<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>katjam&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/katjam//406</id>
   <updated>2008-12-24T10:42:40Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>The once upon a time corporate executive</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/2008/12/the-once-upon-a-time-corporate.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/katjam//406.249336</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-24T10:09:24Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-24T10:42:40Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Once upon a time CEO&apos;s actually built companies for their long term viability not their short term gain and their compensation bore a resonable ratio to that of other employees. My 90-year-old father  definitely was one of these Old School...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[Once upon a time CEO's actually built companies for their long term viability not their short term gain and their compensation bore a resonable ratio to that of other employees. My 90-year-old father  definitely was one of these Old School CEO. <div><br /><div> In the 1960's he was asked to start a financial arm of a major US manufacturing company. Within a few years he had expanded it to 17 countries around the world. During this time he was paid a typical CEO's salary with bonuses added in exceptional years. By today's compensation rates, however, he was grossly underpaid. Amazingly this never stopped him from doing his best and building a company known for its integrity. <div>In recent years our MBA's have headed to Wall Street not to build companies that provide service but first and foremost to build personal wealth and therein lies the difference that has caused our economy to crash.</div></div></div>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Obama &amp; his daughters v. Palin &amp; her daughters</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/2008/10/obama-his-daughters-v-palin-he.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/katjam//406.240980</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-30T02:50:56Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-30T03:06:52Z</updated>
   
   <summary>During the &quot;ad&quot; on Wednesday night we learned Obama read the entire Harry Potter series with daughter Malika and he calls the girls almost every night to talk as long as they need.  Michelle told Jay Leno that Malika was...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[During the "ad" on Wednesday night we learned Obama read the entire Harry Potter series with daughter Malika and he calls the girls almost every night to talk as long as they need.  Michelle told Jay Leno that Malika was concerned her dad's special might interrupt Nick at Nite and was very pleased it would not. She is not in awe of his running for president. What well-balanced kids the Obama's have and what seemingly terrific parents they are.<div><br /></div><div>Contrast this with Sarah Palin the family values Hockey mom who has taken her youngest girls out of school for two month and along with their baby brother parades them on stage day after day in front of increasingly rabid crowds. What an example she is setting: use sarcasm, enuendo, and a sly wink to raise resoundingly thunderous cries of "boos" and chants of revenge.</div><div><br /></div><div>wow.</div><div><br /></div>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Sarah: thanks but no thanks??</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/2008/10/sarah-thanks-but-no-thanks.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/katjam//406.239080</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-22T17:10:27Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-22T17:15:42Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I guess if you take a girl out of Alaska she just forgets to say &quot;thanks but no thanks&quot; when offered a shopping spree at Neiman Marcus.I&apos;m sure she feels it can be excused by good old trickle down economics....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[I guess if you take a girl out of Alaska she just forgets to say "thanks but no thanks" when offered a shopping spree at Neiman Marcus.<div><br /></div><div>I'm sure she feels it can be excused by good old trickle down economics. The campaign says she will give her new wardrobe as handouts to the real hockey moms of American who shop at charity outlets.</div>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Powell&apos;s redemption and ours as well</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/2008/10/powells-redemption-and-ours-as.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/katjam//406.238018</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-17T21:15:13Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-17T21:25:56Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Colin Powell will very likely endorse Obama this weekend. The reactions have been mixed: betrayal from the Right, too little too late from the Left. But this could be a needed act of redemption not only for Powell but a...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; white-space: pre-wrap; ">Colin Powell will very likely endorse Obama this weekend. The reactions have been mixed: betrayal from the Right, too little too late from the Left. But this could be a needed act of redemption not only for Powell but a beginning of our own as Americans as well</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12px; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; white-space: pre-wrap; ">Powell gave into pressure last early in 2003 and lost his soul in the bargain.  He was the "good soldier"  then but if he had instead fallen on his sword and war had thus been averted ironically it might have resulted in a different kind of fall from grace for him.  First he would have been shunned by almost every Republican and many Democrats as well. History from that point would have taken a different path. The disasterous war of the last five years might have been avoided but other possbily tragic events might have occured instead. What if, having in a sense helped Saddam stay in power, Saddam had ended up funneling a dirty bomb to terrorist who attack us again.  Powell would have been seen as complicit. We just don't know.  We are judging him by what did happened and have found him wanting. I would suggest we all listen to his statement and explanation on Meet the Press.</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; white-space: pre-wrap; ">
I have it on very good authority he is going to endorce Obama on Sunday. If it helps Obama in any way we should be grateful. We cannot know the future but readers of this blog have good reason to fear  the election of McCain/Palin and the continuation of Republcan rule. Without knowing that version of our future we cannot judge the value of Powell's endorsement helping Obama to win. 

<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: ArialMS; font-size: 13px; white-space: normal; ">I have one last thought as well. The disastrous consequences of
this war could have already marked the beginning of an irreversible decline for
the US or it could be the beginning of a return to a better America.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>We have been stunned to see ourselves
of late: the hubris but not the honor and grace to justify it; the confidence
not justified by our blatant shortcomings, the realization that the America we
thought we lived in is riddled with inequities, ineptness, and a growing
unwillingness to strive to be the best in science, education, and leadership.
We have had a major comeuppance these last few years, but maybe this trial will lead to our renewal. Maybe the enthusiasm that is being tapped into by Obama is a
widespread desire and willingness to regain our place in the world and in our
own eyes. If we are willing this time to choose a man who not only strove for
the best education, but is as proudly erudite as he is profoundly practical, a
man who is willing to use power wisely not merely covet and wield it, who tells
us without hesitation we too must work hard and be our best selves, then maybe
the wake up call of these last 7-8 years will be seen as the trial that allowed
us to move beyond our dangerous complacency of recent years.</span></span></div><!--StartFragment-->



<!--EndFragment-->


</div>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Delegitimize the election?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/2008/10/delegitimize-the-election.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/katjam//406.236651</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-13T15:28:49Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-13T15:34:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I just heard Palin on the campaign trail.  Vote fraud is the newest war call from their failing campaign. They know they are going to lose so they want to delegitimize Obama&apos;s win.We need for him to win BIG so...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[I just heard Palin on the campaign trail.  Vote fraud is the newest war call from their failing campaign. They know they are going to lose so they want to delegitimize Obama's win.<div>We need for him to win BIG so do not get complacent about Obama being ahead in the polls.</div><div><br /></div><div>Go donate again if you can.</div>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>What kind of country do you want Republicans?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/10/what-kind-of-country-do-you-wa.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.223674</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-11T20:57:24Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-11T20:57:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary> My Saturday afternoon rant having watch a clip of Palin rousing the rabble before watching a football game: What kind of America do you want Republicans?   Do you want these economic times to tear us apart?  It’s easy...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[

<p>


<p>

<p>My Saturday afternoon rant having watch a clip of Palin
rousing the rabble before watching a football game:</p>

<p><b>What kind of America do you want Republicans?</b></p>

<p> </p>

<p>Do you want these economic times to tear us apart?  It’s easy you know. Find your favorite
scapegoat and direct all the free-floating anxiety towards your choice. Rev up
the angry and frightened and give them something or someone to blame. This
method is a time-proven success for dismantling stable governments.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>What kind of economic system do you want?</p>

<p> </p>

<p>Thirty years of your Free Market theory has brought us to
the brink of a full blown depression just as the lengthy pre-1929 period of
non-regulation brought us to the Great Depression.</p>

<p>Oh I know you will say we never achieved your beloved free
and unfettered markets but that shows your system has always been unworkable.
You were unable to move your designs from theory to practice and make them
work. You had lots of excuses but here we are at the edge. We have had booms
and bust during these last decades while you stripped away regulation. The
result?  The economy has come
crashing down. We are close to being bankrupt as a country because your ideas
are bankrupt.  In the end you have
had to turn back to Washington, your nemesis, hat in hand, to save you. After
years of privatizing profits for a select few you are now more than happy to
socialize the debt you have created. (In the Free Market world of your
fantasies I would imagine football games would be played without refs and the
NFL would never consider adding controls like salary caps or having a draft to
distribute the players more equitably among the teams.  Your free market football players would
always call the plays fairly and keep to the rules. Chaos?  Not possible I am sure you would say.) </p>

<p> </p>

<p>What kind of political system do you want?</p>

<p> </p>

<p>It is clear you would be happy with a plutocracy but does
the rule of law mean anything to you other than those who rule make the
law?  Do you fear the massive
growth of government surveillance? 
Do you mind the politicization of our Justice Department? Do you mind
the dismantling of FEMA or the FDA? 
Are you happy with the giant Department of Homeland Security and its Big
Brother connotation? Do you care about our crumbling infrastructure?  Do you care if we are protecting our
ports? Or are all these things trivial in the face of that offense against All
We Hold Sacred: gay marriage?  Do
you want to reach an accord between the right of women to have control over the
when another living entity can inhabit her body and the right of that living
being to be brought to viability or is this too valuable a fundraising,
crowd-rousing issue to ever resolve it?</p>

<p> </p>

<p>What kind of social system do you want?</p>

<p> </p>

<p>Are you planning a full retreat into walled communities when
whites become the new minority within the next three or four decades or do you
plan somehow to create an American version of Apartheid here before then?  Are you going to build that wall along
our border or are you going to make this country work for all of us, white,
black, brown, Latino, Asian?  </p>

<p>Do you want to continue letting the middle class disappear
while concentrating wealth in the hands of the few?  Poor people who have known nothing else are easy to keep
underfoot. A large population of once-economically secure families slipping
into poverty is the stuff of revolutions. During the 1950’s, the time you like
to reminisce about, America was at its economic best because wealth was
equitably distributed. That is one part of the 50’s I would like to see return.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>What kind of leaders to you want?</p>

<p> </p>

<p>If you would even tolerate a ticket with the defamatory
Sarah Palin and her sound-bite depth of knowledge along with a man who
graduated at the bottom of his class then I think that answers the
question.  If you mock an East
Coast education as elitist and long for a Joe Six-pack in the White House I
think we know your answer.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>What kind of America do you want, Republicans? </p>

<p> </p>

<p> </p>

<p> </p>

<p> </p>

<p> </p>




</p>




</p>




]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Hey MSM Sarah doesn&apos;t think you are &quot;asking all the questions&quot; of  . . . .OBama??</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/10/hey-msm-sarah-doesnt-think-you.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.223241</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-09T23:34:28Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-09T23:34:28Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[WATCH ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuSYHnVpYbs&amp;eurl=http://www.americablog.com/Hey Sarah, you are right. The MSM is not doing its job asking the questions so we can really get to know our newest candidate: you.What DO we know of you so far?  You are a six-week flash in...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[WATCH ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuSYHnVpYbs&amp;eurl=http://www.americablog.com/<br />Hey Sarah, you are right. The MSM is not doing its job asking the questions so we can really get to know our newest candidate: you.<br />What DO we know of you so far?  <br />You are a six-week flash in the pan with a tight skirt and a nasty tone filled with false bravado. You never blink, you quickly brag, but you quiver and hide when asked to spend even a half an hour on one of the Sunday morning news shows.  Yes, you are a pit bull of sorts: a strong jawed (female dog) whose brain is wired for one response: attack. You mock learning and education and praise this disrespect as a folksy all-American value. Since you scorn books you probably don't know the pious Puritans who founded our country actually had made starting Harvard College their highest once they had established their colony. Even in the wilderness they believe they needed to educate their children in history, philosophy, and languages. They also considered free libraries and public education critical.In the 18th century our so called Founding Fathers were all educated men who held learning in the highest esteem.  They knew the democracy they were fighting to create could not florish with only an uneducated mob for a citizenry.  They knew a free press was a critical component. You instead incite the excitable to mistrust and hate the press. Your followers and you mock papers of record like the NYT because they apparently are not like your favorite tabloid you quickly read while standing in the grocery line.Yes, Sarah, we hardly know ye. I think I can guess why you want it that way.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Take away McCain&apos;s talking points and he will be disarmed completely</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/10/take-away-mccains-talking-poin.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.222048</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-05T18:06:09Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-05T18:06:09Z</updated>
   
   <summary> On Tuesday night at the town hall style debate Obama needs to state strongly our current problems are too serious and too complicated for talking points and campaign slogans. He should remind people that a two-minute answer can hardly...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[

<p>On Tuesday night at the town hall style debate Obama needs to state strongly our current
problems are too serious and too complicated for talking points and campaign
slogans. He should remind people that a two-minute answer can hardly begin to
explore the complexities of our economic crisis much less describe the
potential solutions. He can undermine McCain at the debate and indirectly undo
Palin’s folksy sound bites and hits on the campaign trail.</p><p></p>

<p>These are serious times. Voters need for us to provide
serious answers, John</p>




]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Palin is the Mae West of politics when this country need an FDR</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/10/palin-is-the-mae-west-of-polit.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.221918</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-04T13:52:10Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-04T13:52:10Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Since Biden had to be on his best behavior to refrain from any comment that could be construed as sexist I found the sexual overtones of Palin&apos;s correction of the phrase &quot;drill, baby, drill&quot; said with her most come-hither smile...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      Since Biden had to be on his best behavior to refrain from any comment that could be construed as sexist I found the sexual overtones of Palin&apos;s correction of the phrase  &quot;drill, baby, drill&quot; said with her most come-hither smile an affront.  We already have the Rich Lowrys of the Right wing drooling from just her winks. Palin is the Mae West of politics when this country need an FDR. Advertisers say sex sells. I guess that was McCain&apos;s only hope.  Country first?  What a joke.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>McCain is a wuss--let&apos;s tell the world</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/mccain-is-a-wusslets-tell-the.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.215278</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-10T11:44:47Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-10T11:44:47Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Watch McCain  on stage these days when he is standing backup to Sarah.  He hates it!  He fiddles with his wedding ring.  His lips are in a tight line or a forced smile. Obama needs to answer questions about why...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[Watch McCain  on stage these days when he is standing backup to Sarah.  He hates it!  He fiddles with his wedding ring.  His lips are in a tight line or a forced smile. Obama needs to answer questions about why he is not going after Palin by saying something like:I know it is hard to believe these days but Palin is not my opponent. Lest we forget, John McCain is actually the one at the top of the ticket. He needs to mock the fact that McCain pales in comparison when Palin is at his side. John's explosive temper is already simmering.  Let's remind him of the humiliation he is already beginning to experience. (Beauty queen Cindy McCain is also none to pleased by being upstaged.)<br />In addition we need to begin mocking and dismantling thethanks but no thanks phrase that is now so deeply embedded with Palin's persona. We need Youtubes and political cartoons created where she is saying TBNT to John.<br />For example show the two of them in the White House. John asks her to attend some state funeral. TBNT John, I'm taking the Joint Chiefs out for a moose hunt today. Or:  TBNT John, I'm waiting for a call from Putin to tell him what I have decided to do about Georgia.Or Sarah to CIndy:<br />The phrase has become her strength. We need to make it her downfall. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Palin v. 2.0 come out tonight!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/palin-v-20-come-out-tonight-1.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.212775</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-03T15:15:55Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-03T15:15:55Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Sarah Palin has been pulled off the shelf. Version 2.0 is presently being tooled for a big rollout tonight. The new updated version will shed a tear artfully for the invasion of her family&apos;s privacy, will be dressed demurely yet...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      Sarah Palin has been pulled off the shelf. Version 2.0 is presently being tooled for a big rollout tonight.

 The new updated version will  shed a tear artfully for the invasion of her family&apos;s privacy, will be dressed demurely yet will raise her chin and fist defiantly in defense of all mothers who try to do it all. She will say she is their champion as both a tough career woman and a loving mom who will show the world what American woman can do. She will wink and say we all know who the stronger sex really is and that Putin and the like won&apos;t know what hit them when she steps onto the world stage. (A reference to Obama&apos;s measured and thoughfully approach will come out as as a mocking: &quot;some people don&apos;t know how to take the fight to the bad guys like John and I do.)
Her ultra conservative religious views will be visible only in coded words. 
She will tout herself as the truest outsider in the race because she is woman and not of Washington.

And then she will disappear again into closely controlled situations.  No Meet the Press.  No 60 minutes. Not even a Katie Couric interview.

The Obama campaign has their work cut out for them and their strongest argument, one that they must pound out 24/7, is the same team that has brought you the last 8 destructive years has a new cheerleader but the same old players planning on doing the some old policies in the same old way with the same old results.
I think Americans are now comfortable Obama can do the job they just need to not be distracted by bright glittery objects and the dump truck full of sh*t the Republicans will now unload.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Palin v. 2.0 come out tonight!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/palin-v-20-come-out-tonight.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.212771</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-03T15:14:10Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-03T15:14:10Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Sarah Palin has been pulled off the shelf. Version 2.0 is presently being tooled for a big rollout tonight. The new updated version will shed a tear artfully for the invasion of her family&apos;s privacy, will be dressed demurely yet...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      Sarah Palin has been pulled off the shelf. Version 2.0 is presently being tooled for a big rollout tonight.

 The new updated version will  shed a tear artfully for the invasion of her family&apos;s privacy, will be dressed demurely yet will raise her chin and fist defiantly in defense of all mothers who try to do it all. She will say she is their champion as both a tough career woman and a loving mom who will show the world what American woman can do. She will wink and say we all know who the stronger sex really is and that Putin and the like won&apos;t know what hit them when she steps onto the world stage. (A reference to Obama&apos;s measured and thoughfully approach will come out as as a mocking: &quot;some people don&apos;t know how to take the fight to the bad guys like John and I do.)
Her ultra conservative religious views will be visible only in coded words. 
She will tout herself as the truest outsider in the race because she is woman and not of Washington.

And then she will disappear again into closely controlled situations.  No Meet the Press.  No 60 minutes. Not even a Katie Couric interview.

The Obama campaign has their work cut out for them and their strongest argument, one that they must pound out 24/7, is the same team that has brought you the last 8 destructive years has a new cheerleader but the same old players planning on doing the some old policies in the same old way with the same old results.
I think Americans are now comfortable Obama can do the job they just need to not be distracted by bright glittery objects and the dump truck full of sh*t the Republicans will now unload.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Palin is a pale shadow of Hillary</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/palin-is-a-pale-shadow-of-hill.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.211671</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-30T18:15:21Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-30T18:15:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary> The question about Sarah Palin is not about her character or even her experience however thin her resume, it is about the depth of her knowledge.  She admits to limiting her focus to issues effecting Alaska which is fine...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[

<p>The
question about Sarah Palin is not about her character or even her experience
however thin her resume, it is about the depth of her knowledge.  She
admits to limiting her focus to issues effecting Alaska which is fine for a
governor.  She may also be content with returning the now powerful role of
vice president to that of limited stand-in, but the truth is, however small the
chance may be of her becoming our president, we cannot afford to have someone
who is not only unfamiliar with national security issues, foreign and domestic
affairs, and the economy, but someone has not given even minimum thought to the
consequences of actions taken in these areas. Americans do not know what Sarah
Palin thinks about our critical issues therefore we cannot judge how she will
act if force to take up the reins of power. And we have only two short months
to vet her. The press needs to question her fully and immediately; a single
vice presidential debate is not sufficient.</p>

<p>The
candidacy of not one but two women for the top jobs on a national ticket has
been historic but with Hillary Clinton there was never any doubt of the depth
and breadth of her understanding of each and every issue. Americans deserve
nothing less of a vice presidential candidate in these treacherous times.</p>

<p> </p>




]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Palin pales by comparison</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/palin-pales-by-comparison.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.211593</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-30T14:22:12Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-30T14:22:12Z</updated>
   
   <summary> The question about Sarah Palin is not about her character or even her experience however thin her resume, it is about the depth of her knowledge.  She admits to limiting her focus to issues effecting Alaska which is fine...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[

<p>


<p>The
question about Sarah Palin is not about her character or even her experience
however thin her resume, it is about the depth of her knowledge.  She
admits to limiting her focus to issues effecting Alaska which is fine for a
governor.  She may also be content with returning the now powerful role of
vice president to that of limited stand-in, but the truth is, however small the
chance may be of her becoming our president, we cannot afford to have someone
who is not only unfamiliar with national security issues, foreign and domestic
affairs, and the economy, but someone has not given even minimum thought to the
consequences of actions taken in these areas. Americans do not know what Sarah
Palin thinks about our critical issues therefore we cannot judge how she will
act if force to take up the reins of power. And we have only two short months
to vet her. The press needs to question her fully and immediately; a single
vice presidential debate is not sufficient.</p>

<p>The
candidacy of not one but two women for the top jobs on a national ticket has
been historic but with Hillary Clinton there was never any doubt of the depth
and breadth of her understanding of each and every issue. Americans deserve
nothing less of a vice presidential candidate in these treacherous times.</p>

<p> </p>




</p>




]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Insinuating a prisoner of war would cheat is outrageous?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/insinuating-a-prisoner-of-war.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.208965</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-18T19:50:07Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-18T19:50:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Insinuating a prisoner of war would cheat is outrageous? But senator didn&apos;t you yourself admit cheating on your first wife after being a prisoner of war? Are only certain forms of cheating &quot;outrageous?&quot;...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>katjam</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/katjam/">
      <![CDATA[Insinuating a prisoner of war would cheat is outrageous? <br />But senator didn't you yourself admit cheating on your first wife after being a prisoner of war?  Are only certain forms of cheating "outrageous?"
<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
