and subsidies for the development and implementation of alternative energy as well as promoting fossil fuel conservation as a significant part of our national energy policy.  It's time to declare openly who you work for;  the people of the United States and the future of our world or the oil companies.  Choose.

The Harder They Come.


USA Today reports that the cost of the US occupation of Afghanistan has outstripped the cost of waging our occupation of Iraq.  This information comes to us at the same time that the leader of the coalition forces in Afghanistan reports that the Afghan war is essentially a draw between the coalition forces and the Taliban.


Nicholas Kristof had an opinion piece in the NYT the other day.  In it he contrasted Bangladesh with Pakistan, a US ally from whence many of the terrorists attacking the US and its citizens originate.  Bangladesh and Pakistan split in 1971 at which point Bangladesh was considered an international "basket case". 

 But then Bangladesh began climbing a virtuous spiral by investing in education, of girls in particular. It now has more girls in high school than boys, according to Unicef. This focus on education has bolstered its economy, reduced population growth rates, nurtured civil society and dampened fundamentalism.  

All of which makes me think about how we administer foreign aid while trying to affect foreign policy in the countries where Islamic fundamentalism is prevalent.  Consider Afghanistan.  We funded the Peace Corps in the 60s and 70s, but following the 1979 coup, and then during the Soviet Union's invasion and occupation, we donated about $3B over 10 years in weapons and economic aid. Following the evacuation of the Soviets and the subsequent collapse of the USSR, our aid to this area of the world diminished to a trickle.  Now we find ourselves occupying the country, killing civilians along with Taliban fighters, spending $83+M per day, and wondering why anyone would be surprised at Gen. McChrystal's admission that the conflict is at a draw.

Read more »

The Language of Dreams.


As far back as I can remember, I've loved music.  It seems to be hardwired into most of our minds, perhaps from generations of singing our legends, stories, and myths around a campfire before we learned to write.  Musicians seem more at home in the realm of Morpheus, of Dreams than most of the rest of us.  Something about the fluidity of this language they speak so eloquently necessitates a mind capable of traversing the "real" world and that of our innermost hopes, aspirations, and fears. 

As a kid I liked to sing.  I can recall my mother singing songs from her young adulthood as she cooked the evening meals when I was a preschooler.  By third grade, I would pray for lulls in the solar storms, so that the AM radio waves originating in Boston and NYC would skip more easily off the ionosphere, as I lay under the covers in my Pennsylvania home with my transistor radio glued to my ear, listening to the latest and the greatest the pop world had to offer.  By junior high I fronted a garage band doing covers of the 'easy' soul classics of the day, (mostly of the Atlantic- Stax/Volt persuasion).   Lately I just listen and sing in the car.  I went on strike as a prepubescent, when my parents insisted I take time from my Saturday morning football to learn to play piano.  Later in high school, I remember my friends Greg and Hans jamming in my parents living room on that same piano and guitars, and I entertained second thoughts about those lessons.  It's great to have friends who are musicians and I keep telling myself that it isn't too late for me to learn something more sophisticated than the kazoo.

Musical compositions that interest me the most are those with a twist.  Sometimes just a simple, but unexpected chord change can make me fall in love with a song.  In H.S. some of my favorite musicians were The Band, not a flashy R & R group, but one given to interesting melodies and arrangements, incorporating a wide assortment of musical instruments.  This kind of music, rather than going from A to B to C and Back to A, takes a more circuitous aural route from A to A.  It's the kind of music that is the antithesis of Top 40, (although two of the Band's singles did reach #25 and 34 on their chart positions).  Making it to the Top 40 playlist, a song has to have an instantly recognizable beat, and a melody that just about anyone can learn in one or two sittings.    The downside of such a formula is that the music can just as quickly lose its' appeal.  Conversely, I often come to appreciate tunes with the musical 'surprises' built in, as I hear them more often.  As I familiarize myself with the often counter-intuitive progressions in such songs, I can appreciate the intelligence and imagination of the composer/composition more fully.   The effect of such compositions can be far reaching.  Who was it who said:  "The Velvet Underground only sold 2000 records on their first release, but all 2000 of the purchasers of that first album formed bands".

Read more »

Capitalism vs Freedom of the Press


Everything you were taught about freedom of the press and the US Constitution in high school civics class has entered the Hall of Mirrors.


photo:jgoldmania/Flickr/creative commons

From Advertising Age Magazine, May 24, 2005:

Days after financial services giant Morgan Stanley informed print publications that its ads must be automatically pulled from any edition containing "objectionable editorial coverage," global energy giant BP has adopted a similar press strategy.

The memo cites a new BP policy document entitled "2005 BP Corporate-RFP" that demands that ad-accepting publications inform BP in advance of any news text or visuals they plan to publish that directly mention the company, a competitor or the oil-and-energy industry.

One former publisher and longtime magazine industry executive who spoke on the condition of anonymity said that "magazines are not in the financial position today to buck rules from advertisers" and predicted that such moves will continue.

Both broad and quite specific, the directives range from notifying the media agency prior to running any editorial that contains fuel, oil or energy news text or visuals to providing the agency the option to pull any advertising from the issue without penalty. If the ad cannot be pulled, then the agency "must receive notification immediately of the situation in order to alert BP and to manage the situation proactively," the memo said. It also states that if MindShare, [BP's media-buying agency], is not notified of the mentions prior to the issue's on-sale date, immediate advertising schedule suspension will "likely result."

Another magazine executive who had not heard about BP's policy or of Morgan Stanley's said his company has unwritten guidelines with advertisers from several industries, including auto, airlines and tobacco, to pull their ads if related negative stories are in the issue.

"I think it's OK to have systems in place to pull advertisers out, but clearly we don't show them stories ahead of time." The executive called BP's policy a "stupid request. It makes you think these guys are hiding something."

Nearly a decade ago, a move by automaker Chrysler Corp. set off a maelstrom of reaction when it sent letters in early 1997 demanding that magazine sales staffs warn them of potentially "offensive" or "provocative" editorial. Editors' concerns over the policy's potentially chilling effect were realized when Hearst Magazines' Esquire killed a short story containing homoerotic scenes, apparently to avoid losing the automaker's business. The marketer, now known as Chrysler Group, discontinued its policy in the fall of 1997. That October, two publishing organizations, the Magazine Publishers of America and the American Society of Magazine Editors, took the unusual step of issuing a joint policy on the topic of editorial integrity that bars magazines from giving advertisers a sneak peek at stories, photos or tables of contents for upcoming issues.


So we can take heart that the Magazine Publishers of America and the American Society of Magazine Editors have issued that policy statement, but a chilling effect certainly remains concerning editorial evaluations of topics concerning corporations as well as industries that are heavy hitters in advertising.  This effect virtually guarantees that there will be no investigative journalism from a major publication concerning such corporations or industries unless they have all ready fallen into public disfavor.  I don't have any solutions and this seems like another instance in which Capitalism and Corporatocracy have failed in our realization of an independent fully functioning democracy.  Welcome to our brave new world.


Black Gold, (A Fiction)


Washington DC, March 30:   The President of the United States proposed opening  vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling, much of it for the first time.

 

Later, that same day, Wyoming, A "gentleman's" ranch, the sun is fading over the Tetons: 

 

Carl:          That black bastard is co-opting our own turf!  Before you know it, he'll be reducing the capital gains tax.

 

Dick:  Don't get your knickers in a twist.  We can make this work for us.  Call Dave and find out what contracts we've got going right now on offshore platforms. 

 

Carl:  You sly bastard...  On it!

 

Dick:  Call Eric when you finish with Dave.  We're gonna need a black ops demolition expert.  If he asks why, tell him it's for that project on the border of Warziristan.  Goddamn it!  We'll control both houses by this fall and the White House again by 2012. 

 



Author's note:  I'm not saying anything like this has actually occurred, but I wanted to ask the rhetorical question if there are powerful political and economic persons who could or would be callous enough to risk environmental calamity in order to advance their political objectives.  What do you think?

miguelitoh2o

user-pic

Following: 170
Followers: 100

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Talking Points Memo
  • Favorite Books Authors: Robertson Davies, Isaac Asimov, Bill Bryson, Margaret Atwood, Michael Connelly, Salmon Rushdie.
  • Favorite Quotes

    A good traveler has no fixed plans, and is not intent on arriving. - Lao Tzu

    If ever I become entirely respectable I shall be quite sure that I have outlived myself. Eugene V. Debs

    Every now and then when your life gets complicated and the weasels start closing in, the only cure is to load up on heinous chemicals and then drive like a bastard from Hollywood to Las Vegas ... with the music at top volume and at least a pint of ether. - Hunter S. Thompson

    But if you wind up in Hell and all you care is to try and help others suffering there and forget your own burning sensation, then you'll be okay. Even There. And what fears can a measly Great Depression stir in someone who's ready to social work Hell itself?

    "To paraphrase an old line, it is better for a big country to keep its superb army idle and let the world think it's not much of a superpower than to use it and remove all doubt". - Bernard Chazelle

    To me, boxing is like a ballet, except there's no music, no choreography, and the dancers hit each other. - Jack Handey

    “Muslims do not ‘hate our freedom,’ but rather, they hate our policies. - Unclassified study published by the Pentagon-appointed U.S. Defense Science Board on Sept. 23, 2004.

    "To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." Thomas Paine

    "If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough" - Mario Andretti

    'Somebody at one of these places ... asked me: "What do you do? How do you write, create?" You don't, I told them. You don't try. That's very important: not to try, either for Cadillacs, creation or immortality. You wait, and if nothing happens, you wait some more. It's like a bug high on the wall. You wait for it to come to you. When it gets close enough you reach out, slap out and kill it. Or if you like its looks you make a pet out of it. - Charles Bukowski

    "Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime." - Mark Twain

    "I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil." - Alan Greenspan

    To let understanding stop at what cannot be understood is a high attainment. Those who cannot do it will be destroyed on the lathe of heaven. - Chuang Tzu

    "They say that hard work never killed anybody ... but why take a chance?" - President Ronald W. Reagan

    "We're going out Marge. If we don't come back, avenge our deaths." - Homer Simpson


Bio

Since I was a kid, I've always favored dogs and more especially, underdogs. Career in the arts by way of biology/pharmaceuticals. Currently trying to make my way in the world by tying balloon animals, although the competition is fierce now that the official unemployment rate has topped 10%.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address