<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Kansasboy&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kansasboy/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kansasboy/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/kansasboy//5098</id>
   <updated>	2008-10-15T19:22:19Z	</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://12.237043-comment:3229571</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/cnn_leads_media_failure_on_aco.php#c3229571" />
		
		    <title>Kansasboy Commented on CNN Leads Media Failure on ACORN Story by Zachary Roth</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-15T19:22:19Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-15T19:22:19Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Has anyone considered the basic source of these fraudulent registrations? After all how could a few "dirty tricks" operatives do more harm in less time than gum up ACORN's works at this time. I saw an article that stated that the signatures "all looked like they had been written by the same hand" referring to one particular bunch of obviously bogus registrations. I am wondering how well some of these people are vetted vis a vis the "other side".I think we would have to agree that the tactic might be very effective.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

