Mind Your Manners: Defending Rod Blagojevich
This week has seen the "nationalization" of Rod Blagojevich hate - something
As we say with burglars or murderers, the accompanying vices of sloth or pride are the 'real' sin - not theft or killing - e.g. "He was a successful burglar - till he got 'lazy' in his method." Or "He was a great serial murderer, but then he became too proud of his murders and spilled the beans."
Right now, Senators from union busting states in the south like
So Rod's sin was that he was too frank about his horse-trading. But that falls in line with other examples of his "hubris." We've been hearing for years about how Rod refuses to play ball with
Now as an outsider, I was always puzzled at why the Governor was expected to kowtow to a city councilman, or why we outsiders were expected to pity poor, poor Mike Madigan.
Personally, what do I care about the hurt feelings of elites? Mike Madigan - a Democrat - had resisted the imposition of Rod's signature accomplishment "Kid Care" - the state sponsored program to insure children with uninsured parents. Similar protests were made by 'reasonable' elites regarding Rod's insistence that senior citizens should get free bus rides in return for state help with the public transit.
Rod refused to be deferential to important families. He refused to accept the "reality" that poor children or seniors that have been kicked out of their cars don't have any "clout." Morality means divvying up the spoils according to who is the highest on the totem pole. Under his predecessor George Ryan, that meant handing a giant bag of money to the liquor concession or mobbed-up gambling interests. George Ryan was making his money on the backs of Secy of State employees - forcing low level employees to sell his fundraising 'tickets' - and that meant they had to trade commercial driver's licenses for money. That resulted in the deaths of children - but hey they weren't Mike Madigan's children - like his daughter Lisa the prosecutor for the state.
Why can't Rod get behind schemes to massively subsidize gambling, or sports teams? Providing health insurance to poor children is seen as nothing but 'grandstanding' by












Is that the same Rod who kept money from a children's hospital until someone ponied up a few grand for his coffers? How is that Rod standing up for the "weak and infirm?"
December 11, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know even the most corrupt politician occasionally does some good for their constituents. Does that make them less deserving to be tossed out on their sorry butts or to spend some quality time behind bars? Nope.
December 11, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Many Dems campaign on health care, then in office deliver a right wing agenda (Clinton anyone?)
Now Obama has campaigned specifically on labor rights - but now Rahm Emmanuel refuses to say whether they will support Employee Free Choice.
Thanks. Thanks alot Rahm.
Rod campaigned as a populist and has delivered on this "occasional" issue of, y'know insuring the weak and poor.
Illinois political piety centers around the fact that providing free fares to seniors or insurance for poor children is "impractical" yet shoveling cash into the gambling and liquour lobbies is 'prudence' personified.
December 11, 2008 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink