FISA Immunity--Can't we just make it a line in the sand?
One thing I am perplexed about is how adamant each side is in the FISA
immunity debate. I hear no talk of compromise--just either that it's
good or it's bad. Could language be constructed that said an
investigation will take place, list capitulations to the White House
that are ok, and list infractions that are not? We could call it
"limited immunity" or "the line in the sand that telecoms may not
cross". Thoughts?
