<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>markg8&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526</id>
   <updated>2009-08-25T17:51:49Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Recess Rally Ends in a Cacophony of Horns</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/08/recess-rally-ends-in-a-cacapho.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.286169</id>
   
   <published>2009-08-22T20:12:28Z</published>
   <updated>2009-08-25T17:51:49Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Today, August 22nd was supposed to be the big day for the Teabaggers, their&nbsp; "Recess Rallies" all across the nation but here in the Chicago burbs at Judy Biggert's office in Willowbrook it just didn't work out that way for...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="22162" label="Biggert" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="862" label="health care" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22164" label="IL-13" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25626" label="Recess Rallies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="18106" label="teabaggers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[Today, August 22nd was supposed to be the big day for the Teabaggers, their&nbsp;  "Recess Rallies" all across the nation but here in the Chicago burbs at Judy Biggert's office in Willowbrook it just didn't work out that way for them. According to the report I read at TPM yesterday they've been organizing these Recess Rallies with FreedomWorks and the other usual suspects for months now through conference calls to organizers etc. <br /><br />Some  activists on our side, and I'm proud to say I'm one of them,&nbsp; beat them to the punch. We raised some money from like minded individuals and bought ourselves a big canvass banner, about 8' wide by 4' high that says "<b>HONK FOR HEALTH CARE REFORM</b>" in foot high letters.&nbsp; On 8' tall  galvanized pipes it stands up high enough  so all 6 lanes of traffic can see it. <br /><br />Starting bright and early at 6:30am Thursday morning we set it up on the public parkway on Rte. 83 right outside the bank building where Biggert  has her office. The bank manager came out and barked at us but he knows better, we're perfectly within out rights to picket outside our congresswoman's office on public property. That didn't stop him from calling the cops who came by to tell us we needed a permit from the Village of Willowbrook to be there. We'd already looked at the Village code and found  no such ordinance but we acquiesced and I went over to Village Hall when they opened up at 9 and filled out a form. We were back out there with our banner at 2pm. <br /><br />We set up again yesterday for both rush hours and that set the stage for today. I wouldn't be surprised to find out Biggert herself called on the "Liberty Alliance" or whatever the astroturfers are calling themselves today to please, please, please send some counter protesters&nbsp; to her office today. They showed up  at noon and by the time we put  up our banner there were about 10 of them including a couple of little kids who quickly got bored.&nbsp; They had some hand made posters and signs, one with HR3200 on it, with a circle and line through it. The others were totally ineffective, too wordy with small fonts nobody zipping around the corner could read more than half of. Most of them stood on 63rd St., not wanting to be near  us and our banner which meant only about a 1/4 of the drivers even saw them.  One brave soul though stood about 50' in front of us on Rte 83 with his poster that started with "Health Care Reform Now" before trailing off into some nonsense about ACORN and tort reform. I told him as he was leaving that where he was standing, near the  middle of  the right turn lane, didn't afford drivers more than a quick  glance of his sign and they probably weren't able to see more than the first line as they drove past, so they probably thought he was on our side. The rest of them, standing behind us, were treated to a barrage of honking horns as folks turning the corner really layed it on when they realized they were teabaggers. Yesterday we got a lot of shy little taps on the horn. Today with the wingnuts irritating people those little beeps turned into blaring symphonies.&nbsp; &nbsp; <br /><br />We get a lot of happy faces, a lot of thumbs up and I can tell a lot of people are just happy and relieved to see us out there doing something. Occasionally some
dumbass will honk to get our attention just so he can flip us off. I
just smile and give him a thumbs up too. After all he is helping us 
even if he's too stupid to figure it out. <br /><br />We started out with just two of us but after a few phonecalls there were six of us holding up signs. After  just an hour and twenty minutes the wingnuts gave up, threw their trash on the ground and drove away. Our folks stayed until 3:30. By then  all the honking must have driven Biggert to distraction, she left about 3pm.&nbsp; <br /><br />We'll be back  again at Rte. 83 and 63rd St. Monday morning at 7am. If we get enough volunteers we'll be there all day every day except  Sundays until Labor Day when dear deaf Judy goes back to DC in need of a hearing specialist.  If we don't get enough vols we stay til 10am and come back for the evening rush. It's a very busy corner, so midday works just as well.  If you're in the area come join us, or at least drive by and honk your horn. <br /><br />Volunteer <a href="http://www.doodle.com/hg6yyv4mszkhyt76?adminKey=">here</a><br /><br />If you're not feel free to make your own banner and let your House rep or senator hear just how many people support health care reform in your district. It cost us about $250 to have this banner printed up, another one of
our guys spent about $100 to rig up the steel pipe poles when the original
flimsy aluminum poles that came with it failed. I'm sure you can make one a lot cheaper with a can of spray paint and a sheet. Bring folding chairs, water, sunscreen, an umbrella if it looks like rain. Then be ready to be the life of the party in more ways than one. <br /><br />The point is do something. We did today and it felt very, very  good to leverage the good will of drivers  honking  their horns   to send the wingnuts packing. And while Biggert isn't willing to listen to us she can't help but hear those horns up  in her ivory tower. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Selling HR 3200 to the Public </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/08/selling-hr-3200-to-the-public.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.284889</id>
   
   <published>2009-08-14T13:47:22Z</published>
   <updated>2009-08-14T15:49:46Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I&apos;ve been a salesman my whole life, like my father and his father before him. Started out selling Christmas cards in August at the age of 8 from an ad I saw in a comic book on miserably hot summer...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="13078" label="benefits" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25120" label="cost" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25121" label="facts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14800" label="Health care" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25119" label="HR 3200" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3814" label="town hall" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[I've been a salesman my whole life, like my father and his father before him. Started out selling Christmas cards in August at the age of 8 from an ad I saw in a comic book on miserably hot summer days in my Sunday best so I could buy a cheesy drum set which I never learned how to play. Housewives thought I was cute and invited me in after I recited my speech and gave me lemonade while they poured over my catalog and picked out sparkly cards with wintry scenes, the baby Jesus, or snowmen on them for $2.50 per 50 cards. &nbsp; <br /><br />I know congressmen and senators must have a little salesmen in them too. Selling themselves to voters at election time is part of the job. So why aren't they selling HR 3200? Instead of focusing on and carping about stupid&nbsp; Republican criticisms (it's socialism! death panels!) they should concentrate on what the bill actually does.<br /><br /><b>The way HR 3200 works:</b><br />&nbsp;<br /><ul><li><b>Health Insurance: </b>It promotes real free markets and does away with the government protected rackets we have now. Insurance companies will have to compete in the exchange with each other and the public plan instead of the virtual monopolies they are in most states today. Insurance companies will have access to 50 million new customers who
aren't insured today. Their operating costs will be lower because a lot the denial of care
bureaucracy they have now won't be necessary because those practices
will in fact be illegal.They can transfer a lot of those actuaries everybody hates into sales jobs where they can make people happy selling better cheaper insurance. <br /></li></ul>
<ul><li><b>Drugs: </b>Whether through rebates like the Baucus/Obamo plan or direct government negotiation we save money. $80 billion over 10 years in the former or as Waxman and Pelosi say $120 to $140 billion by direct government negotiation.If you have a Republican House rep tell him to reject the Baucus/Obama $80 billion deal with the drug
companies.Republicans love opposing anything Obama does. So ask
him to support direct government negotiations of drug prices with big pharma. Canadians get much better prices than we do by doing that and
they only have 30 million strong buying power. We have 330 million
people. It'll cost the taxpayer, insurance companies and the consumer of the drugs much less that way. Seniors will applaud you.<br /></li></ul><ul><li><b>Electronic records:</b> This is a no brainer. Even Newt Gingrich says Fed Ex keeps better track of packages than we do of health care records. He and Hillary agreed on a one page standardized form to fill out a few years ago. The VA's VistA open source record keeping system is the best in the world. They've been perfecting it since 1972. It's used by HI and WVA for their public hospitals and Germany, Finland, India, Malaysia and Jordan have adopted it. 4 or 5 more countries a week come over to check it out. There's&nbsp; already $20 billion in the stimulus bill for health care IT under the Hitech Act. It should all go into putting VistA in every medical and insurance office in the country. It will lower costs for insurance companies, cut out many of the 200,000 medical mistakes that kill Americans each year, doctors will love it. <br /></li></ul><ul><li><b>Best Medical Practices</b>: This is a bit more complicated to explain but basically we'll reward best practices that result in best medical outcomes for patients. Sometimes that means very expensive breast cancer drugs or heart bypass operations. But in other cases sometimes that means catching conditions like diabetes before they require amputations, cancers before they've <span>metastasized. heart disease before it requires that bypass. We'll give bonuses to doctors who keep their patients in good health and heal them instead of paying fee for service for as much as they can order. The beauty of the IT system we'll develop with VistA is that your doctor can look up what works best for people across the country just like you.&nbsp; 60 year old white male of German/Irish descent with stage 1 colon cancer? Sedentary lifestyle? 20 lbs over optimum weight with 12% body fat? Smoker-non smoker?&nbsp; Drinker-nondrinker? Your doctor can bring up the stats country wide and figure out what's worked and what doesn't whether she's a kid fresh out of med school in East Jesus KS being paid a bonus to help pay off her school loans for locating to East Jesus for a few years like the Blue Dogs want or a twenty year expert at the top of her field working on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. Is that new drug really better? How about that new surgical procedure or that spiffy new smart bomb guidance system cancer zapper? If it is she can prescribe it, if it's not she doesn't have to, but she'll have to show you those stats and let you decide. That's better and cheaper care for everybody. <br /></span></li></ul><ul><li><b>Benefits for Business: </b>GM and Chrysler were canaries in the coal mine.
Their legacy health care costs (paying for their retirees health
insurance) bankrupted them. Our businesses simply can't compete with
the Asians and Europeans on world markets paying the health care costs
we are now. It's pricing our manufacturers and workers out of
business. That's a big reason why GM builds more cars in Ontario than
they do in Michigan these days. HR 3200 will&nbsp; cut those job and profit
killing costs and we'll see many more new businesses open up and our
big companies will thrive too. There will be no more job lock for folks
who have existing conditions or love ones who do. </li></ul><ul><li><b>Cost: </b>The CBO says HR 3200 is deficit neutral. The cost is $1.042 trillion over
10 years. Most of it is paid for by the savings above. The rest, $239
billion over 10 years will be paid for by the expiring Bush tax cuts
(make sure you mention Bush because indies and even many
Repubs hate Bush now). It does not add to the US debt.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Bottom Line: </b>The CBO predicts under HR
3200 by 2019 97% of Americans will have health insurance. Of that
number 96% will be covered by for-profit private insurance and 4% will
be in the public plan. It won't drive private insurance out of
business. If you like the plan you have you can keep it (or in most
cases you boss can keep it.) But chances are you and your boss aren't stupid and won't
choose to keep the crappy expensive plan with few safeguards and ever
rising prices you have now. If you want to it's grandfathered in. Most likely you'll both probably decide to buy a new plan, probably from
the same agent and company that's better and cheaper.</li></ul><br /><p>HR 3200
operates on real free market principles and opens up the currently
government protected rackets in insurance, hospital chains, drugs and
doctors to more competition. It mandates protections for
consumers, you can't get booted off the rolls if you get sick, your
premiums will stop skyrocketing, if you change jobs or start a business
you'll still be able to buy insurance because your pre-existing
conditions won't exclude you. Your doctor will be able to look up your medical records even if you've lived in 20 different towns over the last twenty years. That means if you had an allergic reaction to a drug when you were 5 it'll still be in there. It also means Rush Limbaugh won't be able to go doctor shopping for his Oxycontin. <br /></p>Now put on a clean shirt, comb your hair and get yourself to a town hall meeting and bring these points up. It's not like your life doesn't depend on it or anything. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Two Republicans Fall Flat in Town Hall</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/08/two-republicans-fall-flat-in-t.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.284719</id>
   
   <published>2009-08-13T17:54:21Z</published>
   <updated>2009-08-13T18:39:53Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Here are my notes from the Town Hall yesterday starring Judy Biggert IL-13 and Mark Kirk who thinks he's going to win the senate seat Obama used to sit in. &nbsp; The venue was great, the Arista Hotel in Naperville...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="22162" label="Biggert" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="862" label="health care" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25079" label="IL senate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22164" label="IL-13" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10921" label="Kirk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3814" label="town hall" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Here are my notes from the Town Hall yesterday
starring Judy Biggert IL-13 and Mark Kirk who thinks he's going to win
the senate seat Obama used to sit in. &nbsp;</p>

<p>The venue was great, the Arista Hotel in Naperville is a beautiful
place and put on a very nice lunch spread paid for by the Chamber and
donations. The Naperville Chamber of Commerce was an excellent host and
John Schmidt their CEO did a fine job of moderating the session. I hope
they'll continue to host open town halls with our representatives in
the future.</p>

<p>Judging by the response of the crowd in the ballroom their presentation went over like a lead balloon.</p>

<p>The event was filled to capacity, over 100 people. It's a shame the Chamber didn't
allow the television cameras into the room to show the earful Kirk and
Biggert got. They would have been able to record just how much folks in
Illinois's 13th congressional district want real health care reform, not what
Kirk and Biggert were offering. &nbsp; <br /></p><p>I'm gonna ignore the fact that they showed up over half an hour late
for an event most people had to duck out of work in the middle of the
day to attend. I'm going to skip the the first 40 minutes which I guess
somebody decided at the last minute when they saw all those unfamiliar names who registered should be about Transportation,
EFCA and Cap and Trade. At 12:45 they finally got around to health care
which was the issue this event was advertised to be about.</p>

<p>But first a bit about Mark Kirk's opening remarks. He made the same
speech he made to the City Club of Chicago insiders in April about how
Illinois is so corrupt. It was an odd speech, sounded more like he was
running for governor than senator. He looked perplexed when the
audience sat stonyfaced at his applause and laugh lines that worked so
well with the swells who bought Governors Ryan and Blago and hope to buy him. Then
he told us how much he likes Patrick Fitzgerald. Maybe Fitzy could
explain to him about how he's not supposed to be twittering while he's
on duty with the reserves which he's already been nailed for, promised he'd stop but continues
to do. &nbsp; &nbsp;</p>

<p>The highlight of Kirk and Biggert's presentation was a powerpoint
slide show with cherry picked charts, almost all of which were 4 or 5
years old with at least one going back to 1999. All to show us how
wonderful our health care system is compared to the UK and Canadian
systems. While the British and Canadians may or may not have legitimate concerns
with their systems the systems themselves bear no relationship to the
Democratic proposals for health care reform in this country. The Brits
and Canadians have continually modified their systems over the years by
complaining to their elected representatives. Just try that with your
insurance company.</p>

<p>HR 3200 will make health insurance companies really compete against
each other and the public plan in a open market, (the exchange). That
will change the government protected monopoly racket that gives us no
choices these days. It'll make pharmaceutical companies compete against
each other too, and if the government directly negotiates prices with
the drug makers our buying power with 330 million people will be able
to drive a much harder bargain than the Canadians and their 30 million
people get.</p>

<p>With real competition our system will look much more like the Dutch or
German system. Nobody is proposing the government take over the
hospitals as they've done in the UK and a single payer government run
health insurance company like Canada and Medicare, isn't in HR 3200.
They ought to quit trying to scare people with that nonsense.</p>

<p>In her remarks on health care Biggert told us her well worn story
about her daughter's family who have lived in London for 11 years. It
was an attempt to give second hand proof that the UK &nbsp;health care
system is awful. Apparently not so awful mind you that Mrs. Biggert's
daughter doesn't continue to subject herself and her children to it.</p>

<p>She gave us obsolete statistics about wait times for surgeries in
England and once again claimed there's some webpage about it that's
down now because so many people have looked at it. I guess she means it
crashed. That webpage is down because the information is out of date.
Mrs. Biggert knows perfectly well those statistics are obsolete because
an English doctor in one of the hearings she claims congress isn't
having on health care set her straight. You can see the video of him
debunking most of what she told us yesterday below. Yet she continues
spreading these falsehoods.</p><p><br /></p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckN5NFmtwYI<br /><br /><br />Yeah they have some problems in England. But this guy says they knocked wait times down for surgeries to 18 weeks. On the chart Biggert showed us yesterdaym which was years out of date it showed much longer times and in the US it showed us at 23 weeks. <br /><br /><br /> <br /><br />]]>
      <![CDATA[The CBO has scored HR 3200 unlike Kirk's pretend bill. They say under
it 97% of people in America will be insured by 2019. Of that number 96%
will be insured by for-profit private insurers and the other 4% will be
in the government public option plan. That doesn't sound like the
private insurance companies who give you so much money will be "driven
out of business" to me Mrs. Biggert.<br /><br /><p>The CBO also says HR 3200 is deficit neutral meaning it won't add to
the deficit. It'll squeeze inefficiencies and profiteering out of the
system for huge savings and the rest of the cost, $239 billion over ten
years as Mrs Biggert accurately pointed out, will be covered by rolling
back some of Bush's tax cuts for the richest 1% of wage earners.</p>

<p>If the "Medical Rights and Reform Act" they touted instead is so
good why didn't they give us copies of it? Why hasn't it been up on the
internet? They released it almost two months ago. Why haven't they
submitted it to the Congressional Budget Office for scoring? Kirk says
he has one page, three page and twelve page versions of it. Twelve
pages to fix health care in this country? That's not a health care plan
it's a press release. &nbsp;</p>

<p>When it came time to answer questions I asked them why they continue
to talk about the English and Canadian systems when they bear no
resemblance to HR 3200.</p>

<p>A physician in private practice invited them to come down to his
office and compare the exasperating private insurance forms that take
up so much of his time with the simple Medicare forms that are so much
easier to fill out and submit. By law Medicare has to pay him within
two weeks of receiving his bill. Private insurance companies play games
and delay paying as long as they like.</p>

<p>A wheelchair repairman spoke of the silly rules that protect
manufacturers of new hospital equipment from having to compete for
business.</p>

<p>A woman complained about government involvement in health care at
all saying the free market could do better. There is no free market in
health care, most of us have no choice of who we get health insurance
from, we have no recourse if the insurance company decides to drop us
because we get sick and we're not profitable enough for them. We have
no say if the hospital bills $80 for a single Tylenol tablet and the
insurance company tells us what doctors we can see. We've let the free
market run health care for decades and they've set up a money making
machine that forces us to pay twice what the rest of the world pays for
the 37th best health care on the planet. &nbsp;</p>

<p>An Englishman said he has started businesses in the UK, Canada and
the US. He made a very important point about how our system is killing
American entrepreneurial spirit. While he's well to do and can afford
to insure his family there are millions of others who would like to
start their own businesses here but don't dare leave jobs with health
insurance, don't dare join a start up that doesn't provide it. Mrs.
Biggert may mock self employed "yahoos" who make $75,000 a year who
don't buy coverage but some people with pre-existing conditions, or
family members with them, can't buy health insurance at any price.</p>

<p>The last one, an elderly women shamed them for taking so many
campaign contributions from the health care industry to fight against
real reform. She called for the public option and said it's inexcusable
to fight against reform when our current health care system is way down
on the scale somewhere between Costa Rica and Slovenia.</p>

<p>Of the people who were called on I counted 3 who supported Kirk and
Biggert's position and 7 who support the President's. The crowd was
polite, there were few interruptions, there was no chanting, no
outbursts to drown out the speakers as we've all seen teabaggers doing
across the country on tv by now. But it was obvious from the reaction
that most of the folks in the hall wanted to see HR 3200 enacted into
law. &nbsp;</p>

<p>That's what happened yesterday in Naperville. I hope Mrs. Biggert and Mr. Kirk got the message.</p>I was interviewed by Mike Flannery of CBS2 news for about 5 minutes and a FOX guy too. As
you can see from the CBS2 clip the media only wants to see a fight not facts. <br /><br /><a href="http://cbs2chicago.com/video/?cid=5"></a><a href="http://cbs2chicago.com/video/?cid=5">CBS2 newsclip</a><br /><br />FOX didn't use any of my footage but their story was better. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.myfoxchicago.com/dpp/news/metro/naperville_health_care_meeting">FOX newsclip</a><br /><br />Did an interview with TribLocal reporter when I got home.
 His story is up but it isn't much of one. I was quoted at the end and wrote some comments afterward.&nbsp; <br /><br /><a href="http://www.triblocal.com/Downers_Grove/Post_comments/Downers_Grove/Detail_View/view.html?type=stories&amp;action=detail&amp;sub_id=88350">http://www.triblocal.com/Downers_Grove/Post_comments/Downers_Grove/Detail_View/view.html?type=stories&amp;action=detail&amp;sub_id=88350</a><br /><br />If you're in the area we'll be picketing on Rt. 83 &amp; 63rd st. outside Biggert's office in Willowbrook IL soon. We're gonna ask people to honk for health care reform so up in her office in the bank building Judy can hear us. Keep an eye on our website at <a href="http://dgdemocrats.com/">DGDemocrats</a> for updates. If you can join us as we show her just how out of touch she is. . <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><p><br /></p><br /><br /><br /><br />]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Here&apos;s one little Health Care victory</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/08/heres-one-little-health-care-v.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.282909</id>
   
   <published>2009-08-04T03:25:17Z</published>
   <updated>2009-08-04T22:24:37Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Some of you may have heard about Congresswoman Judy Biggert&apos;s (IL-13) straw poll on health care. She put it up on her website Friday asking &quot;Do you support the health care proposal that&apos;s in the House right now?&quot; This was...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="10017" label="2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="24511" label="Biggert health care" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22164" label="IL-13" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16970" label="public option" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="8837" label="reform" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[Some of you may have heard about Congresswoman Judy Biggert's (IL-13) straw poll on health care. She put it up on her website Friday asking <b>"Do you support the health care proposal that's in the House right now?"</b> This was accompanied by her usual Friday email newsletter to her supporters where she blathered about "reform, not revolution" and asked people to come give their opinion. I'm sure she was certain that voters from all over would come to her website and tell her we like paying double what the rest of the world pays for the 37th best medical care. <br /><br />Well it didn't quite work out that way. By the time I saw the poll late Friday afternoon <b>"YES"</b> was winning with 79.1% of the vote. All weekend long <b>"YES" </b>held a double digit lead. Oh there was a time on Saturday where it sank to 42+% and inexplicably "<b>Don't Know/No opinion/What's my name again?" </b>went from 0% to about 20% in a couple of hours, proving I guess you can lead a Republican precinct committeeman to water but you can't make him click on something that's truly not in his best interests like her position on health care reform.&nbsp; <br /><br />So anyway I imagine it wasn't a happy start to the week when Judy and her minions came into the office this morning and got a look at the results. The final tally when they yanked it down about 9am Monday was <b>69.4 for "YES",&nbsp; 21% for "NO" and 9.6% for "What was the question again?" <br /><br /></b>Biggert bragged all week about another little straw poll she took over phone during her teletown conference call last Monday night but we'd like her to publicize this one. She got&nbsp; 59% of the vote for <b>"NO"</b> on the phone poll from folks who could stand listening to her race baiting, immigrant bashing, weird "England has such awful health care one of my daughters and her family have chosen to live there for 11 years" banter with some of her self deluded sycophants all the way through. At one point a caller had to tell her where she could look up the bill on the net and that the number is HR 3200. I especially liked the part where she complained she didn't have enough time to work on the bill after she admitted that the House was in session, at that moment, <i>working on the bill. </i><br /><br />So anyway we'd like folks to call Mrs. Biggert at either (or both) of her offices, and fax her too, and tell her to support real health care reform with a public option strong enough to get her health insurance lobbyist daughter fired. If you want to give her receptionist apoplexy say the words "single payer". And while you're at it ask her real nicely to put the results of the website straw poll back up so everybody can see just how out of touch she really is. You can reach her here: <br /><br />The Honorable Judy Biggert<br />Washington, DC Office <br />1034 Longworth House Office Building <br />Washington, DC 20515 <br />Phone: 202-225-3515 <br />Fax: 202-225-9420<br /><br />District Office <br />6262 South Route 83, Suite 305 <br />Willowbrook, IL 60527 <br />Phone: 630-655-2052 <br />Fax: 630-655-1061<br /><br />Thanks for all you do everybody. Let's make sure that "our Judy" as she likes to bill herself gets off to the kind of start she deserves on her health care reform summer vacation. <b><br /><br /><br /></b>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Standoff in Afghanistan a sign of improvement</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/07/standoff-in-afghanistan-a-sign.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.278284</id>
   
   <published>2009-07-06T14:37:36Z</published>
   <updated>2009-07-06T15:09:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[July 6th, 2009 Standoff between Marines and Afghan&nbsp;insurgents Posted: 09:23 AM ET (CNN) -- U.S. forces faced off against Afghan insurgents in a standoff Monday that caught women and children between the armed groups, a U.S. military official told CNN.The...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="3994" label="Afghanistan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="280" label="CNN" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22906" label="Helmand" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22907" label="insurgents" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="190" label="marines" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[<i>July 6th, 2009</i>
<i><a href="http://cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/06/standoff-between-marines-and-afghan-insurgents/">Standoff between Marines and Afghan&nbsp;insurgents</a></i>
<i>Posted: 09:23 AM ET</i>



<p><i><br /></i></p><p><i>(CNN) --
U.S. forces faced off against Afghan insurgents in a standoff Monday
that caught women and children between the armed groups, a U.S.
military official told CNN.</i></p><p><i>The Marines' restrained approach differs from previous hits on
compounds when airstrikes were readily called in, the official said.</i></p>
<p><i>The standoff in the town of Khan Neshin is especially significant
because the U.S. military earlier reported that the Afghan government
regained control of the town Monday, which was a Taliban stronghold for
several years.</i></p>
<p><i>Coalition forces began talks with local leaders several days ago,
and have moved about 500 Marines into Khan Neshin, a U.S. military news
release said. With the government takeover of Khan Neshin, it is the
first time coalition forces have a sustained presence so far south in
the Helmand River valley, the release said.</i></p>
<p><i>The mission to secure Khan Neshin coincides with "establishing
secure conditions" for August elections in Afghanistan, according to
the release.</i></p><p>As per usual the insurgents fired on the marines and then withdrew to a compound with several buildings. The marines surrounded the place and through an intepreter called on the insurgents to let any women and chldren in the compound go. They let some out and after further negotiations more followed. Now it remains to be seen if the marines and the insurgents can come to some kind of agreement&nbsp; to end this skirmish without more bloodshed.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>I'd have the interpreter tell 'em that drone up there has 4 hours of fuel left and there'll be another on station before it has to go back to base. They can hang around for weeks, long after your water and food is gone. If you so much as tippietoe four feet outside the compound, day or night, one of those things can plant a hellfire missile within a yard of you and blow you to bits. That's a pretty fultile way to make your point and I can't imagine Allah wants you to die in vain. So drop your weapons, come on out and let's talk.&nbsp; <br /></p><p>It ain't much, but it's a start. <br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><br /><br />


 ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Kay Hagan Will Support HELP Bill</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/07/kay-hagan-will-support-help-bi.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.277934</id>
   
   <published>2009-07-02T19:27:47Z</published>
   <updated>2009-07-02T19:31:09Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Grassroots action works! Now keep phoning Landrieu, Snowe and Blanche Lincoln. http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/02/hagan-to-support-help-committee-bill-activism-works/...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7858" label="Hagan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="53" label="healthcare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22742" label="HELP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5627" label="NC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16970" label="public option" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[Grassroots action works! Now keep phoning Landrieu, Snowe and Blanche Lincoln. <br /><br /><a href="http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/02/hagan-to-support-help-committee-bill-activism-works/">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/02/hagan-to-support-help-committee-bill-activism-works/ </a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Health Care Action Site:</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/06/health-care-action-site.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.276385</id>
   
   <published>2009-06-23T15:54:28Z</published>
   <updated>2009-06-23T16:58:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I said I&apos;d put this up weeks ago but have been busy organizing locally. The tide on health care is turning in our favor but we must keep up the pressure to get the strongest public option we can. With...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="22162" label="Biggert" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22166" label="dg democrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22168" label="health care. healthcare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22164" label="IL-13" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22169" label="petition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="22019" label="Public Option" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[I said I'd put this up weeks ago but have been busy organizing locally. The tide on health care is turning in our favor but we must keep up the pressure to get the strongest public option we can. With that in mind I've created some pages at my local Downers Grove Township Democratic Organization website that you can use.<br /><br />Start here: <a href="http://www.dgdemocrats.com/">http://www.dgdemocrats.com/</a><br /><br />If you'd like to <b>fax or phone senators </b>on <b>Baucus's Finance Committee, Kennedy's HELP Committee or House Reps on Rangel's Ways and Means Committee </b>click on the <b>"Healthcare Contact Info"</b> button.<br /><br />If you'd like to <b>download the petition </b>we're circulating click on <b>"Healthcare Petition".</b> You're welcome to modify it by taking our party name &amp; address off the bottom to substitute your own if you like or just leave it blank. A Republican at the last Downers Grove Township Board Meeting did just that by folding the bottom inch under to run off copies on the copying machine. His wife's a&nbsp; nurse so he knows we need to change this system.Take 'em to your local town fair or any gatherings you attend. Ask family, friends, co-workers to sign. Stand on street corner or go door to door. I keep a stack in my car and mention it to anyone I meet. You can sign up every waitress in a restaurant and the owner too that way. I'm gonna make copies of these and hand them to Biggert (more on that below) and fax them to Baucus, Kennedy and Rangel. If you have any other committee chairs or wavering Dems you think I should send them to please leave the info in comments. If enough people do this kind of stuff we'll win this fight. Just ask President McCain what an army of volunteers can do. <br /><br />There's also a lot of <b>links to articles about polling, sleazy insurance company tactics, and the competitive disadvantage American workers and business suffer from under the "Healthcare Reform Information" button.</b> Some of them you've probably seen, some not. &nbsp;<br /><br />If you live in the Chicago area Campaign for Better Health Care is organizing a <b>meeting and rally at House Rep Judy Biggert's (IL-13) Willowbrook office at Rt 83 and 63rd St. next Monday June 29th at 4:30 pm. </b>We want to get as many people as we can there as a show of support for a strong public option in the health care bill. We're going to have media covering it.<br /><br />Biggert has also tentatively agreed to come to a townhall in a bigger hall about health care on a Saturday to be determined in July. I know 4:30 is too early for a lot of people but it's the only time she would agree to next week.<br /><br />I doubt we'll sway Biggert - her daughter is pharma lobbyist - but If we get a good crowd the resulting media coverage might shut her, Mark Kirk (IL-10) and Peter Roskam (IL-06) up for awhile and inspire Bill Foster (IL-14) and Melissa Bean (IL-08) to do the right thing. We're gonna get a good House bill, but the stronger it is, the better the negotiations with the Senate will go and the final bill will be. &nbsp; <br /><br />Please recommend this post. There's lots of useful information at the website and <i>now</i> is the time to get cranking on this. Both Houses say they intend to have the bill ready by August 1st. This is make or break time.&nbsp; We elected Obama so we'd have a president who'd sign this kind of legislation into law. We don't have brigades of lobbyists with tons of campaign cash on our side. What we do have is an army of volunteers who have what they raise all that campaign cash for, to get the votes of hundreds of millions people. Let's remind those Senators and House Reps it's government of the people, by the people,<i> for </i>the people, not the profits of special interests. <br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Jindal is as phony as his name, let&apos;s help him fix that</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/02/jindal-is-as-phony-as-his-name.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.258963</id>
   
   <published>2009-02-26T17:57:26Z</published>
   <updated>2009-02-26T18:29:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary>His first name isn&apos;t &quot;Bobby&quot;, it&apos;s &quot;Piyush&quot;. It means &quot;nectar&quot; in Sanskrit, a delicious drink. Why not use his real name as Republicans always like to say about Barack Hussein Obama? Piyush is a perfectly good name even if it&apos;s...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="10017" label="2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14886" label="Bobby" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6876" label="humor" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14887" label="JIndal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14774" label="markg8" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14889" label="Piyush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[His first name isn't "Bobby", it's "Piyush". It means "nectar" in Sanskrit, a delicious drink. <br /><br />Why not use his real name as Republicans always like to say about Barack Hussein Obama? Piyush is a perfectly good name even if it's not very common in America. Hell "Rush" isn't very common either and it even rhymes with "Piyush" if I have the pronunciation right. A wingnut can't go wrong reminding people of Limbaugh. So he should be proud of his heritage, the voters of Louisiana are a diverse group, they'll still accept him, won't they?. Especially if he steals Obama's line about being a skinny kid with a funny name. <br /><br />But maybe I'm wrong and his polling shows him that Piyush just won't fly. In that case he should try an Americanized version of "delicious drink" as a sobriquet. I suggest he call himself "OJ" or "Whiskey" Jindal. Both have a certain panache.&nbsp; <br /><br />When I think of "Bobby" I think of RFK, not Piyush Jindal. That nickname just doesn't fit him. It's like calling your daughter "Spike" or "Rocky". So let's have a little contest, let's see who can come up with the best new handle for the governor of Louisiana.&nbsp; Any ideas? ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>I Missed Obama&apos;s Speech</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/02/i-missed-obamas-speech.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.258635</id>
   
   <published>2009-02-25T04:53:41Z</published>
   <updated>2009-02-25T14:32:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I had no choice. As George Bush would say this candidating thing is haarrrd! Well, not so much hard as time consuming. I had to go to a wine fundraiser at a restaurant in Naperville for township candidates. My township...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="10017" label="2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14773" label="Downers Grove Township" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13" label="election" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14774" label="markg8" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[I had no choice. As George Bush would say this candidating thing is haarrrd! Well, not so much hard as time consuming. <br /><br />I had to go to a wine fundraiser at a restaurant in Naperville for township candidates. My township got half the take from any of our folks who showed up. It was an opportunity to network with volunteers and other candidates I couldn't in good conscience pass up for the sake of the ticket. <br /><br />But talk about worthwhile. Within five minutes of walking in the door I talked to the local electrical union head who said he'd get us some money and boots on the ground. Then I met another guy who is a candidate for trustee in Naperville who has a skill set we need that's gonna come in very handy very soon. I'll talk about that in a future post, gotta keep that under wraps for the right time cuz you never know who's reading this. <br /><br />Then I walked around schmoozing with people, listening to mini speeches from their candidates and trying to poach any likely volunteers I could. Karol, our highway commissioner candidate said she's heard from other union guys they're looking for us to pay their canvassers cuz they have a lot of people out of work in the construction trades. <br /><br />Chatted with a nattily attired young man named Tom Castillo who is running for Lt. Governor. Don't know too much about Tom yet but he does have some impressive people I know around him and he isn't shy. <br /><br />Saying my good nights I was buttonholed by another township chair who asked me if I'd be willing to join a little vocal ensemble she wants to organize. She likes my voice and I hope maybe more. I've been kind of sweet on her since the state convention down in Springfield last summer. But if we're gonna make sweet harmonies of any kind together it's gonna have to wait til after the election. *sigh* <br /><br />On the ride home I heard the last half of Jindal's response on the radio. His delivery is pretty good. Hits his marks, doesn't stumble over words, emphasizes what he's saying like he means it and sounds like he knows what he's talking about. And if I didn't know better I'd think anthrax and tire rims are just what this country needs for dinner.&nbsp; <br /><br />So I got home and turned on MSNBC. Looked like Barbara Boxer was gonna start crying tears of happiness. Then KO introduced Howard Fineman and asked him what he thought of Obama's speech. Fineman said it was the best financial speech he'd ever heard. Check that, he didn't just say that, he said it with that stunned, <i>"I'm supposed to be too jaded for this kinda stuff, but goddam that was the best financial speech I've ever heard and to hell with the years I've spent crafting an image as a professional skeptic"&nbsp; </i>kind of wonder in his voice that I recognize all too well in myself. Reminded me of my own reaction to Obama's speech the night he lost New Hampshire. There was no quit in the man. Not an ounce of sheepishness, no defeat, no surrender, just an unrelenting determination to rally supporters, pick us up and move us forward. I stood up and with the hair rising on the back of my neck and pointed to the tv and yelled to no one in particular, "That man is going to be the next President of the United States!" He knew it, I knew it and I was damn well gonna make everyone I talked to for the next 10 months know it and believe it too. <br /><br />And with that I'm really sorry I missed the speech tonight. I like it when the hair stands up on the back of my neck. That's also why I haven't been commenting&nbsp; much lately at TPM. Haven't even had time to catch up on my daily fix of DickDay's Camelot saga. <br /><br />But I gotta do what I gotta do and what I've been doing lately is putting together a campaign budget, begging for campaign cash, staying up late pouring over township financial docs, figuring out how to answer open ended newspaper questions like "Why are you running? What will you do if elected? and Why are you the best person for the job?" in 200 words or less, recruiting volunteers, knocking on doors and writing press releases and what I hope are inspiring emails to the rest of the ticket and local newspaper writers hoping they'll cover our race.&nbsp; <br /><br />I'll have more, much more on the race later. But in the meantime I have to sleep. Tomorrow I'm writing a skinny kid with a funny name who says he has 351 high school kids at his school who might canvass for us. And all I have to do is write an email as inspiring as an Obama speech. No sweat!<br /><br />So once again, if you have any cash to spare please hit the website (http://dgdemocrats.synthasite.com/2009twpbrochure.php) and scroll down to the Actblue link and contribute if you can. <br /><br /> I'm Mark Garrity, I'm running for Township Supervisor and I'm here to recruit you.&nbsp; &nbsp; <br />
<br />&nbsp;<br /><br /><br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Our First Campaign Press Release</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/02/our-first-campaign-press-relea.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.257636</id>
   
   <published>2009-02-19T02:16:22Z</published>
   <updated>2009-02-25T16:51:15Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Some of you asked me last week to keep you updated on how my campaign&nbsp; for Township Supervisor is going. I'm on a slate with 6 other candidates: Clerk, Highway Commissioner and 4 Trustees. Here is the first Press Release...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="13" label="election" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14443" label="Supervisor" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14444" label="township" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[Some of you asked me last week to keep you updated on how my campaign&nbsp; for Township Supervisor is going. I'm on a slate with 6 other candidates: Clerk, Highway Commissioner and 4 Trustees. Here is the first Press Release of our campaign. We sent it out over the last few days to every local media outlet around. But first a little background. <br /><br />Here in Downers Grove Township we have a tiny government, sort of a
vestigial appendage left over from the days when Illinois was one of the Northwest
Territories and there were few villages, towns or counties let alone
cities to provide services. DGT government has less than a $5 million
dollar budget and by statute, we have to provide three services, a general assistance program to qualifying residents, property
assessment, and maintenance of township roads and bridges. Beyond these
mandated functions, the township offers a variety of social services
for township residents, including senior citizen and youth programs,
transportation, and cemetery maintenance. To give you an idea of how small
it is the Village of Downers Grove itself has over ten times the number
of employees and is only one of 9 towns within the Township. <br />
<br />
If elected, as Supervisor I'll be the
top official on the board, I will sign the checks and make out
the annual budget and financial reports. Our slate has FOIA'd records
from the township and attended some of the meetings. <br />
<br />
Republicans, as far as anyone knows, have held every position in DGT
township government since there's been one, or at least since the Whig
party died. They run a very
sloppy ship. <br /><br />Lately they screwed up appointing board members and don't have a legally constituted board anymore as you'll see below. Their own handpicked
auditor issued an "adverse" opinion on their year end financial statement last year. In accountant speak that's an F. I'll have more on that in the future. The Highway
Commission uses half the budget and is a microcosm of Chicago's Dept. of Streets and Sanitation with all the nepotism there. That's particualrly funny because all we hear out of Republicans around here is if Democrats get elected "they'll make it just like Chicago". This careless compliance, slipshod
accounting, and cronyism are hallmarks of bad government and ought to
raise red flags. If I have anything to say about it we'll be hoisting ones as big as Old Glory in the coming weeks. <br /><br />So without further ado here is our first press release:<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Republicans Botch Appointments to Downers Grove Township Government</font><br /><br />
Recently several members of the Downers Grove Township Government chose
to retire. Edward P. Smith, the Highway Commissioner left office on
December 31, 2008. Supervisor Barbara Wheat proffered her resignation
letter effective January 16th. It appears rather than serve out the last few
months of their elected terms they left early so their appointed
successors could run as incumbents with the attendant advantages.<br />
<br />
Illinois statutes (60 ILCS 1/60-5) say that's a legal maneuver, the
Board is charged with filling vacancies by appointment, but let's look
at the way they did it.<br /><br />
Those same Illinois statutes (60 ILCS 1/60-20) also say "Whenever they
(the Board) accept a resignation, the township clerk shall make a
minute of the acceptance upon the township records."&nbsp; Nowhere in the
minutes published over the last 6 months does it show the Board made a
motion to accept the resignations of either Smith or Wheat. There was
no motion made to accept the resignation of Frank Wurster as Trustee.
The December 4th minutes show the clerk did read a resolution&nbsp; honoring
Highway Commissioner Smith for his many years of service&nbsp; which was
passed by vote along with a mention that his successor, Lawrence
Anderson would be appointed in January. A resolution honoring someone
is not the same as a motion to accept a resignation.<br />
<br />
During the January 22 meeting Clerk Diane Konicek acknowledged
receiving Barbara Wheat's resignation letter on January 16, 2009. Clerk
Konicek slso informed the Board Trustee Frank Wurster had tendered his
resignation effective January 22, 2009. Trustee Rita Carlson then made
a motion to appoint Kathleen Abbate as Trustee to fill the remaining
term of Mr. Wurster which was seconded by Trustee Robert Del Sarto with
"all" voting aye.<br />
<br />
The next order of business was the appointment of Frank Wurster as
Supervisor. Trustee Carlson then made a motion to appoint Frank Wurster
as Supervisor for the remainder of Wheat's term, seconded by Trustee
Del Sarto, again with "all" voting aye.<br />
<br />
In order for Wurster to be appointed Supervisor he first had to resign
his Trustee position (as he did), he's not allowed to hold two voting
positions on the Board simultaneously, however briefly. In order for
Abbate to be appointed Trustee Wurster also could not remain in that
position, the seat had to be vacant.<br />
<br />
There are five voting positions on the Board, the Supervisor and the
4 Trustees. Neither the recently retired Supervisor Barbara Wheat or Trustee William
Swanston&nbsp; were present at that meeting. That left three voting members,
one of whom was Wurster who had resigned his position to be appointed
to Supervisor,&nbsp; thus leaving only two qualified voting members.<br />
<br />
Two qualified voting members of the Board do not constitute a quorum.
According to the Illinois State Open Meetings Act (5 ILCS 120/1.02)
(from Ch. 102, par. 41.02)&nbsp; "for a 5-member public body, 3 members of
the body constitute a quorum and the affirmative vote of 3 members is
necessary to adopt any motion, resolution, or ordinance".&nbsp; Thus the
appointment of Frank Wurster to DGT Supervisor and&nbsp; Kathleen Abbate to
succeed him as Trustee were not legally done under Illinois law.
Neither is any action the Board has taken during or since that meeting
as they don't have a legally constituted Board.<br />
<br />
Now this might seem like nitpicking to some. But appointing successors
for elected officers is a pretty rare occurrence and serious business,
especially right before an election. The law is very specific but also
flexible, there were any number of ways they could have done this
correctly and stayed within the law. But the all Republican Board, many
of whom have been there for years if not decades, and really ought to
know better ignored the statutes and instead made sloppy and ultimately
illegal appointments. If that's how they conduct very rare business
like this in open meetings when it's bound to attract attention, how
are they conducting the people's business when nobody is watching their
everyday activities?<br />
<br />The rest is contact info for local reporters which I won't include here. But I will include <a href="http://dgdemocrats.synthasite.com/2009twpbrochure.php">the campaign website</a> where you can see the handbill we're having printed with our smiling faces on it and a link to the Actblue page where anyone who has a mind to can make me and TPM look good by ponying up a few bucks for the cause. <br /><br />We start canvassing on Saturday and will be tromping through whatever weather Mother Nature throws at us all 7 weekends until election day on April 7th. There's no way we can reach all the voters we need to on foot so anything you give will go toward postage for mailing out these press releases (in modified form) to voters. Needless to say every little bit helps and will be greatly appreciated. If you're going to donate I ask that you tack a penny on the end so we can tell how many contributions we get from TPM. It's an old Kos trick.&nbsp; <br /><br />Thanks in advance for reading and contributing. Please recommend. <br /><br />
<a href="http://dgdemocrats.synthasite.com/2009twpbrochure.php">The website</a> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Some facts about the stimulus</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/01/some-facts-about-the-stimulus.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.254120</id>
   
   <published>2009-01-28T23:32:17Z</published>
   <updated>2009-01-29T00:16:54Z</updated>
   
   <summary>If you&apos;ve watched CSPAN today you saw a lot of talk about what works and what doesn&apos;t in the stimulus bill. As expected Republicans favor tax cuts of all kinds to solve the problem. Dems favor direct government spending. In...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="10017" label="2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13023" label="HR1. congress" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13025" label="ICLA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13026" label="Moodys" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13027" label="multipliers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="32" label="stimulus" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[If you've watched CSPAN today you saw a lot of talk about what works and what doesn't in the stimulus bill. As expected Republicans favor tax cuts of all kinds to solve the problem. Dems favor direct government spending. In a minute I'd like you to look at some numbers and compare, but first let's keep the following in mind. As the recession
deepens, states' deficits are rising and could total $350 billion to $370
billion over the next 2 1/2&nbsp;years. That translates into huge budget cuts as
well as tax and fee increases, and these things will reduce overall demand,
which removes even more money from the economy. <br /><br />A lot of these states are mandated by law to balance their budgets each year. Foolishly they passed balanced budget amendments that thankfully Republicans were never able to ram through congress in the 1980s. Other states like California are so deeply in debt with no way to raise or borrow funds after years of mismanagement they are essentially bankrupt. <br /><br />Now let's look at those figures. They come courtesy of the Int'l. Labor Communications Association. Now that sounds like a lefty organization (it is) and for some that would automatically make their data suspect. Well here's what the ICLA has to say about that:<br /><br />Right about now somebody will be asking: "Did some wacky liberal (from Neptune) come up with this research and how much credibility does it have?" Sure, this is the sort of policy position you'd expect to come from Barack Obama or some sort of&nbsp; "progressive" think tank. But it comes from Moody's Economy.com, which is an entirely different animal. It is a leading independent provider of economic analysis, data, and forecasting and credit risk services. And its chief economist, Mark Zandi, is a former advisor to presidential candidate John McCain. <br /><br />Fiscal Economic Bang for the Buck<br /><br />One year $ change in real GDP for a given $ reduction<br />in federal tax revenue or increase in spending<br /><br /><i>Tax Cuts</i><br />Non-refundable lump-sum tax rebate &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>&nbsp;1.02</b><br />Refundable lump-sum tax rebate &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>1.26</b><br /><br /><i>Temporary tax cuts</i><br />Accelerated depreciation &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>0.27</b><br />Across the board tax cut &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>1.03</b><br />Payroll tax holiday &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>1.29</b><br /><br /><i>Permanent tax cuts</i><br />Make Bush income tax cuts permanent &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>0.29</b><br />Cut in corporate tax rate &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>&nbsp;0.30</b><br />Make dividend and capital gains tax cuts permanent <b>&nbsp;0.37</b><br />Extend alternative minimum tax patch &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>0.48</b><br /><br /><i>Spending Increases</i><br />General aid to state governments &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>1.36</b><br />Increased infrastructure spending &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>1.59</b><br />Extending UI benefits &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>1.64</b><br />Temporary increase in food stamps &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>1.73</b><br /><br />Source: Moody's Economy.com<br />http://www.ilcaonline.org/ht/display/ArticleDetails/i/75963<br /><br />Feel free to send this to your crazy Uncle Spric or Niece Renaye. They need to know the facts. While you're at it send it your local congressman. Like what's his name says fax it to him or her. Send it to as many US senators as you'd like. John McCain might like to know at least one of his economic advisors isn't insane. <br /><br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Big Fish from Small Ponds</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/01/big-fish-from-small-ponds.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.253180</id>
   
   <published>2009-01-22T14:39:30Z</published>
   <updated>2009-01-22T18:06:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I wrote some of these thoughts earlier as comments in various other posts here at TPM and elsewhere in the past and I&apos;d like to expand on them a bit. As we all know Judge Roberts blew the oath of...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="5137" label="diversity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="12552" label="Roberts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="12553" label="SCOTUS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[I wrote some of these thoughts earlier as comments in various other posts here at TPM and elsewhere in the past and I'd like to expand on them a bit. <br /><br />As we all know Judge Roberts blew the oath of office on Tuesday. It looked like he froze on such a momentous occasion, maybe he was taken aback by the size of the crowd. The Chief Justice's job doesn't require him to be on such a large stage very often. And thankfully in the end the flub was no big deal. <br /><br />But I think this points to a valuable lesson about diversity. George Bush selected Roberts from a limited pool of judicial talent. He only considered like minded strict conservatives for the highest post on the highest court we have. Most if not all of the candidates Bush chose from for the job rose through the ranks of the Federalist Society. These guys have been groomed for high courts from the time they leave law school. They've proved themselves time and time again through rulings from the bench and in their written opinions over the years. When given the chance to nominate SC justices Republicans are no longer willing to risk taking a flyer on a O'Conner or a Kennedy who proved too independent and were such big disappointments to them. <br /><br />Roberts was the best they had to offer but coming from such a small pool of talent doesn't necessarily mean he was the best Bush could have done, even from their side of the aisle. Roberts was a very big fish from a very small pond. And as such he apparently suffers from the delusion that he's not only the best of the best, but like the man who put him on the court he thinks he's better than he really is. The egotistical exercise of trying to recite the oath from memory without back up notes speaks loud and clear to that delusion.&nbsp; <br /><br />We have a very big pond here in the US. We don't have to select Supreme Court justices or anyone else only from Ivy league schools or closed incestuous professional societies where they are stunted by adhering to a particular set of beliefs considered sacrosanct and beyond challenge or even open minded debate. We'd certainly be much better off with people in the highest offices in the land who have learned a little humility through out their lives instead of only those who see their rise to the top foreordained by a series of positions taken, rulings uttered, all predictably checked off the list that keeps them rising to the top of the pyramid. .&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><br />In a different field my dad was an example of why diversity works. He was an all state high school halfback in the fall of 1941 on the undefeated Rock Island High School football team. He earned a football scholarship to the University of Illinois, the first in his family to go to college. WW11 intervened and he spent 3 years as a flight engineer on a B-24 flying around the South Pacific hunting for Japanese submarines. When he came back he joined a class of about 180 other scholarship players on the bulging squad, most returning war veterans like himself. Typically there was less than a third that number of incoming freshman football players in any given year but obviously 1946 wasn't a typical year. My dad was an excellent athelete. Tall, strong and fast for the time he had a knack for the game, he was the archetype of a college football player in 1946. But at his position was a guy a couple years younger by the name of Buddy Young, a little black kid from Phillips High School in Chicago. While short and stocky - listed anywhere from 5'3" to 5'7" - Buddy Young was nothing short of sensational. He set national track records at Illinois. He was built low to the ground and was as shifty as he was fast, sort of the Barry Sanders of his time. Opposing teams couldn't see him behind the big linemen when the play started and if he didn't make them miss he'd stick his helmut in their gut and bowl them over. When he got by them he was gone. Nobody could catch him. <br /><br />My dad was never going to crack the starting lineup with Young in front of him.&nbsp; <br />He tried to transfer to Northwestern but the Big Ten had an agreement not to raid each other's scholarship players. NW's coach reluctantly turned him down. He was stuck. <br /><br />So my dad accepted his fate. He went on to get his master's degree in education. It's not like the NFL back then was a road to riches like it can be today anyway. Well into the 1960s most professional football players had to hold off season jobs to make ends meet. A whole lot of them wound up (and still do today) suffering from crippling injuries the rest of their lives. My dad went on to teach and coach for awhile but as our family grew he moved on to the more lucrative field of selling trucks and he spent most of his adult life earning a very good living. He excelled at it. More than once he earned Ford Motor Company awards for truck salesman of the year complete with rings, plaques and trips to Vegas. His knees were still good enough to play tennis twice a week into his 80s. Buddy Young went on to be a football star in the NFL and was one of the first union organizers of the sport. It worked out for the best for everybody. Illinois put the best football team they had on the field, my dad got the education he wanted and Young went on to not only earn the stardom professionally he so richly deserved as a player but helped make the business side of the NFL fairer to it's employees after his playing days were over.&nbsp; <br /><br />Here's probably the most extreme example of the downside of lack of diversity. In the early 1940s the USA and Nazi Gerrmany were competing to build the first atom bomb. Hitler had driven Jews from his country in the 1930s before he got around to gassing those who remained. With his racism he not only gutted his own pool of nuclear physicists but he drove many of the refugees who happened to be Jewish into the willing arms of the USA with a determination to win that race at all costs. His "pure aryan" scientists were no competition for the much wider talent pool from which the allies had to draw many of whom trained in Germnay's own universities. <br /><br />Another example: Babe Ruth is considered the best baseball player of all time. He was the MIchael Jordan of the game. He won two World Series games as a pitcher for the 1918 Red Sox. He hit 54 homeruns to set a new record one year surpassing Homerun Baker's previous record of <i>21 </i>in a season. But Ruth never faced some of the best baseball players of his generation because of racism. We'll never know just how good he was because instead facing a Satchel Paige in his prime he faced a pitcher of lesser skill because Paige wasn't allowed to play major league baseball for most of his career. Conversely would Ruth have been driven to even bigger heights if some of the best homerun hitters of the time were allowed to compete against him? Would there have been a Mantle/Maris McGwire/Sosa season long homerun contest between Ruth and a black player in the 1930s? Like I said we'll never know. <br /><br />And we'll never know if Roberts is the best justice Republicans have because unless their candidates for the court have to fit a very specific profile they'll never rise to the top. Roberts may be the best the Federalist Society had to offer but that's like saying Paul Wolfowitz is the smartest foreign policy expert the neocons produced. That's not saying much. <br /><br />&nbsp;<br /><br />&nbsp; &nbsp; <br /><br /><br /><br />&nbsp;<br /><br />&nbsp; <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>If a tree falls in the forest...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2009/01/if-a-tree-falls-in-the-forest.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.250954</id>
   
   <published>2009-01-08T21:45:25Z</published>
   <updated>2009-01-08T21:57:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>...and nobody is there to hear it did it actually make a noise?Well if a $3000 tax cut to an employer to hire or retain an employee doesn&apos;t immediately inspire a lot of hiring so what? A tax cut that...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="11760" label="$3000" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="730" label="jobs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="32" label="stimulus" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6725" label="tax cuts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="842" label="tax policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[...and nobody is there to hear it did it actually make a noise?<br /><br />Well if a $3000 tax cut to an employer to hire or retain an employee doesn't immediately inspire a lot of hiring so what? A tax cut that isn't used doesn't cost the government anything. But once hiring does pick up it'll make the job recovery that much faster.&nbsp; <br /><br />Remember Bush's jobless recovery of 2002-2005? Want a repeat of that? I don't. So why wouldn't a Democratic president want to promote hiring? We have an $11 trillion dollar debt as it is. We can't afford half a decade of double digit unemployment. Maybe this isn't the best way to do it. But if not then let's hear some better ideas. <br /><br /><br /><br />&nbsp;<br /><br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Are you having campaign withdrawal? </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/2008/11/are-you-having-campaign-withdr.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/markg8//526.245091</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-19T20:44:40Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-19T20:50:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Do you find yourself yawning at pundits speculating about who is going to be in Obama&apos;s cabinet? Have you caught up on all the mundane chores and recreational activities you promised yourself you&apos;d get to as soon as the election...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="TPMDC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="9140" label="Chambliss" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5226" label="Georgia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="4265" label="Martin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="471" label="senate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[Do you find yourself yawning at pundits speculating about who is going to be in Obama's
cabinet? Have you
caught up on all the mundane chores and recreational activities you
promised yourself you'd get to as soon as the election was over? Are
you still jonesing to put Republicans out to pasture? We'll you're in
luck! <br />]]>
      <![CDATA[Some of Scott Harper's (IL-13) staff have gone to Georgia to help Jim
Martin defeat Saxby Chambliss. They need home phonebankers calling into
Georgia and asked me to spread the word.<br /><br /><p>I don't need to tell you how important this race is. With Begich's
all but certain win in Alaska, Franken's pretty good odds in the
Minnesota recount, a Martin victory in the runoff on December 2 would
give us a filibuster proof 60 Democratic US senators. </p><p>Sure Lieberman won't vote with us on some issues but where he
won't we'll be able to pick off some of the more reality based
Republicans. Anybody really think Lugar isn't going to go along with
Obama on Iraq? With a 60 vote majority it'll be almost impossible for
McConnell to hold his caucus together on Iraq, healthcare, and any
number of issues. </p><p>There's no better candidate to retire than the execrable Saxby
Chambliss. He's a chickenhawk on a par with Cheney, five Vietnam era
student deferments until he found a doctor to give him a medical
deferment for a "football" knee. Yet he's marched in lockstep with Bush
on Iraq. </p><p>We all remember his disgusting 2002 ad against Max Cleland
tieing him to Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein for standing up to
Bush on workers' rights at the then new Homeland Security Dept. Even
John McCain called the ad "reprehensible" and "worse than disgraceful"
back then for attacking the patriotism of a man who lost three limbs
for his country. Of course that hasn't stopped McCain from going to GA
to campaign for Chambliss the past couple of weeks. &nbsp;
</p><p>Chambliss is also a blatant racist. I know that's not so
uncommon in the south, even in 2008. But it ought to be and there's no
better way to show the Republican party that the Southern Strategy is
deader than the confederacy than to send this creep packing. </p><p>A few examples: following the 9/11 attacks, Chambliss said
Georgia ought to "arrest every Muslim that crosses the state line."
During early voting last month as African Americans were turning out in
droves as expected, Chambliss told his white supporters that "the <i>other folks</i>
are voting" to push Republicans to get out and vote. In another
instance, Chambliss told the New York Times that the "rush to the polls
by African-Americans" in Georgia "has also got <i>our</i> side
energized, [because] they see what is happening." After failing on 11/4
to get 50%+1 of the vote required under Georgia law to avoid a runoff,
Chambliss in a Fox News interview said it was due to the "high
percentage of minority vote" this year and the the fact that "we
weren't able to get enough of <i>our</i> folks out on Election Day."
Now the vote in Georgia sadly still breaks down overwhelmingly along
racial lines. But we only need to turn a small percentage of white
voters and/or inform Georgia minority voters about how important it is
that they elect this Democratic senator. It's eminently winnable. Kos's
poll done by R2K shows Chambliss up only 49-46% in this two way race. &nbsp;
&nbsp; </p><p>Jim Martin, served in Vietnam, is an accomplished legal
scholar, and was a Georgia state legislator for 18 years. The guy's no
lightweight. He supports the Employee Free Choice Act (union check
card), wants to get us out of Iraq and has run TV ads attacking
Chambliss for not supporting Obama's agenda. Of course Saxby has
attacked Martin for supporting Obama. That tells me pretty much all I
need to know about the most important issue at stake here: how they'd
vote in the senate for the next 6 years. </p><p>So if you have some free time over the next week and a half
and are still fired up and ready to go sign up to make calls for Jim
Martin. As anyone who has read Kos or Nate Silver the last few weeks
knows this run off is like most special elections. It's all about GOTV,
flushing the base. Turnout is expected to be low, maybe much lower than
the general. Nat'l Republicants are putting everything they have into
saving Saxby Chambliss. They won't give it up easily. It's up to us to
take it away from them. </p><p><a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=p0WIy9v_9Q77aMjEAvFnRIw">You can sign up here.</a>
</p>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Dems Must Give Voters Explicit Permission To Like Palin</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/dems-must-give-voters-explicit.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.217038</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-15T19:55:58Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-15T19:55:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Sage advice from Sean Quinn at Nate Silver&apos;s site Five Thirty Eight: &quot;Because they already do. That ship has sailed. When facts are used to discredit Sarah Palin, emotion trumps facts. The instinct is to defend against the facts. Consider:...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>markg8</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/markg8/">
      <![CDATA[Sage advice from Sean Quinn at Nate Silver's site Five Thirty Eight: <br /><br />"Because they already do. That ship has sailed. When facts are used to
discredit Sarah Palin, emotion trumps facts. The instinct is to defend
against the facts. Consider: you meet someone and like him or her on a
gut level. A stranger – someone who doesn’t have built-up personal
credibility with you – gives you a list of reasons not to like that
person. How do you react?<br /><br />On an emotional level, you want them
to be wrong, and you will take every possible favorable inference on
the likable person’s behalf. Using facts is pushing a big rock uphill.
You might get it to the top with a few voters, but you’re going to
expend a lot of energy for only a little return."<br /><br />http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/dems-must-give-voters-explicit.html<br /><br />Read the whole thing for how to counter this, it applies to McCain too. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
