The effects of republican economic policies.


Economist Ben Stien and Warren Buffet have cogently and reasonably argued there is a a class war is ongoing over taxes and we are loosing to the rich and super rich.
The richest 5% of americans own 95% of America while only paying 50% of the taxes.
Since Reagan started cutting taxes on the rich the top 1% got a 50% tax cut while our taxes are virtually unchanged.
Inflation adjusted hourly wages for working folks have not increased in 50 years.  It typically now take 2 incomes to run a houshold where back in the good old days a father could support a family.
In 1970 th erichest 1% took in 9% of American income, by 2007 it rose to 23.5%.
David Stockman, Ronald Reagan's OMB director, has blamed republican borrow and spend economics as the cause of our economic distruction.
And what have the rich done with all the money we transfered to them?  Create jobs?  Invest in America?  Trickle it down to the rest of us?  Nope, the rich Americans increased thier investment in foreign countries and foreign jobs from $1.3 Trillion in 2000 to $3.1 Trillion in 2008.  
Meanwhile without the taxes the rich used to pay we as a nation have cut federal invesment in our futures, federal non-defense R&D and public phisical capital spending were both 2.5 times more in the 1960s, as a percentage of GDP, then they are today.   Boy it would be nice to have the jobs such investments create today but Republicans are hell bent on maintaining tax cuts so the rich can continue to invest in foreign countries.

What the wealthy did with their tax cuts


According to the the U.S. census  US capital investment in foreign countries has gone from $1.3 trillion in 2000 to $3.2 trillion in 2008 while at the same time the Bush tax cuts which overwhelmingly went to the wealthy cost 1.3 trillion  per politifact.  So the wealthy essentially took their tax cuts, intended per the Republicans to spur U.S. jobs, and invested them and more in foreign countries, not the U.S..

Sarah Palin advocates American Theorcracy


Palin say's our founding fathers documents mean "that we would create law based on the God of the bible and the ten commandments."  See here.

Perhaps Sarah should listen to what our founding fathers themselves had to say.

 

James Madison - Fourth President of the USA

"What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the civil authority; on many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wish to subvert the public liberty may have found an established clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just government, instituted to secure and perpetuate it, needs them not." --- James Madison, "A Memorial and Remonstrance", 1785

"Experience witnesseth that ecclesiastical establishments, instead of maintaining the purity and efficacy of religion, have had a contrary operation. During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What has been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution." --- James Madison, "A Memorial and Remonstrance", 1785

"It may not be easy, in every possible case, to trace the line of separation between the rights of religion and the Civil authority with such distinctness as to avoid collisions and doubts on unessential points. The tendency to unsurpastion on one side or the other, or to a corrupting coalition or alliance between them, will be best guarded agst. by an entire abstinence of the Gov't from interfence in any way whatsoever, beyond the necessity of preserving public order, and protecting each sect agst. trespasses on its legal rights by others."

James Madison, "James Madison on Religious Liberty",

"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."

James Madison -letter to Wm. Bradford, April 1, 1774

"The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries."

James Madison -1803 letter objecting use of gov. land for churches

 

Thomas Jefferson Third President of the USA

 

There was a line in the email concerning things Jefferson worried about. It doesn't say much about what he believed religiously... but he did write his own version of the bible

http://books.google.com/books?id=lI7PerjA9wwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=jefferson+bible&as_brr=1&cd=3#v=onepage&q&f=false

"Is uniformity attainable? Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced an inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools, and the other half hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the earth." --- Thomas Jefferson, from "Notes on Virginia"

"Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." --- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, Aug. 10, 1787

"It is too late in the day for men of sincerity to pretend they believe in the Platonic mysticisms that three are one, and one is three; and yet that the one is not three, and the three are not one. But this constitutes the craft, the power and the profit of the priests." --- Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 1803

"The clergy...believe that any portion of power confided to me [as President] will be exerted in opposition to their schemes. And they believe rightly: for I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. But this is all they have to fear from me: and enough, too, in their opinion." --Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Rush, 1800.

"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose." --- Thomas Jefferson to Baron von Humboldt, 1813

"But the greatest of all reformers of the depraved religion of his own country, was Jesus of Nazareth. Abstracting what is really his from the rubbish in which it is buried, easily distinguished by its lustre from the dross of his biographers, and as separable from that as the diamond from the dunghill, we have the outlines of a system of the most sublime morality which has ever fallen from the lips of man. The establishment of the innocent and genuine character of this benevolent morality, and the rescuing it from the imputation of imposture, which has resulted from artificial systems, invented by ultra-Christian sects (The immaculate conception of Jesus, his deification, the creation of the world by him, his miraculous powers, his resurrection and visible ascension, his corporeal presence in the Eucharist, the Trinity; original sin, atonement, regeneration, election, orders of the Hierarchy, etc.) is a most desirable object." --- Thomas Jefferson to W. Short, Oct. 31, 1819

"It is not to be understood that I am with him (Jesus Christ) in all his doctrines. I am a Materialist; he takes the side of Spiritualism; he preaches the efficacy of repentence toward forgiveness of sin; I require a counterpoise of good works to redeem it.

 

Among the sayings and discourses imputed to him by his biographers, I find many passages of fine imagination, correct morality, and of the most lovely benevolence; and others, again, of so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same being. I separate, therefore, the gold from the dross; restore him to the former, and leave the latter to the stupidity of some, the roguery of others of his disciples. Of this band of dupes and imposters, Paul was the great Coryphaeus, and the first corruptor of the doctrines of Jesus." --- Thomas Jefferson to W. Short, 1820

John Adams Second President of the USA

"I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved--the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced!" --- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson

"As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?" --- John Adams, letter to F.A. Van der Kamp, Dec. 27, 1816

"What havoc has been made of books through every century of the Christian era? Where are fifty gospels, condemned as spurious by the bull of Pope Gelasius? Where are the forty wagon-loads of Hebrew manuscripts burned in France, by order of another pope, because suspected of heresy? Remember the 'index expurgatorius', the inquisition, the stake, the axe, the halter and the guillotine." --- John Adams, letter to John Taylor

"The priesthood have, in all ancient nations, nearly monopolized learning. And ever since the Reformation, when or where has existed a Protestant or dissenting sect who would tolerate A FREE INQUIRY? The blackest billingsgate, the most ungentlemanly insolence, the most yahooish brutality, is patiently endured, countenanced, propagated, and applauded. But touch a solemn truth in collision with a dogma of a sect, though capable of the clearest proof, and you will find you have disturbed a nest, and the hornets will swarm about your eyes and hand, and fly into your face and eyes." --- John Adams, letter to John Taylor

George Washington - first president of the USA

"Religious controversies are always productive of more acrimony and irreconcilable hatreds than those which spring from any other cause. Of all the animosities which have existed among mankind, those which are caused by the difference of sentiments in religion appear to be the most inveterate and distressing, and ought most to be depreciated. I was in hopes that the enlightened and liberal policy, which has marked the present age, would at least have reconciled Christians of every denomination so far that we should never again see the religious disputes carried to such a pitch as to endanger the peace of society."

- letter to Edward Newenham, 1792

Washington was otherwise mostly quiet about his beliefs - from those in positions to know best:

The father of this country was very private about his beliefs, but it is widely considered that he was a Deist like his colleagues. He was a Freemason. Historian Barry Schwartz writes: "George Washington's practice of Christianity was limited and superficial because he was not himself a Christian... He repeatedly declined the church's sacraments. Never did he take communion, and when his wife, Martha, did, he waited for her outside the sanctuary... Even on his deathbed, Washington asked for no ritual, uttered no prayer to Christ, and expressed no wish to be attended by His representative." [New York Press, 1987, pp. 174-175]

Paul F. Boller states in is anthology on Washington: "There is no mention of Jesus Christ anywhere in his extensive correspondence." [Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1963, pp. 14-15]

"One incident in Dr. Abercrombie's experience as a clergyman, in connection with the Father of his Country, is especially worthy of record; and the following account of it was given by the Doctor himself, in a letter to a friend, in 1831 shortly after there had been some public allusion to it: 'With respect to the inquiry you make I can only state the following facts; that, as pastor of the Episcopal church, observing that, on sacramental Sundays, Gen. Washington, immediately after the desk and pulpit services, went out with the greater part of the congregation -- always leaving Mrs. Washington with the other communicants -- she invariably being one -- I considered it my duty in a sermon on Public Worship, to state the unhappy tendency of example, particularly of those in elevated stations who uniformly turned their backs upon the celebration of the Lord's Supper. I acknowledge the remark was intended for the President; and as such he received it. A few days after, in conversation with, I believe, a senator of the United States, he told me he had dined the day before with the President, who in the course of conversation at table said that on the preceding Sunday he had received a very just reproof from the pulpit for always leaving the church before the administration of the Sacrament; that he honored the preacher for his integrity and candor; that he had never sufficiently considered the influence of his example, and that he would not again give cause for the repetition of the reproof; and that, as he had never been a communicant, were he to become one then it would be imputed to an ostentatious display of religious zeal? arising altogether from his elevated station. Accordingly, he never afterwards came on the morning of sacramental Sunday, though at other times he was a constant attendant in the morning'" (Annals of the American Pulpit, Vol. v, p. 394).

In February, 1800, a few weeks after. Washington's death, Jefferson made the following entry in his journal:

"Dr. Rush told me (he had it from Asa Green) that when the clergy addressed General Washington, on his departure from the government, it was observed in their consultation that he had never, on any occasion, said a word to the public which showed a belief in the Christian religion, and they thought they should so pen their address as to force him at length to disclose publicly whether he was a Christian or not. However, he observed, the old fox was too cunning for them. He answered every article of their address particularly, except that, which he passed over without notice" (Jefferson's Works, Vol. iv., p. 572).

Jefferson further says: "I know that Gouverneur Morris, who claimed to be in his secrets, and believed himself to be so, has often told me that General Washington believed no more in that system [Christianity] than he did" (Ibid).

Gouverneur Morris was the principal drafter of the Constitution of the United States; he was a member of the Continental Congress, a United States senator from New York, and minister to France. He accepted, to a considerable extent, the skeptical views of French Freethinkers.

The Rev. Dr. Wilson, who was almost a contemporary of our earlier statesmen and presidents, and who thoroughly investigated the subject of their religious beliefs, in his sermon already mentioned affirmed that the founders of our nation were nearly all Infidels, and that of the presidents who had thus far been elected -- George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson -- not one had professed a belief in Christianity. From this sermon I quote the following:

 

"When the war was over and the victory over our enemies won, and the blessings and happiness of liberty and peace were secured, the Constitution was framed and God was neglected. He was not merely forgotten. He was absolutely voted out of the Constitution. The proceedings, as published by Thompson, the secretary, and the history of the day, show that the question was gravely debated whether God should be in the Constitution or not, and, after a solemn debate he was deliberately voted out of it. ... There is not only in the theory of our government no recognition of God's laws and sovereignty, but its practical operation, its administration, has been conformable to its theory. Those who have been called to administer the government have not been men making any public profession of Christianity. ... Washington was a man of valor and wisdom. He was esteemed by the whole world as a great and good man; but he was not a professing Christian."

 

Dr. Wilson's sermon was published in the Albany Daily Advertiser in 1831, and attracted the attention of Robert Dale Owen, then a young man, who called to see its author in regard to his statement concerning Washington's belief. The result of his visit is given in a letter to Amos Gilbert. The letter is dated Albany, November 13, 1831., and was published in New York a fortnight later. He says:

 

"I called last evening on Dr. Wilson, as I told you I should, and I have seldom derived more pleasure from a short interview with anyone. Unless my discernment of character has been rievously at fault, I met an honest man and sincere Christian. But you shall have the particulars. A gentleman of this city accompanied me to the Doctor's residence. We were very courteously received. I found him a tall, commanding figure, with a countenance of much benevolence, and a brow indicative of deep thought, apparently approaching fifty years of age. I opened the interview by stating that though personally a stranger to him, I had taken the liberty of calling in consequence of having perused an interesting sermon of his, which had been reported in the Daily Advertiser of this city, and regarding which, as he probably knew, a variety of opinions prevailed. In a discussion, in which I had taken a part, some of the facts as there reported had been questioned; and I wished to know from him whether the reporter had fairly given his words or not. ... I then read to him from a copy of the Daily Advertiser the paragraph which regards Washington, beginning, 'Washington was a man,' etc., and ending, 'absented himself altogether from the church.' 'I indorse,' said Dr. Wilson, with emphasis, 'every word of that. Nay, I do not wish to conceal from you any part of the truth, even what I have not given to the public. Dr. Abercrombie said more than I have repeated. At the close of our conversation on the subject his emphatic expression was -- for I well remember the very words -- 'Sir, Washington was a Deist.'"

Benjamin Franklin - Eldest member of continental congress, signer of both declaration of independence and constitution.

"If we look back into history for the character of the present sects in Christianity, we shall find few that have not in their turns been persecutors, and complainers of persecution. The primitive Christians thought persecution extremely wrong in the Pagans, but practiced it on one another. The first Protestants of the Church of England blamed persecution in the Romish Church, but practiced it upon the Puritans. They found it wrong in Bishops, but fell into the practice themselves both there (England) and in New England."--- Benjamin Franklin

"I wish it (Christianity) were more productive of good works ... I mean real good works ... not holy-day keeping, sermon-hearing ... or making long prayers, filled with flatteries and compliments despised by wise men, and much less capable of pleasing the Deity."--- Benjamin Franklin, Works, Vol. VII, p. 75

"I cannot conceive otherwise than that He, the Infinite Father, expects or requires no worship or praise from us, but that He is even infinitely above it." --- Benjamin Franklin, from "Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion", Nov. 20, 1728

"I think vital religion has always suffered when orthodoxy is more regarded than virtue. The scriptures assure me that at the last day we shall not be examined on what we thought but what we did." --- Benjamin Franklin, letter to his father, 1738

". . . Some books against Deism fell into my hands. . . It happened that they wrought an effect on my quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a thorough Deist."

"When a religion is good, I conceive it will support itself; and when it does not support itself so that its professors are obliged to call for the help of the civil power, 'tis a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one."

"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason."

-in Poor Richard's Almanac

Thomas Paine - Father of the American Revolution, author of the revolution inciting Common Sense

All the below and much more from The Age of Reason

But when the divine gift of reason begins to expand itself in the mind and calls man to reflection, he then reads and contemplates God and His works, and not in the books pretending to be revelation. The creation is the Bible of the true believer in God. Everything in this vast volume inspires him with sublime ideas of the Creator. The little and paltry, and often obscene, tales of the Bible sink into wretchedness when put in comparison with this mighty work.

The Deist needs none of those tricks and shows called miracles to confirm his faith, for what can be a greater miracle than the creation itself, and his own existence?

There is a happiness in Deism, when rightly understood, that is not to be found in any other system of religion. All other systems have something in them that either shock our reason, or are repugnant to it, and man, if he thinks at all, must stifle his reason in order to force himself to believe them.

But in Deism our reason and our belief become happily united. The wonderful structure of the universe, and everything we behold in the system of the creation, prove to us, far better than books can do, the existence of a God, and at the same time proclaim His attributes.

It is by the exercise of our reason that we are enabled to contemplate God in His works, and imitate Him in His ways. When we see His care and goodness extended over all His creatures, it teaches us our duty toward each other, while it calls forth our gratitude to Him. It is by forgetting God in His works, and running after the books of pretended revelation, that man has wandered from the straight path of duty and happiness, and become by turns the victim of doubt and the dupe of delusion.

Except in the first article in the Christian creed, that of believing in God, there is not an article in it but fills the mind with doubt as to the truth of it, the instant man begins to think. Now every article in a creed that is necessary to the happiness and salvation of man, ought to be as evident to the reason and comprehension of man as the first article is, for God has not given us reason for the purpose of confounding us, but that we should use it for our own happiness and His glory.

 

Republican and big oil request Govt bailout to deal with gulf oil spill.


Perhaps it's a message from God to conservatives...

 

From the Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704608104575218441197366002.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us

"Local officials have also been critical. Bobby Jindal, governor of Louisiana, said he had "concerns that BP's resources are not adequate." "I urge them to seek more help from the federal government and others," he told reporters."

"The company has also asked for help from the U.S. Department of Defense, requesting better undersea imaging equipment and remotely operated vehicles or ROVs, the underwater robots that have been used to try and shut off the well. It wants to know whether the department has "better ROV capability than is available commercially," the company said in a statement"

Breaking - France requests return of Statue of Liberty


What began with a small spontaneous protest against the recent Arizona immigration law near the Eiffel tower led by the descendents of Frederic Bartholdi, the designer of the statue, has grown into a full fledged national movement and a letter from the French president to president Obama.   In the letter France requests either the return of the Statue of Liberty or it's full covering with a symbolic burka emblazoned with the fourth amendment of the Bill of Rights.

 

The short letter states, "Recent events in the U.S., the Arizona Immigration law in particular, have deeply saddened the French people.  The Statue of Liberty was a gift from the French people to the people of America in recognition of the ideals of liberty and freedom of all men as demonstrated by the U.S Bill of Rights, Constitution and the American people.  The people of France are currently in a virtual state of morning over what is perceived by them to be the end of the ideals of that America and of the light of liberty shining from it's shores and the Statue being extinguished by fear and hate.  Therefore we, the people of France, regretfully request the return of the statue or, pending what we can only hope is a return to sanity in America, the statues covering with cloth imprinted with the fourth amendment of the U.S. Bill of Rights."

 

There has been no comment from the white house.  The Governor of Arizona responded curtly, "Like George Bush I and the legislature of Arizona believe the U.S. constitution and Bill of Rights are just pieces of paper."

 

References:

 

Fourth amendment:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

Inscription on the Statue of Liberty:

"Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
    

 

Nearly half of Americans pay 100% or more in taxes


Seriously, they do.

 

If you look at it this way.   According to the congressional research service  http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40647_20090901.pdf nearly half of Americans have a 0% or less savings rate.  Why?  Because after paying the cost of living taxes take up 100% or more of their remaining, net, income.   Hence, no or negative savings.

 

Of course some would say that these negative savings are due to people living beyond their means but given the fact that most of these households gross less then $50,000 going beyond their means is more often then not borrowing just to get by.  One could even argue they don't have to borrow for the car needed to get to work but instead they borrow to pay their taxes.

 

Why should so many Americans have to pay a 100% or more tax rate on their net income while the Warren Buffet pays less then 18%.  

It's a lie "half of americans don't pay taxes"


It's all over the news it seems, "half of Americans don't pay" any federal income tax.  On FOX Hannity and others go even farther stating "50 percent of American households no longer pay taxes".  While, of course Hannity's is a bigger one, both of these claims are flat out lies.

 

To expose the full truth lets look at a median household with an income of $50,000 that pays "no income tax." These households pay social security tax 6.2%, medicare tax 1.45%, federal gasoline tax @27.2c/gallon, @ 30 gallons /week that's  425/year or .85% of 50,000 totaling 8.5% federal taxes on their income.

 

Average total state taxes http://money.cnn.com/pf/features/lists/taxesbystate2005/index.html are 10.2%.  That's a total tax rate of  6.2 + 1.45 + .85 + 10.2 = 18.5% or $9,250 in total taxes for the median $50,000 household.  Hardly the "no taxes" currently being broadcast in media.  Considering that the federal gas and most state/local taxes are regressive the total tax rate for households making less then the median are even higher.

 

To put this in prospective I just heard Warren Buffet, on CNBC, say he paid 17.2% of his income in taxes for 2009. 

Fox's American Idol Religiously censors John Lennon song


Just saw American Idol and someone sang Lennon's Imagine, except for one line "and no religion too."    WHY?

Below are the full lyrics.

 

Imagine there's no Heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace

You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world

You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one

How the republicans are really destroying America and what we can do to stop them.


Even before we were a nation Americans were a people who believed they could, given the opportunity, do anything.  Faced with war against the British empire, then the worlds superpower, Americans knew we could do it.

Since our founding we believed we could do anything.  We built the worlds largest railroad system, the biggest buildings, longest bridges, the most productive factories and went to the moon.  In the face of every adversity the words "we can't" were proven wrong.  This didn't just apply to things we built, it applied to how we as a society treated each other as well.  Our social contracts with each other.

We were capable of looking ourselves in the mirror, acknowledging our faults and saying "we can do it."  When Americans saw how a lack of education was a lack of individual opportunity we built the largest and best public school system in the world.  When we saw elderly and others in poverty and dying of treatable illnesses we created social security and medicaid and medicare.  When we saw how we mistreated those who are different we said we are better then that and passed civil rights laws.  In America anything and everything was possible.  We expected, no, we demanded no less from ourselves and, by extension, our government.  We demanded investment in our children, research, science, education

We Americans, republicans and democrats alike, never said "we can't" do what was right or what needed to be done and we were willing to work hard and pay taxes to do it if necessary, as high as 90% on the richest after the depression and up to 70% into the 80s (http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html).  

Then something happened, the republican party began to say we can't.  We can't have better education.  We can't develop renewable energy.  We can't pay workers healthcare and fair wages.   We can't afford good union wages and benefits.  We can't We can't continue to invest and be the worlds leader in research, science and the arts.  We can't have the inflation adjusted median income growth of 50s, 60s and early 70s when it doubled Vs up 16% over the same amount of time since then (http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/histinc/f07ar.html).  WE CAN'T do these things and maintain the TAX CUTS for the RICH begun in the 80s.  WE CAN'T do these things and continue to take the wealth of our nation away from "we the people" and give it to the rich (http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html).  WE CAN't invest for the greater good and maintain the hundred fold increase in income for the rich.

The result of the "we can't" republican platform is worse then just the stagnation of most Americans incomes since the 80s or the taking of the wealth from working people and giving it to the rich.  The "we can't" republicans are destroying America itself.  They are destroying the "we can" attitude that made us great.  They're research and education cuts are hindering our ability to lead scientifically now and into the future.  The "we can't" republicans are holding us down while other nations are graduating more and more engineers and scientists to build their futures.  The "we can't" republicans are keeping us riding 100 year old rail lines while China builds the worlds fastest.  The "we can't" republicans are forcing us to stay dependant on forign oil as we hand money to people who would like to kill us rather then build a new clean, green energy independent future.  Heck, they even got a congressional leader named Eric CANTor.

These Cantors would have us believe that America is over, that the we can do anything days are behind us.  Bullshit!

Well guess what "CANTOR" republicans?  WE CAN stop you from destroying this nation any further.  WE CAN again invest fair taxes on the rich to lead the world in education, science, research, technology, medicine AND our social pacts with each other as we did in the "good old days" of the 40s through the 70s.  WE CAN create millions of jobs becoming energy independent and protect the environment for our children.  WE CAN see the median income increases of the decades before you "we cantors" came along.  WE CAN and we will because we are Americans and that's what we do.  You "we Cantors" can join in or get the @#!#% out of the way. 

And to the the democrats that have been too wimpy to take the majority we gave you to stand up to the "we Cantors"...  Grow a set and start saying WE CAN and WE WILL, otherwise WE CAN and WE WILL vote the the whole lot of you out of office.


 

Sign The Public Option Petition


Thanks to Howard Dean for creating http://standwithdrdean.com/.

After signing the petition you can also look up your congressional representative to see where he or she stands or volunteer to take additional action.

Fox news and Google News....


Is it me or is Fox playing games to get their stories (propaganda) to the top of the Google news page?

I was looking at Google news a few minutes age and a Fox story about how "the Bush Doctrine" was working in Iran was at the top of the Iran coverage. 

Call me crazy but with all the Iran news out there I just don't understand how such a story could make it to the top of the top stories on Google without some type of shenanigans.

 

 

 

 

Republicans don't trust Americans.


 

Republicans don't trust us Americans to make the right decision if we are given the option to choose to spend our money on a public health insurance option Vs private insurance.  They claim that if given the choice the American people will choose the public option and this will lead to all sorts of evil such as rationing of health care and bureaucrats making life and death decisions. 

 

This from the party who in regards to corporate & financial regulation and taxes on the rich and powerful, has said, "We trust the American people" to make the best decisions of what to do with their money.  I suppose, in reality, the Republicans only trust the corporations, rich and powerful to make good decisions (such as tanking our economy).  But when it comes to individual choice the Republicans just don't trust us Americans.

 

To all the Republicans out there I ask that you trust American individuals to make the right decision if given the public insurance option.  What's the worst that could happen?  We choose public insurance and it doesn't work out, then we have to change our minds and buy back into private insurance.  What's the best that could happen?  We each save thousands a year on our health insurance.    

Demand McCain Debate Online Petition Started


Democrat Vs Republican Economic Philisophy


IN GOOD TIMES

Democrat:  Increase the minimum wage, increase wages for increases in productivity, reduce taxes on the poor and middle class, increase long term investments in education, renewable energy and infrastructure and cut down on the national debt.  Reggulate the markets to ensure stability.  Share the wealth.

Republican:  Concentrate the wealth at the top, keep the minimum wage fixed, keep all profits from increases in productivity in the hands of CEOs and shareholders, reduce taxes on the wealthy, cut back or block long term investments in education, renewable energy and infrastructure and increase the national debt.  Deregulate the markets.  The rich get richer and the poor and middle class gets whatever trickles down.

IN BAD TIMES

Democrats:  Stabilize the economy with bailouts where needed to prevent economic breakdown.  Help those most in need of assistance, prioritize federal expenditures to areas that aid the lower and middle classes, invest inareas that will help create jobs and benifit in the long run such as education, renewable energy and infrastructure.  Examine the causes of the of the market failures to identify where oversight and regulation was insufficient to prevent the problems and create changes to prevent recurrence.  Ask those fortunate enough to be able to afford it to pay more.

Republican:  Stabilize the economy with bailouts where needed to help the rich and to prevent economic breakdown to get democrat support.  Help those who stand to loose millions with additional tax cuts while telling those at the bottom they should have been more responsible.  Cut back or block long term investments in education, renewable energy and infrastructure.  Share the pain.

PUT IN ANOTHER WAY

In good times democratcs are for well regulated capitalism seeking fairness in the distribution of the wealth created while useing taxpayer for long term investments that benifit all.  Republicans are strict free market capitalists wherein the wealthy get wealthier and the use of taxes for the greater good is socialist, evil.

In bad times republicans suddenly turn into socialists and demand that the government use taxpayer funds for bailouts in the name of the greater good.

Democrat Vs Republican Economics


IN GOOD TIMES

 

let freedom ring

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 3

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address