« Why David Paterson Less Popular than a Case of the Clap | Matthew Saroff's Blog | Naked Aggression »
Because Timothy Geithner is a Loser
So, Annette Nazareth and Caroline Atkinson, have withdrawn their names from consideration for positions working in the department of the Treasury, and we have blame placed on Senate delays, and the Obama Administration's thoroughly anal retentive vetting process.
I have no doubt that both of these issues figure prominently in some of the difficulties in staffing, though Obama is actually well ahead of the pace of recent transitions, but I think that there is another factor.
I think that a number of people out there believe that Timothy Geithner, and be extension, Lawrence Summers, simply don't get it with the banking crisis, and that they are wrong, and that they will continue to refuse to recognize the reality that a number of the gargantuan banks in the US are simply insolvent, and so they are refusing to do the sane thing, and put them in receivership. (or pre-privatization, nationalization, or whatever the frack you want to call it)
Simply put, they recognize that in the next 6-18 months, there is a real possibility that working with Timothy Geithner on their resume will look like working with Hank Paulson, and in any case, they want no part of a policy that they see as an train wreck.
Cross posted from 40 Years in the Desert.
I have no doubt that both of these issues figure prominently in some of the difficulties in staffing, though Obama is actually well ahead of the pace of recent transitions, but I think that there is another factor.
I think that a number of people out there believe that Timothy Geithner, and be extension, Lawrence Summers, simply don't get it with the banking crisis, and that they are wrong, and that they will continue to refuse to recognize the reality that a number of the gargantuan banks in the US are simply insolvent, and so they are refusing to do the sane thing, and put them in receivership. (or pre-privatization, nationalization, or whatever the frack you want to call it)
Simply put, they recognize that in the next 6-18 months, there is a real possibility that working with Timothy Geithner on their resume will look like working with Hank Paulson, and in any case, they want no part of a policy that they see as an train wreck.
Cross posted from 40 Years in the Desert.
Advertisement












For some reason, Geithner has always reminded me of Eddie Haskell.
March 6, 2009 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now I'm no big fan of Timothy Geithner. However, I do believe he is taking the only option open to him. Remember...It's not just our banks that are involved in this mess. Nearly every major, and probably more than a few minor, financial institutions in the entire world are deep into it one way or another. What he is trying to get is enough time to untangle the mess and give the institutions in other parts of the world time to do the same without creating a global meltdown and social and political upheaval.
C
March 6, 2009 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like I said and Josh just reported from WSJ it's not just our banks.
C
March 6, 2009 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink