"Imaginary victims".......classic.

Imaginary villains?!

Yippee!! Dick Cheney is imaginary!!

(And no wonder those shoes missed Bush, he's imaginary too!)

Pssst!! Spread the word:
Dr. Lyle Rossiter is imaginary!

This obviously irrational liberal wonders why the WingNut Daily (love it!) is just now promoting a book that was published in Oct. 2006.

Still practicing irrationality, I also wonder how Rossiter knew to focus on Barack Obama before Oct. 2006, when (then) Sen. Obama did not announce his candidacy until February 2007.

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by both Barack Obama and his Democratic primary opponent Hillary Clinton can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

Just my painfully neurotic mind making things up, I guess.

Just from the short quote, it's obvious the guy is a "quack!"

Put the quack with the lame duck. :)

Liberals are mentally ill.
So are conservatives.
Moderates, too.

feeding the snake its own tail

From Rossiter's Professional Business website:
LYLE H. ROSSITER, JR., M.D.
2580 Foxfield Rd. Suite 204, Saint Charles, IL 60174

Professional Status

• Diplomate in Psychiatry, American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, 1972.
• Diplomate in Forensic Psychiatry, American Board of Forensic Psychiatry, 1984.
• Private Practice, General Adult and Forensic Psychiatry.
• Forensic Psychiatric Consultant to DuPage County Circuit Court
• Public Defender and State's Attorney's Offices
• Cook County Public Defender's Office
• Office of the State Appellate Defender Supreme Court Unit
• Kane County Child Advocacy Center
• private attorneys in Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Texas, California, Alabama, and Washington, D.C.

• Board-certified in general and forensic psychiatry
• Over 35 years of experience
• Consultation, evaluation, reports, and testimony
• Civil and criminal matters
Expert/consultant for plaintiffs, defendants, and prosecution

• Fitness to Stand Trial: Fitness to stand trial requires that a defendant understand the nature and purpose of the legal proceedings against him and be able to cooperate with counsel in his defense. To understand the proceedings, a defendant must be able to comprehend the charges against him and the penalties if convicted. He must also have at least a minimal understanding of courtroom procedure and the functions of those who participate in it. To cooperate with counsel he must be able to plan a legal strategy, be able to recall pertinent facts and events, including his motives and actions at the time of the offense, and be able to testify in his behalf and challenge prosecution witnesses. My function in these cases is to determine whether or not a mental disorder or defect precludes this understanding and cooperation. Usually a written report submitted to the court suffices, but from time to time my testimony is needed.
• Legal Insanity: The much publicized legal insanity defense is much more often attempted than successful. When asked for an opinion, I first determine by examination and review of records whether a defendant's mental or emotional state at the time of the alleged offense meets the threshold requirement for a major mental disease or defect. Then I have to render an opinion as to whether that condition substantially impaired the defendant's ability to appreciate the wrongfulness of the act for which he is accused of some crime, or whether his condition substantially impaired his capacity to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law, or both. Note that the concept of legal insanity is very different from the concept of clinical psychosis. In reports and testimony I present detailed evidence that the defendant's clinical mental state either does or does not satisfy the legal definition of insanity.
• Mitigating Factors at Sentencing: Typically, in these cases, a defense attorney will ask me to assess his client's personal history and determine whether or not congenital, intellectual, educational, socioeconomic, or developmental injuries or deprivations have predisposed the defendant to commit a crime. These findings may then be offered to the court in an effort to reduce the severity of the sentence imposed on the defendant.
• Postconviction Matters: I have consulted in several cases involving death row inmates to determine whether their rights were violated at the time of their arrest, detention, trial or sentencing. I have examined defendants who were unfit for trial because of the effects of psychotropic medicine, or who were inadequately represented regarding a possible insanity defense at trial or with respect to factors in mitigation at sentencing. These cases require detailed analysis of police reports, detention records and transcripts of testimony, and interviews of the defendant and pertinant witnesses.

Given that Rossiter is a recognized courtroom expert witness in Illinois, including Cook County, and he asserts that liberals that liberals are mentally ill, in extreme cases even suffering from psychopathy, Blagojevich's attorneys should call him as an expert witness for his defense, and if Rossiter refuses, subpoena him as a hostile witness.