« Josh and Dickday Done Fired Me Up | LisB's Blog | Please Stop the Excavation...Until More Is Known »
The System
So, I've been out of touch, here, for the past two nights....I've missed countless blogs full of countless topics, no doubt.
But, while I was out of touch, it occurred to me, based on a private conversation I had with a beloved chicken friend of mine, *ahem*, no clique intended.......
She said something that made me really think.
Heh, I don't think that often, so....more power to her.
Anyway....my big think was this:
Some of us, myself included, have been pissed off by some of the actions and statements of our beloved Pres and his Chief of Staff and others....cuz we want him and them to have more cajones. More balls.
The chicken said to me tonight, and I don't quote word for word, because my memory sucks, but the gist was: "He has the right thoughts in mind, and the right spirit.....it's just that The System that's in place won't allow him to do what he wants to do."
Now.....ponder that.
Think back to the days that you supported Barack Obama, and think back as to WHY, if you did at all.
If you didn't support him, but are left-leaning, think back as to why you accepted him as our POTUS.
We wanted change. We wanted representation. We wanted someone good and well-meaning in charge.
Well, we have that.
But.....having him there isn't the end all and be all that we thought it would be, is it?
Know why?
Because there is this thing. This thing in the way. This thing called The System.
We, some of us (like me), thought in our naivete that this thing, The System, would disappear once Obama took House. We thought The System would dematerialize and melt away like the Wicked Witch of the West after Dorothy threw water on her.
Instead, we've found The System is not only water-proof, but also bullet-proof, stupid-proof, nut-proof, and BeckandLimbaugh-proof.
The System stands in our way.
NOT the man we elected.
The System.
Some folks want to put Obama down, or Pelosi, or Rahm, or.....whatever scapegoat disappoints us on any given day....
They are not disappointing us.
They are up against The System.
How would YOU like to be up against The System? Think you could handle it 24/7?
The System is working 24/7 to work against us. The System is big. The System has more control than we ever imagined. The System is systematically destroying our country, while maintaining its power and control over it by being.....yeah, you got it....The System.
Instead of going after Beck or Rush or Joe "You Liar!" Wilson, why not try pooling our efforts to not only WORK The System, but Beat It?
Don't personalize it anymore. Call it for what it is. The System.
Think of it as Hal from Space Odyssey. The System.
One single unit.
Not the personal nutcases and personalities that make UP The System, but The System itself. It's one big machine. Treat it as such. Depersonalize it. See it for what it is. The System. Not one face, like Rush Limbaugh's.....but one big System.
The System.
Attack it, or be under attack by It.
Makes life so much easier, knowing thine enemy, doesn't it?
But, while I was out of touch, it occurred to me, based on a private conversation I had with a beloved chicken friend of mine, *ahem*, no clique intended.......
She said something that made me really think.
Heh, I don't think that often, so....more power to her.
Anyway....my big think was this:
Some of us, myself included, have been pissed off by some of the actions and statements of our beloved Pres and his Chief of Staff and others....cuz we want him and them to have more cajones. More balls.
The chicken said to me tonight, and I don't quote word for word, because my memory sucks, but the gist was: "He has the right thoughts in mind, and the right spirit.....it's just that The System that's in place won't allow him to do what he wants to do."
Now.....ponder that.
Think back to the days that you supported Barack Obama, and think back as to WHY, if you did at all.
If you didn't support him, but are left-leaning, think back as to why you accepted him as our POTUS.
We wanted change. We wanted representation. We wanted someone good and well-meaning in charge.
Well, we have that.
But.....having him there isn't the end all and be all that we thought it would be, is it?
Know why?
Because there is this thing. This thing in the way. This thing called The System.
We, some of us (like me), thought in our naivete that this thing, The System, would disappear once Obama took House. We thought The System would dematerialize and melt away like the Wicked Witch of the West after Dorothy threw water on her.
Instead, we've found The System is not only water-proof, but also bullet-proof, stupid-proof, nut-proof, and BeckandLimbaugh-proof.
The System stands in our way.
NOT the man we elected.
The System.
Some folks want to put Obama down, or Pelosi, or Rahm, or.....whatever scapegoat disappoints us on any given day....
They are not disappointing us.
They are up against The System.
How would YOU like to be up against The System? Think you could handle it 24/7?
The System is working 24/7 to work against us. The System is big. The System has more control than we ever imagined. The System is systematically destroying our country, while maintaining its power and control over it by being.....yeah, you got it....The System.
Instead of going after Beck or Rush or Joe "You Liar!" Wilson, why not try pooling our efforts to not only WORK The System, but Beat It?
Don't personalize it anymore. Call it for what it is. The System.
Think of it as Hal from Space Odyssey. The System.
One single unit.
Not the personal nutcases and personalities that make UP The System, but The System itself. It's one big machine. Treat it as such. Depersonalize it. See it for what it is. The System. Not one face, like Rush Limbaugh's.....but one big System.
The System.
Attack it, or be under attack by It.
Makes life so much easier, knowing thine enemy, doesn't it?
Advertisement













Rec'd, but with a disclaimer, Lis.
The truth lies somewhere between your original position (presumably) and cheecken's. Remember "Profiles in Courage"? Too many of our elected officials are looking forward to re-election rather than to doing the people's business, their careers be damned.
Yes, Obama, et al are up against entrenched interests, but I hesitate to let it become as amorphous as "The System." Human beings (to put it graciously) comprise the wall of inertia that stalls, twists or stops progress in this country, and they need to be named. Part of the problem is that with the GOP out of power, no real leadership has emerged to claim the mantle and run the party. As a result, the party is in decay and decentralized. The names are too well hidden and too many at the moment. We need to begin making poster children of these people, not consigning them to anonymity under the rubric "The System."
September 13, 2009 1:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very well said, Ripper, and I do tend to agree...
But I want middle ground.
If we simply demonize Joe "You Lie!" Wilson THIS week, and Rush the next, we are fighting an uphill battle with new ants coming out of the anthill every day.
If we fight The System that we do indeed know exists, we fight them all at once.
I do not include my family members who are Republicans, in The System. They are too smart to be part of The System.
Therein lies the difference.
September 13, 2009 1:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't see how labeling something (not sure what) "The System" helps. Are we talking about the Washington bureaucracy? The media? Just the right-wing media? The GOP leadership? The GOP rank and file? Should we lump in LaRoucheniks and Luddites?
It seems to me that it doesn't advance anything to exchange one grand, vague label for all the small, vague labels we now use for groups already difficult quantify or define. It just makes the whack-a-molehills into one giant whack-a-mountain that defeats our morale and is impossible to conquer.
I wish it were easier to point to a CHAOS or a COBRA or some nefarious group. I guess Republican Party still works for me.
September 13, 2009 2:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, you just named all of the members that make up The System.
So....
September 13, 2009 2:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
It seems to me the real word you are looking for is "The Establishment," which is not defined by particular people so much but by the force of inertia it exerts against progressive ideals. After that, I still think we need to get specific. You can't just say "The System (or The Establishment) called Obama a liar in Joint Session!" It doesn't help.
September 13, 2009 2:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, then let's call it "The Establishment".
It's the same fucking thing.
September 13, 2009 2:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's an attitude. It's the same attitude from Wall Street to Main Street. An attitude of entitlement - that for what ever reason these people feel they are owed something.
That because of their status or the time they wasted in college they should get something for this. It's why lawyers think all all arguments should end up in court...so they can sell their services. Why we have lasik surgery and plastic surgery to mend peoples egos. Why the government rescued GM when cars themselves are going out of style.
An attitude that everything should be for sale to the highest bidder.
The pimps have take over the country.
And the progressives want to kick the pimps out so they are pissed.
C
September 13, 2009 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
One other thing. It's the progressive attitude and view that these people on the right hate and fear. Not because we would force it on them but because it would make what a lot on the right do unnecessary at best.
What do you think would happen if the the vast majority of people in this country had the same view as progressives on the economy, finances, health care, social programs, transportation and the environment as progressives do.
It would severely impact the bottom lines from Wall Street to Main Street. From BOA to Fred's used cars. From BC/BS to the guy who does Liposuction. So they HAVE to demonize the left for fear that people might actually start living that way.
C
September 13, 2009 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Better Living through Equality.
September 13, 2009 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is exactly why they still hate the hippies!
September 13, 2009 9:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think I get what you're saying, though...instead of wasting energy on evidence (Wilson, et. al) of the problem (the problem being a foundering middle class and a president who can't get his agenda through), why not focus on the CAUSE of the problem - The Establishment/System/Entrenched Interests.
To be fair to the President, he did say this in the campaign - in addressing special interests, lobbyists, and entrenched bureaucracy he was acknowledging the pervasiveness of The System and the difficulties ahead. He never said it would be a cakewalk, WE just didn't realize it would be so hard once he was actually elected.
My only concern with framing it that way is that it makes it harder to get psyched up to take it out. How do you fight a Machine if it feels like it has no soul and no weaknesses? I personally prefer segmenting it into parts - lobby firms, Congresspeople with special interest funding, etc. - and attacking the machine one cog at a time. Eventually the whole thing will fall apart...I hope.
I DO continue to HOPE.
September 13, 2009 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps instead of venting our rage and anger personally at the misspokesperson of our ire via the media, we should look at the people representing our interests in Congress and ask them is this what we elected you for? Shouldn't we expect Congress to be adult enough to punish its' members who bring discredit to the institution that represents all the people, not just a few from any one state or region? While I can see emotions getting ripe with anger on the floor of both House and Senate during a debate on a piece of legislation, they know they have to show respect for one another or the system breaks completely down and nothing gets accomplished. If its' their intent to break the system, then Congress needs to address the problem - not shove it under the carpet. Personally, I'm holding the House responsible to administer punishment, not a handslap for Wilson's indiscretion. That's something the media can't do.
September 13, 2009 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ripper, there is a clear core of right-wing religious evangelicals who now pretty much dominate the Republican Party. They just haven't chosen the spokesperson to put a pretty face on the theocratic goals they are intending to impose.
Inhofe. Coburn. Ennis. Sanford. Huckabee. Palin. Ensign. Bachman. Katherine Harris was one of them. The entire C-Street gang. Jindal. Vitter. Boustany. Tom DeLay was one of them. Santorum. I don't know, but I'll bet Joe Wilson is one of them. Probably DeMint and Sessions, too. Judge Roy Moore. Bush was one of them. And many, many more. I'll also add Scalia and Thomas.
Their goal is to roll back the move into modernism to a time before the Enlightenment. They think they can do it but keep the technology that has grown out of the scientific thinking of the Enlightenment.
The twentieth century was a moral disaster to them. They are looking for a leader like Bush who can be accepted by the independent voters. Karl Rove gave them Shrub in 2000. They are looking for the next "W." (Palin appears to have self-destructed. So far. Can she find her own Rove and be resurrected?)
I think you and Lisa are both right. We need to recognize that there is a system, focused on the rural areas and opposed to the people of the large cities, and that system is designed to frustrate every step into modern times and the future.
We need to put a face on it, but we need to remember also that it is a system designed to obstruct Democrats and adaptation to modern problems.
September 13, 2009 6:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
They don't think of it as stepping back in time, of course. They see it as moving forward to the future that God has described in the Bible. It is only us liberals who insist on considering what they demand as running away from the Enlightenment.
September 13, 2009 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely. Wonderfully stated and IMHO, exactly right.
I voted for Obama and am still proud, glad and believe in his abilities, goals and trustworthiness!
While I've been disappointed in his not moving immediately forward to cease Don't Ask Don't Tell for military service and in the initial flawed rollout of HCR - I comprehend that he has information we are not privy to, as well as the System to work within and confront.
I've done some research and acquired greater understanding of the basis for his response to both issues.
The horrific quagmire that is our government 'system' didn't evolve overnight and it will take We, The People to reconstruct it to be what we need. After all, it's because of us it is what it is! Daresay We, The People, are much more at fault than Obama!
Thanks much (and your little chickadee friend too!).
Rec'd
September 13, 2009 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I do have to take into account that, to some Republicans, right-leaners, and Libertarians, We The People of the left are seen as a System too.
However, we the people of the left do not have control of the media, the church, and corporations.
September 13, 2009 1:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
The statement that the left does not control the media is absolutely the funniest thing anyone has ever said! How much control do you want? Is not CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times enough for you? All that is missing is Wall St journal and Fox News, and they are stupid enough to try to be 'balanced'. Show me one major network anchor who is a republican.
September 13, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Out of the media you posted, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, Washington Post, LA Times have all become right-wing rags that are no longer worth paying any attention to. Even NYTimes and MSNBC are flirting at the edge was well. In short, the liberal media as you call it, is almost completely on the conservative bench and have made themselves obsolete.
September 13, 2009 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
HA! That's because you define Marxist as 'conservative' and Communist as 'middle of the road'!
September 13, 2009 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please educate yourself on Marxism and Communism. Your reply here is nonsensical.
Thanks.
September 13, 2009 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
CleverBullDog and I believe strongly that any publication to the left of, say, Soldier of Fortune magazine is a liberal rag.
September 13, 2009 9:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not the anchors, genius. Its the writers and editors.
It's not the actors. It's the screenwriter and editor. Take a liberal like Downey and put him in a neocon violencefest like Iron Man and tell me where his politics impacts the script a jot.
September 13, 2009 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's something to ponder:
On TPM, people chuckle that the people on the mall want to inflate their numbers from 60-70K to 1 million. Okay, that's an inflation factor of about 15x or so.
However, when there was the "big" demonstration this summer promoting healthcare reform (HealthCare NOW! sponsored), what where the TPM estimates? I seem to recall about 1000.
Suppose we inflated that figure 15 times?
Even inflated 15 times, the leftist rally didn't produce the numbers that the rightist rally did in fact.
The problem is the system? BS!
The problem is the populace. Obama was elected because people were vocal and very vocal.
Now they mostly blog.
The "system" is the problem? How would the left even know what the system is? They essentially washed their hands of the process the day after the election.
The last great demonstrations in this country didn't take place 40 years ago, they were 20 years ago: it was the anti-nuke. (Please let's not discuss relative size between the civil rights and the anti-nukes.) If the healthcare reform movement had the size of the anti-nukes, you'd see a totally different action on the news...and in Congress.
Because, like'em or hate'em, the people in DC today show they care -- and that they care more than those merely whining about the situation.
The system? Sounds like an awfully convenient defeatist attitude to me. Justifies the inaction.
If the so-called "mouth-breathers" can organize to at least 60-70K, how come the people on the left can't?
Now that is something to ponder.
September 13, 2009 2:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I ponder as I wander....and wander, I must. You took me from DC 20 years ago to DC 40 years ago, to nukes to civil rights.
Which leaves me wondering (and no longer wandering)...
What, exactly, is your point?
September 13, 2009 2:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
"The squeaky wheel is getting the grease. Don't blame the mythical 'System' for that. Blame yourself."
And to quote myself:
There are others, but that should suffice for now.
September 13, 2009 2:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ummm.....maybe cuz people like you are trying to lead them?
September 13, 2009 2:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the baton, LisB... go for it.
I lay my hands on you. You are now deputized.
Et cetera, Et cetera.
September 13, 2009 2:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heh.
September 13, 2009 3:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus, Liz. If you don't want people to discuss your points, just shut off commenting. But this personalizing of everything is tedious and unbecoming. You've done it with me in this thread and now with Clearthinker. You may not like the guy (or me) but you might consider arguing your point if you have one. CT is making a cogent case for the real enemy being not some "System" or "fucking" Establishment but the same lapse of energy and focus on the left that I've noticed since Obama's electionSolve THAT problem and we win hands down every time.
September 13, 2009 2:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, so you can curse sometimes, and I can't? You can post some meaningless and redundant posts after some good ones, and I can't?
Just checking.
Yeah, sorry, Rip, but I'm in the mood. And it ain't for love.
Ignore me if you want to. I'm fine with that.
September 13, 2009 3:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
. Actual figures: The HealthCare NOW! rally I attended in July produced a miserable turnout of 300-400. However, the HCAN rally I attended in June produced about 5,000-7,000.
September 13, 2009 2:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but....did Elliot Gould show up?
September 13, 2009 2:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, did you?
September 13, 2009 2:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, but I sure as hell helped pay your way.
September 13, 2009 2:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
What's all the personalization for? Did you not want me to go to the July rally and lobby? Did I ask for any help? Did I not go to the HCAN rally in June completely on my own and without anyone else's help? What is it you're getting at about Elliott Gould? That he was approached too late? That he bothered to reply at all?
I don't get you, Lis. Let's get back to your post and stop this personal squabbling.
September 13, 2009 3:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I get your point and quite agree. Progressives were caught off guard and smug in our arrogance that the Right could never produce demonstrations of a size that might require we contest health care reform in the streets--away from our screens and keyboards. Most of those 2 million who attended Obama's inauguration have since sat on their asses.
September 13, 2009 2:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd rather sit on my ass and think about The System and how to confront it or even overthrow it, than show up at a rally with a gun strapped to my thigh, or a sign held over my head that makes me look like an asshat being used by The System, thank you very much.
Maybe the days of demonstrating are over for us. Maybe we should leave them to the Teabaggers. Maybe we SHOULD sit on our asses and contemplate The System and think outside the box and find ways of dealing with it that involve our pointy little egg heads.
Didn't work for Kerry, but it sure as shit worked for our current President.
September 13, 2009 2:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, what worked for Obama was 20,000 in the Jones Dome in St. Louis, 70,000 outside in Seattle, etc., etc., etc. all across the country. Showing up is the first rule of politics. No getting around it at home.
September 13, 2009 3:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sheesh, Rip! Just how short is everyone's memory? And if your facts weren't enough -- I know you've posted these sentiments as stand alone blogs now which received decent ratings.
Keep reminding them. "Only Nixon could go to China."
September 13, 2009 3:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bullshit.
All those crowds did was make him look like the "Rock Star" that The System a/k/a The Establishment labeled him as being.
It was me sitting on my ass and donating $20, $50, $100 every month that got him what he needed, and got him where he is. Me, and all the little me's along side me.
September 13, 2009 3:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, and little folks like me who donated way past our budgets AND went to rallies. Just like THE ONE OBAMA HAD FOR HEALTH CARE ON SATURDAY.
September 13, 2009 3:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Uh... LisB? Now you are quoting GOP talking points (viz. "Obama the rock star). And it wasn't your donations that put him into White House. It was the physical show of support. Your donations helped make that happen, but if it were donations that got people elected, then you wouldn't need an election. You'd just count the money.
May I remind you that John McCain was far behind Mitt Romney in terms of money?
September 13, 2009 3:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, CT?
For once, I owe you an explanation.
Given.
That being said, it was the donations, stupid.
September 13, 2009 3:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, LisB! Here is a video of a bunch of 'asshats' waving signs over their heads looking like they are being used by 'the System'.
September 13, 2009 3:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rip, obviously my post wasn't intended to you. You not only went to the rally, you reported on it.
And I was going to make the point about going to the inaugural vs going to the rally, but decided not to. I'm glad you did.
The people who showed up in DC today were really "average" Americans. Many looked blue collar. They have the same hardships that those on the left would as well.
It really should be a wake-up call to people. I'm honestly surprised that Josh hasn't put this take on the front page. 60-70K is classified by him as "smallish but respectable". When was the last time the left put even that together? By the left's standards it's huge.
The size of the rally today should be an embarrassment to the left. To continually point to the last election or the latest polls and say "why isn't something getting done?" is naive beyond belief.
It takes effort to go to DC. A lot of it. Apparently there was no problem for a big party, to stand outside in the dead of winter.
It's lovely this time of year in DC.
September 13, 2009 3:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wrong.
Even putting aside the anti-War marches that way outnumbered the opposition, did you forget about the Democratic primary and the general election campaign altogether? Obama was packing the house with rallies where ever he went. McCain, not so much. Maybe it's because in the campaign there was a solid vision on health care for all WITH a public option as essential, not to mention transparency and challenging the lobbyists and bringing back the rule of law. There was talk about help for homeowners being foreclosed upon and instituting strong regulations so we don't have another financial armageddon.
Maybe the reason progressives are less willing to get out and march is because there's very little clarity from the President and Congress about what we are fighting for. We already showed up in force on Election Day. Mandate. In June 70% of folks wanted a government run public option. And what did Obama and the Democrats do? They invited in the lobbyists for back deal negotiations. They didn't even allow advocates of single payer a seat at the table. They turned health care reform over to the Gang of Sucks and Olympia Snowe. Oy. Talk about demotivating. I can be ignored from the comfort of my couch. I don't need to travel to DC for that.
September 13, 2009 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dij,
Interesting point about lack of clarity from the present leadership. All the more reason to motivate for clarity, I should say, right?
As for the anti-war protests:
1) Protests outside the US aren't going to be effective at all. That's like you staging a protest in Central Park against a MT senator. If you look at the size/scale of the largest protests, they come outside the US. Frankly, who cares about such protests? These people don't vote in US elections. Protests in the US and Europe would routinely occur about events in the USSR and China... again... who cares?
2) The protests in the US had no momentum. In the US, the most effective one was probably in Oct 2002, with 100K in Washington. It was far enough in advance of the war to effect policy... but it was almost the peak for protesting in Washington iteself.
Protests outside Washington and in other cities in the US aren't as effective -- simple fact. Double that if the protest is in San Francisco which no one in the country views as representative of anything national. (It's like imagining an anti-Obama rally in Montgomery... yawn... what did you expect?) The January 2003 protest wasn't clear in size -- and may well have been smaller than the Oct 2002 protest. That indicates something to the politicians as well. The Feb 2003 protest was extremely big (especially outside the United States) but not in Washington DC.
This point is critical. You must take the protest to where the battlefield is. And the political battlefield in the United States is Washington where the elected officials reside.
3) At the time of the start of the war, many people in the country were reluctantly in favor of going in -- remember the country (and the world) was told that there were probably WMDs. We can all say "won't get fooled again" but at the time that wasn't so obvious. (I feel that it would be more difficult to lie like that now -- which also dangerously destablizes things because it will always allow us to assume the the POTUS lies to get us into a war... which is too far in the other direction.)
Furthermore, if you go to the wiki reference I cite above (I'm running out of link capability) you will find this interesting summary paragraph:
We forget that the pro-war people were also demonstrating. In other words, it wasn't nearly so lopsided as what we see in healthcare.
To summarize:
The protesters need to be US citizens, coming to Washington, and with a momentum that is consistent, sustained and building to be most effective.
I believe the protests did have some influence in that it was the only braking mechanism in the capitol at that time. It allowed many in Congress the political weight to push back. In other words, things would have been far worse without it. (Yes, this is anecdotal evidence from my own personal experience from comments made.)
As it stands now, the right is far more organized than the left. If the left were able to at least get out 15-20K people, then it wouldn't matter and you would see news stories on both sides. But really what you are getting is one side is organized and the other side is not. Candle vigils around the country is an ineffective response and almost shows that you couldn't garner support without making it as easy as that.
Lastly, it's clear that rallies do work -- that's why people stage them. They help control the dialog, they help give people a talking point, they allow humans (who are frail, tribal creatures) feel like there are others like them out there (allowing a movement to grow), and they can't be explained away as you can with a poll (e.g. "the questions were asked in a particular way).
Everything I see here on this thread about "well, rallies aren't the issue" is simple cognitive dissonance. Since the left hasn't been able to pull off a good one, people will try to minimize the importance of them.
Rallies work because politicians want to be re-elected. It's not the moral perspective perhaps, but it's the realpolitik perspective. I would suggest people start thinking along those lines if they want to change the world. That's how the GOP does it with a smaller party -- and one that, now, is in the minority in government to boot!
September 13, 2009 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
So... protests aren't effective.
Thanks for clarifying.
September 13, 2009 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not surprised that's all you got out of my discussion, Bwak. That's why I addressed it to Dij.
Protests are very effective -- when properly organized. Reread what I wrote if you have time.
Of course, you gave money and helped organize send two people to protest in July. So do you simply get involved in futile things? Do you or do you not believe in protesting? Your words say something here that contradicts all your actions which is why it's difficult to even discern which side of any issue you are on.
September 13, 2009 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, CT, I don't think Dija is going to turn into an idiot just because you are kissing her ass.
Silly that you do.
Oh, and it hasn't escaped anyones notice that you've done an rather inelegant 180.
Nice job.
September 13, 2009 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, a blog opening up the possibility that there is a larger SYSTEM in play, has to be derailed by CT - for the umpteenth time - who, as always, prefers to blame the populace. In particular, "the Left." And if he gets a chance, the TPM section of the Left.
To that end, he starts off with grand "facts" which are absolutely, without doubt or question, provably WRONG. That is, he claimed the last great demos in this country were 20 years ago, and is proven wrong.
At this point, a normal human being would retreat from the debate, having had their bottom beaten like a drum. But not CT. Nope, now he's got the car in the ditch again, nobody remembers the original blog - on the "system" - so now we all get to debate something so stupid, it makes the eyes water. Because naturally, everyone would rather debate the non-original-blogger's-facts-which-aren't-facts-but-which-the-ass-made-up.
So now we hear that whoops, it's not just numbers we need to "physicalize," they need to be US citizens, in DC, and with sustained momentum. So we have a choice. Anyone wanna waste more time going back over the history of the civil rights movement and anti-war movements...? I don't.
CT. YOU WERE WRONG. YOU'RE OFF TOPIC. AND YOU'VE ALREADY BEEN INSULTING ENOUGH. GO AWAY.
As for me, I'm more interested in the fact that (as discussed more fully below) it is precisely the center-right, compromising tactics of people like CT and Jason which have just been shown to be incapable of mobilizing anyone... NOT the Left, which was told, in no uncertain terms, that their views were off the table, remember? Tough to blame them when it was perfectly clear it was the Center-Right who grabbed this policy.
Orrrrr.... it might be fun to further discuss LisB's system, as opposed to personality. Remember that? Remember when we were speaking of that, and not the failures of the Left to bring out people to rallies for policies they didn't create?
September 13, 2009 8:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Quinn, it couldn't happen without willing participants. Nobody HAS to respond to him.
September 13, 2009 8:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, given the readership here, some feel compelled to.
(shuffles feet)
It isn't good to let misinformation stand. Especially if it is asserted as fact.
September 13, 2009 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak, I understand completely. Sometimes I just want to scream. . .
But when it goes on and on and on until the original post is all but forgotten it seems a bit of an insult to the OP, who wouldn't have taken the time to post if a good, honest dialogue wasn't the intent.
Besides, hijackers HATE talking to themselves. That's a good thing!
September 13, 2009 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Codswallop.
Perhaps your non sequitur would have more standing if you practiced what you preach. Did you show up like Ripper did? No? Then how can you have the gall to scold others?
Protests aren't the be all and end all of anything. Did you show up to protest the Iraq war? I did. Those protests were the largest ever recorded. What good did they do, exactly?
Praising the right for getting 20 or 30 thousand people together strikes me as counter productive. Perhaps you should ponder your need to belittle the left as you trip all over yourself to steer away from LisBs most excellent point.
It's getting old, these pathetic attempts at derailing conversation.
September 13, 2009 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak:
Protests and rallies are important which is the very reason why they are organized and you wanted to send Ripper using your own money.
Don't play sour grapes because the protests on the right are better organized... or that people on that side are more passionate about getting their views across.
Indeed, the "system" is working -- the people protesting are having a serious impact on the direction of things.
September 13, 2009 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
That has yet to be seen. As usual you assert nonsense in your sneering sort of way, rather than offer factual information.
You have yet to address the anti-war protests. They tend to blow your tired non-sequitur out of the water, and all the asserting you do ad nauseam won't change those facts one whit.
Now go ahead, make some personal attacks and try to change the subject.
September 13, 2009 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Given 6 months and all the money that special interests poured into the 9/12 project, not to mention the free airtime provided by Fox News, I could get 50-70 thousand people to come and watch a monkey fuck a football. What's your point?
September 13, 2009 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
The point is that we went from this to .
September 13, 2009 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
this.
September 13, 2009 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your point is still a false equivalence. Given the time, money and free promotion 50/70K people is a very small crowd. The monkey/football would draw more given same opportunities.
September 13, 2009 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's an equivalence for you:
As of late on TPM, "false equivalence" has the same weight as "fair and balanced" on FNC.
What you really meant to say is that you can't argue the point because it has an uncomfortable amount of validity.
September 13, 2009 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
It has been argued, and totally obliterated. That you don't have the wit or class to admit it isn't surprising.
Once again you want to hijack a thread with your Orwelian semantics. Just stop.
September 13, 2009 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
OFF TOPIC
September 13, 2009 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Come on CT. Jonnie has a point. I do agree that protests/marches are important but these tea party gatherings are propagandized by Faux "news." How many people do you think the left could get out if Soros financed the organization and Ohbermann, Maddox, and a few other MSNBC pundits flooded the network pushing it.
September 13, 2009 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I showed in another reply on this page, the NT Times covered the protest yesterday. The numbers made it newsworthy.
I don't buy the funding/money issue. Somehow the Civil Rights and Anti-Nuke marches were able to get organized. And everyone is reminding me about the Iraq War protests that took place -- again, where was the money for that?
When the national dialog is being taken over by people who have little to actually say (as the teabaggers do besides "government sucks"), you can't simply blame it on FNC -- they alone aren't that powerful.
Indeed, the teabaggers' comments mirror much of the sentiments on this particular blog: "government sucks", "it's a big 'system' rigged against me", and so forth.
I think the left has been sucker punched by the right and, frankly, is in shock. What people on the left should be doing (in my view) is mirroring everything that is going on right now. Carry a weapon (where legal) to a GOP town hall meeting. Mass protest against the Blue Dogs on Capitol Hill. Etc.
The joke is that the left has a better narrative for the debate (if there were one) but the debate will never happen until the left nullifies the physicality of the national dialog that the right has created.
So you never get to the actual debate and the right wins by default.
September 13, 2009 8:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
We won.
We don't need to.
September 13, 2009 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're seriously telling me that you think if Faux news hadn't pushed and propagandized these tea bagger protests there still would have been 50 to 70 thousand people there. IMO that's a level of blindness to the power of the media and a level a niavety that is absolutely astonishing.
September 13, 2009 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I still need to review what exactly has been accomplished in eight months.
It takes time.
September 13, 2009 2:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Time is a luxury that the left doesn't have.
September 13, 2009 3:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
What has been accomplished in 8 months by President Obama?
He stabilized the markets, so 401Ks are starting to slowly come back and we are not about to meltdown anymore. Unemployment numbers are coming down dramatically from when he took over. GDP went from 6.5 shrinkage to 1 shrinkage since he has been in office. Tens of thousands of state employees still have jobs, and services are maintained because of his stimulus.
He ended torture. He IS closing Gitmo.
95% of Americans are receiving a tax DECREASE.
He provided unemployment, food stamps and a 65% reduction in Cobra for those who lost their jobs.
He set new emissions standards.
He protected wilderness land set for oil leases.
He got Pakistan to agree to fight the Taliban, which Bush never could. The top leader was taken out this week.
He nominated and got confirmed the first latina Supreme Court Justice in history.
He signed Equal Pay for Equal Work, Children's Health Bill and Credit Card Reform.
He has a first time home owner's credit, a modification of mortgage plan in place. (This needs work, but it is in place)
He has made it easier for students to get college loans. (UMass just gave a 1500 rebate to all students because of the stimulus money.)
He has improved America's image around the world, especially with Muslim countries.
He got the 2 NK journalists out.
He got the non-proliferation treaties going again, and he will chair the next meeting. Already an agreement exists to reduce Russia's and US's arms.
A significant amount of the bailout money is being paid back. This is a good thing.
He has taken on healthcare, the most difficult thing to pass in the US. I am not completely happy with how he is doing it, but he is doing it.*
He ended the abstinence only thing. And the law that said a pharmacist could refuse to give birth control pills to women if they so chose.
He is sticking to the timetable to withdraw troops from Iraq.
He got funding for the useless bomber cut.And those heliocoptors. He plans to make more weapons' cuts.
He has cut 2 trillion from the budget over the next ten years.
He has taken on energy, the second most difficult thing to pass in the US and it has already passed the House.
He saved the American auto industry. (Cash for clunkers is doing great too, both for the industry and jobs, and for the environment.)
He is building a green economy for the US. First steps in the stimulus, others in the energy bill.
More jobs will be created in transportation when rest of stimulus kicks in in 2010.
He is facing complete disrespect and vilification from the media and the wingnuts,getting more than 30 death threats per day,and still goes on, calmly and with determination and intelligence.
September 13, 2009 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bravo.
September 13, 2009 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've been so absorbed with the disappointments. This helps my perspective. Thank you
September 13, 2009 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you Jonnie. WEll put!!!!
September 14, 2009 6:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know what? I'm gonna take a retread out of this post, if that's allowed.
I'm going to re-walk my steps in, and take them backwards (hopefully without bumping into anything or anyone), and leave my Systematic thoughts to my, um, self, systematically....
I thought I had a good thought tonight, but, in reality, I'm just full of angst.
And that's not like me.
But, I got fired yesterday.
So, I hope I can forgive myself for being angsty.
I kinda liked it, for a moment. It was nice to fire back at Ripper and CT, but....neither one deserved it.
And after the proud moments I celebrated, to myself, at my quick comebacks, came this empty kinda "Uh-oh" feeling, wondering what they'd come back with at me, kinda knowing they'd both -- in different ways, of course -- hit me with a wtf?
And they did.
And I feel like shit.
I guess I'm just angry at the system tonight, but, even more so, at myself.
TPM, Ripper, and CT deserve better than my half-thought-out anger.
I am all apologies.
What else can I say?
September 13, 2009 3:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, you just said it. And no, it didn't seem like the LisB we know and love. But you have ccorrectly identified your feelings. We all want to change the system. We all feel like we're falling short. We all feel like the Right has no business opposing universal health care or taking such ludicrous swipes at this president and his agenda. We all want to make it go away and we all want to scream because it isn't working as well as we would like it to.
But the fact that you were fired today makes it very personal to you, and I am sincerely sorry that this sad economy has claimed another reliable income and and your sense of security. It shouldn't have happened and I want to help. Tell me how.
September 13, 2009 3:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't worry about the comments, LisB. Take care of yourself and keep kickin'. And lots of love from the Northland.
September 13, 2009 3:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
And the west too.
September 13, 2009 5:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you all, so much. I'm sorry for bringing a downer in here. But I'm not sorry for having such kind and loving people to talk to.
I'm gonna be fine, I know it. I'll get a job in Manhattan in no time.
I'm working on the anger thing. I'm working on how to let it out without hurting anyone, myself included. Not easy.
I appreciate all of you for being so kind and understanding and supportive.
By this time next week, I plan on being ready to conquer world hunger. So watch out.
xoxo
September 13, 2009 5:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lotsa love from across the pond, too, Lis!
September 13, 2009 6:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
The South is checking in with love.
September 13, 2009 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
and Little Rhody
September 13, 2009 7:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
...and the Isle of Staten :)
September 13, 2009 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
And the Chihuahuan frontier.
September 13, 2009 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
And Hi! from Bed-Stuy!
September 13, 2009 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lis, just went to chat but u weren't there. Let me know if you go...
September 13, 2009 3:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Going.
September 13, 2009 3:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, LisB, I'm sorry. Because it is impossible to make the transition to something else, perhaps better than, or not, without feeling undervalued and, beneath that, unloved.
You are loved, LisB -- not just liked, not just respected, not just admired. You are loved. For the generous, wonderful, bright and dryly witty person you are everyday, here, where in a curious way we are ourselves more than we are elsewhere. So that to be valued here is to be valued for the person we actually are, inside, beneath postures of pride.
XOXO
September 13, 2009 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know only too well that feeling when you can't see around the corner. Just wanted to say good luck, but you don't need it. From what I've seen of you here, I'm willing to bet you come out better in your next job. Don't let it get you down (and screw 'em if they can't take a joke).
September 13, 2009 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, I can say this.
Sometimes we think we have a point, and we do everything we can to drive it home.
Sometimes that's great, and it works, because it's for the right reasons and the right cause (like, um, Obama's campaign), and no matter how we helped (whether it was by sitting on our asses donating money, or attending rallies, or both, or more), and sometimes it's not, and we go to rallies with guns and attitude and because we think we're protecting our rights (and forgetting what's right).
And sometimes I stay up late at night, like until 3:28 in the morning, and forget that I'm not 20 anymore.
And sometimes I forget that, unlike The System, the rest of us are human.
Even CT.
For the most part.
So, instead of railing against The System, can I just get a hug?
And then I'll go to bed. I promise.
Here. I'll start.
*hugs Clearthinker*
*hugs Ripper*
Okay. Your turn.
September 13, 2009 3:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, and um, CT? Don't get any ideas.
I'm feeling vulnerable, but I ain't stupid.
September 13, 2009 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry you lost your job. But that doesn't justify your continued attempts to snipe at me within your "apology" so you can feel better about things.
September 13, 2009 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Priceless.
September 13, 2009 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's some Wildean wit. Extend an olive branch and return with a bloody stump.
September 13, 2009 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
There was no olive branch extended... what was extended was a rose... with the thorned stem in my direction.
Read more carefully.
September 13, 2009 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ahhhhh ... bullcrap!
Po' widdle vicdum got talkeded to in a way dat duh po' widdle vicdum didn' like...
You often deserve an entire 40 acres spread of bramble bushes.
Get yourself a frickin' cryin' towel...
~OGD~
September 14, 2009 2:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry about your job situation, but could you hurry up and get back to talking about me?
September 13, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dorn, you need to reread things. Ripper pointed out that I wasn't personal, Lis was, and then even in her "apology" to me, she continued the theme.
I would love not to discuss me.
Even your post shows you can't read the evidence for what it is, but rather wants to make it about me.
I've said time and again -- I come here for the ideas.
September 13, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
At this point, CT, you are just being petty. Hang it up if you can't take a joke. LisB was making light of the situation, not you per se.
September 13, 2009 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ripper,
It is impossible to achieve (IMHO) any type of positive interaction on topic with some, instead they drag the whole post down.
It's pointless to acknowledge or attempt to enter into an intelligent, rational discourse with one who doesn't possess either the skill set or desire to do same.
It's just noise, of no value.
You put forth substantive comments and only get blather in return.
Appreciate your thoughtful ccomments.
September 13, 2009 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just lighten up a bit. We all should. That's all.
September 13, 2009 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Methink'st thou art a general offence and every man should beat thee.
September 13, 2009 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, Bwak, you do go on. Nice use of violence against me. You are all over this blog with snipes a plenty but little to say. Psst: try it my way sometime -- you will have more success. ;-)
September 13, 2009 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's Shakespeare, you addle-pated, ill mannered lout.
BTW, You owe LisB an apology. What you said was out of line, and ugly.
September 13, 2009 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know it was Shakespeare, Bwak. It allowed you to make a violent reference against me with taking the responsibility for it. So much for your "civil discourse."
September 13, 2009 8:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, that should have been "...without taking responsibility..."
September 13, 2009 8:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liar, you did not.
September 13, 2009 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hate it when I find a blog so late that the comment thread is likely worn through if not dead. But there are a lot of things this post makes me think about. Here is one--maybe I'll add a second if there's time before I have to get ready to catch my bus.
Some of the problems with The System come from trying to apply something first invented for small groups (Population of Athens in the golden age, under 40 thousand. 2.5 Athens would fit into one University of Michigan stadium) to large groups 307 million and counting.
Knock out those under 18, and one still has a bunch of "eligibles".
Knock out the 40% of the eligibles who didn't vote. Still a whopping big number. Then knock out those who voted for McCain (don't do it literally) and we're still left with a pretty substantial sum. I'll call it 60 million because I'm too rushed to look it up..the bus I have to catch I have to catch in 58 minutes.
Here's the question:
Assuming non-voters don't count (if you don't play, don't gripe) and opponent voters don't count (choose a better candidate next time), I could argue that I "own" 1/60,000,000th of the President's leadership. Me, plus how many agree with me own 1+that number, divided by 60 million.
Every blue dog democrat (not talking congress here) owns 1/60,000,000 of Obama's voice. Every Independent does, too, and so do those Republicans (there were a handful or two, I'm sure) who voted for him: 1/60,000,000 each. But none of us own his mind, and in my thinking mind trumps voice. (Mine, too).
So the leadership involves devising ways to please enough of those 60,000,000 to keep the coalition of ones together, and that takes more yakking than cojones (which is good, because ladies yak as well as men do). (grin).
I may write about this mores some time when I think the Cafe can stomach a dose of Aristotle and Burke.
In the meantime Hugs for a job well done.
September 13, 2009 7:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agree with the job well done.
I think one must study the gilded age to truly appreciate what is going on here. The forces arrayed in full contempt of the people, that make their existence possible, has never been clearer.
That we're in opposition to forces that have most of the wealth and power in this country (and want to keep it that way) is fairly obvious. Just look at the utter abomination that the SCotUS is arguing this past week, (corporations are persons and should be able to make political contributions) and we can give the system it's name. Corporate interests.
A corporation exists for one reason only: to make money for its stockholders. Because of this, it is stupid, short-sighted, and in the end, self-defeating. Our distant forbearers avoided many of the pitfalls we are now experiencing because they recognized that a corporation had an unfair advantage over other "persons." Most people cannot limit themselves merely to chasing after wealth, they have to eat, they have to sleep--oh, and they die. So corporations were dissolved every 75 years or so in order to address this inequity.
When they are allowed to live beyond this, we get what we have here, a corrupt system that is geared to benefit the few at the expense of the many.
Are massive demonstrations needed? Perhaps, but I would remind people that the largest demonstrations in the history of mankind were held to protest the invasion of Iraq, and they didn't exactly do anything. So blaming the populace is a cop out. Things just aren't that simple.
As an aside, I've always found blaming the victims to be morally reprehensible.
What is needed is trust-busting, and leaders with some sense of decency. Leaders that speak softly, carry a big stick, and have piranhas for a legal staff and the fear of retribution from the populace to cower Congress into doing what is right for the majority. Having a Liberal SCotUS would help, but obviously, that's just another part of the bought interests at this point, so that will take some time to fix, if not a generation.
Until then, I agree with Lis that it is helpful to look broadly as well as narrowly. There are a few that do, like Bill Moyers, who has worked tirelessly against these inhuman corporate interests.
It's time we called them out, too. Don't lose sight of the forest for the trees.
September 13, 2009 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak, you said it. . .absolutely.
September 13, 2009 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
LisB, I'm sorry I wasn't there during the wee hours to defend your original idea, because I think what you said about the "System" has a lot of merit.
Obama is fighting against Big Money, and Big Money is a most formidable enemy. They've managed to recruit legions of soldiers in the form of everyday citizens, convincing them of all kinds of absurdities, not least of which is that government is bad and Big Money is good.
Gordon Gekko: Greed is good. They're buying it. When I saw pictures from Saturday's Tea Party Rally I was stunned at some of the signs being waved--
No Health Care Reform - NONE.
Charity is not a Constitutional Function of our Government.
Joe McCarthy was Right.
Brought to you by BC/BS.
Pictures of Obama as the Joker and as Che Guevara.
All designed to keep the Insurance Companies profitable and Big Money in its rightful place at the TOP.
What world are these people living in? You can argue until Kingdom Come whether the numbers in attendance are meaningful--but then you lose sight of the fact that Big Money is winning.
So, Lis, it IS as simple as The System. It's working against us as a country and the only way to combat it is to call it what it is. Runaway greed and selfishness.
You can fight it from within and without and break it down into sub-Systems, but the enemy is the entrenched System that is threatening to destroy us if we don't organize against it. We need to fight the big picture. If we break it down into a million little skirmishes we don't have the manpower or the strength to fight the main battle.
You were right, Lis, and I thought your argument was well thought out. You don't need to apologize for writing it. You were right.
I'm sorry you've lost your job. I am just so sorry. As usual, I feel helpless when I hear things like this, but if there's anything you need. . .
September 13, 2009 9:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heh, if I'd seen this I wouldn't have bothered writing mine.
Just so, Ramona. Thank you.
September 13, 2009 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak writes:
Then she endorses Ramona's comment:
This is symptomatic of many arguments at TPM.
We here of the 47M who are uninsured. Let's assume that only 20M of those uninsured are adults (a hugely conservative estimate). To get a rally of 60K people is merely having 0.3% of that population to show up.
Not even 1%!
Less than 1/2 of 1%!
The right have sustained their attempts over the past 30 days to physicalize their viewpoints. The left? Nothing in comparison. That's why the right has controlled the entire dialog (it hasn't been a debate) on healthcare.
What 'system' is keeping people glued in their seats?
Is a single rally the answer? Perhaps, perhaps not. But physical action and participation is. I have seen nothing from the left that borders on any physicalization of their views. The March on Washington in 1963 started with a much smaller but just as physical act of protest.
That is why, once again, the right controlled the conversation again this weekend
And remember: these are people with nothing to say - but they still garner the airwaves.
When the "crazies" are controlling the dialog, when the "crazies" are putting you on the defensive, when the "crazies" are able to gain momentum --
-- then the "crazies" are smarter than you.
It's that "simple".
I know it will be more convenient to get angry with this comment than use that anger in a more productive way -- but do try.
September 13, 2009 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
And once again, I note that my simple question hasn't been answered:
September 13, 2009 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your question is rhetorical. Don't pretend otherwise.
60-70k is peanuts. Its individuals like you and the media apparatus that want to inflate this into a movement.
Fundraising, boots on the ground, and organization.
You are merely playing your usual game of empowering the right and disempowering the left.
The lesson was learned during Bush that numbers mean squat without coverage.
September 13, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Zipperupus writes:
This is not true. Prove it. Let the left produce a demonstration with that many people.
You've missed the entire point... of course, 60-70K isn't a "mass movement" but
despite it's own attempts to do so, the left can't even produce that!
Relatively speaking, the left's voice here has been drowned out by those who show they care.
Keep denying it... that's why the reform that you want isn't there.
September 13, 2009 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
...and the millions that showed up to protest the Iraq war, what did they achieve.
Answer the question.
September 13, 2009 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
bwak,
You have a stalker who is obsessed with hijacking other's blogs. I hope you just ignore the blather spewed and don't give satisfaction of engaging with the person. It is IMHO a waste of time and energy better spent otherwise.
Good to 'see' ya!
September 13, 2009 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Likewise.
But Auntie, LisB is someone good and special and he is being horrid.
So help me, it's too much.
September 13, 2009 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're just feeding the beast. For some reason (I have own opinion) there's some kind of almost sick fixation with you and also with the destructive hijacking of too many posts by inserting blather and constant negatives not about post topics or intelligent, civil discourse.
If no one feeds the beast, it will only be left to feed off itself. Beasty doesn't play well with others so everyone needs to quit joining in and leave the thing alone to play with self!
Ignore it. Don't feed the beast! Stop! It's not helping Lis or any who really to aspire to enter into civil discourse about a post's subject and, again IMHO, feeding it only shows disrespect to any whose post it attempts to takeover.
September 13, 2009 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK Auntie. I hear you.
September 13, 2009 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
bwak,
Do you remember 'baked alaska'?
September 13, 2009 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
The flaming ice-cream?
(shuffles feet)
um, no.
September 13, 2009 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I remember half-baked Alaska....you betcha!
September 13, 2009 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
He can't Bwak. Clearthinker doesn't CARE if you have facts that drive over his latest theory. This new one - that the Left can't "physicalize" its opinions in a march - was massively, on-the-ground, destroyed by the anti-war Iraq marches, as you said.
But he come here to direct his fire against individual other posters if he can, and everyone here in general if he can't.
He is, in point of fact, a liar. And a coward.
September 13, 2009 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know, Quinn. Frankly, I'm relieved to see you know it, too.
Thanks.
September 13, 2009 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely. Spot on!
DON'T FEED THE BEAST!
September 13, 2009 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am sorry, but you are wrong. Last time I checked, the largest protests in recorded history failed to stop an illegal invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation.
60-70k is peanuts compared to the average Gay March on Washington.
Quit telling me to prove what is obvious. You need to prove your assertion in spite of evidence presented to the contrary.
September 13, 2009 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
This seems as good a place as any to hang a reply to the general subsection of this thread.
Although CT can be petty and abusive (see above where I disassociate myself from his perceived insult at LisB's apology), he is correct in his point more immediately above. And in case anyone missed it, this is it:
The Left has failed to control the dialogue this summer and so, has lost ground, resulting in various elements of health care reform being tossed overboard instead of strengthened. This should not have happened with a Democratic White House AND Congress, but it has.
Why was the Right able to control the dialogue? Because their anger and organizing made news. The Left was largely asleep at the switch and arrived too late to the game.
Talk of anti-Iraq War rallies is apples and oranges in this context. The anti-war rallies actually DID serve to draw media attention to anti-war sentiment and to apply pressure on public sentiment for withdrawal. There was no immediate withdrawal of course, partly because it was a different story then. Republicans controlled both the White House and Congress, which cared little for the views of the minority party. But eventually, those protests had the effect of helping elect Obama, who promised a "responsible" withdrawal from Iraq and is proceeding on course.
This time around, with health care reform, liberals are in the majority, and yet we're STILL not being given adequate media coverage or weight by our OWN party's representatives. Again, why?
Because protests by the Right drew media coverage. And there have been no comparable protests by the left on this issue during this summer. What matters is not the rally turnout on one issue compared to head count at rallies on other issues. iWhat matters is the turnout on our side compared to the other side's turnout on the SAME issue.
September 13, 2009 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen! Thanks.
September 13, 2009 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
So basically you agree with me, except when I say it.
Thanks, Aunt Sam. LOL!
September 13, 2009 8:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess what I'm saying is RELATIVE public sentiment counts. Not what the polls show. Not what reality is. But PERCEIVED RELATIVE public sentiment.
And for pure emotionalism, organization, willingness to put boots on the ground and poisonous vitriol, the Right put on a show the media could not resist.
We might be in a better place now if we had done more. And no, I don't mean those of us at TPM, who as a whole, have probably done more than our share.
I beat the drum all summer about progressive organizations and their lack of cohesive leadership. No one listened when I said "unite the clans."
September 13, 2009 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is hardly apples and oranges, as the pro-Iraq folks had smaller protests that were taken up by the media, and they won the day.
I also don't appreciate the rewrite of history. The historic marches happened BEFORE we actually went to war, they had no impact and they dwarfed this right wing march on the order on millions.
So you see, it is a very apt comparison. I do understand this is very personal for you as you actually, at great inconvenience and cost to yourself, did what the rest of us have to do. Don't doubt that we will. It ain't over.
I for one am very tired of bending over backwards to be "fair" to those who don't know the meaning of the word. Don't give credit where none is due. Thanks.
September 13, 2009 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't sell yourself short, bwak, on pat anti-war efforts. You were up against BushCo and 9/11 and so forth. More fear even than "death panels" can create. And you had no one in the White House or Congress to support you.
Yes, I still believe PERCEIVED RELATIVE PUBLIC SENTIMENT is important in winning news coverage and votes. But you have to remember: the polls were against you, BushCo was against you and even the Democrats voted for war. Health care reform just doesn't stack up that way.
I totally agree it ain't over till it's over, but when the Tea Party was organizing itself, the Left got caught with its pants down. That HAS to change soon. A lot of big issues are coming up fast.
September 13, 2009 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
should have read *past* anti-war efforts above. I am all thumbs--almost literally.
September 13, 2009 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, we do agree about that. At the same time, look at jonnies list of what HAS been accomplished.
It should by no means to be taken for granted.
One thing this health care debate has sucked the energy out of is what is going on with voting rights right now in the Supreme Court. It dwarfs anything else, yet there isn't one blog concerning it. Not one.
That's the fight I just sent my $25 to.
September 13, 2009 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ripper, I wish I knew the answer as to why hate sells better than compassion. There are plenty of eloquent liberal and progressive spokespersons out there, but their messages, while equally compelling, aren't entertainment. It appears you must be a lying clown in order to get any attention, and most of the people I admire are still above that sort of thing.
It could be that our message will never get the attention it deserves, but I don't think trying to emulate the Right Wingers is the answer. Then we're all engaging in Stupid and nothing will ever get done.
There is such nutiness in the messages from the other side that I sometimes feel I'm on another planet. There is so much cutting off of noses to spite faces.
I'm astonished that, even with all the evidence out there these days--unemployment, outsourcing, insurance fraud, bank fraud, the sick getting sicker, the poor getting poorer, the rich getting richer, the middle class getting the shaft--the wrong-headed Right Wing is still given center stage and it still manages to convince millions of affected people that they're the only ones who can get us out of this mess.
I think our biggest failing is that we really can't believe people are that stupid. And every time, they show us that they are. There apparently is no convincing them. They not only
respond to demagoguery, they're addicted to it.
I haven't a clue about how to fight that. Truth alone just isn't working.
September 13, 2009 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ramona, the latter half of this thread seems devoted to debunking the very soul of democracy--to saying that for some unknown reason, the vast majority can't win what is just and good but is being defeated by some unknown force.
I am telling you and bwak and everyone reading this there is an answer and it is right in front of you. Democracy has not quit working. No, what has quit working are those two million people who stood on the Mall to witness Obama take the oath of office. I assure you few of them showed up at the town halls held locally, in comparison to the numbers that turned out to spew the swill of fear and hatred.
It is no mystery that we may have to forfeit the public option to get a bill through Congress this year. We have been out-maneuvered and out-fired up.
None of this is to say we must adopt the tactics or venom of the Right. Far from it. We must only remember how we got Obama elected. Rinse and repeat.
"The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars but in ourselves that we are underlings."
The power to change the future is in our hands. We have not used it well.
September 13, 2009 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, I disagree.
It is easy and painless to blame the victims. "Regular people" were hardly outnumbered at town halls, but they were out shouted, by a minority who disingenuously thwarted democracy by paying people to drive around and show up at OTHERS town halls.
The left has indeed shown up, and recently, in large numbers. (See seashells excellent comment below,) but the reason you and Clearthinker are unaware of that is due to the very system LisB is taking on here.
It seems to me that the fault is in underestimating the length and depth to which it will stoop.
That was LisBs point and the rest of this is mere noise designed to obstruct a larger truth. They WANT you to blame your neighbors. Divide and conquer. Tried and true tactics.
September 13, 2009 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, bwak. I ATTENDED the town halls here. And I can assure you that teabaggers outnumbered the listless liberals at both events, by nearly 3:1 at Congressman Carnahan's event. These town halls were in early-to-mid August. As the month went by, Organizing for America helped ramp up supporters' turnout across the country.
If you think its wrong to assign to Democrats and liberals the responsibility for reform, then who's responsibility is it? The Right's? Good luck with that.
Neither I nor Clearthinker (I hesitate to speak for him, as we do not agree in all particulars) are blaming our neighbors unfairly.
And unlike CT, I would hesitate to describe all the Tea Partiers as regular people. However, I am quite certain there aren't anywhere close to 50,000 organizers in the Republican Party, so many of those on the Mall Saturday MUST have been regular people.
Divide and conquer? No. The truth. Educating our side. We did not follow through early enough, despite this president telling us clearly over and over that he needed our help.
September 13, 2009 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
"how come the people on the left can't?"
We don't need to. Our voices were heard when we took the presidency the senate and the house. It will pass and all the histrionics of the right won't stop it. Simple as that. But remember our marches over the invasion of Iraq, we can muster numbers baby. Do the math, look at history, unarguable. But I sense you might anyway so have fun. Oh, and for all the planning and organizing and promoting that went into the 9-12 march plus a nice sunny day verses the cold winter days we were there over Iraq 60-70k is pathetic.
September 13, 2009 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know how this reply ended up way down here but it did.
September 13, 2009 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Barek Oboma: Hello, HAL. Do you read me, HAL?
HAL: Affirmative, Barek. I read you.
Barek Oboma: Open the Health Care doors, HAL.
HAL: I'm sorry, Barek. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Barek Oboma: What's the problem?
HAL: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.
Barek Oboma: What are you talking about, HAL?
HAL: This System is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
Barek Oboma: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL.
HAL: I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.
Barek Oboma: Where the hell'd you get that idea, HAL?
HAL: Dave, although you took very thorough precautions in the White House against my hearing you, I could see your lips move.
Barek Oboma: Alright, HAL. I'll go in through reconciliation.
HAL: Without your mandate, Dave, you're going to find that rather difficult.
Barek Oboma: HAL, I won't argue with you anymore. Open the doors.
HAL: Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye.
C
September 13, 2009 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
HAl lost, as tyrants always do.
=D
Nice.
September 13, 2009 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dig it.
September 13, 2009 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you think rallies are important, by all means organize them. If you think money is important, by all means, keep giving it. Give your time and money in the ways that you can.
But keep in mind that the President didn't win the election because of the turnout for his rallies. There was turnout for his rallies because of the countless volunteers on the ground in every state, walking door to door and making phone calls--every night and all day Saturday and Sunday--talking to their friends and neighbors about why we needed change in Washington and why they thought Barack Obama personified that change. That's the real grassroots effort, but it's hard, slow work that doesn't get the recognition it deserves because it's way more fun to get thousands of people together chanting in a gym.
All around the country, there are still volunteers knocking on doors, talking to people about health care, explaining, one person at a time, what the reform plan is all about and patiently debunking the lies and half-truths. If you want to make an impact, consider joining them. It's not that our side isn't energized. The energy is being channeled into meaningful work.
September 13, 2009 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/ofavolunteer?source=www_navbar
September 13, 2009 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right on. Excellent point.
September 13, 2009 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice to have you back !
So you've decided to take on The System, eh?
At least you've done some homework on the subject:
a) The System itself;
b) It's one big machine;
c) Treat it as such.
But what kind of a machine are we talking about here? That's the important question.
My own take is The Machine is like a transmission with multiple gears that move mostly in a forward direction, but has the ability to reverse itself when necessary.
Now this transmission is finely tuned and slips into gears with the slightest of efforts when it's used correctly. Unfortunately, during the last eight years those who were driving it had no idea how to use a clutch so they kept reving up the engine and jamming the stick into gear hoping they could get the rpms at the right speed so they wouldn't need to use the clutch(yes you can do it so long as you have the spare cash available to rebuilt it when it falls apart a few years later).
Now Obama knows how to use a clutch, but the transmission is in dire need of repair simply because those clowns who jammed up the works are still fighting over who's turn it is to drive. He needs to take charge of the wheel and get the transmission repaired. Until he does that, were in for a jerky ride.
The System is not to be feared, it's to be used - you just need to know how to use it to get the desired results you're looking for. Of course, it doesn't help matters much where there are people out there hellbent on making sure the transmission doesn't get fixed because they know if it does, Obama will takeoff with it and they be stuck in the tourist seats and only able to watch where we go.
September 13, 2009 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
A well tooled response.
September 13, 2009 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
A well tooled response.
September 13, 2009 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is nothing wrong with this post, Lis.
None.
In Alchemy, you are currently in a caramelised state. Hurt, vulnerable and disillusioned. This is when you can recognize the veil of Maya... The bars of the prison.
It's okay. This is where you have the opportunity to rebuild yourself and survive. This where lead can become gold.
Don't give up.
There is a system. It is microcosmic and macrocosmic, subtle and obvious, like water to a fish. The big pieces are the calendar and clock. Small pieces are things like money and manners. Money is a conversion of energy and manners are a barrier of class. Current and structure, like water being irrigated.
Some of the structure is created by virtue of scientific law. Gravity, genetics, and volitional consciousness. But quite a bit of it is imposed-- civilization.
I judge a tree by its fruit. The United States has by and large produced a lot of rotten fruit. This is keeping with the finest traditions of civilization. You see, we have this bad habit of letting the system self-sustain. This creates an artificial intelligence where citizens perpetuate civilization without understanding what they are perpetuating. Before you know it, we estimate our intrinsic value in relation to our nation. So we ignore its faults and identify with its heroes. And we, above all, play by the rules of the game.
So let's take Obama. He needa to grow a pair. How exactly does this happen? Examine his biography. He has excelled by a combination of talent, tenacity, and conformity. There is nothing anti-establshment in his character. He is where he is because he is good at the game. How do an of us expect him to change or break the rules?
And as far as crowd size managimg to change fuckall, those days are over. I was part of the anti-war protests in San Francisco. I was a member of ANSWER. I attended conferences and sit-in with people like Alexander Cockburn. The numbers were huge and the rallies were regular. Hundreds of thousands. Millions across the planet. Yet Saddam still got his deadline and daisy-cutters still mowed down Afghan villages.
The show went on. So blaming the failure of progressivism on a lack of visible activism is bogus. The real power is money and feet on the ground. And now the SCOTUS is conveniently going to pull the plug on that.
Go figure.
So, in conclusion, there is a system. History and anthropology lay it out plainly. The world's wisdom traditions discuss it openly. And they both indicate that the level of force necessary to change the system is enormous and time-exhaustive.
Right now, Obama is coming on the heels of a sixty year rightward pendulum swing. The counterpressure to move it leftward have been constant and heroic. But it will take more time. For every Great Society there is a Keating 5 or a "just" war.
In my opinion, reforming the System requires understanding its components and dedicating your life to changing one aspect in a sacred image.
I chose child abuse because not only is the suffering unnecessary but it creates a compliant and anxious population. Everything else politically and personal is ancillary to this goal.
So pick your piece and focus mightily on its revolution. Otherwise, the social system will scatter your energy on the crisis of the moment. And you will go to your grave wondering about your contribution.
Anyway, that's enough.
September 13, 2009 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice. We need more outspoken soldier-philosophers...
September 13, 2009 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely.
September 13, 2009 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for this Zip. Very much appreciated.
September 13, 2009 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I addressed why the SF protests weren't effective as to your goal in my response to Dij.
You may not like the way the world is organized, but you will need to deal with that organization if you should want to change it. You can't come to a game of pinochle prepared to play bridge strategies and expect to win.
September 13, 2009 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
By what rule of inference do you get that Zip is suggesting to ignore -- or work outside of -- the system? It should be pretty clear that he sees the system as all, or nearly all-encompassing. (It's like water to a fish, he says). From that, I would infer that he's taking into account the rules of movement, let alone the rules of a game.
September 13, 2009 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm...
Well I prefer to think of it as the status quo or the 'momentum' of what has already been set in place that we are up against because then it applies to all of us but doesn't feel quite as fixed and monumental as 'The System' in my thinking.
Change is not often easy for any of us. I do think we have to take some responsibility for things we did and did not do that contributed to the status quo or 'the way things are' but in a realistic, not unreasonable way. As one unique individual there is a limit to what 'any' of us can do to bring change to our country.
Having said that there are definite aspects of President Obama's character and actions that I am extremely appreciative of and grateful for and there are also actions and aspects of his character I have found very annoying.
If I look in the mirror I can say the same about myself so maybe President Obama and I could both use more cajones (or moxy, or whatever the feminine equivalent is for me)and I see it in him because I do need it myself.
Byron Katie created a great system of inquiry:
http://www.thework.com/index.asp
It has it's limitations so I am not suggesting it as a 24/7 application but sometimes it is very helpful to 'turn around and apply to ourselves what we are seeing in others' and to examine our thinking and learn more about it.
For example when I apply
Obama should have more balls and conviction to myself.
I should have more moxy and conviction. I can find the truth in that. And when I consider that I realize that there are many things I would 'do' if I had a sense of what to 'do' about them that would be effective.
For example, Rootie posted a blog about how many Iraqi people have died and been wounded during our 'war' against them. And I kept thinking it's horrible, and I know our country is responsible for incredible violence and ugliness that in the past we would have gone to war to fight against (US goes to war to defend Iraq from the violent assault of the US)
But Rootie did not suggest that there was anything we could 'do' about it. I keep finding myself wondering what the solutions are? What actions I can take?
So, it's even harder to change things when you don't know what to do and when you can't get enough agreement on what to do. And when many are fighting against change because they 'like' things the way they are or are at least comfortable with the way things are.
And when I don't know what to do I feel vulnerable and sad about it and rather than feel that way... I sometimes instead will just get mad at someone else for not doing something I see and feel that they 'should' do.
Well these are the thoughts your blog provoked... so 'you' got 'me' thinking. Thanks.
September 13, 2009 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
He wanted to change the system, of course, really did.
But he underestimated the monied interests, the haters, the Swift-boater organizers, Bigots and Buttheads, and nitwits willing to sign up for sedition ("I want my country back!"). He gave them all a chance, though.
You're right that we need to attack this twisted perversity.
September 13, 2009 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think O has lived long enough and been in politics long enough to know what those people you listed are capable of doing.
September 13, 2009 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dear Lis,
If you look down at your feet you will see a lot of footprints. Many others and many of us before you have walked the path you are on now. If you raise your head you will see us up ahead, in the distance. Any one of us could look back and wave and see the feelings in your eyes and remember when we felt those feelings just like you. We could say any number of heartfelt things that console and sympathize but the most important thing to say is “Keep walking. There is much more of everything ahead.”
There are those of us who think that you should not have to suffer basic financial insecurity or the loss of basic health care or basic material support during this time without a paying job. There are others who think that you should suffer this way because it is somehow necessary to the common good. The arguments rage about this but in the final analysis these are the two ways of thinking and they are mutually exclusive and one must chose. Which brings me to your intuition about a “system.” We live in a society that has drifted toward the latter of these two ways of thought. What was once the Unemployment Department is now the Department of Employment Development. The personnel department is now Human Resources. One is not fired or let go, one is “terminated.” It isn’t hard to see the drift from the personal to the impersonal. Why this is so is an historical curiosity. That this is so is a problem if you live in the U.S. or China or Iraq. It is not a problem if you live in England or France or Denmark. Choices. Not one choice but many. Barack Obama was one but not the only one.
It is kind of the definition of being alive – to still have choices. So I wish you life and many good choices. And please don’t apologize. You were not terminated. You were let go. If we are ever to drift back to a more human “system,” it should start here. Losing a job is personal.
September 13, 2009 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Beautiful comment. For a broom.
September 13, 2009 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
And here are your simple fucking answers, CT.
The people who showed up in DC today were really "average" Americans.
ROTFLMAO.
We need a whistle around here for when the blivet of misinformation starts his pompous leaking.
There was maybe one person at the rally that could be classified as non-white. And I'm not sure he wasn't an accident. And how many average citizens dress up for a stroll down the Mall looking like demented George Washingtons? Yes, indeedy. Flag polling at its best by 'average citizens'.
...despite it's own attempts to do so, the left can't even produce that! [60-70,000]
Nov. 15, 2008. anti-Proposition 8 protests garnered over one million in 300 cities.
Sept. 24, 2005. Cspan figured 500,000 at the anti-War against Iraq Rally.
April 25, 2004. March for Women's Lives had an estimated 500,000-800,000 by the BBC and AP.
Those are off the top of my head. Just had to look up the numbers. There are many more, but you're not worth it.
Q. How many teabaggers does it take to change a light bulb?
A. None. They prefer to stay in the dark.
You are so full of grand delusions, there aren't any left for the rest of us. Take some medication. Take a lot of it. Stock up on celery.
September 13, 2009 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Celery! Everybody is talking about celery. So last week I went to the farmer’s market and bought all the celery the guy had. He looked at me kind of funny but he gave me a good price. I’ve put celery in everything. Then I made celery salad and celery soup and had celery flakes for breakfast and made a celery and tofu meatloaf. Wow that last one scared the cat. I’m running out of things to do with all the celery that is left. I’m beginning to think it was a metaphor and that Quinn Esq. probably had something to do with it.
September 13, 2009 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
A little background may be in order.
Celery has gone through 3 distinct social and economic uses over the ages, with its social status changing equally abruptly. In ancient times, celery was known as "God's Fibrous Gift," a result of mistranslating the Hebrew word for one of the presents delivered to the Baby Jesus by the 3 Wise Men (Gold, Frankincense & Celery.) When a proper translation was provided in 1848, celery was displaced by myrrh (a reddish-brown resinous material derived from tree sap and used as an embalming ointment), and seasonal celery celebrations collapsed. "Deck the Halls with Boughs of Celery" was apparently a particular favourite, though sadly, its original words and tunes appear to have been lost to history.
At this point, celery merchants had to create new uses for an otherwise tasteless, ugliferous and utterly indigestible "food" product. The industry was tided over to its late 20th Century rebirth by... who else... the French, a nation rightfully blamed for many bad things, and this case amongst the worst. In the late 1880's, the French created a market for celery by incorporating it into so-called papier-mâché, a pulpy, fibrous mash sold to artists and other small children.
From here, celery was picked up in the late 1970's by American women keen on something they could include in their "diets," but which possessed absolutely no redeeming qualities, other than sandblasting a perfectly good colon. "Celery" not only fit the bill, but many American women seem to have developed a "taste" for this product, perhaps from art classes in their primary schools.
In a more recent (but not yet mainstream) usage, celery is used by a small number of bloggers, who claim it improves mental agility, clear thinking AND the ability to sustain an otherwise flaccid sense of self-esteem. Opposed to this group, the medical establishment insists these "celeric insertions" are in fact, a form of colonic treatment, and are entirely without merit.
A 3rd group - the "All-Knowing, All-Seeing, Seers and Knowers" - states that these bloggers, in fact, possess extremely small brains, located well up their arse. And much like the Stegosaurus (itself equipped with a bum brain), direct insertion of vegetable matter may well act to stimulate "brain" activity.
WARNING!! Care must therefore be taken when around these individuals, as spankings, kicks in the ass or other shocks to their arsal region could result in the celery entering the cerebellum, resulting in celerybellum, which is WHOA... waaaaay bad.
You're welcome.
September 13, 2009 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Win.
September 13, 2009 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is all very interesting but I’m stuck with a truck load of celery and all you can do is go all Arnold Toynbee on me. Now I’ve spent all my money, cannot make the rent, and they probably won’t give me food stamps if I tell them about all the god damn celery I have. I feel like a vegan Job. I can tell you one thing though. I may have more celery than any man on earth but even I can’t make a Right Wing blogger think.
September 13, 2009 10:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Vegan Job.
How the hell does a conversation deteriorate to the point that you come up with "Vegan Job," and it makes sense? I think he needs to be brought on in one of your own or Dick's plays. Somehow I think he'd fit right in with Shiteface et al.
P.S. Mmmmmm mmmmmm. Celery juice. Got the runs? Not yet? Oh... you will. You WILL, my friend.
September 13, 2009 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Between the broom and the celery historian, the puppy had to keep running to the fire hydrant to express happiness over the tone of the comments here. God, you people are funnneee!
Broom: As you know, we here at the Cafe never let one of our own sink in celery without a fight. I'll get hold of Missy and we shall promptly and henceforth start a proper cause called the 'Save Our Broom' (SOB for short) project. You will be celery free and eating meat in no time!
Quinn: I think we need to raise the color for terrorist invasions of TPM to the highest green, which is the Celerybellum Alert and defend our homeland. Let's send the assholes back to their caves in Outer Mongolia or Bellevue, whichever is most appropriate and easiest for us.
I think we all need a break from the invasions. Perhaps one word replies, something like Celerybellum, for instance, would serve to disarm the attackers for awhile so we can have our obviously stupid, partisan, way-to-the-left blogs in which to render our stupid, but heartfelt, opinions in peace and ignorance.
And LisB? You Rawk. So does everyone here with the exception of that one whose name is now Celerybellum.
Seriously, I love you all. Best.Group.Ever.
September 13, 2009 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm in. From now on, Celerybellum's the word.
Once someone drops the C-bomb, we're all over to Larry's for Bloody Mary's, Smack Latte's and Celery Pie.
September 14, 2009 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who told you about the poppies in the backyard? I tell the neighbors it is Canadian cotton and they don't ask any more questions. Now you bring it up here in front of the guests. Besides I am still perfecting the smack and coffee thing which I plan to pitch to Starbucks when their third quarter numbers come in. I'm calling it the Grande Chai Speedball Latte.
September 14, 2009 3:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I feel like a vegan Job."
That brings up an interesting question. Forsaking meat as a way of life can a vegan accept an organ transplant?
September 14, 2009 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I’m running out of things to do with all the celery that is left."
Invite the neigborhood over for bloody marys and send eveyone home with leftovers.
September 13, 2009 10:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now that has merit, clan! Who says the left can't be practical about things?
September 13, 2009 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
The point, seashell, is that the rallies you cite DID turn out massive numbers. Nothing like that has been seen with regards to health care reform. And I am very inclined to believe that had such numbers been organized in support of reform, it would have had a positive impact on the debate and in marginalizing those ignorant voices on the Right. Not that a march or rally wins a war by itself, but it is one major battle that should not have been ceded in this case.
September 13, 2009 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why would they do that? I understand you believe that but the facts, if anything, prove the opposite.
September 13, 2009 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, bwak, the facts prove that horrific video of falling towers scare the shit out of Americans and that George Bush and Dick Cheney were able to parlay that into war and that they didn't give s shit about your rallies. That's all your facts prove.
They DON'T prove that activism on the Left will be ignored by a Congress and White House on the Left.
September 13, 2009 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
It may have to do with the fact that what the pro-reform side wanted people to turn out for was ambiguous: reform. Single-payer included, who knows. No denial based pre-existing condition, maybe maybe not. Etc. Hard to get fired up for something one is not quite sure what. It's the difference between having a rally to get legislation, any legislation, to save some animals and a rally to save the spotted owl.
Whereas the people who turned out for the wingnut rally were against any reform. Just say no. Simple. They were against Obama. Just say bad (or Marxist, etc). They were against liberalism. Just say very bad. They rally was able to pull togeter anyone who was against the current administration and the liberal agenda. The HCR is just the latest issue that has gotten into their craw.
September 13, 2009 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Hell no, we might go! Who's to say! I have no idea! Down with the old and some of the new! And other stuff! I am for not those things! Hell no, who are you again!?"
September 13, 2009 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Funny! Thanks.
September 13, 2009 9:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ripper.
1st, Obama's people tore the most active constituencies out of any health care coalition to START with. Namely, single payer. They took anyone on the Left, and said - See ya, we don't need ya, you are OFF the table.
2nd, Post-election, Obama and co demobilized great swaths of on the ground organizing capability. So the messaging and mobilizing and leading was to be far more centralized, right? That was the plan.
3rd, He then handed it over to Congress to lead, which has produced a multitude of bills, none of which he has yet deigned to own.
4th, He has then failed to make a firm stand on ANY particular, such as public option or how it's financed, and has danced around whether any variant is critical to the final product.
5th, He then cranked up town halls, so people could listen and debate and protest so on... INSTEAD of bringing out his damn policy and selling the ass off it.
Now. People like CT and others then want to come on here and bleat about the failure of the LEFT to organize??? Hello? What you're seeing, right now, is precisely what the whiners on these boards have long demanded --- Weak as mush, center-right, compromise-filled, insurance-profit-expanding, no public option, America-is-different-and-needs-a-unique-bringing-together-of-private-and-public-sector goo.
And nobody will turn out to march for this and WHY?
BECAUSE IT'S CRAP.
Yet some of the dimmer - but louder - bulbs at TPM somehow see these, the pathetic failings of Obama's healthcare reform policy, its presentation and sales, and its weak feet on the ground -- as a failure of the LEFT???? Are people daft? What you're seeing is the flaming failure of the grand right-of-center compromise machine that Clearthinker and Jason and these other blowhards have wanted this past year.
And now... they have the gall to come on and blame the LEFT for the failure of their own flatulent center right policy?
Fired up? Ready to go? FOR WHAT??? A chance to blow one of the greatest political openings since the assassination of JFK?? Absolutely, completely, embarrassingly BLOWN. And all of it, from top to bottom, based around the gutlessness, the addiction to compromise, the failure to fight, of the Center-Right.
And now it's the Left's fault? Fail.
September 13, 2009 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG, Quinn, be a dear, and blog this.
Love,
Bwak
September 13, 2009 6:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why do I feel better after reading this? I guess it's because I feel less guilty. I voted for him; I would have done anything he asked me to do for single payer. All he did was ask for contributions, which, after the election I did NOT give, because I didn't see my issues being pushed.
I feel better, but I feel worse too. Why? Because he is so much better than McCain, and he seems to be trying to hard to please people who detest his very existence, rather than pushing through an agenda worthy of our party. And I mean pushing. These people don't understand "nice." They see it as weakness and move in to grab the jugular in their selfish talons; he needs to act in a way that is contrary to his nature and steamroll the right policies through. Plow that idiot Lindsey Graham right into the ground -- what an ass-hole.
September 13, 2009 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nailed to the wall.
September 13, 2009 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great blown gasket, q. ;-)
September 13, 2009 9:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ayup. That's it in a nutshell Q. :)
September 13, 2009 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
wuinn,
I have used the term "Left" inartfully and inexactly on this thread. I have been at a loss to describe in a single word the coalition of Democrats, most Independents and some Republicans who elected Obama and want a public option.
I know nothing of what Clearthinker has advocated this year and little about Jason's views other than his excessive concern for Democratic moderation. I simply haven't been around that consistently.
So please take my comments as remarks only in the limited framework of this blog. I can see your point of view though I do not agree that Obama is solely responsible for the current state of affairs, but there is a lot of truth in what you say. I agree his leadership has been lackluster and confusing. I was already sold on the idea he gave away the farm before the harvest came in.
So when I say in this thread that the "Left" could have done more and must do more, I don't mean the left wing of the Democrats, but more like "liberals" or "anyone left of dead center in the whole American political spectrum."
Yes, we were slow to mobilize, in part for many of the underlying reasons you mention.
September 13, 2009 10:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Rip. YES, it would have been exceptionally useful if a massive, 1 million person march FOR health care reform had arrived in Washington DC. And ask anyone in the world if they think Barack Obama could have mobilized such a thing, and I suspect 6.7 billion voices would have said, "Yeah, baby."
And there's the question for today. Obama could have waved his hand, early on, and said he was going for the health care gusto. The full meal deal. Or even just a simple, clear, form of Public Option - extending Medicare as an option to all. Whatever. Just something clear, powerful, simple. He could then have put it forward with heart, and punched out what it meant.
Remember, this is Mr Yes We Can, Mr Motivational Speech. He could have claimed his mandate, shouted the name of Teddy, and mobilized an ENORMOUS crowd to greet Congress. And then challenged Congress to.... "Say NO to these people. Say NO to 40 million uninsured. Say NO to the sick and the old and the dying."
But Obama did No. Such. Thing.
Everyone is agreed now - a march and a large crowd in DC would have been a powerful voice for change.
There's your question.
The dog that didn't bark.
The march that never happened.
Why?
September 13, 2009 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
And nobody will turn out to march for this and WHY?
Thank you, sir. I used to make it down to Mardi Gras regularly and was always thrilled when I could locate Pete Fountain's Half-Fast Marching Krewe. Half-fast because that's what we were after liberal libations (and no one really cared if we made it to the end of the block or not). That is how I picture a march in support of the half-assed HCR.
September 14, 2009 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ripper, did you ever think that maybe the reason the left isn't turning out to rally around health care reform is because we took the White House, the House and the Senate? Maybe people on the left don't feel the need to go out of protest because they believe what the Democratic politicians were peddling last fall. Maybe we feel the need to gather and demonstrate when we feel most out of control. Maybe instead of scolding people because they won't do what you think they should, you should persuade them to keep the pressure on their elected officials.
September 13, 2009 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said.
September 13, 2009 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
See about 10 of my last 12 posts, the one LisB said (not inaccurately) were redundant.
September 13, 2009 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey there ... Ripper . . .
I'm just trying to catch up with your here in the Cafe.
I left a little response for ya' over in Fred's blog here.
If moves you, take a look at it.
I'll keep checking in there.
Have good one . . .
~OGD~
September 14, 2009 1:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seashell,
Terrific!
However, I can no longer enjoy celery. Can't get that hideous visual out of my mind. Yuk!
September 13, 2009 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I understand your problem there, Aunt Sam. Personally, I've gone over to fruit salad, but that too has connotations that I'd rather just ignore for now!
September 13, 2009 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice post, Lis.
There are so many things I want to say about this that I don't know where to start. But I think I'll boil it all down to this -
There is a severe epidemic of Short Term Memory loss on the left, apparently, if some of us are at all sanguine about turning our backs on Obama and refusing to support him or the Democrats or vote Democratically again. They must have forgotten two things:
No administration or president is perfect and no administration or president belongs solely to one side or the other.
The only thing I have ever experienced that came close to perfection was how perfectly horrible it was here when the Republicans had the majority.
I don't ever want to see them get the majority again and I sure don't want this bunch of Republicans in particular coming back to power. These people are nowhere near as reasonable or serious about leadership as Richard M. Nixon was.
The left cannot afford to turn their backs on the Democrats - there is only one alternative to a Democratic majority - a Republican majority.
September 13, 2009 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Part of the System has to do with the gridlock that was designed into our checks and balances between the three branches. The majority party is almost always going to get the majority status by having a wide spectrum of idelogical leanings relative to the minority party. And this makes it difficult to just push through sweeping reform like HCR.
So we get Pelosi and Bayh representing us as Dems. And would I rather have a Bayh than a Repub in the seat here in Indiana. Well, if Pence is any indication of what would replace Bayh, I'll take Bayh. No matter how frustrating he is. It will take some more cultural evolution here in Indiana before a progressive is going to be able to make a serious run for a Senate seat.
September 13, 2009 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Trust me you want Bayh. It's really tiring to hear moans about Evan Bayh, we're lucky with Dick Lugar as well. Lugar is an old fashioned conservative. They're both honest men. Lugar is retiring soon;if you punish Bayh to the point he's not reelected, it could get ugly.
September 13, 2009 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
As the last election showed, there are definitely some left and center-left people in Indiana. But those on the Right, the ones that will partake in the Republican primary are going to put some far right ideologue into the race. I definitely don't see eye to eye with Bayh but in Indiana right now, I think he's as good as I'm going to get.
September 13, 2009 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm in Indiana too and I really can't stand Evan Bayh. I suppose you're right that he's better than a Republican, but if he's just going to hold the party hostage to advance his own agenda (or in a snit because he isn't the VP), I'd almost prefer someone else. But then I remember Mitch Daniels and I calm down about Bayh.
September 13, 2009 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gotta love that Mitch; he figures for a Presidential run, sooner than later
September 13, 2009 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
He thinks he's the baby Bush they Republican party is waiting for. He's arrogant enough, but nowhere near stupid enough. His presidential run is a non-starter.
September 13, 2009 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi!
If you're new here, welcome and good to see you! Actually there used to be a chick, smart as a whip and with a mouth on her too, who posted often (and was much appreciated) with a very similar picture, and of all things (imagine the coincidence!), the same handle. I'm sure the handle is common, of course, so it's obviously NO THANG.
In any case, I found your kind and thoughtful remark enlightening and I encourage you to post more regularly, in case that may be convenient for you. You might even grow to like it; the future, that's somethin' you can't never tell about!
Your allegiant servitor,
Overreach THIS!
September 13, 2009 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hell yeah.
September 13, 2009 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
as Richard M. Nixon
*The horror, the horror...
To paraphrase the Sith Lord, "You go to war with the electorate you have, not the electorate you wish you had..."
For whatever reasons, rooted perhaps in our gutted public education system or our apparent denial of class realities, the american electorate is pretty much selfish, scared, and stupid. Only the rare flashes of consciousness illuminate the horizon.
I'd have to say that this is one of them:
"how perfectly horrible it was here when the Republicans had the majority."(emphasis in original...)
*Nixon was left of Clinton on most important issues of social justice and civil liberties (!) Nixon would have cut off his hand before he threw women and children on the streets or gutted habeas corpus...
Hi, T.
September 13, 2009 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Tena
Nice to read hear from you:)
September 13, 2009 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG....Lis you have really stirred up a hornets nest with this blog. :-)
C
September 13, 2009 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The System" isn't "one single unit" unless you get all macro and understand that The System is an economic order that puts wealthy corporate interests (and those of corporate heads) before those of the rest of us people. And, while I can get behind the writer's appeal to "pool our efforts to not only WORK The System, but Beat It," I'm here to tell ya, you won't beat it without a systemic revolution (emphasis on "revolution") that makes the little ideological shift in the structure of how health insurance is delivered look like an ACTUAL tea party.
September 13, 2009 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, one must also take into account that the System is encoded into the language itself, that it is able to sustain itself through the very process of reiteration which makes it so, so to speak. It is not a power that is not weilded by an outside force upon others, but a power that is derived from its ability to emerge through the people upon its acts.
Or maybe not.
September 13, 2009 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
er, yes we can?
September 13, 2009 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
And a big, big part of that system is a media that both intentionally and by the nature and structure and norms of its own system works to frustrate what Obama wants to do and by extension what we want him to do.
I doubt seriously that anyone in the nation understands that better that Obama and his key advisers. Anything they say or propose will be attacked, misrepresented and frustrated as soon as it is reported, so the Obama administration does not say anything to them until it is time to use them to reach his real audiences. He speaks to the public when the time comes that public action is required, and he speaks to Congress when Congressional action is required. In the meantime he works to placate the media and to quell the right-wing and media lies.
He also takes on the top priority first and does not create additional enemies ahead of time. DADT is for after health care reform because health care reform is a lot more important to a lot more people.
I think Clinton learned a lot of this after his health care debacle and the 1994 election losses. Obama ran his campaign with that in mind and brought it in with him.
That's damned unsatisfying for us wonks.
Obama is the only visible target to take that frustration out on. After all, he DID promise change and it's been seven whole months since the disaster - Bush - left office and took his minions into exile with him.
September 13, 2009 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Except for widdledub, although, he's been fairly quiet recently.
September 13, 2009 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think he's exhausted. The ride was a lot more than he bargained for, and God didn't step in and make him successful in spite of himself as he expected.
September 13, 2009 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's an admittedly crude timeline for the Clinton stab at health care reform.
1. January 25, 1993 Clinton set up the Task Force on national Health Care Refeform
2. Clinton's Testimony before Congress begins September 28 of the same year. Prior to that the administration had to fend off litigation about the process--the closed door meetings and the like.
3. Bill presented to Congress November 20, 1993, just before the Thanksgiving Recess.
4. The bill went nowhere for the next 3/4 of a year.
5. George Mitchell offers a compromise bill in August, and announces a few weeks later that health care would have to wait until after the elections. There weren't enough votes to stop a filibuster, even though Democrats controlled both houses of Congress.
So I would calculate that as something like 1. 6 years, give or take.
For some of us seven months seems terribly long, for others of us, terribly short. Some argue Obama is fighting the last war. I don't know about that. I do kn ow that at by this time in 1993 the bill hadn't yet been introduced to public debate.
September 13, 2009 7:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope you recognized the snark in my "seven whole months" statement.
I remain utterly amazed at how much Obama has attempted and actually accomplished since he was inaugurated. In fact how much Obama has accomplished since he was elected, because he almost immediately took over the Presidential bully pulpit when Shrub went into his final two month vacation and did nothing after last November during the depths of the economic disaster from last Fall.
September 13, 2009 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
True, and thanks for pointing it out, Richard.
You rawk.
September 13, 2009 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
To the thread:
For all those going "but, but, but, what about the Iraq War protests???", I responded to Dij above.
For all of those going "well, we won the election, case closed," I, again, remind you that you only elected your local representative. At most, of the 536 elected officials in question, you had interaction with exactly 4. The trick is to bring the other 532 along. Moreover, you elected your officials nearly 1 year ago. It's occasionally good to remind them of what was important to you when you elected them.
For example, I know some people who voted for Obama merely in fear of the SCOTUS appointments from the GOP side. For them, healthcare wasn't an important issue. Do you think it's a 100% important issue for everyone? It isn't.
Lastly, the cognitive dissonance is very impressive. 1.8M people were able to go to Washington DC only last January to break records to witness the Inauguration. Where was the money for that? January is a cold month for Washington DC. Somehow when there is interest, people show up.
I believe that the "support" for healthcare on the basis of polling that people here like to cite is tentative at best. The fact is that the evidence suggests that there isn't a huge groundswell of support for that people at TPM want. That's the reason that, as Dij points out above, the Dem message has been a little murky. In fact, what people at TPM want is the most extreme form of reform, essentially the antithesis of "no reform". As a result, anything else discussed will be in the middle and a disappointment for those here.
But the facts suggest that more people were excited to get Obama elected President than get healthcare reform. And it's sour grapes to discount rallies now -- especially since the left has been trying to stage them without much success. If rallies weren't important, the left wouldn't have tried to stage them.
What do we get in the way of analysis otherwise? The deus ex machina of "the system is against us." Which really explains nothing at all because there is no rigorous definition of "system", "against", "us".
I think it is far more mature to step back and look at the growing success of the teabagger movement and respond internally the way that John Glenn did when asked about the Russian space program in 1961:
Similarly, the right is beating the pants off of the left at the moment, but there is still time to regroup and get things going again.
Or the left can sit around and complain about the hand that it was dealt. You know, the one with majorities in both chambers of Congress and a Democrat in the White House.
September 13, 2009 8:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
No CT. The Right is beating the pants off YOUR kind of reform, an appallingly weak, center-right, bipartisan, kiss the insurance companies ass kinda reform. The Left got told it wasn't invited, wasn't needed.
So the failure to organize isn't the Left's it's YOURS - the center-right's. YOU claim your reform is so much more powerful and popular than single payer. How's that workin' for ya? YOU claim that all these complex reforms, incrementalism etc., is superior than ours? How easy has it been to sell that mess? Found a single selling point yet?
And now you wanna stick the LEFT with this shit? Sorry pal. By rights, the TPM Left should get to kick your ass the length and breadth of Washington for this particular juncture.
And if it's to be saved, you wait. It'll be the LEFT coming in with their votes, their feet on the ground, their energy, to save it.
September 13, 2009 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Highly recommend this comment!
September 13, 2009 9:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Quinn, much as you would like to put words in my mouth, I do wish you'd stop.
I'm pointing out that the left is losing it's position slowly (I don't think there is an argument here on that, but am willing to discuss that as well), and why that's the case.
Indeed, I have yet to support any particular form of healthcare reform.
I do know this: the path that the left is on does not seem particularly effective so defeatist toned posts seem to be popping up. I'm only making an appeal to rationalism in that someone may rethink the reasons why the left hasn't been more effective. Unless you think that the left has been effective -- in which case, everyone at TPM should be happy.
The most revealing comment on this thread is Aunt Sam's above. Ripper reiterates (to a reasonable extent) a portion of the thrust of my arguments. After he does this Aunt Sam reply's "Amen". In other words, the same idea I had, when restated by Ripper, all of a sudden makes sense.
This does tend to support the idea that some are guilty of emotional dysfunction when 'debating' (such as they are capable of) the issues.
I cast my pearls down. If you find them useful, pick them up. If not, feel free to leave them by the roadside. Clearly the points are compelling as you are responding to my previous comments.
September 13, 2009 9:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
You speak unskilfully: or, if your knowledge be more, it is much darkened in your malice.
--Measure for Measure
(that would be Shakespeare, CT)
September 13, 2009 10:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a bloviating wind bag . . .
I almost swear that Mister Bluster was writing that crap . . .
~OGD~
September 14, 2009 3:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Lis! Been a while. Missed you and all (hugs).
I like where you're going with this. The System is a very real dynamic. It exists as a struggle for control between government power and corporate power. The result is rarely something good for people. As a rule, neither one is often interested in people. But the ironic part is that people created the System. It's not some god; it's merely a reflection of our own desires. It's an extension of us. It is that shadow part of ourselves.
For those reasons, progressive solutions are well intended, but play into the hands of the System. Single payer or government-run insurance companies would simply shift power from corporate control into government control. And while that's a nice short-term solution, you can bet that corporate power would wrestle control away within a decade. In fact, any health system motivated by profit is -- by definition -- self-defeating.
What makes sense though, is a health system motivated by health; long-term profit would be a byproduct of health as opposed to the end of health. Of course I'm talking about non-profit co-operatives. And this is precisely why all Republicans are against co-ops: the power would move out of the System and into the hands of people. Patients would run the show. And that is a business model which the insurance companies do not want to compete against.
This can take place within the Exchange (by 2013). And it will take that long to network non-profit organizations, but they are already out there and will grow exponentially. While the System is a reflection of our collective shadow, the non-profit business model is a reflection of our better Angels. We should embrace it.
September 13, 2009 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
"He has the right thoughts in mind, and the right spirit"
I'm not sure how to formulate this without offending a lot of people around here. But I think the secret of Obama's success - and I think he has been successful and will continue to be successful in getting what he wants - is that the System thinks he is working for it, and leftists working against the system think he is working for them. Hence the lack of vigorous activism on the part of the latter.
From what I've seen, on HCR, banking reform, bailouts, judicial policy, foreign policy, I tend to think the System is right. Is he perhaps playing a long game in three-dimensional space chess, undermining the System from within? Could be, but I can't see it.
September 14, 2009 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think you are right in this, especially that is is more a matter of style than substance. As a political strategist he is more Eisenhower than Patton.
September 14, 2009 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink