Obama & his daughters v. Palin & her daughters
Sarah: thanks but no thanks??
Powell's redemption and ours as well
Delegitimize the election?
What kind of country do you want Republicans?
My Saturday afternoon rant having watch a clip of Palin rousing the rabble before watching a football game:
What kind of America do you want Republicans?
Do you want these economic times to tear us apart? It’s easy you know. Find your favorite scapegoat and direct all the free-floating anxiety towards your choice. Rev up the angry and frightened and give them something or someone to blame. This method is a time-proven success for dismantling stable governments.
What kind of economic system do you want?
Thirty years of your Free Market theory has brought us to the brink of a full blown depression just as the lengthy pre-1929 period of non-regulation brought us to the Great Depression.
Oh I know you will say we never achieved your beloved free and unfettered markets but that shows your system has always been unworkable. You were unable to move your designs from theory to practice and make them work. You had lots of excuses but here we are at the edge. We have had booms and bust during these last decades while you stripped away regulation. The result? The economy has come crashing down. We are close to being bankrupt as a country because your ideas are bankrupt. In the end you have had to turn back to Washington, your nemesis, hat in hand, to save you. After years of privatizing profits for a select few you are now more than happy to socialize the debt you have created. (In the Free Market world of your fantasies I would imagine football games would be played without refs and the NFL would never consider adding controls like salary caps or having a draft to distribute the players more equitably among the teams. Your free market football players would always call the plays fairly and keep to the rules. Chaos? Not possible I am sure you would say.)
What kind of political system do you want?
It is clear you would be happy with a plutocracy but does the rule of law mean anything to you other than those who rule make the law? Do you fear the massive growth of government surveillance? Do you mind the politicization of our Justice Department? Do you mind the dismantling of FEMA or the FDA? Are you happy with the giant Department of Homeland Security and its Big Brother connotation? Do you care about our crumbling infrastructure? Do you care if we are protecting our ports? Or are all these things trivial in the face of that offense against All We Hold Sacred: gay marriage? Do you want to reach an accord between the right of women to have control over the when another living entity can inhabit her body and the right of that living being to be brought to viability or is this too valuable a fundraising, crowd-rousing issue to ever resolve it?
What kind of social system do you want?
Are you planning a full retreat into walled communities when whites become the new minority within the next three or four decades or do you plan somehow to create an American version of Apartheid here before then? Are you going to build that wall along our border or are you going to make this country work for all of us, white, black, brown, Latino, Asian?
Do you want to continue letting the middle class disappear while concentrating wealth in the hands of the few? Poor people who have known nothing else are easy to keep underfoot. A large population of once-economically secure families slipping into poverty is the stuff of revolutions. During the 1950’s, the time you like to reminisce about, America was at its economic best because wealth was equitably distributed. That is one part of the 50’s I would like to see return.
What kind of leaders to you want?
If you would even tolerate a ticket with the defamatory Sarah Palin and her sound-bite depth of knowledge along with a man who graduated at the bottom of his class then I think that answers the question. If you mock an East Coast education as elitist and long for a Joe Six-pack in the White House I think we know your answer.
What kind of America do you want, Republicans?
Hey MSM Sarah doesn't think you are "asking all the questions" of . . . .OBama??
Hey Sarah, you are right. The MSM is not doing its job asking the questions so we can really get to know our newest candidate: you.
What DO we know of you so far?
You are a six-week flash in the pan with a tight skirt and a nasty tone filled with false bravado. You never blink, you quickly brag, but you quiver and hide when asked to spend even a half an hour on one of the Sunday morning news shows. Yes, you are a pit bull of sorts: a strong jawed (female dog) whose brain is wired for one response: attack. You mock learning and education and praise this disrespect as a folksy all-American value. Since you scorn books you probably don't know the pious Puritans who founded our country actually had made starting Harvard College their highest once they had established their colony. Even in the wilderness they believe they needed to educate their children in history, philosophy, and languages. They also considered free libraries and public education critical.In the 18th century our so called Founding Fathers were all educated men who held learning in the highest esteem. They knew the democracy they were fighting to create could not florish with only an uneducated mob for a citizenry. They knew a free press was a critical component. You instead incite the excitable to mistrust and hate the press. Your followers and you mock papers of record like the NYT because they apparently are not like your favorite tabloid you quickly read while standing in the grocery line.Yes, Sarah, we hardly know ye. I think I can guess why you want it that way.
Take away McCain's talking points and he will be disarmed completely
On Tuesday night at the town hall style debate Obama needs to state strongly our current problems are too serious and too complicated for talking points and campaign slogans. He should remind people that a two-minute answer can hardly begin to explore the complexities of our economic crisis much less describe the potential solutions. He can undermine McCain at the debate and indirectly undo Palin’s folksy sound bites and hits on the campaign trail.
These are serious times. Voters need for us to provide serious answers, John
Palin is the Mae West of politics when this country need an FDR
McCain is a wuss--let's tell the world
In addition we need to begin mocking and dismantling thethanks but no thanks phrase that is now so deeply embedded with Palin's persona. We need Youtubes and political cartoons created where she is saying TBNT to John.
For example show the two of them in the White House. John asks her to attend some state funeral. TBNT John, I'm taking the Joint Chiefs out for a moose hunt today. Or: TBNT John, I'm waiting for a call from Putin to tell him what I have decided to do about Georgia.Or Sarah to CIndy:
The phrase has become her strength. We need to make it her downfall.
Palin v. 2.0 come out tonight!
Palin v. 2.0 come out tonight!
Palin is a pale shadow of Hillary
The question about Sarah Palin is not about her character or even her experience however thin her resume, it is about the depth of her knowledge. She admits to limiting her focus to issues effecting Alaska which is fine for a governor. She may also be content with returning the now powerful role of vice president to that of limited stand-in, but the truth is, however small the chance may be of her becoming our president, we cannot afford to have someone who is not only unfamiliar with national security issues, foreign and domestic affairs, and the economy, but someone has not given even minimum thought to the consequences of actions taken in these areas. Americans do not know what Sarah Palin thinks about our critical issues therefore we cannot judge how she will act if force to take up the reins of power. And we have only two short months to vet her. The press needs to question her fully and immediately; a single vice presidential debate is not sufficient.
The candidacy of not one but two women for the top jobs on a national ticket has been historic but with Hillary Clinton there was never any doubt of the depth and breadth of her understanding of each and every issue. Americans deserve nothing less of a vice presidential candidate in these treacherous times.
Palin pales by comparison
The question about Sarah Palin is not about her character or even her experience however thin her resume, it is about the depth of her knowledge. She admits to limiting her focus to issues effecting Alaska which is fine for a governor. She may also be content with returning the now powerful role of vice president to that of limited stand-in, but the truth is, however small the chance may be of her becoming our president, we cannot afford to have someone who is not only unfamiliar with national security issues, foreign and domestic affairs, and the economy, but someone has not given even minimum thought to the consequences of actions taken in these areas. Americans do not know what Sarah Palin thinks about our critical issues therefore we cannot judge how she will act if force to take up the reins of power. And we have only two short months to vet her. The press needs to question her fully and immediately; a single vice presidential debate is not sufficient.
The candidacy of not one but two women for the top jobs on a national ticket has been historic but with Hillary Clinton there was never any doubt of the depth and breadth of her understanding of each and every issue. Americans deserve nothing less of a vice presidential candidate in these treacherous times.
Insinuating a prisoner of war would cheat is outrageous?
But senator didn't you yourself admit cheating on your first wife after being a prisoner of war? Are only certain forms of cheating "outrageous?"




