Got An Opion on the Public Option? Tell Dick
This just in from U.S. Senator Dick Durbin. Thought I'd share in case anyone's interested in voicing an opinion.
[Dear So and So,]
The tide is shifting our way.
You joined over 100,000 Americans to support a public option at CitizensForAPublicOption.com. Thanks to the tireless efforts of activists like you we've seen a tremendous shift in the health care reform debate. On Monday, Majority Leader Harry Reid introduced the merged Senate health care bill -- a bill that includes a public option.
The question is no longer if we will have some sort of public option in the final health care reform bill, but instead what form it will take.
There are several interpretations of what a public option should look like, and I'd like to share the preferences of the American people with my colleagues in the Senate. But I must do so before the final health care reform bill comes to a vote on the Senate floor in the coming weeks.
Please rank your preferences for what form the public option should take in the final bill at:
http://ga3.org/dickdurbin/po_poll.html?member_key=esiuu3599j3e56wk&source=popoll
I believe that a robust public option must give more Americans more choice on day one. But some of my colleagues would be content with a public plan that only kicked in if insurance companies continued to raise premiums at an unreasonable rate -- the so-called "trigger." Others would prefer a more limited public option, requiring state governments to "opt-in" to participate in the program.
I am "whip counting" the votes in favor of all of these in the Senate, and we're very, very close to reaching the 60 votes we need to pass a robust form of the public option -- one that provides more coverage to more people by requiring states to "opt out" if they don't want to participate. That's exactly how Medicare and Medicaid work, and all 50 states participate in those popular programs.
Ultimately my colleagues need to know what their constituents think a robust "public option" really means -- and what it doesn't.
Read up on the various interpretations of a public option now under consideration, and tell me -- and my colleagues -- where you stand.
http://ga3.org/dickdurbin/po_poll.html?member_key=esiuu3599j3e56wk&source=popoll
Virtually every poll now shows most people support a robust public option to expand health insurance choice and offer coverage to more Americans. And the American people will not settle for a "public option" in name only.
Neither will I.
Let's tell Congress what precisely we want and expect to see in the final health care reform bill that President Obama signs into law.
Thank you for taking my poll.
Sincerely,
Dick Durbin
U.S. Senator
[Revised link from email to accomodate blog]
















Thanks for this. I was just in taking a break in the middle of sending all of the democratic senators (sans senators Lieberman, Bayh, et al) the following after reading today that Reid and Durbin still consider reconciliation an option, not the ideal I know, but...:
Dear Senator XXXX,
Reconciliation of a stronger bill is better than an ugly fight over a weak one.
I am very concerned by the fact that Senator Bayh's personal finances are tied to the value of insurance stock along with Lieberman's gross ignorance of what the people of his state want re: a robust public option in favor of serious ties to the insurance corporations.
Based on this information and what has been stated publicly. I would rather see the senate put forward the most robust health insurance/care reform plan you can and pass it through reconciliation.
Weakening the bill should not be an option. That would give more power to the corrupt and greedy and ignore the people.
The people are suffering in this country on many fronts and they have been ignored enough.
Please fight for passage of a true public option that will cut costs and is available to all Americans or fight for the best version we can get but refuse to let it get weaker than it already is. No gimmick or games like triggers etc.
I am already concerned that the opt-out in my State of Colorado could end up making those people who choose a public option to have their health insurance treated like a political football whenever the political majority changes.
Reconciliation of a stronger bill is better than an ugly fight over a weak one.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
me
October 29, 2009 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're welcome and thanks for sharing your letter.
October 29, 2009 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink