« Declaration on Strengthening the Financial System | Merrill's Blog | JPMorgan warns on credit card woes »

Case-Shiller Home Prices Relative to Peak


The news reports often give the year-over-year or month-to-month drops, but not the drop in prices from the peak month.  The drop in price from the peak month to March 2009 is as follows for the just-published, seasonally adjusted data:

-52% AZ-Phoenix

-40% CA-Los Angeles

-42% CA-San Diego

-45% CA-San Francisco

-12% CO-Denver

-33% DC-Washington

-47% FL-Miami

-40% FL-Tampa

-21% GA-Atlanta

-27% IL-Chicago

-18% MA-Boston

-44% MI-Detroit

-35% MN-Minneapolis

-10% NC-Charlotte

-50% NV-Las Vegas

-20% NY-New York

-20% OH-Cleveland

-19% OR-Portland

- 9% TX-Dallas

-21% WA-Seattle

Note that Case-Shiller is for a selection of metro areas, and that major areas such as Houston and Philadelphia are not included.  It does not have good represention across the mid-section for cities such as Baltimore, Cincinnatti, Memphis, St. Louis, and Kansas City.


2 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

And a graph for those who like pictures.

user-pic

As said in another thread, some middle-class cities in the SF Bay Area have only about -25% average per your source in that thread. It's also unclear how the C-S data deals with skews in volume/price (mean vs. median is a start on that).

I wonder if anyone has chewed the data to produce a new graph, or a comparison to say 2002 prices.

A June 2008 graph: http://carolan.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/case-chart-062408.gif

Leave a comment

Merrill

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 8

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address