Truthers, Birthers And Town Hall Terrorists
Since
President Obama said Sergeant Crowley acted "stupidly" when he arrested
Professor Gates, what do you think he is thinking about the "truthers",
the "birthers", and the "town hall terrorists" who are all coming out
of the wood work these days?
I'll go with "these mother******'s are stupider than I thought!"
Because
the TRUTH is, all this manufactured outrage about where OUR (as all the
citizens of the United States) black president was born has got me
thinking about is the old D.W. Griffith movie BIRTH OF A NATION - then
again, maybe some studio is remaking it, because these people
TERRORIZING the healthcare town hall meetings could stand in as extras
for the mob scenes without any coaching at all.
I've been
meaning to get around to doing a piece on the absurdity that is the
Glen Beck phenomenon, whose presence on CNN is so negative, the cable
news network could run "Black In America" specials five days a week and
it wouldn't balance it out what has to be the "stupidest" son of a
biscuit eater on the air.
Beck makes Michelle Malkin and Rush
Limbaugh look like the right wing actors they are as they join the
fray, whipping the herds of town hall terrorists out there into a
frenzy, directing their followers in the art of creating pandemonium...
...all so they can keep ALL OF THE PEOPLE, including themselves, from getting a better health insurance deal than they have now.
If
we can all agree that our nation's insurance companies are peeing on
our heads and telling us it's raining - then why is anyone who is NOT a
CEO in the healthcare industry or major shareholder in one of these
companies even thinking about keeping things the way they are?
If
the president is able to get health insurance companies to actually do
what they claim to be doing, and less of the denying of coverage to the
people who pay the premiums that keep these insurance company doors
open, while providing an alternative source of health care coverage for
those of us who would throw off the statistics in any actuarial pool,
an alternative source that will drastically cut back our emergency and
trauma center costs - which seems from most angles to look suspiciously
like something right out of the pages of the old Good Book my Christian
citizens are ready to raise in the air whenever their motivations are
questioned - why is this seen as such a terrible apostasy?
Doesn't the phrase "promote the general Welfare" come right out of the Preamble to our own Constitution?
I mean - what would Jesus do?
I don't remember Jesus standing with the money changers or the "wealth creators".
As a matter of fact, I believe he is best known for feeding the hungry and healing the sick.
Healing the sick was seen as a miracle two thousand years ago.
Today, we call it "modern medicine".
I
can guarantee it would cost us less - much, much less - to "heal the
sick" than the trillions we've spent keeping those "wealth builders" in
Connecticut and Westchester and Ossining rich.
Just think about
this - there was a time, years ago, when the effort to make seatbelt
usage mandatory was just beginning, when some of us protested that too.
Amazingly,
with all the disorderly conduct that has been going on at these town
hall meetings - the charge of disorderly conduct, we have learned in
the last two weeks, covers most kinds of public unruly or disturbing
behaviors which acts to provoke a disturbance - not one of these
non-professorial, non-Harvardites has been arrested.

















It is a sad commentary on our country, that so few can have so much influence. The repubs have gotten away w/ doing NOTHING about health care for decades, because they were in power. Now, they are NOT in power, yet they seem to wield the same power.
Are we dems really such weenies? What will it take for us to get what WE want for a change? Is it really going to come down to rioting in the streets?
August 8, 2009 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
It never ceases to amaze me how easily the unwashed and unschooled can be manipulated to act against their own self-interests...When health care reform finally passes in some form or another, the first people to benefit from the changes will be the people who are shout the loudest at the town-hall meetings....And they will be the first in line to sign up for and secure whatever benefits derived from the reforms the are now so vociferously and violenlty fighting to prevent from occuring.....
August 8, 2009 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
This past week, I think someone on one of the TPM blogs called it what I'm beginning to think it is - Stockholm Syndrome. They are well into things to the degree that they now identify completely with their oppressors.
August 8, 2009 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice blog post, but Beck has been Fox News for a while now, not CNN.
August 8, 2009 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think you should be dismissing the Wisdom of the Crowds so quickly.
True, many haven't a clue what is really being proposed. But far from condemning them for their ignorance, it should be looked upon as the cause of their anger -- and a true and correct response to the present situation.
Let's go back to how Obama promised he would approach health-care. At a town hall meeting in Chester, Va. back in August of last year candidate Obama had this to say about the important value of public debate regarding health care:
"People say, 'Well, you have this great health care plan, but how are you going to pass it? You know, it failed in '93,' And what I've said is, I'm going to have all the negotiations around a big table. We'll have doctors and nurses and hospital administrators. Insurance companies, drug companies — they'll get a seat at the table, they just won't be able to buy every chair. But what we will do is, we'll have the negotiations televised on C-SPAN, so that people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents, and who are making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies. And so, that approach, I think is what is going to allow people to stay involved in this process."
More recently at a town hall occasion – again in Virginia - Mr. Obama had the following to say about value of public debate regarding his plan for the nation’s economy:
"I don't want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess.”
Well, for some reason the health care negotiations never made it to C-SPAN, and far more dangerously, Mr. Obama decided to fast-track the biggest social-engineering proposal since FDR's "Social Security" legislation through Congress before many have even read the bill. Indeed, the bill is still being written even as we speak.
Is it any wonder why people are upset? Is it any wonder why people are angry? Is it any wonder why people are coming to the only real public discourse venue many have, their own town meetings, held by their own Congressional representatives?
The really pertinent question is, given the history of this great nation, what is it about Obama and his friends in Congress that would allow them to think their own constituency would react otherwise?
ex animo
davidfarrar
August 9, 2009 8:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama fast-tracking health reform,Dave? You'd have a lot of trouble convincing some of the posters here of that. If Obama got health care reform passed at the Dawn of Time, he'd get criticized here for moving too slowly.
Anyway, nothing is being hidden, nothing is being rushed, the legislative process is working as it is supposed to, and your complaints are without merit.
August 9, 2009 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink