« Need A Bus To DC For The Single Payer Rally July 30th? | Synchronicity's Blog | New ACLU 'Tortured Logic' Video On Accountability: Made For Eric Holder »

Single Payer Vote In Committee Friday. Still Time To Make Your Voice Heard


Most of you know that I am 100% in support of a single payer/universal health care system.

The more that I have witnessed and learned, the more I feel that the public option will turn healthcare into a political football for years to come.  And one question I have is, if it will leave out some people, who are they, and why? 

It feels to me that there is an underlying game being played with this public option.  If it truly allows competition (we 'secretly' know it will lead to a single payer system), we want it but the insurance companies and those supporting the insurance companies don't want it and will fight it with everything they've got.  If it is watered down, distorted, and turned into something more chaotic, then more who support the insurance companies will accept it but it will offer us little value in terms of savings and competition so we don't want it. 

This is like a game of chicken. A Mind 'D'uck! It is completely screwed up. 

I think it is time to take the profits out of health care, 'now'. 

The Energy & Commerce committee claims that they will vote tomorrow on HR 676.  They apparently need 5 more votes.  If you haven't alreay faxed, please do and email and call as well. 

I have written to Waxman, as head of the committee, others as members of the committee, and to a representative from my state I said 'I am writing to you as the only representative from my state on the committee', etc. 

The following is from www.democracy.com on the vote tomorrow:

One week ago, we eagerly anticipated a crucial vote on single-payer Medicare for All ( H.R.676 ) in the House Energy & Commerce Committee, sponsored by Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY). But then seven BlueDogs waged a highly-publicized war against a "robust public option" and the vote was delayed for a full week.

We just learned the vote will be tomorrow ( Friday ). Based on all of your calls, we have nine single-payer Democrats: Tammy Baldwin, Michael Doyle, Eliot Engel, Anna Eshoo, Gene Green, Edward Markey, Janice Schakowsky, Anthony Weiner, and Peter Welch.

Lean Yes
Diana DeGette CO01 202-225-4431
Jane Harman CA36 202-225-8220
Christopher Murphy CT05 202-225-4476
Frank Pallone NJ06 202-225-4671 @FrankPallone
Bobby Rush IL01 202-225-4372
Five more Democrats are leaning single-payer but still uncommitted. Please call each one and give them one crucial reason to support single-payer from our petition:
http://www.democrats.com/single-payer-petition?cid=ZGVtczU5MTQ0NWRlbXM=
(Be sure to sign our petition and forward it if you haven't already.)

Be concise and practice in advance so you can speak quickly (or leave a voicemail) because they are getting swamped. Report the results of your calls here:
http://www.democrats.com/single-payer-committee-whip

Public Option Only (or Won't Say)
Rick Boucher VA09 202-225-3861
Bruce Braley IA01 202-225-2911
G.K. Butterfield NC01 202-225-3101
Lois Capps CA23 202-225-3601
Kathy Castor FL11 202-225-3376
John Dingell MI15 202-225-4071
Charles Gonzalez TX20 202-225-3236
Jay Inslee WA01 202-225-6311 @RepInsleeNews
Doris Matsui CA05 202-225-7163
Jerry McNerney CA11 202-225-1947
John Sarbanes MD03 202-225-4016
Bart Stupak MI01 202-225-4735
Betty Sutton OH13 202-225-3401
Henry Waxman (Chair) CA30 202-225-3976
If you have more time, these 14 Democrats support a "public option" at best. But that "public option" (a new government program to compete with private insurance) was disastrously weakened this week by the BlueDogs. They banned the use of Medicare pricing to reduce costs and thereby expand availability. Try to persuade these 14 to vote for single-payer instead of a worthless BlueDog "public option."

Don't let anyone tell you single-payer can't pass: the Kucinich Amendment for a single-payer "state option" passed by a shocking 25-19 bi-partisan majority in the House Education and Labor Committee on July 17. The Weiner Amendment will pass on Friday if enough Democrats vote for it!

A victory on the Weiner Amendment would make a huge difference. Please call as soon as you get this - night or day.

Thanks for all you do!


10 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I personally WANT a single payer system today, just like you do, Synch.....but it ain't gonna happen. I am moving on to supporting a public option, knowing that it might be our foot in the door.

I applaud your efforts and I know you gave it your best and will continue to do so, but....for me, single payer just ain't gonna happen.

user-pic

Yes. You have alread said as much LisB and I respect your decision. Don't see the public option happening in a meaningful way either (because basically to the insurance company a meaningful public option 'will' lead to a single payer system) so I am going to go for what I think is best for our country and our economy.

user-pic

Yeah, you are technically right ... but sticking this in the Blue Dogs' face would be AWESOME! Sometimes winning isn't everything. (keep after it Sync).

user-pic

You know you not only give your time Sync, you put your time to good use.

Great up to date research again. Amazing, just amazing.

user-pic

Thank you, Sync, for this excellent information.

user-pic

Sink,
Here is the entire response I received from Bart Stupak, (D-MI) when I e-mailed him awhile back asking for his view on health reform....

July 20, 2009

Dear Mrs XXXXXX:

Thank you for contacting me regarding health care reform. I appreciated hearing from you on this important issue.

The experiences of Northern Michigan families and employers parallel the national trend. Almost 50 million Americans, including 10 million children, are living without health care. Approximately 82 percent of these uninsured individuals have a full or part-time job. Unfortunately, it is becoming harder for employers to offer affordable insurance to their employees. Coverage is becoming more expensive and less comprehensive, with high deductibles, co-pays and coverage limits.

From 2000 to 2007, employer sponsored annual health insurance premiums rose from $6,817 to $12,151, an increase of $5,334 or 78.2 percent. Over the same period, the median earnings of Michigan's workers increased from $25,910 to $27,096, an increase of $1,186 or 4.6 percent. Clearly these skyrocketing health care costs are unsustainable for both families and employers.

Health care is a basic right that should be afforded to all Americans, it is not a privilege. It is my belief that in reforming health care in our country, Congress needs to build on the existing framework by making it easier for employers to provide health insurance and by providing access to government programs for individuals not covered by their employer.

President Obama has committed to making health care reform a priority by dedicating $634 billion in his five year budget to finance health reforms aimed at reducing insurance premiums and the number of uninsured Americans. While $634 billion will not be enough to fully fund a comprehensive reform, it is a concrete first step in the direction of health reform.

H.R. 3200, America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009, was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 14, 2009. It is estimated the legislation would ensure health care coverage for 97 percent of Americans by 2016. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated the bill will cost $1 trillion over 10 years, although the bill includes provisions that fully pay for health care reform without increasing the federal budget deficit.

Despite some of the improvements provided in H.R. 3200, I remain concerned with the legislation. During my first campaign for Congress in 1992, I made a promise to my constituents that I would support health care reform and not accept the health insurance that is offered to members of Congress until all Americans had access to quality, affordable health care. I have kept that promise.

I hear every day the heartbreaking stories of my constituents - the insured, the uninsured and the under insured. I hear from those who the current health care system has left helpless, bankrupt and disillusioned.

I want to help all of my constituents by providing quality, affordable health care, but the proposal before us perpetuates a broken system. CBO has said that by 2016 - seven years from now - 97 to 98 percent of Americans will have health care coverage. CBO's independent, non-partisan analysis said the legislation does not address the inequities in the current system. Perhaps most alarming is that CBO said H.R. 3200, in its current form, will cost us hundred of thousands of jobs and weaken our economy. I am really concerned about the costs to small businesses.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee, on which I serve, began considering amendments to H.R. 3200 on Friday, July 17, 2009. This process will continue through Wednesday, July 22, 2009. I will listen carefully to the debate and offer and support amendments that provide for accessible, affordable and efficient health insurance coverage. I hope that when this process is complete H.R. 3200 is a bill that better accomplishes the goal of effectively reforming our health care system.

Again, thank you for contacting me. Please feel free to contact me again if my staff or I can be of any assistance.

Sincerely,

BART STUPAK
Member of Congress

So, it looks like he is not throwing his vote towards H.R.676....single-payer is not his solution. I'll work on him. ;o)

H.R. 3200 appears to be moving now.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.3200:
John Dingell (D-MI) is the sponsor of H.R.3200 so I highly doubt he would throw his vote towards H.R.676.

It's early yet, though. These bills gets torn apart and pieced together like a crazy quilt....truly, one never knows what the end product will be.

I am starting to get the hunch, that after Congress resumes in September, single-payer may get a break. Numbers need to be crunched and advertised. It has to be known that single-payer is the taxpayer's friend more so than any other reform. People always, always, always vote their pocketbook. Compassion for your fellow man/woman is commendable, but the public in general is more concerned with how much is it gonna cost me?

Don't lose the vision, my friend.

user-pic

Thanks Flower.

Sounds like his heart is in the write place. I can't imagine why he would vote against single payer. Many have argued that it is overall best for the economy even with the changes in employment.

It would be best if we could understand who the 3 or 5 percent of us are that would not be covered?

I understand that some people feel that they just want their foot in the door. My sense is that whatever gets passed, since the law so far appears to not take place until 2013, insurance and pharma money will be back with a vengeance during the next two elections to try to regain power and DC and stop or change this law's effect.

I have to go with my gut here and say let's get inside the door 'all of the way' it will be harder for the opposition to push us back out:)

user-pic

Call them.1.866.220.0044 this morning...call the local offices as well ...Just read a article changing the Blue dogs to OLD YELLOWS...Hope it sticks!

user-pic

This was a great opportunity to continue applying pressure.

I faxed my representative this morning (whom I've already faxed, called, and emailed this summer) and implored him to urge the two representatives in the Energy and Commerce Committee from our state to vote "yea" on HR 676. Other family members did likewise.

If we fax prior to every vote, that will help keep the pressure on.

Good work, Sync.

user-pic

According to the news, the single payer proposal was withdrawn after Chairman Waxman promised it could be voted on by the full House.

The Committee approved a bill with some reasonably good features. It includes a public option probably similar to the one of a few days ago, except with caps on how much insurance rates would be permitted to rise. It increases subsidies for low income individuals, and gives the government new authority to negotiate Medicare drug prices. It seems to be a positive step.

Leave a comment

synchronicity

user-pic

Following: 6
Followers: 37

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address