<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>MaryRW&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/mary_ray_worley/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/mary_ray_worley/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/mary_ray_worley//5105</id>
   <updated>2008-10-16T19:27:44Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>No More Neocon Jobs!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/mary_ray_worley/2008/10/no-more-neocon-jobs.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/mary_ray_worley//5105.237717</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-16T19:01:41Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-16T19:27:44Z</updated>
   
   <summary>McCain keeps saying he&apos;s for change, and last night he said he isn&apos;t George Bush. But the ideology he clings to as though he were a drowning man grasping at a dead weight for support is the same ideology that...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>MaryRW</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="57" label="McCain" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="815" label="neocon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5365" label="Palin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="675" label="racism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/mary_ray_worley/">
      <![CDATA[McCain keeps saying he's for change, and last night he said he isn't George Bush. But the ideology he clings to as though he were a drowning man grasping at a dead weight for support is the same ideology that landed the U.S. (and the rest of the world along with it) in the huge mess it's in now.<br /><br />McCain flip-flops more than any politician I've ever listened to. He barely says a sentence without contradicting himself. He's going to freeze spending. He's going to pay down the deficit. And he's going to lower taxes. Does he think we're really buying that? Who does he think he is: Houdini?<br /><br />I am deeply offended by his obvious contempt for Obama. His facial expressions, interruptions, and the rolly eyes trick are petulant to the point of absurdity. If he won't listen to his opponent during the debate, what makes anyone think he would ever listen to any of us?<br /><br />During the last debate he looked like he was on the verge of blowing a gasket every time he had to shut up and let Obama talk. The man can't control himself, and he can't control the rabble who come to his mob fests. Do we want four years of him appealing to the lowest common denominator, motivating people with hate and fear and preposterous allegations of terrorism against anyone he doesn't like or who doesn't agree with him?<br /><br />]]>
      <![CDATA[And what does the tenor of McCain's and Palin's rallies say about their
leadership? Obama has the good sense to quiet his supporters when they
boo McCain. "We don't need any of that," he said. "What we need is to
vote." And the crowd cheers and leaves its uglier sentiments behind.
Whereas, after McCain and Palin fan the flames of hysteria, fear, and
racism, cries from the crowd of "terrorist" and "kill him" pass by with
nary a blink nor even the mildest of rebukes. Sure, one day (out of how
many?) McCain tries to calm his supporters' fears, but he does it so
ineffectually that it just frustrates them. When he said Obama was a
decent family man, his rabble actually booed him. Great leadership,
that.<br /><br />And what's with his whining about a "character attack
against Governor Sarah Palin" from Rep. John Lewis? Lewis had the
temerity to call McCain and Palin out on their blatant appeals to fear
and racism, so McCain's response is to paint himself and Palin as
victims? Huh? And even though the Obama campaign had absolutely nothing
to do with Lewis's remarks, McCain wants him to repudiate them? Huh?
Next he'll be saying that his campaign deserves kudos because no one
has been using the "n" word. That tactic would be only slightly more
transparent than the tactics McCain and Palin have been using. Does
McCain think we just don't get it? Does he really think we're just that
ignorant? He called Lewis's remarks "beyond the pale." That's just what
I think of his appealing to the mob's racism. Utterly beyond the pale.<br /><br />No
way this guy should be in any position of leadership much less in the
most powerful position on the planet. Anybody with anger management
issues like his shouldn't be trusted anywhere near the red button. And
Lord help us if something happened to him and Palin took his place as
president. I couldn't agree with Tina Fey more: I'd have to leave the
planet, or at the very least barricade myself in the house and unplug
my TV and my computer for fear I might catch a whiff of her.<br /><br />I
know there are many who feel that at 72 McCain is too old to be
president. I do not. I know there are some who are plenty vigorous and
sharp and capable at 72. I wouldn't want to exclude them from running
for the presidency or to vote against them just on the basis of their
age.<br /><br />I don't have nearly as much of a problem with McCain's age
as I do with the oldness of his hard-line ideology. McCain apparently
thinks we won't recognize the Bush doctrine when he spouts it. He
apparently believes that we don't realize how much damage the Bush
doctrine has done in virtually every area of public life. He thinks we
don't get it. But he's the one who doesn't get it. We've been there,
we've done that, we've been screwed royally, and we are well aware of
what and who has done the screwing. Enough already! No more neocon
jobs!]]>
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
