Red State Says Jesus Would Have Approved Waterboarding
[-- Originally Posted on Library Grape. --]
[-- Follow Library Grape on Twitter --]
More pearls of wisdom from that bastion of politicized Christianist exceptionalism (h/t John Cole):It's likely even Jesus would have OK'd water boarding if it would have saved his Mom. He would've done the same to save his Dad, or any one of His disciples. For that matter, He even died to save all humans.So, Jesus wouldn't be cool with killing babies in the womb but he'd be fine with torturing people? Yep, nothing says "Christ's love" like strapping a guy to a bench and drowning him to extract information.
It's obvious He would not be happy with those who voted for the candidate who kills because it's above his "pay grade" to know if they're alive. Checking the Commandments, killing innocents is against the 5th. Because pro-aborts don't know for sure life does not exist at conception, they are still willing to risk that it's not killing.
This reminds me of a couple of things I've blogged about before. The first is the poll that came out a few weeks ago that revealed that a majority of regular church-goers approve of the use of torture:
More than half of people who attend services at least once a week -- 54 percent -- said the use of torture against suspected terrorists is "often" or "sometimes" justified. Only 42 percent of people who "seldom or never" go to services agreed, according the analysis released Wednesday by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
There was also this gem of a quote from Christian Right leader There are a lot of things Jesus wouldn't do because he's the son of God. I can't imagine Jesus being a Marine or a policeman or a bank president, for that matter. The more appropriate question is, 'What is a follower of Jesus permitted to do?'It's pretty sad that the Christian Right in this country has been politicized to the point that, in defense of their preferred political ideology, they have been reduced to claiming that Jesus' supposedly loving message of peace and caring for your fellow man has been perverted to justify torture.
I think if we believe the person we have can give us information to stop thousands of Americans from being killed, it would be morally suspect to not use harsh tactics to get that information.
Say what you will about torture and Christianity, only the most extreme reading of the Gospels imaginable could, at the same time, claim that Jesus preached both a message of love and a message that could justify torture.
Perhaps the most important Bible passage for this debate is this:
"Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing." (Luke 23:34)Here are some other passages to bear in mind:
Exodus 22:21 - Do not mistreat an alien or oppress him, for you were aliens in Egypt.
Deuteronomy 27:19 - Cursed is the man who withholds justice from the alien, the fatherless or the widow.
Psalm 9:9 - The Lord also will be a stronghold for the oppressed, A stronghold in times of trouble.
Psalm 74:21 - Let not the oppressed return dishonored; Let the afflicted and needy praise Your name.
Psalm 146:9 - The Lord protects the strangers; He supports the fatherless and the widow, But He thwarts the way of the wicked.
Isaiah 29:20 - For the ruthless will come to an end and the scorner will be finished, Indeed all who are intent on doing evil will be cut off.
[-- Originally Posted on Library Grape. --]
[-- Follow Library Grape on Twitter , Subscribe to Library Grape (RSS) --]
Advertisement
















I think that the argument expressed in the Jog=hn Cole quote is conceptually muddled. There is a huge difference between choosing to suffer on the behalf of others, and subjecting others to suffering.
Likewise, as expressed in the second quote, the parsing between what Jesus would do and what a "follower" of Jesus would do. My understanding of being a Christian is to endeavor to be "Christ like." If that is the case, then the differentiation between what Christ would do and what a follower of Christ would do is moot. (I also heard this distinction made by Huckabee during the campaign).
While not mentioned in your post, it calls to mind another story in relationship to the the Christ/followers argument: Jesus throwing the moneylenders out of the table.
I believe that there is a vocal thread of Christianity that has taken a very narrow and morally bankrupt approach to Christianity.
I am not a Christian, but I appreciate and thank you for this analysis.
May 24, 2009 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have a magnet on my refrigerator that reads "Get real. Like Jesus would ever own a gun and vote Republican".
May 24, 2009 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently one of the churches that worship Jesus believes that He would approve of imprisoning young women and using them for slave labor and sexually and physically torturing children. Given that, it is easy to believe that Christian churches approve of torturing people - if it was good enough to be done to "heathen" Arabic people hundreds of years ago, it must be certified as approved by Christ.
Not a year goes by when I don't thank God that I am not a Christian.
May 24, 2009 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
The imaginary Jesus is being confused with the imaginary God. The one who smites the hell out of all manner of people and encourages the same of his chosen.
Enjoy.
May 24, 2009 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been toying with the idea of putting a "WWJT-Who Would Jesus Torture" sticker/sign on my car here in the Bible-Belt, but this post makes think that the irony would be lost...
May 25, 2009 3:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Another thought: so many times I've heard that libruls are moral relativists. Hmmmmm...et tu, Dick?
May 25, 2009 3:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh you forgot one bible verse:
But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. Luke 19:27
Can't we just finally do away with this crap?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6734321991450996691
May 25, 2009 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Torture is wrong. I do not need to rely on what was in the Bible to make that decision. There is a visceral response to torture that brings this awareness to me. Anything anyone says under torture cannot be relied upon, and anyone who sanctions or commits the act is doing so for their own sadistic pleasure. It has no merit whatsoever.
May 25, 2009 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink