Single Payer Vote In Committee Friday. Still Time To Make Your Voice Heard
Most of you know that I am 100% in support of a single payer/universal health care system.
The more that I have witnessed and learned, the more I feel that the public option will turn healthcare into a political football for years to come. And one question I have is, if it will leave out some people, who are they, and why?
It feels to me that there is an underlying game being played with this public option. If it truly allows competition (we 'secretly' know it will lead to a single payer system), we want it but the insurance companies and those supporting the insurance companies don't want it and will fight it with everything they've got. If it is watered down, distorted, and turned into something more chaotic, then more who support the insurance companies will accept it but it will offer us little value in terms of savings and competition so we don't want it.
This is like a game of chicken. A Mind 'D'uck! It is completely screwed up.
I think it is time to take the profits out of health care, 'now'.
The Energy & Commerce committee claims that they will vote tomorrow on HR 676. They apparently need 5 more votes. If you haven't alreay faxed, please do and email and call as well.
I have written to Waxman, as head of the committee, others as members of the committee, and to a representative from my state I said 'I am writing to you as the only representative from my state on the committee', etc.
The following is from www.democracy.com on the vote tomorrow:
One week ago, we eagerly anticipated a crucial vote on single-payer Medicare for All ( H.R.676 ) in the House Energy & Commerce Committee, sponsored by Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY). But then seven BlueDogs waged a highly-publicized war against a "robust public option" and the vote was delayed for a full week.
We just learned the vote will be tomorrow ( Friday ). Based on all of your calls, we have nine single-payer Democrats: Tammy Baldwin, Michael Doyle, Eliot Engel, Anna Eshoo, Gene Green, Edward Markey, Janice Schakowsky, Anthony Weiner, and Peter Welch.
| Lean Yes Diana DeGette CO01 202-225-4431 Jane Harman CA36 202-225-8220 Christopher Murphy CT05 202-225-4476 Frank Pallone NJ06 202-225-4671 @FrankPallone Bobby Rush IL01 202-225-4372 |
http://www.democrats.com/single-payer-petition?cid=ZGVtczU5MTQ0NWRlbXM=
(Be sure to sign our petition and forward it if you haven't already.)
Be concise and practice in advance so you can speak quickly (or leave a voicemail) because they are getting swamped. Report the results of your calls here:
http://www.democrats.com/single-payer-committee-whip
| Public Option Only (or Won't Say) Rick Boucher VA09 202-225-3861 Bruce Braley IA01 202-225-2911 G.K. Butterfield NC01 202-225-3101 Lois Capps CA23 202-225-3601 Kathy Castor FL11 202-225-3376 John Dingell MI15 202-225-4071 Charles Gonzalez TX20 202-225-3236 Jay Inslee WA01 202-225-6311 @RepInsleeNews Doris Matsui CA05 202-225-7163 Jerry McNerney CA11 202-225-1947 John Sarbanes MD03 202-225-4016 Bart Stupak MI01 202-225-4735 Betty Sutton OH13 202-225-3401 Henry Waxman (Chair) CA30 202-225-3976 |
Don't let anyone tell you single-payer can't pass: the Kucinich Amendment for a single-payer "state option" passed by a shocking 25-19 bi-partisan majority in the House Education and Labor Committee on July 17. The Weiner Amendment will pass on Friday if enough Democrats vote for it!
A victory on the Weiner Amendment would make a huge difference. Please call as soon as you get this - night or day.
Thanks for all you do!
















I personally WANT a single payer system today, just like you do, Synch.....but it ain't gonna happen. I am moving on to supporting a public option, knowing that it might be our foot in the door.
I applaud your efforts and I know you gave it your best and will continue to do so, but....for me, single payer just ain't gonna happen.
July 31, 2009 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. You have alread said as much LisB and I respect your decision. Don't see the public option happening in a meaningful way either (because basically to the insurance company a meaningful public option 'will' lead to a single payer system) so I am going to go for what I think is best for our country and our economy.
July 31, 2009 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, you are technically right ... but sticking this in the Blue Dogs' face would be AWESOME! Sometimes winning isn't everything. (keep after it Sync).
July 31, 2009 1:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know you not only give your time Sync, you put your time to good use.
Great up to date research again. Amazing, just amazing.
July 31, 2009 1:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, Sync, for this excellent information.
July 31, 2009 6:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sink,
Here is the entire response I received from Bart Stupak, (D-MI) when I e-mailed him awhile back asking for his view on health reform....
So, it looks like he is not throwing his vote towards H.R.676....single-payer is not his solution. I'll work on him. ;o)
H.R. 3200 appears to be moving now.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.3200:
John Dingell (D-MI) is the sponsor of H.R.3200 so I highly doubt he would throw his vote towards H.R.676.
It's early yet, though. These bills gets torn apart and pieced together like a crazy quilt....truly, one never knows what the end product will be.
I am starting to get the hunch, that after Congress resumes in September, single-payer may get a break. Numbers need to be crunched and advertised. It has to be known that single-payer is the taxpayer's friend more so than any other reform. People always, always, always vote their pocketbook. Compassion for your fellow man/woman is commendable, but the public in general is more concerned with how much is it gonna cost me?
Don't lose the vision, my friend.
July 31, 2009 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Flower.
Sounds like his heart is in the write place. I can't imagine why he would vote against single payer. Many have argued that it is overall best for the economy even with the changes in employment.
It would be best if we could understand who the 3 or 5 percent of us are that would not be covered?
I understand that some people feel that they just want their foot in the door. My sense is that whatever gets passed, since the law so far appears to not take place until 2013, insurance and pharma money will be back with a vengeance during the next two elections to try to regain power and DC and stop or change this law's effect.
I have to go with my gut here and say let's get inside the door 'all of the way' it will be harder for the opposition to push us back out:)
July 31, 2009 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Call them.1.866.220.0044 this morning...call the local offices as well ...Just read a article changing the Blue dogs to OLD YELLOWS...Hope it sticks!
July 31, 2009 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
This was a great opportunity to continue applying pressure.
I faxed my representative this morning (whom I've already faxed, called, and emailed this summer) and implored him to urge the two representatives in the Energy and Commerce Committee from our state to vote "yea" on HR 676. Other family members did likewise.
If we fax prior to every vote, that will help keep the pressure on.
Good work, Sync.
July 31, 2009 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
According to the news, the single payer proposal was withdrawn after Chairman Waxman promised it could be voted on by the full House.
The Committee approved a bill with some reasonably good features. It includes a public option probably similar to the one of a few days ago, except with caps on how much insurance rates would be permitted to rise. It increases subsidies for low income individuals, and gives the government new authority to negotiate Medicare drug prices. It seems to be a positive step.
July 31, 2009 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink