« Dancing With The One Who Brung You | Kris Broughton's Blog | Wall Street And The Art Of The Big Con »
Professor Obama Lectures White House Press
I called my buddy immediately after President Obama exited his press conference, before the commentators could begin to start telling us what we just saw.
"My man," I said, "did that Negro talk his behind off or what?"
"Man, I fell asleep. I just woke up."
"You're in good company. S. was asleep before the president finished answering the first question. Dude, the damn dog was yawning at the TV."
My buddy paused, letting a small yawn of his own pass. "He's going to have the reporters scared to ask questions with answers like that."
I've never really been a fan of these kinds of things, because they usually are more about style than substance. Multi-dimensional thinking is what I want in my president. Someone who has the capacity to use the entire capacity of their brain power when things go wrong - not just the left side, or the just right side, or the just damn middle, but the whole entire thing.
President Obama transformed into Professor Obama before our eyes, segueing from reading his remarks from the teleprompter to answering questions from the press. Professor Obama proceeded to take over the question and answer session with a fifty minute performance. At times, it seemed like he was teaching freshman seminar classes in economics and political science.
It was very impressive at first, but by the end of the evening the president's wide ranging answers had become a bit pedantic, with the length of his comments threatening to try the patience of even the most dedicated political junkies.
"You probably felt like you were back in law school watching this," I said to my buddy as we joked about the president's "around the world in eighty days" method of not exactly answering the questions he was posed.
My buddy groaned audibly, as if I had dredged up a painful memory. "Yeah - he's a professor alright."
"Man," I said, "Obama was excited to be there. There was fire and enthusiasm in his monologue. It was like the trip to Elkhart was his warm up, like the day trips used to be back on the campaign for his big night time rallies that were more likely to be on prime time TV for free."
President Obama put the "bully" in "bully pulpit last night, using his celebrity and his breadth of knowledge to shape practically all of his answers to press corp questions into vehicles for his main themes - creating new jobs, easing the credit crisis, stabilizing home values, and getting some kind of expansion in our economy to counteract the current contractions.
If you didn't know these were his main themes, you were probably asleep too.
I was actually surprised when he didn't somehow turn the question about Alex Rodriguez's admission of steroid use into yet another illustration of how his economic recovery plan was going to help the citizens of Elkhart, Indiana, and by extension, the rest of America.
The other thing about the sheer amount of verbiage contained in President Obama's responses is the indirect effect it will have on reshaping the media narrative. In addressing all of the things he touched on for the next few days, the news media will have to jettison some of the "strife between the parties" storylines, effectively removing the Republican message from the forefront of the public's minds at a time that is crucial to the passage of theeconomic recovery bill.
S. woke up after the ninth or tenth question. She got a little perturbed towards the end, when I mentioned that the press conference, the one we'd both figured would be over in half an hour, was coming up on the sixty minute mark.
"What? This thing is about to mess up my shows."
"My man," I said, "did that Negro talk his behind off or what?"
"Man, I fell asleep. I just woke up."
"You're in good company. S. was asleep before the president finished answering the first question. Dude, the damn dog was yawning at the TV."
My buddy paused, letting a small yawn of his own pass. "He's going to have the reporters scared to ask questions with answers like that."
I've never really been a fan of these kinds of things, because they usually are more about style than substance. Multi-dimensional thinking is what I want in my president. Someone who has the capacity to use the entire capacity of their brain power when things go wrong - not just the left side, or the just right side, or the just damn middle, but the whole entire thing.
President Obama transformed into Professor Obama before our eyes, segueing from reading his remarks from the teleprompter to answering questions from the press. Professor Obama proceeded to take over the question and answer session with a fifty minute performance. At times, it seemed like he was teaching freshman seminar classes in economics and political science.
It was very impressive at first, but by the end of the evening the president's wide ranging answers had become a bit pedantic, with the length of his comments threatening to try the patience of even the most dedicated political junkies.
"You probably felt like you were back in law school watching this," I said to my buddy as we joked about the president's "around the world in eighty days" method of not exactly answering the questions he was posed.
My buddy groaned audibly, as if I had dredged up a painful memory. "Yeah - he's a professor alright."
"Man," I said, "Obama was excited to be there. There was fire and enthusiasm in his monologue. It was like the trip to Elkhart was his warm up, like the day trips used to be back on the campaign for his big night time rallies that were more likely to be on prime time TV for free."
President Obama put the "bully" in "bully pulpit last night, using his celebrity and his breadth of knowledge to shape practically all of his answers to press corp questions into vehicles for his main themes - creating new jobs, easing the credit crisis, stabilizing home values, and getting some kind of expansion in our economy to counteract the current contractions.
If you didn't know these were his main themes, you were probably asleep too.
I was actually surprised when he didn't somehow turn the question about Alex Rodriguez's admission of steroid use into yet another illustration of how his economic recovery plan was going to help the citizens of Elkhart, Indiana, and by extension, the rest of America.
The other thing about the sheer amount of verbiage contained in President Obama's responses is the indirect effect it will have on reshaping the media narrative. In addressing all of the things he touched on for the next few days, the news media will have to jettison some of the "strife between the parties" storylines, effectively removing the Republican message from the forefront of the public's minds at a time that is crucial to the passage of theeconomic recovery bill.
S. woke up after the ninth or tenth question. She got a little perturbed towards the end, when I mentioned that the press conference, the one we'd both figured would be over in half an hour, was coming up on the sixty minute mark.
"What? This thing is about to mess up my shows."
Advertisement





Speaking as a college professor, I was entranced...
February 10, 2009 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was refreshing to hear someone answer the questions. Those reporters, Squiggly and Carrot Top were given their names back. If someone has a two or three part question, all parts were addressed. Obama did not inform them that he was going to take their questions as simply a starter gun for whatever talking points he wished to spread. [Remember Palin in the debates, effectively declaring she already had her own questions to answer.] There were no smack-downs and he has not groaned about having been thrown a "Gotcha" question, you know, the ones where the President has no good answer because the issue is indefensible and it is the fault of the interviewer for asking the embarassing question rather then something that could alter his course.
February 10, 2009 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
His town halls and his press conference, incredible.
If w did something for us Dems, it was demonstrate how low the bar actually was. From the worst public speaker to the best. Cable news is speechless.
February 10, 2009 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
The press conference had all of the content that he intended but none of the fire that would be required to get the point across to Americans. Democrats need to learn that it's not enough to be right. You have to be believed. The GOP learned this years ago and used it to sell the most absurd lies. Obama has truth on his side but he needs a better pitch to get it across.
February 10, 2009 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
They were talking on MSNBC last night - on Rachel Maddow I think - about how Obama needs to present his message in a concise way that gets people's attention, something like the "war on terrorism." I think we've all got "war on" fatigue but they need to come up with a label for the economic plans, something short enough to fit on a bumper sticker, with an explanation short enough for a 30 second soundbite.
America is all about Short Attention Span Theater, folks.
I'm a political junkie but if it hadn't been for the entertainment value of watching Obama's head ping pong back and forth between teleprompters, I wouldn't have listened to his prepared remarks. I was zoned out after the first 10 minutes of Q&A.
February 10, 2009 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
"America is all about Short Attention Span Theater, folks."
Don't think this is quite right. America is a country of short-attention-span folk desperately hoping for a president who is not one of them. They've tried that...
So i zapped in and out of the press conference, but felt great confidence in the guy. He seemed to know what he was talking about.
February 10, 2009 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, we do need a short and sweet explanation.
Got it! We're watering the root of the plant. A little rain on the top will save a plant in the short run, but watering the roots will help it reestablish.
February 10, 2009 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think we have a short attention span media. If you need to be entertained, change the channel.
February 10, 2009 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, as one of your fellow citizens I not really impressed that a discussion of the most important public issues of our lifetimes bores you.
Obama has made a career--somewhat successful one-- of talking to the people as if they were adults and could understand what he was talking about and cared that the people in power both know what they are talking about and are willing to be challenged on it. Pretending everything is simple when it is not does a favor to know one. So you want the cliff notes version. Tough. You are going to have to do your homework, too.
February 10, 2009 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, that was a little nasty, now wasn't it?
February 10, 2009 9:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, it was merely blunt and very much to the point.
If you're so bored, ask yourself what kind of person is bored by the very thing they claim to be a "junkie" for.
February 10, 2009 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama has also made a career of sound bites and catch phrases. "Yes we can." "Change." "Hope."
Ring any bells, smart ass?
All I was saying is that he needs to do more of that to catch the attention of the majority of Americans, who don't hang out on websites like TPM.
"Zoned out" is not the same as bored. My point was, if even a political junkie like me drifted off (after a very long day of work and whiny toddlers by the way) I imagine that people who are less interested in politics than I am didn't pay attention at all.
Details are good. I'm not against the details, the intellect, the reasoning behind the policies. Bravo to Obama for doing that.
My point is I think there has to be some marketing, for lack of a better word, to appeal to the masses who don't have the time and patience to watch an hour-long news conference.
There was no reason for you to be for freaking snarky.
February 11, 2009 2:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking as another professor... I thought he ROCKED!
February 10, 2009 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a former student (many years ago), I concur.
The problem is that the kids don't want to attend classes anymore--they'd rather be out skateboarding or playing video games. Short attention span is a curable disorder, but only if there's someone around not afflicted with it to guide the kids back on track.
I think Perfessor Obama can do this by example. We've been exposed for the last eight years to a man who couldn't complete most of his sentences--hardly conducive to encouraging long attention spans. Now we have a guy who not only listens to the questions, but answers them coherently and on point.
What a concept.
February 10, 2009 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
To issue an opening speech on a teleprompter, then answer 3 questions in 45 minutes, no not answer any questions, just ramble for 45 minutes, is going to raise some eyebrows eventually.
If it had been any other president, it wouldn't be tolerated. But with this one, the press just keeps on fawning. Just like you and your fellow Koolaid drinkers.
Why, that wasn't mindless evasive ramble, why, that was professorial!! Just like Hillary's futures trading, 'Why, she's just that smart'!!!! yeah
February 11, 2009 1:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
To issue an opening speech on a teleprompter??
Hey spriche,
Where did you see a telepromper. you must be kiddin me,...I seriously doubt President Obamna has to read from a teleprompter for a nickle and dime news conference.
Btw, president Obama graduated from Harvard "magna cum laude"
Until you prove otherwise I'll just calmly note that accusation as a lie.
Now, exactly which part of that nickle and dime news conference are you having such a problem with. I thought he spoke very articulate and answered the questions in a very concise manner.
Don't you think it's just a breath of fresh air that we finally have an intelligent adult back in office again.
It's been 8 long years. Enjoy!
February 11, 2009 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
>>issuing an opening speech on a teleprompter??
Hey spriche,
Where in the world did you see a teleprompter? You got to be kiddin me,..lol.I seriously doubt President Obamna has to read from a teleprompter for a little nickle and dime news conference.
Btw, President Obama graduated from Harvard "magna cum laude"
Until you prove otherwise I'll just calmly note that accusation as a lie.
Now, exactly which part of that nickle and dime news conference are you having such a problem with. I thought he spoke very articulate and answered the questions in a very honest and concise manner.
Don't you think it's just a breath of fresh air that we finally have an intelligent adult back in office again.
It's been 8 long years. Enjoy!
February 11, 2009 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I'm just a regular old person, not a professor, and I was thrilled that our President answered the questions he was asked, and talked to us all like we were adults. No bumper sticker sound bites, no spin, no evasions, no made up words...I found it refreshing (except that I sorta like to make up words myself!)
February 11, 2009 2:13 AM | Reply | Permalink