« Re Fisa: Obama articulated his reasoning in a 2005 Kos Diary. | LBS's Blog | Watershed for 20,000,000: NYState one step closer to drilling. »

Halliburton Fishkill in NE PA. Coming to NY Watershed?


Just five miles from where my husbands' folks live, there is an environmental catastrophe in the making.  The natural gas industry, which has been drilling nationwide with substantial reported problems, has started drilling the Marcellus Shale in NE PA, and is on its way to NY.

A few months ago, folks lost their water.  Last week 6,000-8,000 gallons of chemicals found their way into wetlands, and fish are dying.

This catastrophe comes with the advent of a new kind of natural gas drilling called hydraulic fracturing.  With the help of lobbyist Tom West, New York State passed a law last year that will allow this fracturing horizontally, breaking up the shale structure underneath hundreds of miles of land, using about five million gallons of water per each frac, about ten fracs per well, for of each of the two-thousand wells projected for New York state.  The water is rendered poisonous by a chemical fluid; much of the fluid and equipment is supplied by Halliburton.

(To give Governor Patterson much credit, he put drilling on hold until the DEC could create new statewide regulations.  The scope has already been completed, and the draft SGEIS is due out in late September.  From what I know of the scope, the draft will be lacking key components.  I love Obama, but he voted for Cheney's energy bill back in 2005 that exempted this process from virtually all federal regulation.) 

The fracing fluid is exempt from right-to-know. We don't what is in it.  Independent scientists, like the renowned Theo Colbourn has found toxic and carcinogenic substances.

The process is exempt from the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, storm protection, and the superfund.

Oil companies using Halliburton equipment and know-how have been drilling throughout the country, and we already have 1000's of cases of water contamination.  Under the Bush administration, these were not studied, but officials in Wyoming have found benzene in the aquifer and a toxic plume of 28 miles.  Just this year, the EPA finally got involved and has directly connected natural gas production with water contamination.

Scientific American gave it a very thorough treatment last November, and so did, of all magazines, Business Week.  However the progressive press has been silent on this issue.  Nothing on the Daily Kos, from what I know.  The Huffington Post has been featuring articles by T. Boon Pickens telling us of green natural gas and national security.  I wrote TPM about it, but haven't seen anything here - and darned I wish someone would pay attention.

I will seem to be exaggerating, but this process is akin to having ten Love Canals in thousands of communities all around the country many affecting major watersheds. 

The lack of attention is, to say the least, bizarre. 

Part of the problem is the Sierra Club national (much to the chagrin of many chapters) along with other national environmental organizations decided last year to endorse natural gas as a "transition" fuel because it burns about 23% cleaner than oil. 

My guess is that Pickens was successfully able to pitch his idea, and so, garnering the names of well-respected environmental organizations, basically refashioned himself as a clean-green progressive.

Sadly, the environmental organizations seem to have endorsed Pickens' plan when we were still ignorant about the process used to obtain this gas, which (as stated) uses billions of gallons of water that is never returned to the ecosystem but which is contaminated with carcinogens and toxins associated with reproductive disorders, brain damage, nerve damage and cancer -- among other health problems.

The process also involves the creation of ozone and methane, greenhouse gasses more dangerous than CO2.  A scientific study has found that the pollution caused by the process causes twice as much pollution in the Fort Worth area than all traffic in that area combined, and Fort Worth has already been facing pollution remediation due to pollution from traffic.

As a bonus, the drilling also brings radon and heavy metals to the surface (like lead and mercury) and radon has already found its way into the air and food chain in Texas as is reported in the Denton Record Chronicle.

To say this stuff is deadly is an understatement.  A nurse in Durango spent ten minutes with a rig worker who was doused in the fracing fluid.  She did not touch him, but still ended up in intensive care for days. The company would not tell doctors what chemical she had been exposed to for days, either, and even then swore the doctor to confidentiality. 

The drilling set to come to New York will most certainly take place near the watershed, though I imagine that a sacrificial two mile buffer may be put in place. However, given the little we know about substrata migration (particularly in New York where there are frequent fissures in sub-strata rock that is blown to pieces using a new, largely unstudied process) I would not consider the watershed safe. 

Could someone please cover this issue?  ProPublica's website has outstanding reporting. 

I am bewildered, shocked, and amazed at what is happening, and in front of our eyes.

 


19 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Oh, we have environmental regulations, all right.

user-pic

LBS...thank you for blogging about this and taking the time and trouble to gather the links and post them.

You just have to believe that Halliburton is up to no good (duh) when they refuse to disclose the chemicals they are using in frac drilling.

user-pic

Thanks for covering this LBS. The subject of hydraulic fracturing has been covered in the reader blogs here before, but I can't remember anyone on the left side of the page giving a run at it. And yes, a two mile, 'safety' zone between watershed/aquifers should not instill any confidence on the part of anyone who values their aquifer and its' freedom from polluting compounds.

user-pic
I am bewildered, shocked, and amazed at what is happening, and in front of our eyes.
Wish I could say the same. Seems about par for the course to me.

Thanks for bringing attention to this.

user-pic

I appreciate the comments. I think another problem here is that environmentalists see natural gas as an alternative to coal, which is a little like seeing Sauron as an alternative to the Emperor or Darth Vadar.

To put it another way, the assumption is that if one supports one interest that has a powerful lobby, the other interest with its powerful lobbby will vanish -- which is not the case. Both simply become more powerful and better able to subdue less powerful lobbies (i.e. common sense).

Anyway, it's a sad story.

The so-called "gas support facilities" don't seem to be much better than the wells themselves. Schlumberger, a company with a dubious environmental track record, wants to build a plant up in Horseheads near an elementary school, day care centers, wetlands and an aquifer.

The problem is that these companies come offering money -- in the Schlumeberger case 400 jobs. The Southern Tier is so hard up that folks forget to think.

In any case, the issue is interesting on an intellectual level: It is very difficult to research the issue in any depth and not be horrified, unless, I suppose, one were inclined to believe anti-environmental rhetoric to begin with.

The question then becomes: Has big business found ways to co-opt the progressive press. I don't mean that somehow Josh Marshall has become a sithe lord. TPM is still my favorite blog. But on a fundamental level, people have discovered how to tap the surface anger of the progressive pool of thought and make it move -- wave upon wave of hullaballoo can occur at the surface, when no one is sounding the depths of the issues. We react, and don't consider and research everything because we can't, so even we are open to right-wing manipulation.

I voted Obama, but Obama certainly showed how it could be done. I certainly used up enough hot air on these pages advocating for him against Clinton. (I still like Obama, but the whole primary season seems rather silly now, nu?)

Pickens and his "plan" seems a different kind of case study. It is interesting. I would be more interested if I weren't so angry, scared and sad.

This is a nationwide, environmental debacle.

user-pic

I should put in a quick plug for Marshall (who is not a sithe lord.) The reason I appreciate TPM is that it is well-researched and its journalism is -- well, journalism. Not that yellow, waxy stuff one might use to shine up one's surf-board.

user-pic

And Obama's Interior Secretary has vowed that science will take precedence in decisions about environmental issues. If that is the case, then trade secrets fly in the face of scientific assessment. Interior Department oversees much of the natural gas drilling in the west and elsewhere. The problems with 'fracing are too numerous to continue to cover up.

Is there a legislator with guts (I know, I know...) to right the industry-written exemptions, and protect the people? All the people, not just the rich ones?

user-pic

In the words of that great statesman from Philly, Ozzie Meyers; "Money talks and bullshit walks."

Halliburton has tons of money.

user-pic

Halliburton is as close to pure evil as a corporation could be. (Our ex-veep is the perfect poster boy.)

And they don't just have "tons of money", they have tons of our money.

user-pic

They've known about the shale gas for many years. The area has been depressed with very little development and lots of people looking forward to a big pay day.

Oh yeah, sure, lets let Halliburton shoot secret chemicals into the ground and believe them that it won't pollute. Yeah right!!

How long before Liz Cheney gets on teevee to support another of dad's clusterf*cks?

user-pic

I called my congressman from the 25th district. Hopefully he'll look into this. It doesn't sound too good. This has the makings of another major screwup.

user-pic

I appreciate all these comments and the discussion. Thanks for calling your representatives. I also very much agree that this is a social justice issue.

Of course, I failed to mention that there are other aquifers at stake - I believe the Finger Lakes have been mentioned. And hundreds of thousands of people live in the Southern Tier of New York.

There is unconventional shale drilling going on in other areas of the country with similar reports of environmenal mayhem.

If anyone would like more information, the ProPublica pieces (linked above) are outstanding. Also, a very fine organization, the Oil and Gas Accountability Project (OGAP http://www.earthworksaction.org/oil_and_gas.cfm) has excellent, trustworthy information as well as links to the scientific studies we have. They are working to develop regulation and have already helped implement legislation in Colorado and New Mexico.

Theo Colbourn's The Endocrine Disruption Exchange also has fine information. http://www.endocrinedisruption.com/home.php

As for TPM, I did not mean to single it out. I am just amazed at how successful Pickens has been at capturing the liberal/progressive press. But people don't know what they don't know until they know they don't know it.

The gas industry has known about the Marcellus for years; it has been planning. (Has anyone heard of the Millenium Pipeline?)

However, most people -- even in my area -- don't know a damned thing about this. Not even the policy makers knew a year ago. Pete Grannis of DEC, not to mention Patterson's environmental advisor, Judith Enck, have solid reputations (Enck especially so). So when the DEC (which is charged not only with conservation but with the exploitation of energy resources) sponsored legislation to take away virtually all local juristiction from horizontal fracing, basically giving the industry cart blanche in NY, folks in the legislature thought it was fine. No one -- not even the most liberal -- thought to question. After all, the Sierra Club was behind it, right?

I only found out last May, and haven't had time to breathe much I've been so frightened, for my home sits in the middle of the shale. A handful of folks -- some activists, some not at all, just about all of us struggling -- have worked day and night to do something.

With a lot of hard work (especially from one professor who has basically given his life to researching the issue, and carefully too. He's a scientist -- his mantra, "If you don't have three sources, it is not a fact")we managed to get the governor's attention, and thank goodness he listened. (Patterson deserves credit. Strangely, however, his energy plan and economic initiaves still call for natural gas drilling. The Muckraker would do well to look at NYSERDA which has had an odd relationship with the gas industry.)

But still, few in NY or PA know, and the NYT didn't even mention the issue in its story on water, even though the EPA had released its findings regarding Wyoming only a week before, and even though the report of the Dimmock wetland spill/fishkill was surfacing and people called to let the reporter at the Times know.

Nada. Nothing.

I am very heartened by the responses here, however. You all are caring people who work for your communities, so you know what the fight can be like.

So anyway, I'm just glad TPM is here.

user-pic

This is a great starting point of a blog!!!

What you are seeing in this particular case is, in fact, much broader. Much like the protests about Vietnam started once the comfortable middle class was affected by the draft, this issue has been raging for a while -- just in poorer communities.

Environmental Justice is part of the EPA that gets very little attention. Last week, the New York Times highlighting this issue.

Too often those on the left think of the environmentalism as saving polar bears. A serious re-education needs to be had here. There are many poor communities today who worry about merely bathing or showering in water coming out of their pipes! Without the abilities to enforce, the legislation we already have is useless.

The left also like "clean energy" as a mantra and much of Obama's environmentalism is focused in this area. But this is the shiny flashy side of things that make Prius drivers -- and campaign donators -- happy. There needs to be more enforcement to have a clean environment. Our laws are in place -- we need to give them teeth.

The White House has their own little treatment facility for water coming out of the Potomac. I have met many people who think this is the wave of the future -- you can't count on the municipalities for purifying, so you will have to host your own home facility, like a hot water heater.

Is this the sort of country we want?

I would encourage you to write to TPM and Josh again about this issue and environmental justice in particular. It's truly something that will affect us all.

user-pic

It's the kind of country the GOP wants. Let's bankrupt the cities so the corporations can make bigger profits. Having a community look after itself prevents companies from picking people off one at a time. HOw much can comapnies make once the cities can no longer prpvide something as pure and simple as a clean glass of water.

BTW, if the aquifers are toxified, what will that mean for the Chemung River, which flows into the Susquehanna? And what will it mean to the Finger lakes?

user-pic

Gregor:

It's the kind of country the GOP wants.

This is the type of ignorant comment that prevents progress.

You don't think that Dems are to blame too? Here's a clue: go check out Louisiana and get back to me. And that's just an easy example that you probably don't even have to Google to understand.

user-pic

In fairness to TPM, this has never been an environmental or science blog. It's about "talking points" - the political bullshit, and parsing the bits of truth from the swill. So my guess is if there's an angle on this TPM would cover, it would have to be the political story, in its national scope, rather than the local tragedy of yet another bunch of rural people being poisoned.

There was a good article in the Times last week about people's wells being poisoned by runoff from large farms in the Midwest. A vital story, to be sure, also with a political side, but outside the scope of reporting I'd expect TPM to make itself responsible for. No one blog can be responsible for illuminating all the injustice in this world.

user-pic

I referenced that NY Times article in my reply above.

We live in a world where issues of science cannnot be viewed as separate from issues of politics. Indeed, the present healthcare debate -- and that including stem cell research -- is very much tied into science.

Indeed, if global warming is a topic here at TPM -- and it is -- then environmental justice needs to be understood as well.

user-pic

[blockquote]So my guess is if there's an angle on this TPM would cover, it would have to be the political story, in its national scope, rather than the local tragedy of yet another bunch of rural people being poisoned.[/blockquote]

You're leaving out a fairly important piece of TPM. The Muckraker is what brought me to TPM, and you'll find coverage of a lot of local, apolitical-but-muck-worthy stories there.

user-pic

LBS,

So angry that I clicked submit before acknowledging your fine work on this post and including the informative links. Sometimes this all feels like a bad dream and we'll wake up and all will be well.

The big corporations don't care a lick about us, so we'll have to be the squeaky wheel.

Otsego County here, and it looks like I've got a lot of concerned neighbors here too. Hopefully the low info landowners can see past the dollar signs and look out for their interests.

Thanks for helping to S.O.M.E.- Save Our Mother Earth

bluejeansntshirt

Leave a comment

LBS

user-pic

Following: 4
Followers: 6

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address