
The
perennial stereotype of the horse racing gambler has been recounted in
books and movies as the kind of person who is able to see attributes in
the horses that they inevitably lose money on that just aren't there.
It almost seemed that they got more pleasure out of not winning than
they ever could if their horse actually came in first.
The post
race political spin last night was starting to sound the same way as
the Democrats began to explain why losing the governor's races in New
Jersey and New York wasn't indicative of anything at all other than the
will of the voters. "The president", said the White House spokesman,
"is not watching returns."
This was one of the funnier quotes
of the night - what the hell else would a wonkish pol like Obama, who
lives at ground zero in the most political city in the country, be
doing? Bowling? Playing Scrabble with the girls? Updating his Fantasy
Football picks?
The article
"It's The Spending, Stupid"
that was released before the results were final in New York's District
23 by Cynthia Lummis, a Republican Congresswoman from Wyoming, was just
as funny. "Doug Hoffman's ascendance is a referendum on the reckless
spending of the Obama administration and the Pelosi-Reid Congress."
It's kind of hard to call this race a referendum on spending when an
unknown Democrat actually won the race last night in District 23, but
I'm sure Rep. Lummis will come up with an inventive way to recast this
outcome into a positive development.
The races themselves
almost seem incidental, so hungry is our political establishment on
both sides of the aisle for a chance to trumpet their agendas. I've
often wondered why, in such a large country, we can't just accept the
fact that people who call themselves Democrats or Republicans in one
part of the country may not have the same ideological beliefs as those
in another part - that the membership in a political party is an
affiliation of similarly minded people in the truest sense of the word,
rather than a brain washing syndicate that attempts to indoctrinate its
ranks from coast to coast the way fascist dictators do.
The
people of New Jersey and Virginia and New York's District 23 know these
people running for office better than anyone on the national level ever
could. When the smoke clears, and the cameras and the reporters are
gone, the voters don't care about the national agendas - they care
about what's happening on their streets, in their school systems, and
in their neighborhoods and downtowns.
But reporters don't call
regular citizens to ask them what they are thinking. They call experts
and analysts instead. Then they call Sarah Palin and Glen Beck and
Keith Olbermann to get the final word on the matter. They use old
articles for research. They listen to other journalists and op-ed
writers, and end up publishing coverage that reinforces a binary
version of reality, as if we are not a multi-dimensional, multiple
narrative population who may or may not act in ways that protect our
own self-interests.
It would be easy to say that we have
devolved into a nation that is all talk and no action, but that isn't
really the case. In many ways, to the people who package and sell
political talk, reporting on the saying is is much more lucrative than
reporting on the doing - how many ways can you describe the
construction of a new bridge that will take two years to complete?
But
view that bridge through the eyes of an editor, or a public relations
specialist, and all of a sudden the building of forms and the pouring
of concrete take on a whole new light as we are bombarded by
accusations of graft and corruption, payoffs and kickbacks, shoddy
workmanship and back room dealmaking.
To the people who need
the bridge, the politics of it is secondary to actually getting it
completed so they can drive over it to get where they are going.
It
would be disingenuous to write all of this and not admit that there is
certain amount of irony in my writing this, since I have my own
political and cultural opinion blog. At the end of the week, I've
written a whole lot more than anything I've done to take action. Maybe
what I have to say ads to America's political narrative. Maybe it
doesn't.
The upshot of all of this is that for the next two
weeks, you will be bombarded with headlines like
"Palin's Candidate
Loses In NY Congressional Race", "How Will Obama Respond To GOP Wins In
VA And NJ?", "Dems, Incumbents Get Wake-Up Call", "Analysis: Elections
Not A Referendum On Obama", "A Warning To Democrats: It's Not 2008
Anymore", "GOP Wins Reveal Cracks In Obama Coalition", and
"VA and NJ
Elections: Obama World Stayed Home".These headlines, however
stirring, will do nothing to alleviate the high unemployment rate, and
will have no bearing on any efforts to stimulate the economy, the two
things America is
really interested in seeing improve.