« Gallup's "pro-life" poll deserved greater scrutiny | kstone's Blog | AARP dodges position on health care reform »

Getting smokers at both ends. Health insurers and tobacco industry


When people use tobacco insurance companies charge them higher premiums. So smoking and chewing must be unhealthy, right?

Right. More smokers means more lung cancer, heart disease and other illnesses. According to the CDC, about 443,000 Americans die from smoking-related illnesses each year.

Then why are seven of the largest life and health insurance companies in the United States, Canada and the UK invested to the tune of $4.4 billion in tobacco companies?

Having grown fat off individuals' health care premiums, particularly smokers', giant insurers like Prudential, Mass Mutual and Sun Life are investing some of those billions in tobacco companies.

J. Wesley Boyd, MD, PhD, and colleagues at the Cambridge Health Alliance at Harvard shared a list of the insurers and the size of their investments in tobacco companies as of March of this year. In a correspondence piece to the New England Journal of Medicine published June 4 they wrote:

"Although investing in tobacco while selling life or health insurance may seem self-defeating, insurance firms have figured out ways to profit from both. Insurers exclude smokers from coverage or, more commonly, charge them higher premiums. Insurers profit -- and smokers lose twice over.

"These facts should discomfit Canadian and British readers as their countries consider further privatization of health insurance," wrote Boyd. "For those of us in the United States, these data are a reminder of the true priority of the insurance industry, which is making money, not ensuring health and wellbeing."

A rational person might hope that this knowledge would cause some discomfiture in Washington, DC, where Congress is presumably wrestling over how to best reform the health care system so that it serves people, not profits, and wrests some control over health care delivery away from insurance companies. But so far, those in charge of crafting the plan are listening only to industry.




6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Nice catch kstone. I think this helps lay to rest any questions as to what the insurance companies priorities are regarding profits vs public health.

user-pic

As if there was ever any factual doubt.

user-pic

Nice catch indeed.

And the government increases cigarette taxes to fund children's health care. Yes let's make health care dependent on smokers - there's a plan. Wonder who got the money making idea first - insurance companies or legislators.

user-pic

"Right. More smokers means more lung cancer, heart disease and other illnesses. According to the CDC, about 443,000 Americans die from smoking-related illnesses each year."

If its ok I would like to use that quote--properly cited of course--for my next blog.

I am a barbarian smoker. I love tobacco. And I am old, and it will probably be listed as a substantial contributing factor in my ultimate demise.

With that out of the way, I DID NOT KNOW THE FACTS STATED IN YOUR BLOG.

The private corporation is not the proper conduit for health insurance. It just is not.

Really fine post, very informative.

user-pic

Thanks. Hey, I'm a smoker, too. And I grew up on the Range(Ely). I know that smoking is risky. I just resent very much knowing someone is profiting from my weakness for tobacco while at the same time dictating my health care. Makes me ill, actually.

user-pic

When I saw the post on TPM's front page about Rep. Buyer (R) denouncing Tobacco Socialism, I had a vague thought; something revolving around how insurance companies must love tobacco companies for keeping them profitable.

And lo, I am answered.

I really don't understand what it is about people not wanting to see that culture for what it is:

A culture that, on one side peddles death and suffering; and on the other, deals in financial transactions around that suffering and death.

It's a system, like any other.

On the one side there's a stock: tobacco...with its inflow: profit from the sale of carcinogens.

On the other side, the stock is, well, eponymous; the inflow is the money from the insuring institutions.

These two separate (wink, wink; nudge, nudge) systems are actually a single system. They are a system designed to transfer wealth from the communities that purchase their products to a central entity...nothing more than wealth re-distribution via dealing an addictive drug.

And don't even get me started on how harmful tobacco, as a crop, is to the land on which it is grown.

Leave a comment

kstone

user-pic

Following: 19
Followers: 11

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Website: www.fleshandstone.net/
  • Location St. Paul, Minn.
  • Party not so much since I became self-employed
  • Politics Political convulsions, like geological upheavings, usher in new epochs of the world's progress. - Wendell Phillips

Favorites

  • Favorite Books I have fave authors rather than books. Right now I'm reading everything by Jhumpa Lahiri, and by J. Maarten Troost and Christopher Buckley because they cheer me up. "Supreme Courtship" by CB is hilarious but I have to pause sometimes. Didn't that all really happen?
  • Favorite Quotes there's that Howard Zinn one about not giving up....

Bio

Freelance writer and reluctant trouble-maker

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address