avatar

mcrose68

User profile »

McCain's Hussein Flip Flop

Now we're hearing that McCain is dropping the Barak <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/222237.php">*Hussein*</a> Obama bomb.

Has anyone asked McCain  (or his surrogates) what's changed since February 2008 when McCain felt obliged to <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/mccain_apologizes_for_radio_ho.html">apologize</a> that Bill "Willie" Cunningham, a conservative radio talk show host in Cincinnati emphasized Barak *Hussein* Obama

Any word whether

Fundementals

It sounds like the McCain campaign is going to settle on
"America Workers" as their final answer for the meaning of "fundamentals".

When Wall Street bankers were still getting $100 million bonuses you thought the economy had made great progress.

When your benefactor John Thain got a $15 million bonus from Merrill in 2007, and went on to bundle several $100 thousand for you, the fundamentals where solid.

And the day Merrill Lynch disappeared, the checks had just started rolling into your campaign and I heard you felt the fundamentals were pretty strong.

Yesterday you noticed that the workers of America are unhappy about something, and that you'd better call them strong too, so you said that they were the "fundamentals" which you were referring to all this time

And it is true, the workers of America ARE the fundamental thing that makes the American economy work.

And that is why it's fundamentally wrong that American workers are getting screwed in the economy the Republicans built these last 7 years.

Americans are not whining but describing a very simple economic reality. This economy has been harder and harder on American workers every year since Phil Gramm got rid of all those regulations, and Dick Cheney got rid of those pesky "worker rights", and George Bush decided he wanted to have a war.

Maybe they'd whine a little less if some of the financial gurus out there were put out of work, so those $100 million bonuses and $10 million salaries could be better spent on $70,000 salaries.



McCain laughing about his lies

This is an old CNN interview with McCain about cheating on his wife. 

At about 3:12 into this interview John McCain is responding to a question about being a 41 y/o married man lying about his age and marital status in the hopes of hooking up with a 24 y/o girl.

He says, "I lied." and starts laughing about it.

I think it might make an effective montage if someone with video editing capability  would cut together some of McCain's better whoppers, each followed by 1.5 seconds of McCain laughing about his lying ways.

If McCain starts crying foul, and saying that clip isn't referring to his current lies, then we will be forced to ask which lie he is referring to.

Fair Question Gov Palin?

Gov Palin is clearly dedicated to having children.
Even becoming Governor didn't stop her from fulfilling God's promise one more time.

Does she intended to take measures to prevent a pregnancy during the time she may become President? And if she does become pregnant again, and she does becomes President does she think that she could handle the stress of the Presidency and childbirth at the same time?

Our we within our bounds to ask her this question

Hubris we can believe in

Not hubris we can believe in.

It seems the pinnacle of hubris to apply for a job, yet decline to submit yourself for an interview.

There
is quantifiable and significant likelihood that a 72 year old former POW who has had
multiple melanomas removed will die in the next 4 years. 

So
essentially, the McCain campaign is asking us to give Gov Palin one of the
most important jobs in the world, but we're not even allowed to
interview her for the job????

Of *if* we are allowed to interview her, it will be on the terms teh campaign lays down.

It's been awhile since I last applied for a job, but isn't it usually considered poor form to tell your potential employer to go #% them selves ?


Hubris we can believe in

Not hubris we can believe in.

It seems the pinnacle of hubris to apply for a job, yet decline to submit yourself for an interview.

There
is quantifiable and significant likelihood that a 72 year old former POW who has had
multiple melanomas removed will die in the next 4 years. 

So
essentially, the McCain campaign is asking us to give Gov Palin one of the
most important jobs in the world, but we're not even allowed to
interview her for the job????

Of *if* we are allowed to interview her, it will be on the terms teh campaign lays down.

It's been awhile since I last applied for a job, but isn't it usually considered poor form to tell your potential employer to go #% them selves ?

The tire-gauge and the spoiled spouse


The Republicans are like the spoiled spouse who responds with sarcastic snark when you suggest they stop buying shoes so you can afford to buy the kid a car to get to work.

Please!

When Obama points out that we can save a measurable amount of gasoline (and money) with zero risk and 79 cents expense, the Republicans respond with sarcasm and ridicule. Compensating much??? 
Why would we want to save money and defund terrorist when we could spend more and complain about it.

Californians use nearly 30% less energy per capita than they rest of the country -- this despite a strong growing high tech economy. 
This is because they've spent the last 3 decades investing in simple high-return, low risk projects to save energy.  Proper, inflation of your tires is but one of these.

If Republicans want to pout and act like children when presented with common sense solutions, then maybe it's time for the grown-ups to take over.

One more question for Liz.

I accept that Liz Trotta has apologized, but I still need to understand something. . .

So I have one more question Liz Trotta or her employers over at Fox News:



What exactly if *supposed* to be funny about the image of Osama bin Laden, and Barak Obama dead together?



I get "bomb-bomb-bomb, bomb-bomb Iran", it sounded like a song! I see
why it was funny, har har.


But wtf?

Can we get Liz or the folks over at Fox News to explain why that's funny. . . why "knocking off Obama" is a joke to them?

Executive Branch Accountability

Since Elliot had his hand in the cookie jar (har har), I'm glad he got caught. And since we aren't Bushies, we aren't going to try to sweep our dirty laundry under the rug. I applaud the proper functioning of government, where open records and honest audits will find that a few thousand dollars have been transferred from government accounts to a shell company. . . . for PROSTITUTES.   Now get over it! We have more important things to talk about than five thousand dollars spent on a high priced prostitute. We have an imminent threat in a messianic president who's every new move seems intent on destroying what shred of pride, dignity, or fiscal solvency we have left as a country   So every time a Rovian asks, "What about your Democrat Governor getting caught paying for high priced prostitutes with your tax dollar???",   I say: "Yes, that was bad, and that's why I think that politicians, even chief executives, should be held accountable for what they do on our dime.  And where they lack enthusiasm to tell us, The American People have the right to an answer. This right can be enforced through the FBI.  But when our Justice Department refuses to do it's job it is the duty of the legislature, as the most direct representative for the people, to ensure that we get answers.  And if the legislature doesn't think the people have a right to know, I think it's time for a new legislature. Unfortunately, up until last November, the Republican led Congress was unwilling to even ask Dick Cheney who works in his office.  Imagine that, the Vice President might have a bigger staff than The President. But the American People, who incidentally pay all of their salaries, are not even allowed to know how many people the Vice President has in his office, never mind who they are.  What are they afraid we might learn if they told us what they're spending our money on???   Please.

Truth and Reconciliation

It is understandable that people at The Telcos would comply with a direct Presidential Order.

Now that we know We The People have been lied to, it's easy to believe that the CEOs of The Telcos were lied to as well.

If they want immunity they need to be honest with us.  I'll endorse immunity in exchange for FULL DISCLOSURE on what they were told to do and what they did.   And no cries of Executive Privilege, because these are not his advisors.

Any law granting immunity to The Telcos must include a demand that The Telcos demonstrate loyalty to the Constitution and The People of the United States over loyalty to The President.

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


October 6-10

Book Cover

October 13-17

Book Cover

October 20-24

Book Cover

November 17-21>

Book Cover

December 1-5

Book Cover





Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address