« You'll want to see Orrin Hatch's tribute to Kennedy. IT'S AMAZING. | Overreach THIS!'s Blog | The DEVILS of TASMANIA: Vicious and Sick »

Uppity Negro


Say what?


Sorry for the hideous phrase, but that's really the problem here, and it's what they mean when they say they want their country back. They want back that country that always had white Presidents. The idea of "one of them" being the leader, the senior, the Commander in Chief, Number 1, is unbearable.


It was tolerable, sort of, during the campaign, and that's what Sarah Palin wanted to say when she wasn't allowed to give a speech the night they lost the election: not being too bright, she would have railed that the vote was nothing but a distracting warmup, with the real struggle to only now begin by gum (so don't think some piddly little election mattered for much!). You betcha!


They never really grapsed (they're not too bright either) that day after day they would have to look at his dark skin and think to themselves, "that's my President." It galls them to no end and even that doesn't fully describe their primitivist humiliation and rage. That's partly why words fail them, Obama is "fascist" or "socialist" or "actually scary" or "Hitler."  It calms them not at all to face the horrific fact that he is about 50 times smarter than they. 


This is blind fury, being guided to subordinate themselves to such a being (!!!) and they can't vocalize the odious, putrid real reason for it. Not when they're sober, anyhow. Incidentally, I notice commentators are beginning to acknowledge this as the actual basis, virulent racism that's "always been a factor, of course."  Yucch!


That mostly covers what's been going on, unfortunately.


185 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I do believe you are right on most of this.

Lots of two-stepping around it in public discourse, to be sure, and if Clinton or Biden or whoever had been elected instead I think the R's would still be screaming, just different things.

This President, though, well, he just seems to send them around the bend.

I think it's time we dust off "Love it or leave it!" for these clowns, don't you? Forget trying to reason with them. They are immune to the process.

user-pic

Sorry, your answer misplaced below, Sir!

user-pic

What if we made new bumper stickers like,

Americans elected this President

or

You can't have your country back, it never left!

or

Whatever happened to United We Stand?

or

If you don't want single payer,
give back your Medicare!

or

I support Single Payer. I have Medicare!

user-pic

Or how about:

Our President is black, racists are the minority now: get over it!

user-pic

This is very good and very funny and very good BTW, Greg!

Best, O.T.

user-pic

Here Gregor:

YOU CAN HAVE YOUR COUNTRY BACK BUT IT TURNED LEFT

HAHAHAHA

user-pic



Ah yes ... And do you realize . . .

Three rights make a left . . .

So ... by then those who went left will be continually three blocks ahead.

~OGD~

user-pic

The Glenn Beck vision that the Uppity Darkie-in-Chief is training and mobilizing a para-military Darkie Army to run the FRMA-camps to house right-wing dissenters while the Prez takes absolute control of the country is contagious. We know they belong in rubber rooms; they know that we need to be Terminated with Prejudice.

user-pic

Terminate us with Extreme Prejudice to protect the Co'ssitution, goddammit!

My country shamed by thee
Wet tree of liberty
Lynched from thy branch!

And I say again, Yucch!!

user-pic

Terminate us with Extreme Prejudice to protect the Co'ssitution, goddammit!

My country shamed by thee
Wet tree of liberty
Lynched from thy branch!

And I say again, Yucch!!

user-pic

"he just seems to send them around the bend."

Yes! This is what is so baffling, so illogical, so unexplainable.

Until, Grouch, you try on a pair of the special goggles they use to look at this!

user-pic

OT,

He sends them around the bend because he is a bright, articulate, kind and well intentioned human being. They fear him and his success in any arena. While they nurture and feed off the 'uppity negro' mentality, in reality it is about more than just his 'ethnic' heritage.

They must tear him and his down with lies, distortions and abuse of process because that's all they can do! Truth and integrity is their enemy, while bigotry and fear is their friend.

There is no honor or invocation of truth among bigots and rancid bullies!

user-pic

I have no problem with Obama except that he nominates people like Van Jones into positions of power. This guy Van Jones decides to bring race into the issue of green jobs. He harps on the "white polluters" and the "white environmentalists steering poison into the people of color communities"

He even likes to use the term "uppity".

C'mon - you just can't make this stuff up. How does this guy get nominated??

I'd rather have Bill Ayers be the Green Jobs czar...

user-pic

Don't know Van Jones, honestly, so can't comment. Thanks for sharing your views in a polite manner.

user-pic

You're welcome

user-pic

No, dude. This is the latest Beck/Limbaugh outrage. MCB is a rightwing troll, period. He should either be flamed or ignored.

user-pic

Oh, you are referring to the very real topic/problem of environmental racism?

user-pic

I am referring to the comments made by our "green jobs czar" Van Jones. The same guy who is part of a group which thinks 9/11 was a "cover-up"

user-pic

Burt you accept the idea of environmental racism, Van Jones' idiot comments aside, right?

Meaning, that economic and racial minorities suffer the worst environmental abuses precisely because of their lack of political clout in our system....

user-pic

I'm wondering if you've read this, Bill:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/04/defending_van_jones_from_the_mccarthyites/

And if so, what your thoughts are?

user-pic

Thanks Lis for the link. I usually avoid reading Nate because his views on unions, the Stimulus and now Van Jones are all incredibly upsetting to me.

He says its nice to have a different "viewpoint" in the White House. Somebody whose "viewpoint" is that the "white polluters" are targeting communities of color is something I don't really appreciate.

And the 9/11 group he is a part of is much more than just accusing the government of "ignoring warnings". This group is promoting investigations into a possible "cover-up" by the government - that the government was somehow involved in blowing up the Twin Towers.

See - Nate is a friend of Van Jones so is spinning it a bit differently.

Van Jones has tried to apologize and disassociate himself with the 9/11 group but I don't think he's being sincere.

user-pic



Don't worry about Van Jones ... . McBellow . . .

Here's where the brouhaha has hit the hill and your legislators are hot on the trail.

Apparently, the news source from Beck/Limbaugh has been the source for the following outraged party-of-no Senate megaphone.

I'm sure this dweeb will get to the bottom of the brouhaha for MiddleClassBellow.

Senator Kit Bond (R-MO), “ranking member of the Green Jobs and the New Economy Subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, today called for a Congressional oversight hearing probing the fitness of a senior White House official,” according to a press release.

In his letter to Senator Sanders, Bond wrote, “Today, news outlets are reporting that Van Jones signed a petition from the so-called ‘Truther’ movement which suggests that the Bush administration ‘may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext to war.’  I can imagine few sentiments more repulsive to our brave fighting soldiers and the victims of the 9/11 terror tragedy than to think the U.S. government deliberately allowed the events of 9/11 to occur.  Of course Mr. Jones in hindsight is embarrassed by the public disclosure of his participation in the petition drive and now asserts he did not read the fine print of the petition.  But can the American people trust a senior White House official that is so cavalier in his association with such radical and repugnant sentiments?”

Mr. Van Jones “is responsible for directing administration policy and spending on tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer funding regarding environmental policy and green jobs programs,” according to the release.

senatus.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/bond-calls-for-oversight-hearing-on-van-jones/


Most pressing priority in the whole wild world . . . Anything to stay clear of the real debate on health care.

Maybe this has something to do with 12% poll numbers for the republicans on the hill.


~OGD~



user-pic

August has been such an awful month for Obama's healthcare debate that the President is probably glad somebody brought this up.

Everybody's ratings are disastrous so that's really not a meaningful point.

And if everybody must be healthcare 100% of the time, then why are you posting about Texas secession?

user-pic



Dearest ... McBellow . . .

Your reps and team are looking dumber and dumber everyday . . .

Take my latest blog about the heartless mental case Michael Steele as just the latest example... And this one is related to the health care issue.

Cold Blooded Steele: Verbally Assaults Woman of Mom Who Died of Cancer? (video)

WOW! He really exhibits the type of RNC leadership needed by your team to go forward into the future.

Forward into the crapper's more like it...

Oh I know I know. He doesn't speak for you. I guess none of these dweebs speak for you.

You just have a tendency to agree with the majority of their bullshit.

~OGD~

user-pic

You didn't answer my question. You accuse people of talking about things other than healthcare. So why did you blog about Texas secession?

user-pic



Here's my answer . . . McBellow . . .

None of your fucking business you twit.

Now what the hell you going to do about that? Call you loser republican rep, or whine that you're some kind of poor put upon victim?

hahahahaha

~OGD~

user-pic

I just wanted to point out your hypocrisy. You criticize others for discussing non-healthcare issues and there you are blogging about Texas. Way to go.

user-pic



Yeah ... I bet everyone's concerned . . .

Except the concern is more about your imbecilic idiotic comments and your use of ordering people around like you own the place.

Blow off . . . pip squeak . . .

~OGD~

user-pic

Who am I ordering around? You ask me questions that I've tried to answer. And I was just asking for the same courtesy back.

But if you're not going to bother discussing your accusations, then I won't bother answering your questions.

Have a nice day.

user-pic

Oh, yeah, if it weren't for Van Jones you'd be a big Obama supporter. Yeah, right. Nice try though.

user-pic

Supporter? Probably not. But I wouldn't be against him just because of his skin color.

Overreach is trying to accuse me of being anti-Obama because he's black. And that's just silly.

user-pic

And that is your blind spot Bill. You put everything in terms of "Well it isn't true because I am against him and race has nothing to do with it". The fact is to the majority of people who oppose him, left (my sister and brother-in-law, sadly for example, who up to now have been loyal democratic voters but are now "birthers"), right and center oppose him because of his race.

But since you feel like this post unfairly attacks you in making its point that it is untrue.

user-pic

You speak for the majority of people that oppose him? Of the 40 something percent of the country that didn't vote for him and now gives him poor ratings, you have spoken with most of these people and they've told you it's because he's black? I oppose to the gross generalizations made by OT on this. Give me a break.

user-pic

I believe that this out of all proportion anger, the people calling Obama Hitler, the people screaming about Hitler's Youth, is about racism, pure and simple. Why doesn't your party call them on that? Why do you accept that? Let's call racism what is and stop fucking around. That's what this post is about.

user-pic

I don't believe that those people you talk about screaming racist slurs don't represent the mainstream out there. They are a very small minority.

user-pic

And I am not including you in my generalizations assuming you're not a birther. I disagree with about every time and sometimes we have words. But I have not reason to toss you in with these people.

But *very* small, Bill? Isn't it 20% or so? Close to it anyway?

And the question, why doesn't your party repudiate this odium, seems to me very legitimate.

user-pic

You never used the word "birther". I read it as you were speaking about anybody who disagrees with him. Lots of people are saying they want their country back, not just the small group that are really racists.

I want my country back too. But it has nothing with Obama being black.

user-pic

Well, that raises the question honestly of what the hell you're talking about. You want your country back?

In what exact way? Who took your country and how?

user-pic

"I want my country back, too." Back to what. Bill? Separate drinking fountains? Separate restrooms? Only white need apply? $2.50/hr. wages? Openly restrictive housing covenants? Defacto school segregation? Joe McCarthy screening "communists"? Literacy tests for voting? Local government sanctions of lynchings? Profiling by law enforcement? Explain.

user-pic

Not at all. Why would you jump to those conclusions?

To answer your question - I want a country where the government doesn't get more involved in industry. I want reform for certain things like healthcare but not the reform that's being proposed by Congress or Obama. I don't want a country where spending is going to get even more out of control and taxes will go back to rates we saw pre-Kennedy. Many other things but those are two timely points.

user-pic

I appreciate where you're coming from, but you're a little misguided in saying that it's just matter of getting the good ol' times back.

Back before government got involved in industry we had no health and safety standards, no protections for workers injured on the job, no child worker laws, no minimum wage among other things. What we DID have was business that grew discriminantly and ground the middle class to pieces while fostering our monopoly-tastic Gilded Age and bringing on financial panics (eventually the Depression).

My tax rates are LOWER now than they were for my income bracket in the 1950's (and yes, I've done inflation adjustments). In fact, the tax rates for my salary bracket actually DECREASED under Kennedy and Johnson and increased under Nixon (again, if you take inflation into account).

Billy Joel had it right: "the good old days weren't always good and tomorrow ain't as bad as it seems..."

user-pic

Link would be helpful:

http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html

Sorry 'bout that

user-pic

Awesome comment, Burnie...I want MY country back, too. I want to go back to when the idea of the president talking to school children didn't cause panic, to when lobbyists didn't own the country lock,stock and barrel, to when all people were created equal, to when everyone had affordable health care, when big companies cared about their employees health and well-being more than obscene profits, to before food companies sold us food that would kill us, and businesses didn't pollute the air and water-ways, to when people had respect for each other, to before there were child molesters in every neighborhood, to when the party that got elected got to advance their agenda, to when politicians did what the majority of their constituents wanted instead of free lancing, and oh so much more...Hmmm....guess I just dreamed up that country.

user-pic

Thanks Stilli. I like YOUR country. Can I live there, too??

user-pic

Like I said - you can agree or disagree that history was "better" or "worse" than the present. But that's not the point. The point is that I should be able to wish for the "old days" without being accused of racism and hating a black president.

user-pic

But you haven't told us what's good about the "old days." Everything you've tried to list isn't actually GOOD, though. As we knock items off the list one at a time the only thing you're leaving us with is that you liked people having and knowing their place.

Either that or you're longing for something that can't possibly exist ever again which makes you as delusional as Scarlett O'Hara longing for her lost childhood on the plantation.

The past is gone. Instead of whining like a Backstreet Boy about "I want it THAT way," why not put some effort into the future? What do you envision as a future to be proud of? Describe it. Let's identify and work toward that.

user-pic

I get a kick out of your logic - the past is gone so stop whining.

Let me ask you a question - did you whine about Bush when he was in office? Complain about his policies? Did you whine about Bush Sr. or Reagan?

Assuming you did, what makes your whining OK but not mine?

What was good or bad about the "old days" is a debate over more government versus less.

I'd even love Bill Clinton right now. Remember his 1996 State of the Union where he said the "era of big government is over"?? God bless him.

user-pic

I didn't accuse you of racism, already said that, and you didn't answer my questions. It is per se, suspicious, Bill to aver that somebody took your country away from you when all that happened was the Party that you didn't vote for won at the ballot box, which is why we are inquiring. Is not normal, civil discourse despite whoever you may be hanging out with, with is why we wanted to know more.

user-pic

Not normal civil discourse? I know lots of people on here who part of "normal discourse" said that when Obama got into office we finally "saved our country" and took it back from a "dictator" who didn't know anything about the "rule of law". People made it sound like we were living in a banana republic prior to this year. But I bet you never said anything like that.

Your original post up top was completely stereotypical - never using the term "birther".

OT - I'll stop asking you why you're making race such an issue. Of course there are racists in this country. Always have been and always will be. But it's not right to paint everyone who wants their country back as a racist.

But I am curious - what race are you?

user-pic

Sorry, I don't think I'm being clear. I'm not calling anyone a racist. But I'm genuinely confused when people say "I want MY America back," or "I want the good old days back." What made it their America and what past (or aspects of the past) do you want back? I'm just asking for examples or issues. What is further confusing is when those same people vaguely reference something (taxes, big government) but have no response when their reminded of how those things weren't all good in the good old days.

Bill I don't know you and I don't know what your motives are beyond what you've said. But I really, really want to know what made it the Good Ol Days? What specifically do you want back? And why does it have to be a matter of getting that "back?" Why can we work together for future improvement?

And, thanks for aging me but I was in middle school during the first Gulf War and was six years old when Reagan started his second term, so it's hard to relate to that argument...

user-pic

It's your opinion that the things I mention were or weren't good. Government taking a bigger role in healthcare than they have in the past, for example. Government taking a bigger role in cap-and-trade than in the past. Government taking a bigger role in corporate bankruptcies than in the past. There are many points. And they are definitely debatable. But the point here is that for someone to have a viewpoint on these topics that is against the current administration should not make them a racist.

And please answer my question. Did you whine about Bush? You say that I should get over it and stop "whining". You never whined about Bush?

user-pic

Well, I don't know if we have a false equivalency here, I certainly think we do. A three-judge Federal Panel in California, one appointed by W. and one appointed by Reagan, just ruled unanimously that your team made a real dog's breakfast out of the rule of law. That's not Kosfiles, that's the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. And I do think, I am not afraid to say it, that the U.S. Supreme Court has four votes ready to overrule that any day of the week on purely political kangaroo-court grounds, so it would be down to Kennedy as usual. That's my opinion, whatever you may think of it and I respect you if you regard it as highly offensive, I know I would if I were in your shoes.

Have I said other cutting things about Bush that would trouble you? You can check my party affiliation above and other data and you'll have the answer. These are my honest views. Cheney is actually potentially looking at jail time, you realize? (But the four done-deal political votes on S.Ct. plus-maybe-Kennedy analysis above once again applies, as I see it.)

These guys have broken not one law, but many, many laws. Which ones did Obama break? To take your country away from you? I mean those are strong words, right? TOOK AWAY YOUR COUNTRY??? You still haven't answered, and okay, consider it a rhetorical question then.

Please don't take this the wrong way, but let's got get personally racial, okay? I mean no offense and I am not trying to be cute, sincerely. I just don't think it matters what race I happen to be (unless you wanna count native Tasmanian).

user-pic

You didn't answer my question.

user-pic



Hey McBellow . . .

Screw answering you.

You're a pushy SOB ... No one owes you crap. What are you the floor supervisor at work or what doing the dirty work for the big boss man? Or maybe you own your own damn business and you're just use to ordering the folks around like they're your chattel.

Maybe a parking lot cop?

hahahaha

~OGD~

user-pic

I wasn't, Bill. Most people understand who I am talking about, and it certainly isn't people who are Republican because they like business or want less government.

But the "I want my country back" line further below makes me wonder. In elections, power peacefully change hands,you know, in a democracy. The people who lost can feel very dejected, but they don't have to say that someone took their country away from them. Are you being honest with yourself about what the basis of that feeling is? Or are just repeating a line you heard somewhere (I hope)? I'm very serious.

user-pic

I'm saying, to put it another way, that I want things back to the way they used to be. Be it on healthcare, cap-and-trade, taxes, etc. I don't like the changes that are being pushed through. I'd prefer the country I used to live in.

user-pic

The country of lies leading to wars? Torture? Banking deregulation and collapse? Tripling of the deficit? Rising poverty levels? Loosening of environmental protections? Growing gap between the rich and the poor? Uhhh....let's see what else did Bush Cheney bring us? Oh, I know, the politics of destruction. Yeah, those were the good old days.

user-pic

You can argue whether its better or worse, but it's got nothing to do with the color of any president's skin.

user-pic

Can't I say that "I want my country back" without be accused of racism?

I'm serious. Just like you said you were serious earlier.

user-pic

You're cracking me up a lot today, BTW!

user-pic

Your over-generalizations crack me up too!

user-pic

That wasn't directed at you, MBC...

Guess I somehow posted in wrong place...

user-pic

You have "no problem with this president" except...

That's Rich! MCB, you are such a fake!

user-pic

I meant to say that I have no problem with the color of his skin. Despite being accused of such.

user-pic

People like MiddleClassbill will never tell us what they miss about the man they voted for, the concrete accomplishments they recall from the 8 years of the George W. Bush administration, or how getting Saddam made their life in (fill in) more free.

user-pic

Like I said, we can argue till we're blue in the face about whether bigger government is better or worse. But I prefer less government, which is what makes me wish we were back in some other administration.

This has nothing to do with Bush. That's what you brought up, not me. I am not comparing Obama to Bush. I would be happy with Bill Clinton back in the White House. Do you remember his 1996 State of the Union address when he said the "era of big government is over"? God bless him.

user-pic

No. There is no argument. You hate our duly elected President because he is "who and what he is." You have shown it abundantly in your writings, and so your false arguments about "I don't care what color he is" would be laughable if not for the damage they do to our country.

Your simple-minded comments are constructed to make yourself seem to be a "simple minded poster." Well, good for you. You have achieved that goal, because your arguments are so lame that I hope your paycheck shows a big deduction;

user-pic

So you're accusing me of hating Obama because he's black? What did I ever say that makes you think I am a racist?

user-pic

That's a different topic. Fpie is implying that it was just students and teachers, who would be unlikely to become unruly.

I know people at Harvard and in general the students are white and the non-professor staff (ie housekeeping, food services, maintenance, etc) are all lower class black. The house was right next to campus and therefore it's more than just students and professors who would be walking past the house.

Crowley's account doesn't contradict the tapes necessarily. The caller said on the phone that one man was hispanic and the other she didn't see.

Crowley said that the caller spoke to him and told him directly it was two black men. Could the caller have changed her story and told 911 something different than what she told Crowley? Perhaps. I don't have enough information to have an opinion as to which one is lying. Without knowing the caller or Crowley, it's hard to know which one is telling the truth. But like I said, that's a different topic.
Posted by MiddleClassBill in reply to a comment from jonnienohands
July 27, 2009 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink

user-pic

Crowley? Harvard? I think your comment was meant for somebody else. I didn't say anything about Crowley or Harvard on this topic here.

user-pic

You ask,

"What did I ever say that makes you think I am a racist?"

I answered.

user-pic

I wasn't asking you.

user-pic



Well he told you anyway . . .

Whether you asked or not you dimwit!

Is there a wheel missing on your tricycle there McBellow?

hahahahaha

~OGD~

user-pic

MiddleClassBill,

Please cite your sources? Glenn Bleck also makes up stories about Van Jones

I think Van Jones and I have something in common. We both stood up (in San Francisco) during the verdict in Los Angeles after the Rodney King incident and said we are tired of black people being the brunt of police brutality. In my book Van Jones is unworthy of your scorn.

As Eva Patterson says in this article, he was just an legal observer who happen to get caught up in illegal arrest. I too was arrested and the city of San Francisco had to pay us both for illegal arrest.

user-pic

The link to the article

user-pic

You can go on to youtube and listen to his speeches from this year. He says things like "We need to create a green economy that Dr. King would be proud of." It's all about racial equality, not just green jobs. Have a listen yourself.

And there's plenty of sites online where you can see that he signed the petition from 911truth.org. And you don't need to go to Fox News for it, you can go right to the source - http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

user-pic

How about this one

According to Little Green Footballs, signatories say they were misled. They believed they were signing a petition to further investigate 9/11 and nothing more.

user-pic

So I guess it's just Jones' word against the organization's. Why should we believe that these people claim to have been misled? It's ironic that the people who are complaining of being misled are self-proclaimed "truthers" themselves.

Did you read the part of the LGF article about his support of the cop killer and the pseudo-science stuff? Obama really knows how to pick them

user-pic

Very direct.
Very correct.
That's the whole story for a lot of people, OT. Some just can't get past the skin color thing and never will. And the rest? Growing pains, maybe? I dunno. Obsessive turmoil.

I have been fighting the racist crapola since I was a teenager. This summer I turned 55 years old and became an elder of the tribe. That's elder with a small e. Anyway, I held out hope that we, as a nation, would be beyond this point by now. I always thought I would die a peaceful old woman. It seems I will die an old warrior instead.

Wahnakiwideh.

user-pic

I am proud of you that you got to be an elder of the tribe, Flower, and I am grateful that you let some of us here get to know you a bit.

I very much feel for you but I never went through anything like what you have and I don't dare suggest I know what it's like other than to say crapola is an awfully fricking polite expression for what you must face.

We were supposed to be a post-racial society, remember that? I wanted to believe it. I used to live in Washington, D.C. and it was a delight to get far away just to escape the racial tension, I kid you not. And here in the election we had young women cackling "Well, my boyfriend's not too happy that he's black!," hardy-har-har, like that is some sort of normal statement. I can't even believe someone could get that out of their mouth, but they chortled about it.

And now look where we are. *Something*, like the Old Grouch says above, really sends certain people around the bend. We may need some brave elders and warriors to see us through this difficult time.

My greatest respect,
O.T.

user-pic

Well, I feel I need to clarify it better, OT. I became an elder (with a small e) by virtue of age...not wisdom. Tribal members with real wisdom are made Elders (with a capital E).

But, I do understand about the delight in getting away from the racial tension. Hate is a heavy weight, a tremendous burden. I know this from my own weight I carry. And being surrounded by this type of tension is not good for you. By getting away from it, you were probably saving your own spirit. I'm glad you followed your own good sense.

I think it will get better, OT. Some of what is going on now is real racism. Some of it is me, too-ism. And some of it, like I said above, is growing pains. A lot of people are going to have an a-ha moment.

Any day now.

I'm sure of it.
:o)

user-pic

I think it has gotten better somewhat, young lady.

We wanted to declare victory, I guess, but we jumped the gun and these people found a way to be bigots and then maintain deniability in all of it:

Why, mercy me, all that I fretted over was that lil' ole Kenyan Al Qaeda birth certificate from Indonesia is all!

user-pic

Which tribe, flower? And congratulations.

user-pic

Anishinaabe.
Congratulations are not really in order here, Wendy, but appreciated. I just managed to live long enough to become recognized for my age is all, not that I acquired any vast amount of knowledge or wisdom. ;o) Now, if it was Elder with a capital E, well, that's a different story.

user-pic

Isn't it great that you have such a handy way to avoid thinking unpleasant and scary thoughts about the effectiveness of the president and Congress?

Simply blame everything on identity politics and - voila! - it works every time.

user-pic

What the fuck are you talking about? You personify racism with your avatar.

user-pic

It's your instinct to stereotype my avatar that personifies racism (whlie we're on identity politics).

user-pic

OK, so you explain your avatar to me. I'm waiting.

user-pic

You're seriously telling me your version is the only one you can understand without explanation?

user-pic

Yes, I am saying that. Since your comments have always been anti-Obama, my guess is that your avatar was not selected as an act of kindness. Obama emulates Lincoln, for many reasons. So, I am serious that I would appreciate your explaining your avatar to me. Pretend I'm really dumb, maybe that will help.

user-pic

Okay, need to jump in here. I'm one of the first up front to scream and rant racist if the robe fits. I've never believed that term or any of its' connatation apply to Lalo.

And my take on his avatar is it was a salute to Obama's holding Lincoln in such high regard.

Just sayin'.......

user-pic

Thanks Aunt Sam (an unlikely shoutout!!).

There are multiple ways to interpret my avatar, including both positive and highly negative to Obama. That's the reason I picked it in the first place, because it revealed so much about people commenting on it.

And I also happen to think that you can disagree with Obama without being a racist (btw I also disagree with Bush on multiple points without considering him a low-IQ religious fanatic).

That's why I find it ironic that people are so quick to use Obama's race while protesting racism at the same time.

user-pic

No doubt you like to push the envelope as they say, but I still stand by my rationale about your avatar and you.

I disagree with Obama on some things too! That said, I respect him and believe that he is much better than any touted alternative!

user-pic

You are talking in circles. You like to be provocative about race because it shows how people can be racist. People who confront racism are racist. I think that's called tautological thinking. I see that you cannot really explain your avatar, not honestly anyway.

user-pic

You think Bush was a brilliant secularist?

user-pic

He is a low IQ whack job. Religious...hard to tell if it was just bluster for votes.

user-pic



Interpret?

I have interpreted the avatar as The Black Cat in the Hat.

And interpret the entity behind the avatar as a confrontationalist who normally brings absolutely nothing to a discussion.

Oh wait, That's not totally correct. The Black Cat in the Hat brings little more than an argument for argument sake to a discussion.

Now interpret that!

~OGD~

user-pic

"They never really grapsed (they're not too bright either) that day after day they would have to look at his dark skin and think to themselves, "that's my President." It galls them to no end and even that doesn't fully describe their primitivist humiliation and rage."

See OT, it is probably morally depraved on my part, but this sentiment gives me solace. Just to know that the dirty bastards are hurting, that they are in pain over this gives me great joy at times.

user-pic

I know what you mean, friend, do I ever.

Honestly, for me, it's just very unsettling that we are citizens of a country where this is a popular view ("My boyfriend isn't too wild about him being black," ha-ha-hah!). What in the *hell*?!!

Though I suppose, more in line with what you say, I may feel some guilty pleasure WHEN healthcare passes. And *if* some of them calm down then and reflect on whether it is the right way to go, hating your fellow Americans, and what they really get out of it.

user-pic

It had to be said!

user-pic

I was in traffic yesterday and a pickup truck tailgated me very close, laid on the horn, almost hit my bumper, then tore around me. This older WHITE MALE driver then yelled out his window and told me to "f off" and flipped me the bird. I have
an Obama/Biden sticker on my car.

I agree that it is sickening. You get that sick feeling in the pit of your stomach probably something like black Americans got in the civil rights movement when the most dangerous kind of hatred in our nation, that embodied by ignorant white trash, begins to unleash. If we had an Middle Eastern terrorist equivalent in this country, it would be that of the ignorant white trash male. These people also embody true cowards--hiding behind the heath care "debate"
Sarah Palin, and anything place else they can put their "odious, putrid" hatred into when really what it is all about is their utter hatred of black people and that a black man is our president. This eats away at them like an acid.

I spotted my white trash pal yesterday immediately. I can spot them now within seconds. Their faces are twisted and full of hate. They
use their cars or trucks to intimidate. He gunned his engines as he threateningly lurched towards my bumper. Then they intimidate you further knowing full well, they can drive away.

They are hate filled cowards but the most important thing to remember is they ARE our own homegrown terrorists and they need to be watched.
Is the FBI watching our own homegrown terrorists in the making?

And they are not Americans.

They are not Americans.

user-pic

Don't be so quick to judge, Dogtail. A twisted face could just mean constipation. But, alas, you are probably right!

user-pic

Uh Oh. Is this a member of the Liberal Police?

Ok. A guy almost hits me, tells me to fuck off and flips me off but I won't "be too quick to judge."

Thank you so much.

This was really helpful. I do need to get another lobotomy. You're right.

user-pic

WEll I am the liberal police.

Your headlite is out. hahahaha

Bend down and grab your knees

user-pic

Slam on the brakes and let his bigotry buy you a new car.

user-pic



Hey! ... . Dogtail. . . Liberal Police?


Nope... Just someone with a sense of humor... dripping in sarcasm.

But after having read your favorite quote I sorta of understand. You know, "If you can't see it, then it isn't there."

Around these parts you must set your sarcasm filter on level eight.

And as an old, and I do me old as in dead, drinking buddy of mine once said:

"You can trust me, I'm not like the others" -HST-


Really . . .


~OGD~



user-pic

These idiots on the TV stirring up the hate need to travel to a place where there is no government and see how cushy their existence will be when everything disintegrates into chaos. They're not thinking how all their money will not enable them to get food, or that they will be prisoners in their own mansions, if those mansions still even stand. These terrorists are not going to be able to support them in the manner of living to which they have become accustomed. They encourage it's destruction at their own peril.

user-pic

Absolutely right! There's no question that the racist hate and fear of millions of ignorant whites is being manipulated and driven by the Repubican right and their allies in the business world. It's not like this wasn't a factor last year, but the Republicans had not figured out how to fully exploit it. Now that they've found the formula they're workin it for all they can. It is a crying shame that Obama and the Democrats are not fighting back though. They appear so weak and wimpy that others who are not driven by this same deep seated racism will start defecting to the forces of evil because they will see him and the Democrats as so ineffective, so incompetent, so impotent that they will not want them in charge any longer. Having said that, it still isn't too late if Obama and company would come out guns a blazin and start kicking ass and taking names. I'm not, however, gonna hold my breath waiting for it to happen since it's extremely unlikely.

user-pic

I hope they're getting this message by the way and are planning an appropriate response, not just another fluff-a-thon ("Thank you! Next Question?")

Guns a blazin is right!

user-pic

AMEN oleeb!!!! Time to fight back...high time the racists were called what they are as opposed to them being called 'the loyal opposition'. There is nothing noble about what they are doing so they should not be treated with respect.

user-pic

This all has the rotting stink of Rove. Where are the decent people in the Republican Party? Everyone is pointing fingers at the Democrats, but it's not their party pandering to these pyschotics and fanning the flames. WHERE ARE THE DECENT VOICES IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? I'm yelling because I'm angry.

user-pic

And in my view, you gotta right to be!!

WHERE ARE THEY???!

user-pic

and I love you because you're angry. We should all be angry. Liberal Police, please leave us alone.

And I do act on my anger in "constructive ways" but please L.P's, do not shame me for it. Do not even think of it.

What I want to see is some passion FROM YOU NOW.
Put down that self-help book and make a sign for the next "town hall meeting..." Go ahead. You can do it.

Some guy threw a can of half opened Budweiser at my feet at a protest a few weeks ago. So see, it really can pay off.


user-pic

Racism: Not just reenacting the Civil War, living it!

user-pic

You are very correct in making this linkage.

The political dynamics that led to the Civil War were hauntingly similar to what we are now seeing play out before our very eyes. We would do well to learn about it and combat these extremists now so it never reaches that point again. I strongly recommend William Lee Miller's book "Arguing About Slavery" which delves deeply into the political dynamics of national politics leading up to the Civil War. His portrait of the bullying and bellicosity of the pro-slavery politicians and the docile, timid, ever accomodating northerners who comprised the majority is frighteningly familiar. In the end, however, the majority did what was required to check the insane, violent and reactionary forces of the status quo who fought change every step of the way since the signing of the Declaration of Independence decades previous.

I also highly recommend the following excerpt from Chapter 17 in US Grant's memoirs that describe the atmosphere in St. Louis, MO at the outset of the war. Armed traitors had joined together on behalf of the Confederate cause and established a base they called Camp Jackson in the City and intended, I believe, on seizing the Federal armory. United States troops captured them and put an end to that. Grant comments on the atmosphere in the city on that day. To me anyway, it is very easy to imagine that scene because it is so similar to the dynamics we see today and have been seeing the past few decades as the right has gained strength and torn our country down at every opportunity.

Here's the excerpt from Grant:

Up to this time the enemies of the government in St. Louis had been bold and defiant while Union men were quiet but determined. The enemies had their head-quarters in a central and public position on Pine Street, near Fifth--from which the rebel flag was flaunted boldly. The Union men had a place of meeting somewhere in the city, I did not know where, and I doubt whether they dared to enrage the enemies of the
government by placing the national flag outside their headquarters. As soon as the news of the capture of Camp Jackson reached the city the condition of affairs was changed. Union men became rampant, aggressive, and, if you will, intolerant. They proclaimed their sentiments boldly, and were impatient at anything like disrespect for the Union. The secessionists became quiet but were filled with suppressed rage. They had been playing the bully. The Union men ordered the rebel flag taken down from the
building on Pine Street. The command was given in tones of authority and it was taken
down, never to be raised again in St. Louis.

I witnessed the scene. I had heard of the surrender of the camp and that the garrison
was on its way to the arsenal. I had seen the troops start out in the morning and had
wished them success. I now determined to go to the arsenal and await their arrival and
congratulate them, I stepped on a car standing at the corner of 4th and Pine streets, and saw a crowd of people standing quietly in front of the headquarters, who were there for the purpose of hauling down the flag. There were squads of other people at intervals down the street. They too were quiet but filled with suppressed rage, and muttered their resentment at the insult to, what they called, "their" flag. Before the car
I was in had started, a dapper little fellow--he would be called a dude at this day--stepped in. He was in a great state of excitement and used adjectives freely to express his contempt for the Union and for those who had just perpetrated such an outrage upon the rights of a free people. There was only one other passenger in the car besides myself when this young man entered. He evidently expected to find nothing
but sympathy when he got away from the "mud sills" engaged in compelling a "free people" to pull down a flag they adored. He turned to me saying; "Things have come to a pretty pass when a free people can't choose their own flag. Where I came from if a man dares to say a word in favor of the Union we hang him to a limb of the first tree we come to." I replied that "after all we were not so intolerant in St. Louis as we might be; I had not seen a single rebel hung yet, nor heard of one; there were plenty of them
who ought to be, however." The young man subsided. He was so crestfallen that I believe if I had ordered him to leave the car he would have gone quietly out, saying to himself: "More Yankee oppression."

user-pic

Sorry about the weird spacing on the excerpt. I cut and pasted it. It looked okay before I hit submit.

user-pic

"after all we were not so intolerant in St. Louis as we might be; I had not seen a single rebel hung yet, nor heard of one; there were plenty of them" US Grant

We have not broken any windows either. :-{)>

user-pic

Just wait, until they turn on Republican members, as we saw happen to Rick Perry last week. They may be creating a monster that will get out of control and spawn more government hatred like we saw in Oklahoma!

user-pic

This post is a wrongheaded distraction from a true understanding of Obama's opponents. I believe in knowing our enemies for what they truly are.

The notion that racism is the driving force behind Republican opposition to Obama is appealing because it affords Democrats an opportunity to attribute the worst possible motives to conservatives and simultaneously offers a unified explanation for the rise of Far Right extremist groups, instances of racial hatred, and Republican attacks on Obama's agenda and legitimacy.

But don't fall for the racism-explains-it-all theory.

Yes, some on the Right ARE racists. But here's the wider explanation for fierce opposition to this president:

1. Republicans lost the White House, Senate and House by HUGE margins in the last two-and-a-half years. They compulsively want back power because that's what political parties DO. They fantasize and ejaculate for power.

2. Republicans have smeared every Democrat you can name in the past 100 years. Almost all of those Democrats were white.

3. The vast majority of opposition to Obama, TPM news tidbits notwithstanding, has focused on his policies, not his race--not even the coded signals that disguise racism: his origins, his birth certificate, etc.

4. What HAS got the Republican base fired up is distrust of Democrats and their priorities, primarily spending. With one eye, Republicans conveniently overlook the dire straits of our economy; with the other, they see only TARP, stimulus, and higher taxes to pay for the uninsured. The fact that those taxes will be levied on the rich only is not important to Republicans, who seem genetically rigged to oppose any taxes.

Again, does racism play a part? Absolutely. The most egregious racism may be the willingness of some Republican leaders to propel the Birther movement and an unwillingness among the rest to denounce it.

But is it the primary reason for the knee-jerk opposition to this president? No. That has to do with the impotent lust and bankrupt values of the party itself.

user-pic

You have a point Ripper but I think the point is what is propelling the hysterical, frothing at the mouth stupidity is racism. Yes, the typical M.O. of the Republicans is to throw public tantrums and bully people, etc... But I think the extra jolt of nastiness and vitriol of the tea baggers and their manic displays is unquestionably driven and propelled by racism. It isn't the only factor, but I think it nearly undeniable that it is at the heart of the demonization of Obama. Since they became the party of racism in the 60's with their southern strategy, the Republicans have become extremely adept at pushing the racist fear and hate button of ignorant whites nationwide, but especially of course in the south. There's a reason why the electoral maps of the past several Presidential elections in large part mirror slave and free states ya know.

user-pic

oleeb, I agree that the Tea Pert Patriots are motivated, in part, by a racism most do not consciously acknowledge even to themselves. The fringe (i.e., the extreme right) of the party is running the whole funny farm.

I want to be very careful in not over-playing the race card here. It has power to shame and power to inflame. It is not a denunciation that rank-and-file Republican and independent voters will accept, because frankly, it doesn't represent their views fairly. This is why Obama would not go near the race card during the campaign.

user-pic

"I want to be very careful in not over-playing the race card here."

- Well played.

user-pic

Second! While I agree with a lot of the reasons Ripper has detailed for right-wing outrage, it's so much easier for the Limbaughs and the Becks and all the other dog whistle callers in congress to attribute it to vailed (and not so vailed) racisim, like the birther movement.

user-pic

oleeb,

There is a certain smugness to your response. However, a broader view of the sectionalism is seen in terms of religious fundamentalism (which includes the red states in the West, which didn't even exist in the time of the Civil War). See, for example, AMERICAN THEOCRACY by Kevin Phillips.

In that light, one could claim, I suppose, that it is really ignorance from where these arguments and ideas spring up. But that would lump religious beliefs with the notion of ignorance... and I'm not sure all here want to make that leap.

user-pic

Don't know what's smug about it but if that's what you took from it so be it.

It is indeed ignorance and lots of religion, not all, not only feeds off of but reinforces ignorance that then gets expressed in all kinds of intolerant, hateful, fearful ways.

user-pic

Smug includes things like "the party of racism since the 60's". Do you think that Condeleeza Rice and Colin Powell think so?

It also includes blanket (and misleading) statements like this:

There's a reason why the electoral maps of the past several Presidential elections in large part mirror slave and free states ya know.

It's true you can get away with things like this at TPM... but would you be able to convince a roomful of true centrists? I hardly think so:

Here is the Gore-Bush 2000 election on a county-by-county basis. Hardly looks free vs. slave to me. In fact, looks more like urban vs. rural - if I had to pick a meme anyway.

But if you view the world this way, you can't just broadly paint all of those disagreeing with you as racists and dismiss them. It would then require more hard thinking to think about combating their views.

user-pic

Ya know, sometimes you really have something to say. But other times you're just a cranky scold like in this instance. Take a hike the rest of the afternoon will ya? I could demonstrate to you how I can easily back up every word but I just don't have time for you today.

user-pic

He overdoes it sometimes, oleeb. CT, be nice.

user-pic

Is your name Fermat? The margin is too small to write the proof, perhaps?

user-pic

We're talking about the lunatic fringe, which is large enough to be dangerous and obviously has been able to scare the shit out of the more reasonable factions of the Republican Party. You say we should know our enemies for who they are. This dangerous loud and aggressive faction is racist. And someone has to speak the truth about it and repudiate it. Who is doing that? We are.

user-pic

Lowly, I agree that racism should be called out. I agree we have the moral and political obligation to call it for what it is. As long as we are careful to direct the word "racist" narrowly and only to the fringe where it applies, I'm very cool with that.

user-pic

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

Friedrich Gustav Emil Martin Niemöller

user-pic

And sometimes, not so narrowly. I think all those Republicans who politically benefit from this kind of hatred, but are unwilling to call these folks out are just as culpable!

user-pic

Agreed. Culpability matters.

user-pic

Yes, they are and so is every pundit. I really don't care how loud they scream, the Right's pundits did have a part in the murder of Dr. Tiller.

user-pic

I feel compelled to post some of Hitler's most famous quotations. They should make us stop and think about who is saying what about who these days.

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”

“How fortunate for leaders that men do not think.”

“It is always more difficult to fight against faith than against knowledge.

“All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.”

“Demoralize the enemy from within by surprise, terror, sabotage, assassination. This is the war of the future.”

“It is not truth that matters, but victory.”

“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”

Now on this last one, we might have a chance. Remember who overwhelmingly supported Obama? What age group?

The tactics being used by Rove and his band of evil doers are exactly what the Nazis used. Same philosophy.

user-pic

Wow --- just wow. I was just skimming down quickly and thought the quotes I was reading WERE from Karl Rove. Amazing.

This is why democracy works only when you have an educated (and thinking) electorate.

". . . whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that, whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them right." Thomas Jefferson