« What Is That Smell? In Answer to DickDay | LisB's Blog | New Home for the TPM-Aholics Chat Room »

On Religion: Can We Not Agree?


I just have this to say, on religion, having read today's and many other posts and readings, all in all (including the Bible and the teachings of Buddha, but not, pardon me Genghis, the Koran, just yet)...

I just have this to say:  Can we not all agree that not one of us, not ANY of us, has the true answer, the solution, the solid story, the perfect proof, the total insight, the complete and honest outlook, the irrefutable evidence, to prove anything?

And, with that, may I just add, that it's okay for each of us to have our own beliefs, and to know that those beliefs are personal and hard to hand on to anyone else?  Because each perspective is different, as is each person, and each religion, and each upbringing, and each individual experience?

And so, with that being said, can't we all just agree that life is incredible, and we should thank whatever brought it to us, and be done with that?

Amen.  Can I get an amen?

Thanks.

Tomorrow, a post on the wonders of playdoh (love that salty flavor, no matter the color), and paper dolls.  I promise.


61 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Amen.

I was always taught that religion was the relationship of the individual and their Creator, and that was why the Bible was written as it was. So as to appeal to ones own heart.

After all, supposedly the Creators Greatest Gift is Free Will.

user-pic

Works for me, chicken...

user-pic

It makes sense to me.

=D

Missed you, Ma'am.

user-pic

Stilli, hope you get this. I posted yesterdy about Christianity today. You might find it interesting. The title might seem aggressive, but it's appearance is deceiving. Heh heh.

user-pic

I'm in!

user-pic

Wot? No comments about the wonders of Play-Doh and paper dolls?

Wusses, the lot of ya.

;)

I love you all. And so does whatever God or whatever else you believe in, or not. And also.

user-pic

Play-doh tastes too good to be just fer kids. Wish we had a 24 hour toy store here in this one horse town... ;)

user-pic

You're proselytizing now, Lis. I prefer Silly Putty, but I try to show a tolerance for PlayDoh-ism.

user-pic

Play-dohism......that should win the comment of the night award!

=D

user-pic

It's a malleable point.

user-pic

*gets silly putty out*

user-pic

Don't know about y'all, but *I* was brung here by my momma, and so I'll be thankful to her, thank you very much! She didn't write any holy book or nothin, but I believe everything she said, even when she lied about vegetables making me as big and tough as Larry Robinson (who nobody but Q will appreciate...)!!

Lis - screw the paper dolls. All play-doh please!!! nitenite...

user-pic

Ah, but Puggie...you haven't learned the pleasures of covering paper dolls with Play-Doh, yet, have you?

user-pic

Amen!

Different religions may have different esoteric doctrines or philosophies. Most thinking people have their own view of a central core of values which are both spiritual and communal. And yes, I think we could agree on a central core of what behavior really matters and how having an inner spiritual core (of whatever type) is important in helping us weather the storms of life and the decisions we all must make.

Good blog! And bring on the Play-Doh!

user-pic

Except most religions are exclusionist. My way or the highway. Silly notion since those same religions also usually espouse kindness and understanding toward the unenlightened. Do what I say, not what I...say...

user-pic

Yup.

user-pic

You hit the nail on the head. The problem with agreeing to disagree is that if you are a radical religionist, YOU CAN'T AGREE TO DISAGREE. You are either going to heaven, or you are going to hell.

user-pic

A-women.

user-pic

I love that!!!! :-)

user-pic

Perfect!

user-pic

Geez I recommended this before I went to bed, of course.

I see patterns in the pictures of the universe, in buildings erected by man, in the pond outside my apartment complex.

Too many patterns.

I get as mad as Hitchens when discussing religion for many reasons.

But without the churches, there would have been no abolitionist movements, no civil rights movements, fewer save the poor movements.

So I step back. Try not to argue too much.

Nice post. Nice thoughts LisB.

user-pic

Dick, I love that. I'm right there with you. Maybe the world would be a lot better off if people who held their own organized religion tightly would look at the similar patterns running through all religions. A religion is just a pointer. But if all religions point towards the same thing (blesses dickday), then what's all the fightin' bout?

user-pic

AMEN MBH.

user-pic

Ahaaw in place of amen from me. :o)

The separation of Church and State must be upheld.

user-pic

Amen and hallelujah LisB!

My opinion, oft stated and deeply held, is that the problem is not religious belief or teaching per se, but dogma. Dogma's rigid insistence on a particular set of beliefs, practices, and so on is always the source of problems when it comes to religious questions. Dogma's insistence that those practices and beliefs are the only proper way to believe and so on are the source of just about every religious difficulty in society.

It seems to me that the human disposition, perhaps even our brain structure itself and how we are wired, without proper intellectual training and discipline, often insists upon an either or approach to the world whether or not it is appropriate. It is difficult for humans to overcome this predeliction even with good intellectual training and discipline. It seems we often insist upon black and white choices and simplification of what is neither black nor white and is anything but simple. I think this proclivity is integrally bound up with the desire for, creation of and very often blind adherence to dogma and dogmatism.

And unfortunately, we can never get consensus on your quite sensible proposition above for the very reason that many religious denominations are based almost solely upon a dogmatic insistence that their viewpoint alone and their methods and practices and beliefs alone are the sole truth and only path to God or enlightenment and so on.

All we can do in the face of that petrified and quite poisonous approach to religion is educate people as well as we can to have open minds and to reject dogmatic belief systems that, by their very nature, engender conflict, competition, dischord, and often much, much worse as we know when we look at all the blood shed throughout history in the name of religion.

user-pic

One additional thought. Dogma, at it's very core denies the proposition I think most of us believe in which is that everyone has a right, a fundamental right, to choose what they will believe. In days long past this was called the right to one's own conscience which includes the choice of believing in nothing at all if that is where one's conscience leads. And that makes dogma the enemy of freedom.

user-pic

Awesome comments, oleeb. Gave me a lot of food for thought. Thank you.

user-pic

Oleeb, you do it every time! Well spoken.

My conscience has always led me to wonder that, if God first built the world perfect, and then man screwed it up and was thrown out of Eden, why we think Man can ever make anything about this planet better then it was originally. Whatever we do is de-creating.

There's also something the religious have never explained to me. We were created to wander around the garden naked. To me anything less then that is removed from Paradise and I question whether the preaching I hear is the truth.

But while I am talking about Eden, here's another question. If that was the perfect place, there was evil there to choose. It was our right to choose evil. I'm not saying using that was a good idea. Look where we ended up, but God gave us that right. Who is anyone to take away that right?

user-pic

Of course, I do realize all of the above is dependent on what relevancy the Bible has in the first place, and I'm not opposed to those who would dismiss it. It is their right and it is for us to respect that God-given right, assuming there is a God and he had anything to do with us or the Bible. None of the people who really know, the ones who have left this world, are saying anything.

user-pic

I always assumed that the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which God forbade Adam and Eve to eat, was symbolic and that "knowledge of good and evil" is nothing more than a conscience, or a sense of morality. Once they ate the fruit, they realized they were naked, and they felt shame. Had they no conscience, or morality, they would've remained blissfully ignorant in the garden forever.

My take on it, any old who.

user-pic

Exactly! No one is naked until they are told they are naked. Everything was great until someone started making derogatory remarks. I just want to say to them, "Thanks for ruining everything! I was working on my tan!"

user-pic

Well, there are still places you can go (like in La Jolla, Ca) where you can work on that tan!

user-pic

I'll buy that explanation.

user-pic

Maybe you'd get more comments if you made a rosary out of Play-Doh.

I went to Catholic school for one year; 5th grade. The nuns made us say ejaculations. Who knew there was another meaning to the word?

user-pic

LOL!

user-pic

If only we could recommend comments....

user-pic

Sigh. Not to presume, but what would the answer be if you posted your question over at Red State? We should agree with you. If we follow the teachings of what practically all religions say (I mean, I don't know of a major religion that's premise is hate--That's for the followers to come up with), then there should be universal agreement with you, LisB.

user-pic

That's why I call myself an agnostic.

user-pic

Me too.

user-pic

Thank you Lis. Very relevant.

I wish all Christians (not that I have anything against them, just that its dominant here) would look closely at the Transfiguration of christ.

So the dude goes up the mountain. The holy spirit (blesses dickday) joins the dude on the right and Moses joins the dude on the left. A cloud covers them all. The cloud goes away. It's just the dude left.

Then I would love it if they studied the concept of Transculturation: the process where one not only tolerates another culture, but allows oneself to experience another culture (or god forbid--blesses dickday--several cultures).

user-pic

The problem is that monotheism was invented. If there is only one god, then one religion's view of Him/Her/It is right and all the rest are wrong.

It was much better when each houshold, kin group, village, etc, could have their own god.

user-pic

Is it all right for the landlord, to evict? If someone was destroying your house and you had invited guests, but some of the guests who felt, they had the freewill to do whatever their conscience allowed.

Would the landlord have to submit to the will of the freewillers, destructive behavior?

Sure you had freewill, You're invited to my house on one condition, if you can't agree to my terms, don't come or I'll ask you to leave. Find somplace else to party.

Some thinking the landlord a wimp, and wouldn't even think about evicting anyone especially if we threaten his other guests.

Maybe some of the guests are in the kitchen making some toxic mixture on the stove, which would injure others. When confronted by the landlord, they yell at the landlord, “Hey jerk, you invited us and then you expect us to behave.”

The landlord then tells the guests "did you not read the notice, unlawful conduct would not be allowed."

Some jerk in the crowd yells back "who do you think you are making the rules. Go usptairs and leave us alone we'll make our own rules"

Hopefully the rowdy guests would just leave quietly. Disappear and cause no more damage. Since they have freewill, maybe they could make themselves a new place to party? Having so much freewill it goes to their heads about how powerful they are. We don't need anybody. WE HAVE FREEWILL.

But I suppose the landlord will probably have to forcefully eject them, so his other guests can enjoy each others company, mindful of the owner’s rights.

Who is the Landlord of the Planet?

user-pic
Who is the Landlord of the Planet?

Ooh! Ooh! I know! It's Mother Earth, right?

user-pic

No, It’s not the Great Harlot spoken of at (Revelation 17:1-2) . . .“Come, I will show you the judgment upon the great harlot who sits on many waters, 2 with whom the kings of the earth committed fornication, whereas those who inhabit the earth were made drunk with the wine of her fornication.. .

She has made people believe she is the owner, but she’s a squatter.

(Revelation 17:5) . . .Babylon the Great, the mother of the harlots and of the disgusting things of the earth.. . .

She has a lot of offspring though. It’s her children and friends who are causing the mischief in the landlord’s house I spoke of earlier.
(Revelation 17:15-16) . . . “The waters that you saw, where the harlot is sitting, mean peoples and crowds and nations and tongues..

Although she thinks she’s the landlord, ruler.
Keep trying though. I’d give you an A for effort.

user-pic

You can probably figure out which letter grade I'd give you.

user-pic

Not really, lately many people have adopted user names, and yet promote a disparate usage of what was a recognized feature or quality of individuals of the FlowerChild period.

Lately there have been imposters posing as something good, but beneath the surface their like the weeds or thistles. The Flowerchildren I remember were at Peace with everyone. They promoted Peace. So I can only guess... You gave me an A?

user-pic

Nope, not an A.

I apologize for the lateness of my reply. I was planting trees yesterday.

Oh, and by the by, my moniker is not adopted. It is the literal translation of Wahbigwanabenooje, the Anishinaabe name given to me.

And what's bad about weeds and thistles? Thinking they are something bad reveals a narrow mind.

user-pic

Looking down from a airliner at 35,000 feet, the thought has come to mind -- If the earth was a dog, you'd spray it for mange.

Better hope that representatives from advanced extraterrestrial civilizations aren't really flying around up there in UFOs.

user-pic

Thanks for bringing back to mind something I've read. Maybe it's the Celestial Chariot
(Ezekiel 1:15-22)

user-pic

We can never agree as long as there are those who say that they are right and everyone else is wrong. Insert any religion into this equation:

user-pic

I'd add,
Any ideology. Even an athiest thinks they're right and belief in God is so wrong.

user-pic

As people turn to gods of cruel design
Is it that they fear the pain of death?
Or could it be they fear the joy of life?

user-pic

My old friend died a while back. Well, his self is gone but I feel that
whatever It is, love must be the driving energy of the universe because
love is still here.

user-pic

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6734321991450996691

Sam Harris (author of Letter to a Christian Nation)at Aspen Ideas Festival. If you have a little time, it is well worth the watch. It may just make you think long and hard about just what you believe and how you defend others' beliefs.

An extremely good segment is between 17:00 and 26:00

user-pic

Oh BTW, transcript here for the video impaired:
http://www.aifestival.org/library/transcript/believingtheunbelievable.pdf

user-pic

Mageduly, Your so-called expert you are trying to promote is a deceiver and full of deception. ((Colossians 2:4 -8) . . .This I am saying that no man may delude YOU with persuasive arguments...Look out: perhaps there may be someone who will carry YOU off as his prey through the philosophy and empty deception. . .

On page 11 line 12 your so called expert makes a reference about Isaac Newton, and then poses a false statement
“ and yet no one is tempted to ascribe to divine agency”

Sir Isaac Newton himself gave the credit to the Divine one. In the literature The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, edited by H. W. Turnbull, F.R.S., Cambridge 1961, Vol. 1, p. XVII.
Newton appreciated that God is the Source of all truth; An analysis of all that Newton wrote reveals that out of some 3,600,000 words only 1,000,000 were devoted to the sciences, whereas some 1,400,000 were on religious topics
Another example of how your so called expert misleads his listeners

on page13 line 15 so “I submit to you there is not a person on earth to have a good reason to believe in the bible and the Koran are the product of an omniscient intelligence”
Does this guy just make this stuff up and the sucker’s belief him? Instead of Paul, Luke or a man named Jesus?

I just gave an example of One Sir Isaac Newton who stated “I find more sure marks of authenticity in the Bible than in any profane history whatsoever.” (Two Apologies, by R. Watson, London, 1820, p. 57)
Its integrity to truth proves sound on any point that might be tested. Its history is accurate and can be relied upon.
Over two thousand years before the time of Columbus, the Bible clearly stated that the earth is round.—Isaiah 40:22.

Sir Isaac Newton, said: “No sciences are better attested to than the Bible.” Patrick Henry, the American revolutionary leader: “The Bible is worth all other books which have ever been printed.” Mohandas K. Gandhi “When your country and mine shall get together on the teachings laid down by Christ in this Sermon on the Mount, we shall have solved the problems, not only of our countries but those of the whole world.”

Page 15 line 6 this is why we have such phrases as wishful thinking, self delusion and self deception

He's right about that! Physician heal thyself first

Writing in The Union Bible Companion, S. Austin Allibone quotes Dr. Johnson who says that we
“we have more evidence that Jesus Christ died on Calvary, as stated in the Gospels, than we have that Julius Caesar died in the Capitol. We have, indeed, far more.”: “Ask anyone who professes to doubt the truth of the Gospel history what reason he has for believing that Caesar died in the Capitol, or that the Emperor Charlemagne was crowned Emperor of the West by Pope Leo III. in 800? . . . How do you know that such a man as Charles I. [of England] ever lived, and was beheaded, and that Oliver Cromwell became ruler in his stead? . . . Sir Isaac Newton is credited with the discovery of the law of gravitation . . . We believe all the assertions just made respecting these men; and that because we have historical evidence of their truth. . . . If, on the production of such proof as this, any still refuse to believe,
we abandon them as stupidly perverse or hopelessly ignorant.”
“What shall we say, then, of those who, notwithstanding the abundant evidence now produced of the authenticity of the Holy Scriptures, profess themselves unconvinced? . . . Surely we have reason to conclude that it is the heart rather than the head which is at fault;—that they do not wish to believe that which humbles their pride, and will force them to lead different lives.”


user-pic

You are either being obtuse, or you are ignorant. Sam Harris said that no one ascribed to Sir Isaac Newton devine attributes. His point was that Newton came up with more knowledge in a short period of time than had ever been in the bible. NO ONE CLAIMED THAT SIR ISAAC NEWTON WAS DEVINE! That was the point.


The bible is full of drivel and ridiculous prophesies; it never even predicted the ball-point pen! Why? Because the people who made it up were people, and couldn't imagine ball-point pens, computers, nylon, the internet, etc. Sir Isaac Newton used his intellect to go forward with mathmatics, and he attributed his success to god -- not atypical for the time.

Sam Harris' point is that people read a book, obviously written by people, and decide it is devine because it has some prophesies in it. Why didn't like-minded people decide that Isaac Newton was Jesus? He had a similar home-life. Why not? Because by then there was print. There was the ability to test reality.

NOT ONE single word about Jesus was written during his life. So everything written is just fiction. Sorry, pal, but it is true. If you would finally realize this (and your band of merry men) the world would be better off.

user-pic

I was thinking of you when I included the finality of my previous post.

We believe all the assertions just made respecting these men; and that because we have historical evidence of their truth. . . . If, on the production of such proof as this, any still refuse to believe,

we abandon them as stupidly perverse or hopelessly ignorant.”

“What shall we say, then, of those who, notwithstanding the abundant evidence now produced of the authenticity of the Holy Scriptures, profess themselves unconvinced?

Surely we have reason to conclude that it is the heart rather than the head which is at fault;

that they do not wish to believe that which humbles their pride, and will force them to lead different lives.”

(Psalm 37:10-12) . . .And just a little while longer, and the wicked one will be no more; And you will certainly give attention to his place, and he will not be. 11 But the meek ones themselves will possess the earth, And they will indeed find their exquisite delight in the abundance of peace. 12 The wicked one is plotting against the righteous one, And at him he is grinding his teeth.

I and my merry seeking friends look forward to a better world, free from false hoods and lies.

You still got your teeth? Becuase it sure looks your always grinding or sharpening them towards me.


user-pic

Thanks. That was very interesting; I'm sure not too many people will watch it, although it would be enlightening to anyone who wants to listen to some well-thought-out ideas.

user-pic

Where I live I've been accosted many times on the street by individuals -- with the best of intentions, I'm sure -- earnestly inquiring if I've accepted Jesus as my personal lord and savior.

My answer: "Well, that's personal, isn't it?" is rarely accepted in the spirit with which it is offered. Among other things, these folks have no appreciation for irony.

If God is your co-pilot, does that mean you're not driving the bus?

Marx said religion is the opiate of the masses. "Whatever gets you through the night," sang Lennon.

I think I'd like some of whatever they're smoking.

user-pic

Amen!

Great post Aunt Lis, we all need to swallow a big pill called acceptance. No bashing of any kind.

Also.. playdoh!? No lie, Joe is here visiting in State College and yesterday in Walmart we saw a ton of playdoh we both turned to each other and said, "OMG remember that time we ate it and it was so salty?! Not expecting that..."

And paper dolls! I had so many Disney ones!

Leave a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address