« Mercedes announces EV Gullwing | kgb999's Blog | Honduras, Myth vs. Reality - a challenge to journalists. »

The sergeants particularly liked removing victims' brains.


I'm not sure what more can be said here. Via Fire Dog Lake is this report from the Colorado Springs Gazette. It is part one of a series and appropriately titled  "The hell of war comes home". The article highlights a group of Iraqi vets, and the violent crimes that were committed in America on their return. But it also highlights crimes that were seemingly routine on the front lines of Iraq and implies a photo scandal that could make the detainee abuse picture issue seem tame.

Another sergeant shot a man in the head without cause while questioning him, Needham said, then mutilated the body, lashed it to the hood of his Humvee and drove around the neighborhood blaring warnings to insurgents in Arabic that "they would be next."

Other Iraqis were shot for invented reasons, then mutilated, Needham said.

The sergeants particularly liked removing victims' brains, Needham said.

Needham offered a photograph of a soldier removing brains from an Iraqi on the hood of a Humvee and other photos as evidence. His father supplied copies to The Gazette.

The Army's criminal investigation division interviewed several soldiers from the unit and said it was "unable to substantiate any of his allegations."

This is a really amazing piece of journalism. The author does not go for a simple account of horrible behavior in Iraq. Instead, Dave Philipps provides a chilling deconstruction of what is happening to our soldiers. It follows the progression of young soldiers deployed with a unit called the "Lethal Warriors" through battle experiences and subsequent return to the US to an ultimate end in prison for violent crimes.  It is a stark statement of the deadly results putting soldiers through a meat grinder and bringing them home with no mental health support has for American communities and the soldiers themselves.

Soldiers from other units at Fort Carson have committed crimes after deployments -- military bookings at the El Paso County jail have tripled since the start of the Iraq war -- but no other unit has a record as deadly as the soldiers of the 4th Brigade. The vast majority of the brigade's soldiers have not committed crimes, but the number who have is far above the population at large. In a one-year period from the fall of 2007 to the fall of 2008, the murder rate for the 500 Lethal Warriors was 114 times the rate for Colorado Springs.

Equally amazing are the prison interviews with infantry specialist Kenneth Eastridge. In two parts, he describes activities in Iraq that led to reprimands and a fatal incident that occurred when he and fellow soldiers returned, resulting in the death of a fellow Iraq War veteran on his birthday.

One thing that I find inexcusable is that the military has treated these soldiers with PTSD like the private insurance companies treat patients with cancer: try to find some way to kick them out.

"As soon as I got out [of the mental counseling facility], I had a scheduled bitching session with the sergeant so he could yell at me about what a liar I was," he said. "After they found out a guy was getting evaluated for PTSD, they would try to find any little thing to kick him out."

Dozens of soldiers who screened positive for PTSD received an "other than honorable" discharge from the Army -- the equivalent of being kicked out -- for infractions such as missing duty and drug use, Pogany said. If soldiers are kicked out, they often aren't eligible for free health care, counseling or other benefits that soldiers who are medically discharged with PTSD receive. Often, Pogany said, that means veterans who need help the most don't get it.

There is no way any blog on the subject is going to do this article justice. It is quite long ... but well worth the time to read.


22 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Beyond disturbing. We've got to get out of this business. Now.

user-pic

"Surge II - McChrystal's Revenge!" feels like a bad, bad idea.

user-pic

Use 'em up and turn 'em loose. To quote David Byrne, "Same as it ever was!"

user-pic

Every war has it's "lost generation" ... but the manifest depravity of mutilating random victims and driving around with them lashed to hoods of Humvees seems a significant new touch.

user-pic

Right. Completely unlike US soldiers in Vietnam taking Viet Cong ears as trophies, or (insert your chosen similarly repellent practice here).

The only "new" factor is the Humvee.

user-pic

I get your point, but still see a significant distinction. I don't doubt there are historical analogues. However, I can't remember when the behavior of the modern American military (WWI+) previously got to the point where as a matter of course, soldiers would drive through the densely populated capitol of an occupied nation displaying brainless bodies strapped to their jeep in broad daylight - talking shit on a loudspeaker.

I suppose it's a matter of degree in some respects, but a combination of the actual act, the implicit motivation of hate (and desire to make sure that hate was broadcast to the population), and the impunity with which the soldiers were free to do it - all combine to be very shocking to me.

user-pic

A Bright Shining Lie, with Zombies?

I snark because it's too disturbing to approach dispassionately.

user-pic

These irreparably damaged American soldiers now live in the house that Cheney built -- literally if Halliburton and Blackwater built their American prisons as well those in Iraq and at Guantanemo, and metaphorically in terms of drinking Cheney's sociopathic poison of unlawful, uncurbed barbarism.
How can any of them recover, ever, from what he has done?
How can Americans recover from the shame of what we allowed them to do by cowering in the face of Bush/Cheney's lawless rampage?
And Iraq? How can the Iraqis ever recover from such an onslaught?
It has taken more than 140 years for the self-inflicted wounds of the Civil War to begin to heal, and there is a long way to go. How long, then, for a country invaded and brutalized by others, for no justifiable reason whatsoever?
The Iraqis want us gone, now, no matter the cost internally. We owe them that, at the very least. Because what we really owe them can never be calculated, much less paid in full. Far more likely is that, eventually, we will be paid in kind.

user-pic

It is indeed the house that Cheney built. But it is now the house that the democrats refuse to clean. When the abuses of 2009 in Afghanistan are revealed, and they WILL occur in Afghanistan, it will be because democrats put a political legislative agenda over a full accounting of the actions of our military in Iraq.

These troops were driving around the streets with mutilated victims, bragging and issuing threats on loud speakers. Now confirmed as late as 2008. The units with institutional knowledge of these actions and the lack of consequence are in Afghanistan right now. With the same sergeants who conducted and the same commanders that have been ignoring such behavior since before Abu Ghraib. How could revealing pictures of abuse, with abusers facing scandal, possibly inflame the theater of war more than the actions so blatantly ignored likely continuing to this day?

No matter how much folks like to pretend, this is not a problem of the past. At least Cheney believed in this shit, democrats simply don't want to "waste" political capital.

I can't even begin to fathom what it will take to repair the damage we have caused. But in my mind that is a moot point until inflicting it actually ceases. Innocent losses in mistaken attacks are one thing - and horrible - but we are on a whole different level, and nobody in power wants to come down to earth.

user-pic

Absolutely, KGB. That goes for everything else. Whatever is covered up or glossed over will continue or be repeated down the road.

Guard duty for killing "not that many, about a dozen" men, women and kids. SOP. And then all disciplinary records, already whitewashed, are destroyed after two years? How is that much different from destroying torture tapes? I'm absolutely not broadbrushing everyone (this is just a fraction of soldiers), but the Army seems to allow, encourage and/or cover it up.

By definition, convicted serial killers here are psychopaths, but it seems that these murders in Iraq predate even the PTSD in most of these cases (and may be the cause of it). The murders after getting home are no more horrific because PTSD has set in or because the victims are Americans or because there is no war to excuse it.

“It’s almost like a religious experience to see a battlefield,” [Eastridge] said. “To hear the explosions — to see a person bleeding out and die — see everything on fire and smell the smoke and burning flesh. It makes you truly realize what it is to be alive. Combat is the biggest rush you can have.”

“He was really good. If I had 10 Eastridges, my job would be a lot easier,” said his platoon sergeant, Michael Cardenaz. Hoohah.

user-pic

Jeepers. Almost like it was straight out of the movie adaptation of Max Payne.

user-pic

The worst of these guys, like Bessler and Eastridge competing for kills (at 80+), would then go play shoot 'em up video games to relax. Just seemed odd to me. Listening to the interview of Eastridge was chilling.

user-pic

When you require that men and women participate in a monsterous and evil enterprise (not to mention illegal and immoral), such as the war in Iraq, it should come as no surprise that a significant number of them commit monsterous, evil acts. This is the harvest of shame we have brought to ourselves.

user-pic

“Very few veterans can return to the battlefield and summon the moral courage to confront what they did as armed combatants. Wallowing in their pain and at times in self-pity, they are often incapable of facing the human suffering and death they inflicted, especially on the defenseless and the weak. They have a habit of disregarding, as they did during the war, the people who live in the lands they brutalized. Walking among the very human beings who bear the scars of war, they see only their own ghosts.”

Chris Hedges

user-pic

“Very few veterans can return to the battlefield and summon the moral courage to confront what they did as armed combatants. Wallowing in their pain and at times in self-pity, they are often incapable of facing the human suffering and death they inflicted, especially on the defenseless and the weak. They have a habit of disregarding, as they did during the war, the people who live in the lands they brutalized. Walking among the very human beings who bear the scars of war, they see only their own ghosts.”

Chris Hedges

user-pic

I read the first part via Atrios Sunday night. Couldn't get to sleep til 5am. A couple of years ago I wrote a thing and posted it here, at Kos, and various places saying let's con the Iranians and Syrians into taking over the Iraq occupation. Wrote partly in jest (I knew it was never gonna happen) but one of my lines was "let's let their kids drive around Iraq waiting to get blown up."

Two thirds of the homeless in this country are Vietnam vets. A whole hell of lot more of them are prison. Men who can't function in society after most of them spent one year, one tour "in country" because of what they saw or what they did. Shell shock, battle fatigue, PTSD it doesn't matter what you call it. It cripples people, makes 'em crazy, and if you keep sending them back it can make them irretravible. God damn Dick Cheney. God damn George Bush. God damn them to hell.


user-pic

markg8,

God damn Dick Cheney. God damn George Bush. God damn them to hell.

Must be nice to have that kind of faith.

user-pic

God damn them to hell is right.

user-pic

Wow, kgb, thanks. Powerful. Good words have already been written above. I have very few to add -- just agreement that, whoever started it, the Democrats own it now. (And plenty of "our" people went along with it then, too.)

That's it. It's so f'ing sad.

user-pic

Let's get one thing straight ... Soldiers are NOT the problem!

Okay.

Just a few weeks past, I remember reading about deployed soldiers being given all kinds of drugs to help them cope with the stress of being in a war zone. The article went further. Once they return to normal society, they begin to have withdrawal symptoms ... they have a dependence for the drugs. What followed was the bizarre behavior exhibited by a variety of soldiers.

It's not their fault. It's the government's. They're the dope peddlers. They're the one's at fault. Dispensing drugs for a quick solution without understanding the long-term effects to the individuals under the influence of the drugs and providing the necessary medical support.

Of course, if the public were aware soldiers were returning to the US, hooked on drugs and that their access to the supply was cut off, they'd realize the government had let loose monsters into civilized society. Best to keep quite and hope nothing happens and if it does, claim the lone gunman scenario/one bad egg out of a dozen.

And the one's at the bottom takes the hit again for the actions of those above them.

user-pic

Makes me wonder if there will be different problems in the opium-producing regions than in Iraq. What with all the opium and heroin scattered about ...
Feck.

user-pic

Thanks for posting this. It should be the lead on all the network news, but it won't make a ripple... and how the heck does such a significant story originate with the Colorado Springs Gazette?

Leave a comment

kgb999

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 28

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address