Recommend please if SMIRKING CHRIS WALLACE deserves a PUNCH IN THE MOUTH.
Some people change careers, and Chris Wallace was a journalist until 2003. He got his start by trading on the name of his overrated father, Mike Wallace, though he did well on his own.
Since 2003, he is unburdened by the strictures of journalistic discipline, and works, as Obama did, as a community organizer. But he has funding from billionaire wackaloon Rupert Murdoch and Fox, and together they toil to create a pro-assassination environment and bring down the government by extra-Consitutional means. Whenever they get into trouble, Wallace is paraded out in a silly reporter's costume and tries to convince himself and others that he still has his old journalist job, and is not a front-man for a corporate sponsored sedition (domestic terrorism?) movement. This weekend, one week after the Fox-organized insurrection rally with its Hitler signs and gun threats in Washington, Wallace had the breathtaking temerity to quip, "Every president is thin-skinned, but I wonder whether this administration, this White House, has a particular problem with criticism." (I.e., blaming the people they are spending millions continually to attack for defending themselves.) They try to hide behind double talk about how the paid insurrectionists are not from the news division of the news department, or some utter malarkey: No real journalist would ever dream of working as such a 1984-style corporate stooge, and he is no more a journalist now than were the KGB officers who wrote op-ed for Soviet newspapers. But Chris Wallace is unfazed and he pronounces the ludicrous words above as though he of all the low, disgraceful individuals had the standing.
I'm tempted to be more nuanced and say tar-and-feather him (and surely boycott), but I honestly can't bring myself to pull the punch. RECOMMEND PLEASE, if somebody oughtta wipe that smirk off his face by giving Wallace a GOOD SOCK IN THE MOUTH.
Thank you,
O.T.
Where is the line forming?
September 21, 2009 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm a total pacifist. So you can have my place in line; that should put you closer to taking action.
September 21, 2009 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're right up in front, Grouch! This charlatan is delusional; we don't have to be.
Thanks!
September 21, 2009 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll betcha his dad can still take him.
September 21, 2009 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good comment. I see that the feisty senior citizen turned 91 in May and supposedly still appears from time to time (?) on 60 Minutes.
September 21, 2009 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
hahahah. Well you got me laughing this morning.
He is so mad he got snubbed yesterday OT. His father had the opportunity to interview so many presidents.
September 21, 2009 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Glad I entertained you, amigo.
Me, this guy actually makes me really mad. Disgrace to the journalistic profession does not even *touch* what his guy is; conflict of interest doesn't lay a *finger* on his repelling mandate.
And yet here he decked out in his risible reporter costume, daring to lecture the likes of Barack Obama's White House on how things oughtta be.
The boycott idea is a good one and not just Obama: they call, one replies, "I don't do Fox." Period.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/thomas-de-zengotita/obamas-case-for-sanity--s_b_292661.html
They can interview Rush Limbaugh all day. First, though, Chris Wallace has got a clock that needs to be cleaned.
September 21, 2009 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes how annoying that there are a few journalists left who do not work for the DNC and dare to ask questions of The Great One.
September 21, 2009 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just three points:
1. "Every president is thin-skinned, but I wonder whether this administration, this White House, has a particular problem with criticism." is not a question.
2. Chris Wallace is by no means working as journalist, the idea is beyond laughable. He is the willing stooge of a propaganda empire. Few things more shameful for a former journalist to sink to. How low can he go, "Clever" Bulldog?
3. Your idea about journalists working for DNC is absurd and disconnected utter from reality, embarrassing really. It certainly sounds like a *very* ignorant thing to say. See, people here are by-and-large smart. If you're not, you could be working from a deficit being on this site.
September 21, 2009 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is that the vast majority of all 'journalists' are leftists. Their bias is very clear in what they report and how they report it. The NY Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC ,CBS, all are solidly pro Obama. One news outlet (Fox) is center/right and you can't stand it.
September 21, 2009 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
The view from a Bush Deadender. Reality of course has a liberal bias to the Bush Base.
Go back to your cave dog and plug into Rush 24/7.
September 21, 2009 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
When will you be learning the difference between fact and opinion? Opinion and lie? That a lie isn't true, therefore cannot be an alternaitve truth?
News reports facts. Opinion is BIAS. Opinion is NOT FACT, therefore is NOT NEWS.
Wake up and grow up. Or STFU: Your ilk and view were thrown out of office by a comfortable margin.
And FOX's Fraud-on-America would be "center/right" except that it's that which is tRADITIONALLY called far-right lunatic fringe. Even Goldwater was to their left.
September 21, 2009 11:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
For you, Bulldog:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hphLyz4kx_k
September 21, 2009 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's a good clip, Burnie! Recommended!
September 22, 2009 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
um, I think the bulldog didn't click on the link. It doesn't support him, so, well...he's just going back to Fox.
September 23, 2009 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about a good swift kick int the ......
C
September 21, 2009 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, Chris. Good to see you weigh in!
Indeed, how'd that be?
===========================
I am not a number, I am free man,
O.T.
September 21, 2009 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry for the broken English!! "*a* free man."
Cheers, O.T.
September 21, 2009 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh just fill in the blank OT. What ever suits you or him as the case maybe.
C
September 21, 2009 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder what his insurance package is. Probably kinda hard to empathize with all the 50 million who can't afford it. And he'll have it until he dies; his wife will too. They just can't imagine it any other way; the very definition of lack of empathy.
September 21, 2009 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought Wallace's grilling of the Acorn leader was priceless.
Ms. Lewis said that we'd have an announcement today about which independent auditor would be conducting a review of their books.
Did anybody see an announcement today?
September 21, 2009 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
We don't watch Fox and we don't say unpatriotic things like "I want my country back."
We love our Democracy.
September 21, 2009 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
You should try watching Fox some time. That's why I watch MSNBC and subscribe to the NYTimes in addition to the WSJ.
September 22, 2009 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't like you all that much, Overreach...
But how the hell can I not rec this?
;-}
Good shit, Maynard.
September 21, 2009 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, that's very cool, Daddy-O. Maybe we could try to build on this.
At any rate, thanks much.
September 21, 2009 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you and sincere congratulations to everyone who has gotten behind this pugilistic message so far and made it a success! I truly think it needed to be heard, and it has been!
September 22, 2009 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Every president is thin-skinned, but I wonder whether this administration, this White House, has a particular problem with criticism."
The right is making a religion out of projection. And how cowardly when he could have said "... I wonder whether Barack Obama has a particular problem with criticism." I wonder what Chris owes his sense of wonder to.
How about "Every president is thick-skinned, but I wonder whether this administration, this White House, has a problem with being too deferential to idiots."
I don't think he even deserves a punch. How about a super-atomic wedgie? I'm sure Chris misses those from his formative years. Or perhaps, the tried and true swirly.
September 22, 2009 7:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I like a lot the "too deferential to idiots" line!
September 22, 2009 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Three thoughts, OT:
1. FOX snubbed the last couple Obama speeches. So, duh.
2. Isn't News Corp foreign owned? So could one make the argument that FOX is foreign sponsored insurrection/terrorism?
3. As satisfying as it could be to plant your fist in Wallace's face, I think it is far more effective to ridicule these people mercilessly. Portray them as idiots, not villains. The whole crew at FOX plus Limbaugh, Coulter et al certainly provide sufficient material for an ongoing Mock-Fest.
And, yes, Wallace is unbearably smug.
September 22, 2009 8:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
All fair comments.
As to number 3, the point I would not lose is the Wallace is not employed as any journalist, but as a decoy dressed in reporter's outfit paid to front for a corporatized sedition conglomerate and willingly disgracing his former profession by that odious and corrupt masquerade.
September 22, 2009 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink