« Josh and Dickday Done Fired Me Up | LisB's Blog | Please Stop the Excavation...Until More Is Known »
The System
So, I've been out of touch, here, for the past two nights....I've missed countless blogs full of countless topics, no doubt.
But, while I was out of touch, it occurred to me, based on a private conversation I had with a beloved chicken friend of mine, *ahem*, no clique intended.......
She said something that made me really think.
Heh, I don't think that often, so....more power to her.
Anyway....my big think was this:
Some of us, myself included, have been pissed off by some of the actions and statements of our beloved Pres and his Chief of Staff and others....cuz we want him and them to have more cajones. More balls.
The chicken said to me tonight, and I don't quote word for word, because my memory sucks, but the gist was: "He has the right thoughts in mind, and the right spirit.....it's just that The System that's in place won't allow him to do what he wants to do."
Now.....ponder that.
Think back to the days that you supported Barack Obama, and think back as to WHY, if you did at all.
If you didn't support him, but are left-leaning, think back as to why you accepted him as our POTUS.
We wanted change. We wanted representation. We wanted someone good and well-meaning in charge.
Well, we have that.
But.....having him there isn't the end all and be all that we thought it would be, is it?
Know why?
Because there is this thing. This thing in the way. This thing called The System.
We, some of us (like me), thought in our naivete that this thing, The System, would disappear once Obama took House. We thought The System would dematerialize and melt away like the Wicked Witch of the West after Dorothy threw water on her.
Instead, we've found The System is not only water-proof, but also bullet-proof, stupid-proof, nut-proof, and BeckandLimbaugh-proof.
The System stands in our way.
NOT the man we elected.
The System.
Some folks want to put Obama down, or Pelosi, or Rahm, or.....whatever scapegoat disappoints us on any given day....
They are not disappointing us.
They are up against The System.
How would YOU like to be up against The System? Think you could handle it 24/7?
The System is working 24/7 to work against us. The System is big. The System has more control than we ever imagined. The System is systematically destroying our country, while maintaining its power and control over it by being.....yeah, you got it....The System.
Instead of going after Beck or Rush or Joe "You Liar!" Wilson, why not try pooling our efforts to not only WORK The System, but Beat It?
Don't personalize it anymore. Call it for what it is. The System.
Think of it as Hal from Space Odyssey. The System.
One single unit.
Not the personal nutcases and personalities that make UP The System, but The System itself. It's one big machine. Treat it as such. Depersonalize it. See it for what it is. The System. Not one face, like Rush Limbaugh's.....but one big System.
The System.
Attack it, or be under attack by It.
Makes life so much easier, knowing thine enemy, doesn't it?
But, while I was out of touch, it occurred to me, based on a private conversation I had with a beloved chicken friend of mine, *ahem*, no clique intended.......
She said something that made me really think.
Heh, I don't think that often, so....more power to her.
Anyway....my big think was this:
Some of us, myself included, have been pissed off by some of the actions and statements of our beloved Pres and his Chief of Staff and others....cuz we want him and them to have more cajones. More balls.
The chicken said to me tonight, and I don't quote word for word, because my memory sucks, but the gist was: "He has the right thoughts in mind, and the right spirit.....it's just that The System that's in place won't allow him to do what he wants to do."
Now.....ponder that.
Think back to the days that you supported Barack Obama, and think back as to WHY, if you did at all.
If you didn't support him, but are left-leaning, think back as to why you accepted him as our POTUS.
We wanted change. We wanted representation. We wanted someone good and well-meaning in charge.
Well, we have that.
But.....having him there isn't the end all and be all that we thought it would be, is it?
Know why?
Because there is this thing. This thing in the way. This thing called The System.
We, some of us (like me), thought in our naivete that this thing, The System, would disappear once Obama took House. We thought The System would dematerialize and melt away like the Wicked Witch of the West after Dorothy threw water on her.
Instead, we've found The System is not only water-proof, but also bullet-proof, stupid-proof, nut-proof, and BeckandLimbaugh-proof.
The System stands in our way.
NOT the man we elected.
The System.
Some folks want to put Obama down, or Pelosi, or Rahm, or.....whatever scapegoat disappoints us on any given day....
They are not disappointing us.
They are up against The System.
How would YOU like to be up against The System? Think you could handle it 24/7?
The System is working 24/7 to work against us. The System is big. The System has more control than we ever imagined. The System is systematically destroying our country, while maintaining its power and control over it by being.....yeah, you got it....The System.
Instead of going after Beck or Rush or Joe "You Liar!" Wilson, why not try pooling our efforts to not only WORK The System, but Beat It?
Don't personalize it anymore. Call it for what it is. The System.
Think of it as Hal from Space Odyssey. The System.
One single unit.
Not the personal nutcases and personalities that make UP The System, but The System itself. It's one big machine. Treat it as such. Depersonalize it. See it for what it is. The System. Not one face, like Rush Limbaugh's.....but one big System.
The System.
Attack it, or be under attack by It.
Makes life so much easier, knowing thine enemy, doesn't it?
Advertisement













Rec'd, but with a disclaimer, Lis.
The truth lies somewhere between your original position (presumably) and cheecken's. Remember "Profiles in Courage"? Too many of our elected officials are looking forward to re-election rather than to doing the people's business, their careers be damned.
Yes, Obama, et al are up against entrenched interests, but I hesitate to let it become as amorphous as "The System." Human beings (to put it graciously) comprise the wall of inertia that stalls, twists or stops progress in this country, and they need to be named. Part of the problem is that with the GOP out of power, no real leadership has emerged to claim the mantle and run the party. As a result, the party is in decay and decentralized. The names are too well hidden and too many at the moment. We need to begin making poster children of these people, not consigning them to anonymity under the rubric "The System."
September 13, 2009 1:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very well said, Ripper, and I do tend to agree...
But I want middle ground.
If we simply demonize Joe "You Lie!" Wilson THIS week, and Rush the next, we are fighting an uphill battle with new ants coming out of the anthill every day.
If we fight The System that we do indeed know exists, we fight them all at once.
I do not include my family members who are Republicans, in The System. They are too smart to be part of The System.
Therein lies the difference.
September 13, 2009 1:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't see how labeling something (not sure what) "The System" helps. Are we talking about the Washington bureaucracy? The media? Just the right-wing media? The GOP leadership? The GOP rank and file? Should we lump in LaRoucheniks and Luddites?
It seems to me that it doesn't advance anything to exchange one grand, vague label for all the small, vague labels we now use for groups already difficult quantify or define. It just makes the whack-a-molehills into one giant whack-a-mountain that defeats our morale and is impossible to conquer.
I wish it were easier to point to a CHAOS or a COBRA or some nefarious group. I guess Republican Party still works for me.
September 13, 2009 2:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, you just named all of the members that make up The System.
So....
September 13, 2009 2:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
It seems to me the real word you are looking for is "The Establishment," which is not defined by particular people so much but by the force of inertia it exerts against progressive ideals. After that, I still think we need to get specific. You can't just say "The System (or The Establishment) called Obama a liar in Joint Session!" It doesn't help.
September 13, 2009 2:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, then let's call it "The Establishment".
It's the same fucking thing.
September 13, 2009 2:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's an attitude. It's the same attitude from Wall Street to Main Street. An attitude of entitlement - that for what ever reason these people feel they are owed something.
That because of their status or the time they wasted in college they should get something for this. It's why lawyers think all all arguments should end up in court...so they can sell their services. Why we have lasik surgery and plastic surgery to mend peoples egos. Why the government rescued GM when cars themselves are going out of style.
An attitude that everything should be for sale to the highest bidder.
The pimps have take over the country.
And the progressives want to kick the pimps out so they are pissed.
C
September 13, 2009 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
One other thing. It's the progressive attitude and view that these people on the right hate and fear. Not because we would force it on them but because it would make what a lot on the right do unnecessary at best.
What do you think would happen if the the vast majority of people in this country had the same view as progressives on the economy, finances, health care, social programs, transportation and the environment as progressives do.
It would severely impact the bottom lines from Wall Street to Main Street. From BOA to Fred's used cars. From BC/BS to the guy who does Liposuction. So they HAVE to demonize the left for fear that people might actually start living that way.
C
September 13, 2009 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Better Living through Equality.
September 13, 2009 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is exactly why they still hate the hippies!
September 13, 2009 9:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think I get what you're saying, though...instead of wasting energy on evidence (Wilson, et. al) of the problem (the problem being a foundering middle class and a president who can't get his agenda through), why not focus on the CAUSE of the problem - The Establishment/System/Entrenched Interests.
To be fair to the President, he did say this in the campaign - in addressing special interests, lobbyists, and entrenched bureaucracy he was acknowledging the pervasiveness of The System and the difficulties ahead. He never said it would be a cakewalk, WE just didn't realize it would be so hard once he was actually elected.
My only concern with framing it that way is that it makes it harder to get psyched up to take it out. How do you fight a Machine if it feels like it has no soul and no weaknesses? I personally prefer segmenting it into parts - lobby firms, Congresspeople with special interest funding, etc. - and attacking the machine one cog at a time. Eventually the whole thing will fall apart...I hope.
I DO continue to HOPE.
September 13, 2009 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps instead of venting our rage and anger personally at the misspokesperson of our ire via the media, we should look at the people representing our interests in Congress and ask them is this what we elected you for? Shouldn't we expect Congress to be adult enough to punish its' members who bring discredit to the institution that represents all the people, not just a few from any one state or region? While I can see emotions getting ripe with anger on the floor of both House and Senate during a debate on a piece of legislation, they know they have to show respect for one another or the system breaks completely down and nothing gets accomplished. If its' their intent to break the system, then Congress needs to address the problem - not shove it under the carpet. Personally, I'm holding the House responsible to administer punishment, not a handslap for Wilson's indiscretion. That's something the media can't do.
September 13, 2009 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ripper, there is a clear core of right-wing religious evangelicals who now pretty much dominate the Republican Party. They just haven't chosen the spokesperson to put a pretty face on the theocratic goals they are intending to impose.
Inhofe. Coburn. Ennis. Sanford. Huckabee. Palin. Ensign. Bachman. Katherine Harris was one of them. The entire C-Street gang. Jindal. Vitter. Boustany. Tom DeLay was one of them. Santorum. I don't know, but I'll bet Joe Wilson is one of them. Probably DeMint and Sessions, too. Judge Roy Moore. Bush was one of them. And many, many more. I'll also add Scalia and Thomas.
Their goal is to roll back the move into modernism to a time before the Enlightenment. They think they can do it but keep the technology that has grown out of the scientific thinking of the Enlightenment.
The twentieth century was a moral disaster to them. They are looking for a leader like Bush who can be accepted by the independent voters. Karl Rove gave them Shrub in 2000. They are looking for the next "W." (Palin appears to have self-destructed. So far. Can she find her own Rove and be resurrected?)
I think you and Lisa are both right. We need to recognize that there is a system, focused on the rural areas and opposed to the people of the large cities, and that system is designed to frustrate every step into modern times and the future.
We need to put a face on it, but we need to remember also that it is a system designed to obstruct Democrats and adaptation to modern problems.
September 13, 2009 6:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
They don't think of it as stepping back in time, of course. They see it as moving forward to the future that God has described in the Bible. It is only us liberals who insist on considering what they demand as running away from the Enlightenment.
September 13, 2009 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely. Wonderfully stated and IMHO, exactly right.
I voted for Obama and am still proud, glad and believe in his abilities, goals and trustworthiness!
While I've been disappointed in his not moving immediately forward to cease Don't Ask Don't Tell for military service and in the initial flawed rollout of HCR - I comprehend that he has information we are not privy to, as well as the System to work within and confront.
I've done some research and acquired greater understanding of the basis for his response to both issues.
The horrific quagmire that is our government 'system' didn't evolve overnight and it will take We, The People to reconstruct it to be what we need. After all, it's because of us it is what it is! Daresay We, The People, are much more at fault than Obama!
Thanks much (and your little chickadee friend too!).
Rec'd
September 13, 2009 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I do have to take into account that, to some Republicans, right-leaners, and Libertarians, We The People of the left are seen as a System too.
However, we the people of the left do not have control of the media, the church, and corporations.
September 13, 2009 1:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
The statement that the left does not control the media is absolutely the funniest thing anyone has ever said! How much control do you want? Is not CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times enough for you? All that is missing is Wall St journal and Fox News, and they are stupid enough to try to be 'balanced'. Show me one major network anchor who is a republican.
September 13, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Out of the media you posted, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, Washington Post, LA Times have all become right-wing rags that are no longer worth paying any attention to. Even NYTimes and MSNBC are flirting at the edge was well. In short, the liberal media as you call it, is almost completely on the conservative bench and have made themselves obsolete.
September 13, 2009 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
HA! That's because you define Marxist as 'conservative' and Communist as 'middle of the road'!
September 13, 2009 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please educate yourself on Marxism and Communism. Your reply here is nonsensical.
Thanks.
September 13, 2009 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
CleverBullDog and I believe strongly that any publication to the left of, say, Soldier of Fortune magazine is a liberal rag.
September 13, 2009 9:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not the anchors, genius. Its the writers and editors.
It's not the actors. It's the screenwriter and editor. Take a liberal like Downey and put him in a neocon violencefest like Iron Man and tell me where his politics impacts the script a jot.
September 13, 2009 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's something to ponder:
On TPM, people chuckle that the people on the mall want to inflate their numbers from 60-70K to 1 million. Okay, that's an inflation factor of about 15x or so.
However, when there was the "big" demonstration this summer promoting healthcare reform (HealthCare NOW! sponsored), what where the TPM estimates? I seem to recall about 1000.
Suppose we inflated that figure 15 times?
Even inflated 15 times, the leftist rally didn't produce the numbers that the rightist rally did in fact.
The problem is the system? BS!
The problem is the populace. Obama was elected because people were vocal and very vocal.
Now they mostly blog.
The "system" is the problem? How would the left even know what the system is? They essentially washed their hands of the process the day after the election.
The last great demonstrations in this country didn't take place 40 years ago, they were 20 years ago: it was the anti-nuke. (Please let's not discuss relative size between the civil rights and the anti-nukes.) If the healthcare reform movement had the size of the anti-nukes, you'd see a totally different action on the news...and in Congress.
Because, like'em or hate'em, the people in DC today show they care -- and that they care more than those merely whining about the situation.
The system? Sounds like an awfully convenient defeatist attitude to me. Justifies the inaction.
If the so-called "mouth-breathers" can organize to at least 60-70K, how come the people on the left can't?
Now that is something to ponder.
September 13, 2009 2:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I ponder as I wander....and wander, I must. You took me from DC 20 years ago to DC 40 years ago, to nukes to civil rights.
Which leaves me wondering (and no longer wandering)...
What, exactly, is your point?
September 13, 2009 2:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
"The squeaky wheel is getting the grease. Don't blame the mythical 'System' for that. Blame yourself."
And to quote myself:
There are others, but that should suffice for now.
September 13, 2009 2:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ummm.....maybe cuz people like you are trying to lead them?
September 13, 2009 2:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the baton, LisB... go for it.
I lay my hands on you. You are now deputized.
Et cetera, Et cetera.
September 13, 2009 2:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heh.
September 13, 2009 3:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus, Liz. If you don't want people to discuss your points, just shut off commenting. But this personalizing of everything is tedious and unbecoming. You've done it with me in this thread and now with Clearthinker. You may not like the guy (or me) but you might consider arguing your point if you have one. CT is making a cogent case for the real enemy being not some "System" or "fucking" Establishment but the same lapse of energy and focus on the left that I've noticed since Obama's electionSolve THAT problem and we win hands down every time.
September 13, 2009 2:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, so you can curse sometimes, and I can't? You can post some meaningless and redundant posts after some good ones, and I can't?
Just checking.
Yeah, sorry, Rip, but I'm in the mood. And it ain't for love.
Ignore me if you want to. I'm fine with that.
September 13, 2009 3:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
. Actual figures: The HealthCare NOW! rally I attended in July produced a miserable turnout of 300-400. However, the HCAN rally I attended in June produced about 5,000-7,000.
September 13, 2009 2:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but....did Elliot Gould show up?
September 13, 2009 2:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, did you?
September 13, 2009 2:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, but I sure as hell helped pay your way.
September 13, 2009 2:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
What's all the personalization for? Did you not want me to go to the July rally and lobby? Did I ask for any help? Did I not go to the HCAN rally in June completely on my own and without anyone else's help? What is it you're getting at about Elliott Gould? That he was approached too late? That he bothered to reply at all?
I don't get you, Lis. Let's get back to your post and stop this personal squabbling.
September 13, 2009 3:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I get your point and quite agree. Progressives were caught off guard and smug in our arrogance that the Right could never produce demonstrations of a size that might require we contest health care reform in the streets--away from our screens and keyboards. Most of those 2 million who attended Obama's inauguration have since sat on their asses.
September 13, 2009 2:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd rather sit on my ass and think about The System and how to confront it or even overthrow it, than show up at a rally with a gun strapped to my thigh, or a sign held over my head that makes me look like an asshat being used by The System, thank you very much.
Maybe the days of demonstrating are over for us. Maybe we should leave them to the Teabaggers. Maybe we SHOULD sit on our asses and contemplate The System and think outside the box and find ways of dealing with it that involve our pointy little egg heads.
Didn't work for Kerry, but it sure as shit worked for our current President.
September 13, 2009 2:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, what worked for Obama was 20,000 in the Jones Dome in St. Louis, 70,000 outside in Seattle, etc., etc., etc. all across the country. Showing up is the first rule of politics. No getting around it at home.
September 13, 2009 3:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sheesh, Rip! Just how short is everyone's memory? And if your facts weren't enough -- I know you've posted these sentiments as stand alone blogs now which received decent ratings.
Keep reminding them. "Only Nixon could go to China."
September 13, 2009 3:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bullshit.
All those crowds did was make him look like the "Rock Star" that The System a/k/a The Establishment labeled him as being.
It was me sitting on my ass and donating $20, $50, $100 every month that got him what he needed, and got him where he is. Me, and all the little me's along side me.
September 13, 2009 3:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, and little folks like me who donated way past our budgets AND went to rallies. Just like THE ONE OBAMA HAD FOR HEALTH CARE ON SATURDAY.
September 13, 2009 3:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Uh... LisB? Now you are quoting GOP talking points (viz. "Obama the rock star). And it wasn't your donations that put him into White House. It was the physical show of support. Your donations helped make that happen, but if it were donations that got people elected, then you wouldn't need an election. You'd just count the money.
May I remind you that John McCain was far behind Mitt Romney in terms of money?
September 13, 2009 3:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, CT?
For once, I owe you an explanation.
Given.
That being said, it was the donations, stupid.
September 13, 2009 3:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, LisB! Here is a video of a bunch of 'asshats' waving signs over their heads looking like they are being used by 'the System'.
September 13, 2009 3:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rip, obviously my post wasn't intended to you. You not only went to the rally, you reported on it.
And I was going to make the point about going to the inaugural vs going to the rally, but decided not to. I'm glad you did.
The people who showed up in DC today were really "average" Americans. Many looked blue collar. They have the same hardships that those on the left would as well.
It really should be a wake-up call to people. I'm honestly surprised that Josh hasn't put this take on the front page. 60-70K is classified by him as "smallish but respectable". When was the last time the left put even that together? By the left's standards it's huge.
The size of the rally today should be an embarrassment to the left. To continually point to the last election or the latest polls and say "why isn't something getting done?" is naive beyond belief.
It takes effort to go to DC. A lot of it. Apparently there was no problem for a big party, to stand outside in the dead of winter.
It's lovely this time of year in DC.
September 13, 2009 3:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wrong.
Even putting aside the anti-War marches that way outnumbered the opposition, did you forget about the Democratic primary and the general election campaign altogether? Obama was packing the house with rallies where ever he went. McCain, not so much. Maybe it's because in the campaign there was a solid vision on health care for all WITH a public option as essential, not to mention transparency and challenging the lobbyists and bringing back the rule of law. There was talk about help for homeowners being foreclosed upon and instituting strong regulations so we don't have another financial armageddon.
Maybe the reason progressives are less willing to get out and march is because there's very little clarity from the President and Congress about what we are fighting for. We already showed up in force on Election Day. Mandate. In June 70% of folks wanted a government run public option. And what did Obama and the Democrats do? They invited in the lobbyists for back deal negotiations. They didn't even allow advocates of single payer a seat at the table. They turned health care reform over to the Gang of Sucks and Olympia Snowe. Oy. Talk about demotivating. I can be ignored from the comfort of my couch. I don't need to travel to DC for that.
September 13, 2009 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dij,
Interesting point about lack of clarity from the present leadership. All the more reason to motivate for clarity, I should say, right?
As for the anti-war protests:
1) Protests outside the US aren't going to be effective at all. That's like you staging a protest in Central Park against a MT senator. If you look at the size/scale of the largest protests, they come outside the US. Frankly, who cares about such protests? These people don't vote in US elections. Protests in the US and Europe would routinely occur about events in the USSR and China... again... who cares?
2) The protests in the US had no momentum. In the US, the most effective one was probably in Oct 2002, with 100K in Washington. It was far enough in advance of the war to effect policy... but it was almost the peak for protesting in Washington iteself.
Protests outside Washington and in other cities in the US aren't as effective -- simple fact. Double that if the protest is in San Francisco which no one in the country views as representative of anything national. (It's like imagining an anti-Obama rally in Montgomery... yawn... what did you expect?) The January 2003 protest wasn't clear in size -- and may well have been smaller than the Oct 2002 protest. That indicates something to the politicians as well. The Feb 2003 protest was extremely big (especially outside the United States) but not in Washington DC.
This point is critical. You must take the protest to where the battlefield is. And the political battlefield in the United States is Washington where the elected officials reside.
3) At the time of the start of the war, many people in the country were reluctantly in favor of going in -- remember the country (and the world) was told that there were probably WMDs. We can all say "won't get fooled again" but at the time that wasn't so obvious. (I feel that it would be more difficult to lie like that now -- which also dangerously destablizes things because it will always allow us to assume the the POTUS lies to get us into a war... which is too far in the other direction.)
Furthermore, if you go to the wiki reference I cite above (I'm running out of link capability) you will find this interesting summary paragraph:
We forget that the pro-war people were also demonstrating. In other words, it wasn't nearly so lopsided as what we see in healthcare.
To summarize:
The protesters need to be US citizens, coming to Washington, and with a momentum that is consistent, sustained and building to be most effective.
I believe the protests did have some influence in that it was the only braking mechanism in the capitol at that time. It allowed many in Congress the political weight to push back. In other words, things would have been far worse without it. (Yes, this is anecdotal evidence from my own personal experience from comments made.)
As it stands now, the right is far more organized than the left. If the left were able to at least get out 15-20K people, then it wouldn't matter and you would see news stories on both sides. But really what you are getting is one side is organized and the other side is not. Candle vigils around the country is an ineffective response and almost shows that you couldn't garner support without making it as easy as that.
Lastly, it's clear that rallies do work -- that's why people stage them. They help control the dialog, they help give people a talking point, they allow humans (who are frail, tribal creatures) feel like there are others like them out there (allowing a movement to grow), and they can't be explained away as you can with a poll (e.g. "the questions were asked in a particular way).
Everything I see here on this thread about "well, rallies aren't the issue" is simple cognitive dissonance. Since the left hasn't been able to pull off a good one, people will try to minimize the importance of them.
Rallies work because politicians want to be re-elected. It's not the moral perspective perhaps, but it's the realpolitik perspective. I would suggest people start thinking along those lines if they want to change the world. That's how the GOP does it with a smaller party -- and one that, now, is in the minority in government to boot!
September 13, 2009 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
So... protests aren't effective.
Thanks for clarifying.
September 13, 2009 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not surprised that's all you got out of my discussion, Bwak. That's why I addressed it to Dij.
Protests are very effective -- when properly organized. Reread what I wrote if you have time.
Of course, you gave money and helped organize send two people to protest in July. So do you simply get involved in futile things? Do you or do you not believe in protesting? Your words say something here that contradicts all your actions which is why it's difficult to even discern which side of any issue you are on.
September 13, 2009 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, CT, I don't think Dija is going to turn into an idiot just because you are kissing her ass.
Silly that you do.
Oh, and it hasn't escaped anyones notice that you've done an rather inelegant 180.
Nice job.
September 13, 2009 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, a blog opening up the possibility that there is a larger SYSTEM in play, has to be derailed by CT - for the umpteenth time - who, as always, prefers to blame the populace. In particular, "the Left." And if he gets a chance, the TPM section of the Left.
To that end, he starts off with grand "facts" which are absolutely, without doubt or question, provably WRONG. That is, he claimed the last great demos in this country were 20 years ago, and is proven wrong.
At this point, a normal human being would retreat from the debate, having had their bottom beaten like a drum. But not CT. Nope, now he's got the car in the ditch again, nobody remembers the original blog - on the "system" - so now we all get to debate something so stupid, it makes the eyes water. Because naturally, everyone would rather debate the non-original-blogger's-facts-which-aren't-facts-but-which-the-ass-made-up.
So now we hear that whoops, it's not just numbers we need to "physicalize," they need to be US citizens, in DC, and with sustained momentum. So we have a choice. Anyone wanna waste more time going back over the history of the civil rights movement and anti-war movements...? I don't.
CT. YOU WERE WRONG. YOU'RE OFF TOPIC. AND YOU'VE ALREADY BEEN INSULTING ENOUGH. GO AWAY.
As for me, I'm more interested in the fact that (as discussed more fully below) it is precisely the center-right, compromising tactics of people like CT and Jason which have just been shown to be incapable of mobilizing anyone... NOT the Left, which was told, in no uncertain terms, that their views were off the table, remember? Tough to blame them when it was perfectly clear it was the Center-Right who grabbed this policy.
Orrrrr.... it might be fun to further discuss LisB's system, as opposed to personality. Remember that? Remember when we were speaking of that, and not the failures of the Left to bring out people to rallies for policies they didn't create?
September 13, 2009 8:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Quinn, it couldn't happen without willing participants. Nobody HAS to respond to him.
September 13, 2009 8:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, given the readership here, some feel compelled to.
(shuffles feet)
It isn't good to let misinformation stand. Especially if it is asserted as fact.
September 13, 2009 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak, I understand completely. Sometimes I just want to scream. . .
But when it goes on and on and on until the original post is all but forgotten it seems a bit of an insult to the OP, who wouldn't have taken the time to post if a good, honest dialogue wasn't the intent.
Besides, hijackers HATE talking to themselves. That's a good thing!
September 13, 2009 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Codswallop.
Perhaps your non sequitur would have more standing if you practiced what you preach. Did you show up like Ripper did? No? Then how can you have the gall to scold others?
Protests aren't the be all and end all of anything. Did you show up to protest the Iraq war? I did. Those protests were the largest ever recorded. What good did they do, exactly?
Praising the right for getting 20 or 30 thousand people together strikes me as counter productive. Perhaps you should ponder your need to belittle the left as you trip all over yourself to steer away from LisBs most excellent point.
It's getting old, these pathetic attempts at derailing conversation.
September 13, 2009 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak:
Protests and rallies are important which is the very reason why they are organized and you wanted to send Ripper using your own money.
Don't play sour grapes because the protests on the right are better organized... or that people on that side are more passionate about getting their views across.
Indeed, the "system" is working -- the people protesting are having a serious impact on the direction of things.
September 13, 2009 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
That has yet to be seen. As usual you assert nonsense in your sneering sort of way, rather than offer factual information.
You have yet to address the anti-war protests. They tend to blow your tired non-sequitur out of the water, and all the asserting you do ad nauseam won't change those facts one whit.
Now go ahead, make some personal attacks and try to change the subject.
September 13, 2009 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Given 6 months and all the money that special interests poured into the 9/12 project, not to mention the free airtime provided by Fox News, I could get 50-70 thousand people to come and watch a monkey fuck a football. What's your point?
September 13, 2009 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
The point is that we went from this to .
September 13, 2009 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
this.
September 13, 2009 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your point is still a false equivalence. Given the time, money and free promotion 50/70K people is a very small crowd. The monkey/football would draw more given same opportunities.
September 13, 2009 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's an equivalence for you:
As of late on TPM, "false equivalence" has the same weight as "fair and balanced" on FNC.
What you really meant to say is that you can't argue the point because it has an uncomfortable amount of validity.
September 13, 2009 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
It has been argued, and totally obliterated. That you don't have the wit or class to admit it isn't surprising.
Once again you want to hijack a thread with your Orwelian semantics. Just stop.
September 13, 2009 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
OFF TOPIC
September 13, 2009 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Come on CT. Jonnie has a point. I do agree that protests/marches are important but these tea party gatherings are propagandized by Faux "news." How many people do you think the left could get out if Soros financed the organization and Ohbermann, Maddox, and a few other MSNBC pundits flooded the network pushing it.
September 13, 2009 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I showed in another reply on this page, the NT Times covered the protest yesterday. The numbers made it newsworthy.
I don't buy the funding/money issue. Somehow the Civil Rights and Anti-Nuke marches were able to get organized. And everyone is reminding me about the Iraq War protests that took place -- again, where was the money for that?
When the national dialog is being taken over by people who have little to actually say (as the teabaggers do besides "government sucks"), you can't simply blame it on FNC -- they alone aren't that powerful.
Indeed, the teabaggers' comments mirror much of the sentiments on this particular blog: "government sucks", "it's a big 'system' rigged against me", and so forth.
I think the left has been sucker punched by the right and, frankly, is in shock. What people on the left should be doing (in my view) is mirroring everything that is going on right now. Carry a weapon (where legal) to a GOP town hall meeting. Mass protest against the Blue Dogs on Capitol Hill. Etc.
The joke is that the left has a better narrative for the debate (if there were one) but the debate will never happen until the left nullifies the physicality of the national dialog that the right has created.
So you never get to the actual debate and the right wins by default.
September 13, 2009 8:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
We won.
We don't need to.
September 13, 2009 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're seriously telling me that you think if Faux news hadn't pushed and propagandized these tea bagger protests there still would have been 50 to 70 thousand people there. IMO that's a level of blindness to the power of the media and a level a niavety that is absolutely astonishing.
September 13, 2009 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I still need to review what exactly has been accomplished in eight months.
It takes time.
September 13, 2009 2:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Time is a luxury that the left doesn't have.
September 13, 2009 3:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
What has been accomplished in 8 months by President Obama?
He stabilized the markets, so 401Ks are starting to slowly come back and we are not about to meltdown anymore. Unemployment numbers are coming down dramatically from when he took over. GDP went from 6.5 shrinkage to 1 shrinkage since he has been in office. Tens of thousands of state employees still have jobs, and services are maintained because of his stimulus.
He ended torture. He IS closing Gitmo.
95% of Americans are receiving a tax DECREASE.
He provided unemployment, food stamps and a 65% reduction in Cobra for those who lost their jobs.
He set new emissions standards.
He protected wilderness land set for oil leases.
He got Pakistan to agree to fight the Taliban, which Bush never could. The top leader was taken out this week.
He nominated and got confirmed the first latina Supreme Court Justice in history.
He signed Equal Pay for Equal Work, Children's Health Bill and Credit Card Reform.
He has a first time home owner's credit, a modification of mortgage plan in place. (This needs work, but it is in place)
He has made it easier for students to get college loans. (UMass just gave a 1500 rebate to all students because of the stimulus money.)
He has improved America's image around the world, especially with Muslim countries.
He got the 2 NK journalists out.
He got the non-proliferation treaties going again, and he will chair the next meeting. Already an agreement exists to reduce Russia's and US's arms.
A significant amount of the bailout money is being paid back. This is a good thing.
He has taken on healthcare, the most difficult thing to pass in the US. I am not completely happy with how he is doing it, but he is doing it.*
He ended the abstinence only thing. And the law that said a pharmacist could refuse to give birth control pills to women if they so chose.
He is sticking to the timetable to withdraw troops from Iraq.
He got funding for the useless bomber cut.And those heliocoptors. He plans to make more weapons' cuts.
He has cut 2 trillion from the budget over the next ten years.
He has taken on energy, the second most difficult thing to pass in the US and it has already passed the House.
He saved the American auto industry. (Cash for clunkers is doing great too, both for the industry and jobs, and for the environment.)
He is building a green economy for the US. First steps in the stimulus, others in the energy bill.
More jobs will be created in transportation when rest of stimulus kicks in in 2010.
He is facing complete disrespect and vilification from the media and the wingnuts,getting more than 30 death threats per day,and still goes on, calmly and with determination and intelligence.
September 13, 2009 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bravo.
September 13, 2009 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've been so absorbed with the disappointments. This helps my perspective. Thank you
September 13, 2009 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you Jonnie. WEll put!!!!
September 14, 2009 6:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know what? I'm gonna take a retread out of this post, if that's allowed.
I'm going to re-walk my steps in, and take them backwards (hopefully without bumping into anything or anyone), and leave my Systematic thoughts to my, um, self, systematically....
I thought I had a good thought tonight, but, in reality, I'm just full of angst.
And that's not like me.
But, I got fired yesterday.
So, I hope I can forgive myself for being angsty.
I kinda liked it, for a moment. It was nice to fire back at Ripper and CT, but....neither one deserved it.
And after the proud moments I celebrated, to myself, at my quick comebacks, came this empty kinda "Uh-oh" feeling, wondering what they'd come back with at me, kinda knowing they'd both -- in different ways, of course -- hit me with a wtf?
And they did.
And I feel like shit.
I guess I'm just angry at the system tonight, but, even more so, at myself.
TPM, Ripper, and CT deserve better than my half-thought-out anger.
I am all apologies.
What else can I say?
September 13, 2009 3:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, you just said it. And no, it didn't seem like the LisB we know and love. But you have ccorrectly identified your feelings. We all want to change the system. We all feel like we're falling short. We all feel like the Right has no business opposing universal health care or taking such ludicrous swipes at this president and his agenda. We all want to make it go away and we all want to scream because it isn't working as well as we would like it to.
But the fact that you were fired today makes it very personal to you, and I am sincerely sorry that this sad economy has claimed another reliable income and and your sense of security. It shouldn't have happened and I want to help. Tell me how.
September 13, 2009 3:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't worry about the comments, LisB. Take care of yourself and keep kickin'. And lots of love from the Northland.
September 13, 2009 3:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
And the west too.
September 13, 2009 5:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you all, so much. I'm sorry for bringing a downer in here. But I'm not sorry for having such kind and loving people to talk to.
I'm gonna be fine, I know it. I'll get a job in Manhattan in no time.
I'm working on the anger thing. I'm working on how to let it out without hurting anyone, myself included. Not easy.
I appreciate all of you for being so kind and understanding and supportive.
By this time next week, I plan on being ready to conquer world hunger. So watch out.
xoxo
September 13, 2009 5:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lotsa love from across the pond, too, Lis!
September 13, 2009 6:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
The South is checking in with love.
September 13, 2009 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
and Little Rhody
September 13, 2009 7:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
...and the Isle of Staten :)
September 13, 2009 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
And the Chihuahuan frontier.
September 13, 2009 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
And Hi! from Bed-Stuy!
September 13, 2009 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lis, just went to chat but u weren't there. Let me know if you go...
September 13, 2009 3:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Going.
September 13, 2009 3:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, LisB, I'm sorry. Because it is impossible to make the transition to something else, perhaps better than, or not, without feeling undervalued and, beneath that, unloved.
You are loved, LisB -- not just liked, not just respected, not just admired. You are loved. For the generous, wonderful, bright and dryly witty person you are everyday, here, where in a curious way we are ourselves more than we are elsewhere. So that to be valued here is to be valued for the person we actually are, inside, beneath postures of pride.
XOXO
September 13, 2009 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know only too well that feeling when you can't see around the corner. Just wanted to say good luck, but you don't need it. From what I've seen of you here, I'm willing to bet you come out better in your next job. Don't let it get you down (and screw 'em if they can't take a joke).
September 13, 2009 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, I can say this.
Sometimes we think we have a point, and we do everything we can to drive it home.
Sometimes that's great, and it works, because it's for the right reasons and the right cause (like, um, Obama's campaign), and no matter how we helped (whether it was by sitting on our asses donating money, or attending rallies, or both, or more), and sometimes it's not, and we go to rallies with guns and attitude and because we think we're protecting our rights (and forgetting what's right).
And sometimes I stay up late at night, like until 3:28 in the morning, and forget that I'm not 20 anymore.
And sometimes I forget that, unlike The System, the rest of us are human.
Even CT.
For the most part.
So, instead of railing against The System, can I just get a hug?
And then I'll go to bed. I promise.
Here. I'll start.
*hugs Clearthinker*
*hugs Ripper*
Okay. Your turn.
September 13, 2009 3:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, and um, CT? Don't get any ideas.
I'm feeling vulnerable, but I ain't stupid.
September 13, 2009 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry you lost your job. But that doesn't justify your continued attempts to snipe at me within your "apology" so you can feel better about things.
September 13, 2009 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Priceless.
September 13, 2009 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's some Wildean wit. Extend an olive branch and return with a bloody stump.
September 13, 2009 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
There was no olive branch extended... what was extended was a rose... with the thorned stem in my direction.
Read more carefully.
September 13, 2009 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ahhhhh ... bullcrap!
Po' widdle vicdum got talkeded to in a way dat duh po' widdle vicdum didn' like...
You often deserve an entire 40 acres spread of bramble bushes.
Get yourself a frickin' cryin' towel...
~OGD~
September 14, 2009 2:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry about your job situation, but could you hurry up and get back to talking about me?
September 13, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dorn, you need to reread things. Ripper pointed out that I wasn't personal, Lis was, and then even in her "apology" to me, she continued the theme.
I would love not to discuss me.
Even your post shows you can't read the evidence for what it is, but rather wants to make it about me.
I've said time and again -- I come here for the ideas.
September 13, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
At this point, CT, you are just being petty. Hang it up if you can't take a joke. LisB was making light of the situation, not you per se.
September 13, 2009 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ripper,
It is impossible to achieve (IMHO) any type of positive interaction on topic with some, instead they drag the whole post down.
It's pointless to acknowledge or attempt to enter into an intelligent, rational discourse with one who doesn't possess either the skill set or desire to do same.
It's just noise, of no value.
You put forth substantive comments and only get blather in return.
Appreciate your thoughtful ccomments.
September 13, 2009 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just lighten up a bit. We all should. That's all.
September 13, 2009 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Methink'st thou art a general offence and every man should beat thee.
September 13, 2009 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, Bwak, you do go on. Nice use of violence against me. You are all over this blog with snipes a plenty but little to say. Psst: try it my way sometime -- you will have more success. ;-)
September 13, 2009 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's Shakespeare, you addle-pated, ill mannered lout.
BTW, You owe LisB an apology. What you said was out of line, and ugly.
September 13, 2009 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know it was Shakespeare, Bwak. It allowed you to make a violent reference against me with taking the responsibility for it. So much for your "civil discourse."
September 13, 2009 8:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, that should have been "...without taking responsibility..."
September 13, 2009 8:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liar, you did not.
September 13, 2009 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hate it when I find a blog so late that the comment thread is likely worn through if not dead. But there are a lot of things this post makes me think about. Here is one--maybe I'll add a second if there's time before I have to get ready to catch my bus.
Some of the problems with The System come from trying to apply something first invented for small groups (Population of Athens in the golden age, under 40 thousand. 2.5 Athens would fit into one University of Michigan stadium) to large groups 307 million and counting.
Knock out those under 18, and one still has a bunch of "eligibles".
Knock out the 40% of the eligibles who didn't vote. Still a whopping big number. Then knock out those who voted for McCain (don't do it literally) and we're still left with a pretty substantial sum. I'll call it 60 million because I'm too rushed to look it up..the bus I have to catch I have to catch in 58 minutes.
Here's the question:
Assuming non-voters don't count (if you don't play, don't gripe) and opponent voters don't count (choose a better candidate next time), I could argue that I "own" 1/60,000,000th of the President's leadership. Me, plus how many agree with me own 1+that number, divided by 60 million.
Every blue dog democrat (not talking congress here) owns 1/60,000,000 of Obama's voice. Every Independent does, too, and so do those Republicans (there were a handful or two, I'm sure) who voted for him: 1/60,000,000 each. But none of us own his mind, and in my thinking mind trumps voice. (Mine, too).
So the leadership involves devising ways to please enough of those 60,000,000 to keep the coalition of ones together, and that takes more yakking than cojones (which is good, because ladies yak as well as men do). (grin).
I may write about this mores some time when I think the Cafe can stomach a dose of Aristotle and Burke.
In the meantime Hugs for a job well done.
September 13, 2009 7:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agree with the job well done.
I think one must study the gilded age to truly appreciate what is going on here. The forces arrayed in full contempt of the people, that make their existence possible, has never been clearer.
That we're in opposition to forces that have most of the wealth and power in this country (and want to keep it that way) is fairly obvious. Just look at the utter abomination that the SCotUS is arguing this past week, (corporations are persons and should be able to make political contributions) and we can give the system it's name. Corporate interests.
A corporation exists for one reason only: to make money for its stockholders. Because of this, it is stupid, short-sighted, and in the end, self-defeating. Our distant forbearers avoided many of the pitfalls we are now experiencing because they recognized that a corporation had an unfair advantage over other "persons." Most people cannot limit themselves merely to chasing after wealth, they have to eat, they have to sleep--oh, and they die. So corporations were dissolved every 75 years or so in order to address this inequity.
When they are allowed to live beyond this, we get what we have here, a corrupt system that is geared to benefit the few at the expense of the many.
Are massive demonstrations needed? Perhaps, but I would remind people that the largest demonstrations in the history of mankind were held to protest the invasion of Iraq, and they didn't exactly do anything. So blaming the populace is a cop out. Things just aren't that simple.
As an aside, I've always found blaming the victims to be morally reprehensible.
What is needed is trust-busting, and leaders with some sense of decency. Leaders that speak softly, carry a big stick, and have piranhas for a legal staff and the fear of retribution from the populace to cower Congress into doing what is right for the majority. Having a Liberal SCotUS would help, but obviously, that's just another part of the bought interests at this point, so that will take some time to fix, if not a generation.
Until then, I agree with Lis that it is helpful to look broadly as well as narrowly. There are a few that do, like Bill Moyers, who has worked tirelessly against these inhuman corporate interests.
It's time we called them out, too. Don't lose sight of the forest for the trees.
September 13, 2009 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak, you said it. . .absolutely.
September 13, 2009 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
LisB, I'm sorry I wasn't there during the wee hours to defend your original idea, because I think what you said about the "System" has a lot of merit.
Obama is fighting against Big Money, and Big Money is a most formidable enemy. They've managed to recruit legions of soldiers in the form of everyday citizens, convincing them of all kinds of absurdities, not least of which is that government is bad and Big Money is good.
Gordon Gekko: Greed is good. They're buying it. When I saw pictures from Saturday's Tea Party Rally I was stunned at some of the signs being waved--
No Health Care Reform - NONE.
Charity is not a Constitutional Function of our Government.
Joe McCarthy was Right.
Brought to you by BC/BS.
Pictures of Obama as the Joker and as Che Guevara.
All designed to keep the Insurance Companies profitable and Big Money in its rightful place at the TOP.
What world are these people living in? You can argue until Kingdom Come whether the numbers in attendance are meaningful--but then you lose sight of the fact that Big Money is winning.
So, Lis, it IS as simple as The System. It's working against us as a country and the only way to combat it is to call it what it is. Runaway greed and selfishness.
You can fight it from within and without and break it down into sub-Systems, but the enemy is the entrenched System that is threatening to destroy us if we don't organize against it. We need to fight the big picture. If we break it down into a million little skirmishes we don't have the manpower or the strength to fight the main battle.
You were right, Lis, and I thought your argument was well thought out. You don't need to apologize for writing it. You were right.
I'm sorry you've lost your job. I am just so sorry. As usual, I feel helpless when I hear things like this, but if there's anything you need. . .
September 13, 2009 9:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heh, if I'd seen this I wouldn't have bothered writing mine.
Just so, Ramona. Thank you.
September 13, 2009 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak writes:
Then she endorses Ramona's comment:
This is symptomatic of many arguments at TPM.
We here of the 47M who are uninsured. Let's assume that only 20M of those uninsured are adults (a hugely conservative estimate). To get a rally of 60K people is merely having 0.3% of that population to show up.
Not even 1%!
Less than 1/2 of 1%!
The right have sustained their attempts over the past 30 days to physicalize their viewpoints. The left? Nothing in comparison. That's why the right has controlled the entire dialog (it hasn't been a debate) on healthcare.
What 'system' is keeping people glued in their seats?
Is a single rally the answer? Perhaps, perhaps not. But physical action and participation is. I have seen nothing from the left that borders on any physicalization of their views. The March on Washington in 1963 started with a much smaller but just as physical act of protest.
That is why, once again, the right controlled the conversation again this weekend
And remember: these are people with nothing to say - but they still garner the airwaves.
When the "crazies" are controlling the dialog, when the "crazies" are putting you on the defensive, when the "crazies" are able to gain momentum --
-- then the "crazies" are smarter than you.
It's that "simple".
I know it will be more convenient to get angry with this comment than use that anger in a more productive way -- but do try.
September 13, 2009 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
And once again, I note that my simple question hasn't been answered:
September 13, 2009 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your question is rhetorical. Don't pretend otherwise.
60-70k is peanuts. Its individuals like you and the media apparatus that want to inflate this into a movement.
Fundraising, boots on the ground, and organization.
You are merely playing your usual game of empowering the right and disempowering the left.
The lesson was learned during Bush that numbers mean squat without coverage.
September 13, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Zipperupus writes:
This is not true. Prove it. Let the left produce a demonstration with that many people.
You've missed the entire point... of course, 60-70K isn't a "mass movement" but
despite it's own attempts to do so, the left can't even produce that!
Relatively speaking, the left's voice here has been drowned out by those who show they care.
Keep denying it... that's why the reform that you want isn't there.
September 13, 2009 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
...and the millions that showed up to protest the Iraq war, what did they achieve.
Answer the question.
September 13, 2009 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
bwak,
You have a stalker who is obsessed with hijacking other's blogs. I hope you just ignore the blather spewed and don't give satisfaction of engaging with the person. It is IMHO a waste of time and energy better spent otherwise.
Good to 'see' ya!
September 13, 2009 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Likewise.
But Auntie, LisB is someone good and special and he is being horrid.
So help me, it's too much.
September 13, 2009 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're just feeding the beast. For some reason (I have own opinion) there's some kind of almost sick fixation with you and also with the destructive hijacking of too many posts by inserting blather and constant negatives not about post topics or intelligent, civil discourse.
If no one feeds the beast, it will only be left to feed off itself. Beasty doesn't play well with others so everyone needs to quit joining in and leave the thing alone to play with self!
Ignore it. Don't feed the beast! Stop! It's not helping Lis or any who really to aspire to enter into civil discourse about a post's subject and, again IMHO, feeding it only shows disrespect to any whose post it attempts to takeover.
September 13, 2009 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK Auntie. I hear you.
September 13, 2009 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
bwak,
Do you remember 'baked alaska'?
September 13, 2009 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
The flaming ice-cream?
(shuffles feet)
um, no.
September 13, 2009 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I remember half-baked Alaska....you betcha!
September 13, 2009 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
He can't Bwak. Clearthinker doesn't CARE if you have facts that drive over his latest theory. This new one - that the Left can't "physicalize" its opinions in a march - was massively, on-the-ground, destroyed by the anti-war Iraq marches, as you said.
But he come here to direct his fire against individual other posters if he can, and everyone here in general if he can't.
He is, in point of fact, a liar. And a coward.
September 13, 2009 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know, Quinn. Frankly, I'm relieved to see you know it, too.
Thanks.
September 13, 2009 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely. Spot on!
DON'T FEED THE BEAST!
September 13, 2009 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am sorry, but you are wrong. Last time I checked, the largest protests in recorded history failed to stop an illegal invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation.
60-70k is peanuts compared to the average Gay March on Washington.
Quit telling me to prove what is obvious. You need to prove your assertion in spite of evidence presented to the contrary.
September 13, 2009 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
This seems as good a place as any to hang a reply to the general subsection of this thread.
Although CT can be petty and abusive (see above where I disassociate myself from his perceived insult at LisB's apology), he is correct in his point more immediately above. And in case anyone missed it, this is it:
The Left has failed to control the dialogue this summer and so, has lost ground, resulting in various elements of health care reform being tossed overboard instead of strengthened. This should not have happened with a Democratic White House AND Congress, but it has.
Why was the Right able to control the dialogue? Because their anger and organizing made news. The Left was largely asleep at the switch and arrived too late to the game.
Talk of anti-Iraq War rallies is apples and oranges in this context. The anti-war rallies actually DID serve to draw media attention to anti-war sentiment and to apply pressure on public sentiment for withdrawal. There was no immediate withdrawal of course, partly because it was a different story then. Republicans controlled both the White House and Congress, which cared little for the views of the minority party. But eventually, those protests had the effect of helping elect Obama, who promised a "responsible" withdrawal from Iraq and is proceeding on course.
This time around, with health care reform, liberals are in the majority, and yet we're STILL not being given adequate media coverage or weight by our OWN party's representatives. Again, why?
Because protests by the Right drew media coverage. And there have been no comparable protests by the left on this issue during this summer. What matters is not the rally turnout on one issue compared to head count at rallies on other issues. iWhat matters is the turnout on our side compared to the other side's turnout on the SAME issue.
September 13, 2009 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen! Thanks.
September 13, 2009 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
So basically you agree with me, except when I say it.
Thanks, Aunt Sam. LOL!
September 13, 2009 8:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess what I'm saying is RELATIVE public sentiment counts. Not what the polls show. Not what reality is. But PERCEIVED RELATIVE public sentiment.
And for pure emotionalism, organization, willingness to put boots on the ground and poisonous vitriol, the Right put on a show the media could not resist.
We might be in a better place now if we had done more. And no, I don't mean those of us at TPM, who as a whole, have probably done more than our share.
I beat the drum all summer about progressive organizations and their lack of cohesive leadership. No one listened when I said "unite the clans."
September 13, 2009 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is hardly apples and oranges, as the pro-Iraq folks had smaller protests that were taken up by the media, and they won the day.
I also don't appreciate the rewrite of history. The historic marches happened BEFORE we actually went to war, they had no impact and they dwarfed this right wing march on the order on millions.
So you see, it is a very apt comparison. I do understand this is very personal for you as you actually, at great inconvenience and cost to yourself, did what the rest of us have to do. Don't doubt that we will. It ain't over.
I for one am very tired of bending over backwards to be "fair" to those who don't know the meaning of the word. Don't give credit where none is due. Thanks.
September 13, 2009 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't sell yourself short, bwak, on pat anti-war efforts. You were up against BushCo and 9/11 and so forth. More fear even than "death panels" can create. And you had no one in the White House or Congress to support you.
Yes, I still believe PERCEIVED RELATIVE PUBLIC SENTIMENT is important in winning news coverage and votes. But you have to remember: the polls were against you, BushCo was against you and even the Democrats voted for war. Health care reform just doesn't stack up that way.
I totally agree it ain't over till it's over, but when the Tea Party was organizing itself, the Left got caught with its pants down. That HAS to change soon. A lot of big issues are coming up fast.
September 13, 2009 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink