Week of October 12, 2008 - October 18, 2008
Inspection- Early Voting? A Bad Idea
But let's just do devil's advocate.
Let's just say; for argument's sake, that a lot of the claims are "a little out there." Would any rational person out there claim that vote theft is impossible? No, not really. Most would say "has happened and probably (to some extent) will happen." So... why would you think giving anyone; corporation, politically-driven individual, politician, or corrupt official, more time to screw around with your vote is a grand idea?
I don't.
I won't.
I believe: make it as damn hard on anyone, any entity, who might consider screwing with the vote, as I can.
I understand. Making voting easier and more accessible is a noble goal. But let's make it a national holiday: a paid one with government working hand in hand with business to achieve that goal. Despite my usual anti-any government money to business attitude, in this case, I say "Hell, yes." More voting locations? As long as their as neutral as possible, yes. Helping people to the polls? Yes.
Giving anyone more time to alter or toss my vote?
Honestly? No way in bloody Hell. They're should have to work their ass off and become just as obvious as possible in my opinion if they have any intent on stealing or screwing with my vote. Flipping votes gradually: over a long period of time, for example, would be less obvious than it would be all at once. However we run elections it should be in some way to make it as obvious as possible that someone, some thing, some corporation, is attempting this traitorous act.
Early voting?
A really, really bad idea.
-30-
Inspection is a column that has been written by Ken Carman for over thirty years. Inspection is dedicated to looking at odd angles, under all the rocks and into the unseen cracks and crevasses that constitute the issues and philosophical constructs of our day: places few think, or even dare, to venture.




