Thanks Senators Kennedy, Kerry, and the entire geriatric Rat Pack. 

It just galled you presidential losers, didn't it?  You'd rather
America float away in a sea of blood red than see the Junior Senator
from NY get what you could not have. 

You all made snide comments when she walked by.  Her energy and
intelligence made your necks stiffen. 

Good work, pals.  It took disenfranchising voters in two states, but
you beat that bitch, didn't you? 

And now, look what McCain pulled out of his hat. An energetic,
strong, intelligent right winger.  And an attractive one at that. 

A Republican Bill Clinton to make dull, mild-talking Obama smell like
yesterday's garlic chicken. 

The humor in all of this is how Obama was so certain of his election,
he (taking strong advice from the senate geezer's club) bypassed
the ONE person who could have gotten him elected. 

Very forward thinking.  After all, who would want HER offering advice
when you're trying to be president.  You'll be elected because you're
just so irresistible, Obama.   

She won the popular vote.  She won the key blue states.  Had Clinton
not had the primary stolen from her, she would have been president. 

But that would have created a stir among the old men in the senate. 

Not only would she be our next president, Obama would be the first
black VP.  And in 8 years, he would run, and assuming he didn't pull
any more Rezko shenanigans,  he would be our first elected black
president. 

But that required a little forward thinking.  And  that is just not
Obama's strong suit.

Paul Krugman, esteemed progressive economist, was never fooled by Obama.  Early on, he let us know that Obama’s health and economic plans were not merely weak, they were to the right.

Yesterday, he expressed irritation with Obama’s lack of passion on the economy. 

I was astonished at the flatness of the big economy speech he (Obama)
gave in St. Petersburg . . . 

. . . All this makes a stark contrast with the campaign of the last Democrat
to make it to the White House, who had no trouble conveying passion over
matters economic.

Krugman was particularly annoyed with Obama for avoiding giving Bill Clinton credit for his brilliant and successful economic strategy.  And Obama's reticence to attack George Bush. 

. . . If Obama can’t find the passion on economic matters that has been
lacking in his campaign so far, he may yet lose this election.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/18/opinion/edkrugman.php

Obama is on the skids, proving himself unelectable.
His lapses of judgement are at at the level of George W. Bush. 
Giving democrats Hope.
Hope that Clinton will make a last-minute comeback. 

And the latest revelations are clinching his demise.

One can only wonder why the NYT isn’t reporting that Obama
has held duel citizenship with Kenya since 1963.   Or
discuss the mystery around his birth certificate.  (Texas Darlin
at New Quarter wrote how the birth certificate Obama posted
at his website is not only a fraud, but is actually a doctored
version belonging to his SISTER!

Why is the NYT not informing its trusting readers on reality?

Instead, they do yet another smear job on Hillary Clinton.
Their usual 3rd rate hack, Patrick Healy writes of
dirt behind the scenes at the Clinton camp during the primaries.

There isn’t much there.  As usual, Healy takes next to nothing
and blows it out of proportion.  It parrots the smear job from the Atlantic
Monthly.  Supposedly, Clinton was angry at her 
ineffectual staff during the Iowa primary.  (Gee!)  And golly, 
she was also angry at the reporters who were smearing her 
relentlessly.  What a bitch!

Good old NYT.  Stirring around dirt from ancient history.
Preventing their readers from  what is REALLY happening
right now.

I wonder if anyone has any theories on whyObama took his sister's birth certificate, and digitallyaltered it as his on.http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/breaking-sister-mayas-name-uncovered-on-phony-obama-birth-certificate/#more-4026

Take another look at Obama's past,  connect it with the present and see what we can look forward to. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/03/obama-weakened-nuclear-sa_n_84651.html

What a quaint idea:  a senator who cares passionately: 
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/03/us/politics/03clinton.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1215101512-blEbreNUwaiKDFvM+7myJw  

Sad to think how Obama used his district’s trust, to enrich only himself. 
He recommended Rezko for the massive job of building
housing for his voters. 

Only Obama got himself a nice home out of the deal.  
His voters got putrid, deadly slum. 

And when his district found radioactivity in their drinking
water from a nearby nuclear plant, Obama got to work on a bill that didn’t pass.  But Obama got hundreds of thousands of dollars in contributions from the nuke interests.  And he finally did get a bill passed - that protected the nuclear industry from lawsuits from Obama’s district. 

Good News:  2012 is only 4 years away!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07u6uffKvpA&border=1&color1=0%D72b405b&color2=0%D76b8ab6&hl=en

The sound of a real candidate?Not just a Politician?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07u6uffKvpA&border=1&color1=0%D72b405b&color2=0%D76b8ab6&hl=en

For months, Paul Krugman warned that Obama was not liberal.  This esteemed progressive economist showed how Obama’s health plan was right wing and ineffectual. Ditto Obama’s economic plan. Is the left wing finally figuring out that to Obama, they are merely a pawn toward get him elected?  He’s got them in his back pocket, now time to reel in the right. 
Yes, Obama is a POLITICIAN. 
Want nominee with values?  Who will not compromise? Then Ralph Nader is your man. 
Will haters who went after Hillary because of her vote on Iraq, finally realizing that Obama would do the same?

 

Obama news writers are putting their credibility, andjournalistic standards on the line for the sake of helping out Obama. 
They feel no responsibility to their viewers.  Deceiving them is just fine. 
One example, is sadly, LA Times writer, Andrew Malcom, whose credibility and integrity are now in floating the toilet bowl of the Times men's room. 
He posts a birth certificate up, as the final word to people who wonder why Obama will not reveal his birth certificate. 
Funny thing about the birth certificate he posted.  That font wasn't around in '61.  Another peculiarity, no signature, and no certification stamp.  The paper looks crisp and fresh out of the Staples shrink wrap. 
It was the same junk floating around DailyKrud a few days ago.
Good work, Andrew!  A credit to your newspaper.  
Oh yeah.  The link:http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.html?cid=118985510#comments

To its credit, the NYT has a fine op ed  on America's wild salmon. We are eating it to extinction. And boutiful farm salmon are helping kill it off. This piece by Taras Grescoe is worth a read.  http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/09/opinion/09grescoe.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

And if you have the paper edition, do take a look at Krugman's thoughts on Obama and Clinton.  Even the know-it-all's here might learn a little something.

interesting link here:http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/juancarloscruz/gG5BSr

Obama supporters might cheer when cable does creepy stuff to another democratic candidate. 
Last week, they attempted to throw the last 2 primariesby announcing that Clinton would concede thatnight. 
Later that morning, they "corrected" this, by sayingClinton was preparing to beg to be Obama's vice president. 
This was all ignored by Obama supporters, who apparently think breaking the law, and soviet-style media propaganda is good when it benefits their candidate.
Suddenly, Chris Matthews, who swiftboated kerry in '04,is an Obama hero. 
Killing off democracy for the sake of my agenda is normally considered a right wing thing. 
This "news" that has pleased Obama democrats is gearing up to swiftboat Obama. 
What will you do?  By October, they will be poundingObama 24/7. 
Will you write CNN an angry email?  Threaten to drop
cable? 
The time to nip this in the bud was months ago. 
Time Warner and General Electric selected George Bush for us, and are selecting John McCain. 
Whatever these 2 companies have their tentacles in, should not be patronized by anyone who wants to restore a healthy democracy.