<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Kaneblues&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/kaneblues//2686</id>
   <updated>2008-11-25T16:48:17Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Mainstream gone Progressive</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/2008/11/mainstream-gone-progressive.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/kaneblues//2686.245786</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-25T16:38:45Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-25T16:48:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary>There was a time not so long ago that if someone spoke about the importance of recycling and alternative energy and eating organic foods and preserving the environment and the humane treatment of animals and natural childbirth and protecting the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="9473" label="mainstream" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16" label="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9383" label="Progressive" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[<p>There was a time not so long ago that if someone spoke about the importance of recycling and alternative energy and eating organic foods and preserving the environment and the humane treatment of animals and natural childbirth and protecting the dolphins and any number of other issues, one could expect to be labeled a tree-hugger or a hippie or (gulp) a liberal. </p>
<p>But look at the world we live in today. We have industries devoted to recycled paper. Energy-efficient light bulbs and chemical-free cleaning products are easily available. We have dolphin-friendly tuna and natural childbirth is&nbsp;routinely&nbsp;provided in our hospitals. We've seen "An Inconvenient Truth" winning an Oscar, and billionaire oilman T. Boone Pickens demanding that we must get off our addiction to oil. National health-care is seen as a need by even some on the right, and the threat of global warming has become accepted as a reality by even those who made a living of arguing against it. </p>
<p>Many ideas that were once vilified as "liberal" are now casually accepted as mainstream. Many progressive ideas are no longer solely offered by those on the far-left of the Democratic party, rather moderates on both sides of the aisle are seeing the light and coming to adopt them as well. Progressive ideas are no longer portrayed as part of a leftist manifesto, thus conservative democrats no longer fear the same policies they once ran away from. Many of those same progressive ideas now occupy the Democratic Party platform. <br /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The Pendulum Swings </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/2008/11/the-pendulum-swings.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/kaneblues//2686.245492</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-22T16:12:27Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-22T16:23:32Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[There has been a recent wringing of hands by some in response to some of the selections that Barack Obama has made&nbsp;for his future administration.&nbsp; Allow me a brief moment to respond with a perspective that some may not have...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="61" label="Democrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[<p>There has been a recent wringing of hands by some in response to some of the selections that Barack Obama has made&nbsp;for his future administration.&nbsp; Allow me a brief moment to respond with a perspective that some may not have considered.&nbsp; If Obama had surrounded himself entirely with liberals and progressives, he would have breathed life into a dying Republican party. The GOP would be emboldened to fight and obstruct every piece of legislation, and they would attempt to paint Obama and Democrats as extremists and out of touch. We would end up with four more years of bickering in Washington with very little getting done. </p>
<p>In surrounding himself with very smart and open-minded people, people who are respected on both sides of the aisle, Obama is making it much more difficult for partisans and republicans to vilify him, his administration, and his policies. Rather than giving life to a modern day wannabe Newt Gingrich and losing the gains of Congress, Obama is laying the groundwork to not only increase those gains, but also strengthening the Democratic brand in the minds of the country. The obstructionists will soon show themselves to be the ones who are the extremists and out of touch, while Obama and the Democrats will solidify themselves as the party that gets things done. </p>
<p>Surely Obama understands that the country has moved to the left. But to bring the rest of the country along, he must do it in a moderate fashion. Remember, when a pendulum swings from the right, it must pass through the middle before it gets to the left.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Something Positive </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/2008/11/something-positive.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/kaneblues//2686.245473</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-22T00:11:46Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-22T00:14:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[If you had to describe the Bush administration in one word, few would be more apt than the word incompetent. &nbsp;From the historic foreign policies blunders of Iraq and Afghanistan to the tragic do-nothing domestic policies of Katrina, 9/11, and...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="9347" label="appointments" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9349" label="responsible government" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[If you had to describe the Bush administration in one word, few would be more apt than the word <i>incompetent</i>. &nbsp;From the historic foreign policies blunders of Iraq and Afghanistan to the tragic do-nothing domestic policies of Katrina, 9/11, and managing the economy. &nbsp; 
<p>Not only have the policies been incompetent, but those with positions of responsibility in this administration have been incompetent. &nbsp;Bush, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, Chertoff, Miers, "Brownie", Cheney, Libby, Rice, Bolton, Goodling and many more. &nbsp;These individuals were not the best and brightest of what this country has to offer, rather they are party loyalists who share a similar disdain and disrespect for the positive role that government can have in people's lives. 
<p>A familiar theme from Barack Obama on the campaign trail was that government can't solve every problem, but at the very least, it should do no harm. &nbsp;With all of the serious challenges that we face as a nation, Obama seems convinced that surrounding himself with very smart people is more important than where a person leans politically. &nbsp; 
<p>Instead of selecting partisans and rewarding political hacks with cushy positions where they have no business being, Obama is selecting open-minded and qualified individuals who are well-respected throughout Washington and abroad. &nbsp; 
<p>Are Obama's selections the progressive all-star team that some of us might have preferred? No, obviously not. &nbsp;Still, few can say that his appointments are incompetents or partisan hacks or ideological die-hards. &nbsp;Many in this country have lost confidence in our government, in our economy, and in our institutions. &nbsp;It seems to me that Obama is attempting to provide a sense of confidence in the team that he is assembling, to give assurances to all that he intends to provide responsible government. &nbsp; &nbsp; </p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Don&apos;t Let This Campaign End</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/10/dont-let-this-campaign-end.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.223319</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-10T12:37:45Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-10T12:37:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[This Morning on MSNBC, Joe Scarborough, Pat Buchanan and Andrea Mitchell were discussing the desperate acts of the McCain campaign.&nbsp; At the end of the conversation, Mitchell reminded everyone that no one has voted yet and anything could still happen.&nbsp;...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[<p>This Morning on MSNBC, Joe Scarborough, Pat Buchanan and Andrea Mitchell were discussing the desperate acts of the McCain campaign.&nbsp; At the end of the conversation, Mitchell reminded everyone that no one has voted yet and anything could still happen.&nbsp; Buchanan reminded her that the polls continue to move in Obama's favor.&nbsp; And Mitchell responds, "I know, I just don't want it to end" </p>
<p>And that, in a nutshell, says it all.</p>
<p>If the&nbsp;MSM were to reveal the associations of McCain and Palin&nbsp;with the same vigor that they&nbsp;discuss the associations of Obama.&nbsp; If they were to point out the&nbsp;hypocrisy of the McCain campaign.&nbsp; If they were to report the overwhelming edge Obama/Biden&nbsp;currently holds in every independent electoral projection rather than lowballing their own projections, this campaign and it's coverage as we know it would be over.<br /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Why the Dramatic Shift in the Polls?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/10/why-the-dramatic-shift-in-the.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.221177</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-01T18:16:21Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-01T18:16:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary>There are some who are suggesting that because of the terrible shape of the economy, voters are turning away from the McCain campaign. Others are suggesting that voters are moving away from the McCain campaign because of Sarah Palin&apos;s poor...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[<p>There are some who are suggesting that because of the terrible shape of the economy, voters are turning away from the McCain campaign. Others are suggesting that voters are moving away from the McCain campaign because of Sarah Palin's poor showing in recent interviews. <br /><br />Granted, the economic conditions have certainly hurt the McCain campaign, and Palin has been of little help. However, lets not forget the behavior of John McCain in the last month or so. Nothing he has done in that time has given voters confidence or assurance in his abilities.<br /><br />If the economy magically turned around tomorrow and Palin had an impressive debate beyond all expectations, the fact would remain that McCain is at the top of the ticket and he is an awful candidate with an awful agenda. <br /><br />In the end the dramatic change in the polls is not because McCain is a poor candidate. It's not because Palin isn't up to snuff. It's not even the economy stupid. Rather the gradual movement away from McCain/Palin is due to what many of us have known all along; the Obama/Biden team is the stronger ticket with the better ideas.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>When History Decides on Bush</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/10/when-history-decides-on-bush.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.221140</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-01T16:08:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-01T16:08:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[When historians write the book on George Bush and his presidency, which catastrophe will be listed first?A)&nbsp; Iraq InvasionB)&nbsp; Economic CrisisC)&nbsp; Katrina Non-responseD)&nbsp; 9/11 AttacksE)&nbsp; Other...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[When historians write the book on George Bush and his presidency, which catastrophe will be listed first?<br /><br />A)&nbsp; Iraq Invasion<br />B)&nbsp; Economic Crisis<br />C)&nbsp; Katrina Non-response<br />D)&nbsp; 9/11 Attacks<br />E)&nbsp; Other]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Gwen Ifill Questions - VP Debate</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/gwen-ifill-questions-vp-debate.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.220633</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-29T17:39:24Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-29T17:39:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[In the 2004 vice presidential debate, moderator Gwen Ifill asked a total of 20 questions of Dick Cheney and John Edwards. Nine of which were deemed as foreign policy, 11 domestic policy.&nbsp; Take note that three of the domestic policy...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[<p>In the 2004 vice presidential debate, moderator Gwen Ifill asked a total of 20 questions of Dick Cheney and John Edwards. Nine of which were deemed as foreign policy, 11 domestic policy.&nbsp; Take note that three of the domestic policy questions were directly about John Edwards (Being a trial lawyer is Edwards part of the problem, as a trail lawyer do you feel personally attacked, and what qualifies you to be a heartbeat away).&nbsp; Another question was about flip-flopping.</p>
<p>If the Obama and McCain campaigns are trying to guess what the questions will be in the vice presidential debate on Thursday night in St. Louis, it appears that Ifill's questioning follows the campaign talking points, with a touch of day's headlines.&nbsp; She's not big on the gotcha questions to see if the candidates know the name of the President of Argentina.</p>
<p>Intro<br />You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long.<br />In the 2004 vice presidential debate, moderator Gwen Ifill asked a total of 20 questions of Dick Cheney and John Edwards. Nine of which were deemed as foreign policy, 11 domestic policy.&nbsp; Take note that three of the domestic policy questions were directly about John Edwards (Being a trial lawyer is Edwards part of the problem, as a trail lawyer do you feel personally attacked, and what qualifies you to be a heartbeat away).&nbsp; Another question was about flip-flopping.</p>
<p>If the Obama and McCain campaigns are trying to guess what the questions will be in the vice presidential debate on Thursday night in St. Louis, it appears that Ifill's questioning follows the campaign talking points, with a touch of day's headlines.&nbsp; She's not big on the gotcha questions to see if the candidates know the name of the President of Argentina. </p>
<p>The following are the 20 questions asked by Ifill in the 2004 VP debate:</p>
<p>(C) Vice President Cheney, there have been new developments in Iraq, especially having to do with the administration's handling. Paul Bremer, the former head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, gave a speech in which he said that we have never had enough troops on the ground, or we've never had enough troops on the ground. Donald Rumsfeld said he has not seen any hard evidence of a link between Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein. Was this approved -- of a report that you requested that you received a week ago that showed there was no connection between Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Saddam Hussein?</p>
<p>(E) You and Senator Kerry have said that the war in Iraq is the wrong war at the wrong time. Does that mean that if you had been president and vice president that Saddam Hussein would still be in power?</p>
<p>(C) Tonight we mentioned Afghanistan. We believe that Osama bin Laden is hiding perhaps in a cave somewhere along the Afghan-Pakistan border. If you get a second term, what is your plan to capture him and then to neutralize those who have sprung up to replace him?</p>
<p>(E) Senator Kerry said, "You've got to do" -- you know, he was asked about preemptive action at the last debate -- he said, "You've got to do it in a way that passes the test, that passes the global test where your countrymen, your people understand fully why you're doing what you're doing and can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons." What is a global test if it's not a global veto?</p>
<p>(C) When the president says that Senator Kerry is emboldening enemies and you say that we could get hit again if voters make the wrong choice in November, are you saying that it would be a dangerous thing to have John Kerry as president?</p>
<p>(E) Part of what you have said and Senator Kerry has said that you are going to do in order to get us out of the problems in Iraq is to internationalize the effort.&nbsp; Yet French and German officials have both said they have no intention even if John Kerry is elected of sending any troops into Iraq for any peacekeeping effort. Does that make your effort or your plan to internationalize this effort seem kind of naive?</p>
<p>(E) If this report that we've read about today is true, and if Vice President Cheney ordered it and asked about this, do you think that, in the future, that your administration or the Bush administration would have sufficient and accurate enough intelligence to be able to make decisions about where to go next?</p>
<p>(C) Mr. Vice President, in June of 2000 when you were still CEO of Halliburton, you said that U.S. businesses should be allowed to do business with Iran because, quote, "Unilateral sanctions almost never work."&nbsp; After four years as vice president now, and with Iran having been declared by your administration as part of the "Axis of Evil," do you still believe that we should lift sanctions on Iran?</p>
<p>(E) Senator Edwards, as we wrap up the foreign policy part of this, I do want to talk to you about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Today, a senior member of Islamic Jihad was killed in Gaza. There have been suicide bombings, targeted assassinations, mortar attacks, all of this continuing at a time when the United States seems absent in the peace-making process. What would your administration do?&nbsp; First of all, do you agree that the United States is absent? Maybe you don't. But what would your administration do to try to resolve that conflict?</p>
<p>-----</p>
<p>(C) In that case, we'll move on to domestic matters. Mr. Vice President, the Census Bureau ranked Cleveland as the biggest poor city in the country, 31 percent jobless rate. You two gentlemen are pretty well off. You did well for yourselves in the private sector. What can you tell the people of Cleveland, or people of cities like Cleveland, that your administration will do to better their lives?</p>
<p>(E) Senator Kerry said in a recent interview that he absolutely will not raise taxes on anyone under -- who earns under $200,000 a year. How can he guarantee that and also cut the deficit in half, as he's promised?</p>
<p>(C) I want to read something you said four years ago at this very setting: "Freedom means freedom for everybody." You said it again recently when you were asked about legalizing same-sex unions. And you used your family's experience as a context for your remarks.&nbsp; Can you describe then your administration's support for a constitutional ban on same-sex unions?</p>
<p>(E) As the vice president mentioned, John Kerry comes from the state of Massachusetts, which has taken as big a step as any state in the union to legalize gay marriage. Yet both you and Senator Kerry say you oppose it. Are you trying to have it both ways?</p>
<p>(C) President Bush has derided in John Kerry for putting a trial lawyer on the ticket. You yourself have said that lawsuits are partly to blame for higher medical costs. Are you willing to say that John Edwards, sitting here, has been part of the problem?</p>
<p>(E) Do you feel personally attacked when Vice President Cheney talks about liability reform and tort reform and the president talks about having a trial lawyer on the ticket?</p>
<p>(C) I will talk to you about health care, Mr. Vice President. You have two minutes. But in particular, I want to talk to you about AIDS, and not about AIDS in China or Africa, but AIDS right here in this country, where black women between the ages of 25 and 44 are 13 times more likely to die of the disease than their counterparts. What should the government's role be in helping to end the growth of this epidemic?</p>
<p>(E) Ten men and women have been nominees of their parties since 1976 to be vice president. Out of those ten, you have the least governmental experience of any of them. What qualifies you to be a heartbeat away?</p>
<p>(C) Mr. Vice President, picking up on that, you both just sang the praises of the tops of your ticket. Without mentioning them by name at all, explain to us why you are different from your opponent.</p>
<p>(E) Flip-flopping has become a recurring theme in this campaign, you may have noticed. Senator Kerry changed his mind about whether to vote to authorize the president to go to war. President Bush changed his mind about whether a homeland security department was a good idea or a 9/11 Commission was a good idea. What's wrong with a little flip-flop every now and then?</p>
<p>(C) Whichever one of you is elected in November -- you mentioned those three electoral votes in Wyoming and how critical they've turned out to be. But what they're a sign of also is that you're going to inherit a very deeply divided electorate, economically, politically, you name it. How will you set out, Mr. Vice President, in a way that you weren't able to in these past four years, to bridge that divide?</p>
<p>Body<br />The following are the 20 questions asked by Ifill in the 2004 VP debate:</p>
<p>(C) Vice President Cheney, there have been new developments in Iraq, especially having to do with the administration's handling. Paul Bremer, the former head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, gave a speech in which he said that we have never had enough troops on the ground, or we've never had enough troops on the ground. Donald Rumsfeld said he has not seen any hard evidence of a link between Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein. Was this approved -- of a report that you requested that you received a week ago that showed there was no connection between Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Saddam Hussein?</p>
<p>(E) You and Senator Kerry have said that the war in Iraq is the wrong war at the wrong time. Does that mean that if you had been president and vice president that Saddam Hussein would still be in power?</p>
<p>(C) Tonight we mentioned Afghanistan. We believe that Osama bin Laden is hiding perhaps in a cave somewhere along the Afghan-Pakistan border. If you get a second term, what is your plan to capture him and then to neutralize those who have sprung up to replace him?</p>
<p>(E) Senator Kerry said, "You've got to do" -- you know, he was asked about preemptive action at the last debate -- he said, "You've got to do it in a way that passes the test, that passes the global test where your countrymen, your people understand fully why you're doing what you're doing and can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons." What is a global test if it's not a global veto?</p>
<p>(C) When the president says that Senator Kerry is emboldening enemies and you say that we could get hit again if voters make the wrong choice in November, are you saying that it would be a dangerous thing to have John Kerry as president?</p>
<p>(E) Part of what you have said and Senator Kerry has said that you are going to do in order to get us out of the problems in Iraq is to internationalize the effort.&nbsp; Yet French and German officials have both said they have no intention even if John Kerry is elected of sending any troops into Iraq for any peacekeeping effort. Does that make your effort or your plan to internationalize this effort seem kind of naive?</p>
<p>(E) If this report that we've read about today is true, and if Vice President Cheney ordered it and asked about this, do you think that, in the future, that your administration or the Bush administration would have sufficient and accurate enough intelligence to be able to make decisions about where to go next?</p>
<p>(C) Mr. Vice President, in June of 2000 when you were still CEO of Halliburton, you said that U.S. businesses should be allowed to do business with Iran because, quote, "Unilateral sanctions almost never work."&nbsp; After four years as vice president now, and with Iran having been declared by your administration as part of the "Axis of Evil," do you still believe that we should lift sanctions on Iran?</p>
<p>(E) Senator Edwards, as we wrap up the foreign policy part of this, I do want to talk to you about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Today, a senior member of Islamic Jihad was killed in Gaza. There have been suicide bombings, targeted assassinations, mortar attacks, all of this continuing at a time when the United States seems absent in the peace-making process. What would your administration do?&nbsp; First of all, do you agree that the United States is absent? Maybe you don't. But what would your administration do to try to resolve that conflict?</p>
<p>-----</p>
<p>(C) In that case, we'll move on to domestic matters. Mr. Vice President, the Census Bureau ranked Cleveland as the biggest poor city in the country, 31 percent jobless rate. You two gentlemen are pretty well off. You did well for yourselves in the private sector. What can you tell the people of Cleveland, or people of cities like Cleveland, that your administration will do to better their lives?</p>
<p>(E) Senator Kerry said in a recent interview that he absolutely will not raise taxes on anyone under -- who earns under $200,000 a year. How can he guarantee that and also cut the deficit in half, as he's promised?</p>
<p>(C) I want to read something you said four years ago at this very setting: "Freedom means freedom for everybody." You said it again recently when you were asked about legalizing same-sex unions. And you used your family's experience as a context for your remarks.&nbsp; Can you describe then your administration's support for a constitutional ban on same-sex unions?</p>
<p>(E) As the vice president mentioned, John Kerry comes from the state of Massachusetts, which has taken as big a step as any state in the union to legalize gay marriage. Yet both you and Senator Kerry say you oppose it. Are you trying to have it both ways?</p>
<p>(C) President Bush has derided in John Kerry for putting a trial lawyer on the ticket. You yourself have said that lawsuits are partly to blame for higher medical costs. Are you willing to say that John Edwards, sitting here, has been part of the problem?</p>
<p>(E) Do you feel personally attacked when Vice President Cheney talks about liability reform and tort reform and the president talks about having a trial lawyer on the ticket?</p>
<p>(C) I will talk to you about health care, Mr. Vice President. You have two minutes. But in particular, I want to talk to you about AIDS, and not about AIDS in China or Africa, but AIDS right here in this country, where black women between the ages of 25 and 44 are 13 times more likely to die of the disease than their counterparts. What should the government's role be in helping to end the growth of this epidemic?</p>
<p>(E) Ten men and women have been nominees of their parties since 1976 to be vice president. Out of those ten, you have the least governmental experience of any of them. What qualifies you to be a heartbeat away?</p>
<p>(C) Mr. Vice President, picking up on that, you both just sang the praises of the tops of your ticket. Without mentioning them by name at all, explain to us why you are different from your opponent.</p>
<p>(E) Flip-flopping has become a recurring theme in this campaign, you may have noticed. Senator Kerry changed his mind about whether to vote to authorize the president to go to war. President Bush changed his mind about whether a homeland security department was a good idea or a 9/11 Commission was a good idea. What's wrong with a little flip-flop every now and then?</p>
<p>(C) Whichever one of you is elected in November -- you mentioned those three electoral votes in Wyoming and how critical they've turned out to be. But what they're a sign of also is that you're going to inherit a very deeply divided electorate, economically, politically, you name it. How will you set out, Mr. Vice President, in a way that you weren't able to in these past four years, to bridge that divide?<br /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Bailout</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/bailout-1.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.220344</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-27T21:58:51Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-27T21:58:51Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Republicans understand that words matter, which is somewhat ironic considering how regularly Bush butchers the English language.&nbsp; But words made it possible for republicans to finally gain public support for the death tax after repeated unsuccessful attempts at trying to...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Republicans understand that words matter, which is somewhat ironic considering how regularly Bush butchers the English language.&nbsp; But words made it possible for republicans to finally gain public support for the death tax after repeated unsuccessful attempts at trying to pass the same bill under the name of the estate tax.&nbsp; It is why republicans refuse to say global warming, adopting instead the less threatening climate change.&nbsp; It is why republicans refused to speak of undocumented immigrants, choosing instead the more emotionally-tinged illegal immigrants. Winning the battle of words oftentimes means winning the war in public perception.&nbsp; It is how we have the Clear Skies initiative which weakens environmental protections.&nbsp; And No Child Left Behind which does little to address education.&nbsp; And a slew of other ridiculously named republican policies.</p>
<p>So it comes as a surprise that when what is deemed the biggest financial crisis since the the Great Depression, the Bush administration rolls out Henry Paulson's proposal which they originally called the Troubled Asset Rescue Plan.&nbsp; Frank Luntz must have cringed when he heard this.&nbsp; It's little wonder that the proposal was quickly referred to as the Bailout plan.&nbsp; Granted, a bailout aptly describes the situation, but describing a bill for what it is goes against the Bush adminstration and republican history.&nbsp; Where was the Bush sales and marketing team on this one? </p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The Clock is Ticking on Sarah Palin</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/the-clock-is-ticking-on-sarah.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.212849</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-03T17:29:51Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-03T17:29:51Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[The GOP is fond of clocks. &nbsp;Earlier this year there was a clock on FOX News that calculated the days, hours and minutes that Barack Obama had not come to FOX to be interviewed.&nbsp;&nbsp;Currently on the RNC website, there is...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[The GOP is fond of clocks. &nbsp;Earlier this year there was a clock on FOX News that calculated the days, hours and minutes that Barack Obama had not come to FOX to be interviewed.&nbsp;&nbsp;Currently on the RNC website, there is a clock ticking as they count the hours "Since Biden's Last Gaffe". &nbsp; 
<p>Perhaps we should give them a good dose of their own medicine and start counting the minutes since Sarah Palin last granted an interview. &nbsp;We can start asking the question, what is Sarah Palin hiding? &nbsp;Why wont Palin answer the questions that the American people deserve? &nbsp;Why is McCain hiding his VP pick? <br /><br /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>It is a promise we make to our children...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/it-is-a-promise-we-make-to-our.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.212344</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-02T10:47:56Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-02T10:47:56Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I was watching as Barack Obama was addressing the media about the hurricane, and then he opened up for questions. The first question asked was about Palin&apos;s daughter. Obama was crystal clear in his answer, repeating that familes are off...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I was watching as Barack Obama was addressing the media about the hurricane, and then he opened up for questions. The first question asked was about Palin's daughter. Obama was crystal clear in his answer, repeating that familes are off limits, and he showed empathy for the Palin family as well. And when he said that if anyone in his campaign were ever involved in something like this they would be fired, it not only revealed a very serious side of Obama, but it showed how serious he was about this issue.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LZsj6eD4Es">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LZsj6eD4Es</a><br /><br />I was then reminded of this:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkO_8btMs_o">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkO_8btMs_o</a><br /><br /><strong>It is a promise we make to our children...</strong><br />&lt;blockquote&gt;...<br />The only time I ever saw my mother really angry was when she saw cruelty, when she saw somebody being bullied or somebody being treated differently because of who they were. And if she saw me doing that, she would be furious. And she would say to me, imagine standing in that person's shoes. How would that make you feel?</p>
<p>That simple idea I'm not sure I always understood when I was a kid, but it stayed with me.<br />...&lt;/blockquote&gt;<br /><br />There have been times during the long campaign when I have felt sad that Barack can't share all of this with his mother, and that she cannot be here to share it with him. How proud she would be. Although she is no longer with us, I have no doubt that she lives on in her son.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Gaffe Machine</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/gaffe-machine.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.209889</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-23T08:44:41Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-23T08:44:41Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Joe Biden is a Gaffe Machine.&nbsp; I've heard&nbsp;this from the 24hour news culture more than once.&nbsp; And I've heard the McCain campaign repeat it as well. Gaffe machine?&nbsp; Really?&nbsp; Has anyone in the media been paying attention to the clown...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[Joe Biden is a Gaffe Machine.&nbsp; I've heard&nbsp;this from the 24hour news culture more than once.&nbsp; And I've heard the McCain campaign repeat it as well.<br /><br />
<p>Gaffe machine?&nbsp; Really?&nbsp; Has anyone in the media been paying attention to the clown that has occupied the White House for the past eight years?<br /><br /></p>
<p>Has anyone in media been watching as John McCain&nbsp;lays a golden gaffe on a daily basis throughout this campaign?<br /><br />For McCain to call anyone a gaffe machine is well beyond the pot calling the kettle black.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Republicans for Obama</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/republicans-for-obama.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.209375</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-20T21:28:48Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-20T21:28:48Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Last night on Hardball, two influential republicans and leaders of &quot;Republicans for Obama&quot; made a thoughtful case as to why they and many other traditional republicans are supporting Obama. Not only do they support Obama and a new direction of...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Last night on Hardball, two influential republicans and leaders of "Republicans for Obama" made a thoughtful case as to why they and many other traditional republicans are supporting Obama. Not only do they support Obama and a new direction of change, but they are vehemently opposed to McCain, who they see as Bush III.</p>
<p>It's worth a view:<br /><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/26300609#26300609">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/26300609#26300609</a></p>
<p>We need to get Republicans for Obama much more air-time. Get them on the news-shows and put them in ads. They have the ability to reach other republicans and independents.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.republicansforobama.org/">http://www.republicansforobama.org/</a></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Obama/Gore08</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/obamagore08.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.208858</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-18T10:21:11Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-18T10:21:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Everyone is making their arguments as to who Barack Obama should choose as his VP candidate.&nbsp; Here's mine:Al Gore would be an excellent VP choice for a number of reasons.&nbsp;&nbsp;First of all, he&nbsp;would certainly excite the base, and you just...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[Everyone is making their arguments as to who Barack Obama should choose as his VP candidate.&nbsp; Here's mine:<br /><br />Al Gore would be an excellent VP choice for a number of reasons.&nbsp;&nbsp;First of all, he&nbsp;would certainly excite the base, and you just know the democrats in Florida would flock to the polls to make sure their vote was recorded this time. 
<p>It also helps that Gore was right on the issue of the war, and he has become the face of global warming. &nbsp;Who better to be a spokesperson to refute the McCain drill-drill-mentality than Al Gore? &nbsp;Gore also represents a time of American economic prosperity without all the Clinton baggage. &nbsp;In Gore, there's foreign policy experience beyond anything McCain offers.&nbsp;&nbsp;Gore provides considerable knowledge on energy, global warming, defense, the economy and technology issues.&nbsp;
<p>Some might ask why Gore would want to get into the political ring again, but I think it's safe to say that being VP in 2008 with Barack Obama would certainly be different than being VP a decade ago with Bill Clinton. &nbsp;Gore would viewed as the wise sage and a valued partner with Obama. 
<p>Admit it. &nbsp;Just the thought of an Obama/Gore ticket excites you.<br /></p></p></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The Pro-Life Campaign</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/the-prolife-campaign.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.208812</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-17T08:04:47Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-17T08:04:47Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Republicans have been promising to do away with abortion for decades, yet what have they done? George Bush and republicans held the White House, both houses of congress and the majority of Supreme Court from January 2000 to November 2006,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[Republicans have been promising to do away with abortion for decades, yet what have they done? George Bush and republicans held the White House, both houses of congress and the majority of Supreme Court from January 2000 to November 2006, yet what great changes did they make to lower abortions in this country? Despite all the GOP promises, abortion rates have not declined in the past eight years. <br /><br />Instead of playing politics with abortion, what if there was a way where we could ensure a dramatic decrease in abortions? <br /><br />Do you think if healthcare was available to all Americans that it might decrease abortions?<br /><br />Do you think providing economic assistance to women to carry babies to term could actually reduce the number of abortions?<br /><br />Do you think passing laws to ensure that women receive equal pay as men would lower the abortion rate or increase the abortion rate?<br /><br />Do you think there's a possibility that in providing middle class families with tax breaks rather than tax breaks for the wealthy that it might have a slight impact on the abortion rate?<br /><br />Do you think that making education a priority and making college affordable to all Americans might have a positive impact in decreasing the abortion rate?<br /><br />Do you think that offering incentives and tax breaks to companies to remain in the States rather than providing tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas might help our economy and in turn, lower the abortion rate?<br /><br />Do you think investing in after-school programs and childcare services might have a positive impact in reducing abortions?<br /><br />We could go on and on. But the point is, if you're truly serious about saving the lives of the unborn, then we must get past the rhetoric of the culture wars that has done nothing but divide us as a nation. There are viable solutions that Barack Obama and the democratic party are offering that will in fact help dramatically reduce the abortion rate as we know it. I encourage you to contrast and compare the ideas and proposals being offered by Democrats and those being offered by Republicans. Then ask yourself, which party truly is pro-life? <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Obama/Bayh v McCain/Romney</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/obamabayh-v-mccainromney.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.207080</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-05T12:16:19Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-05T12:16:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Bill Browning predicted yesterday that Barack Obama will announce his VP choice on Wednesday.&nbsp; It will be, according to Browning, Evan Bayh.Browning makes a good argument why Bayh will be chosen on Wednesday.&nbsp; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bil-browning/obama-will-name-bayh-his_b_116752.htmlIf Browning's prediction is true, then I...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Kaneblues</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kaneblues/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Bill Browning predicted yesterday that Barack Obama will announce his VP choice on Wednesday.&nbsp; It will be, according to Browning, Evan Bayh.<br /><br />Browning makes a good argument why Bayh will be chosen on Wednesday.&nbsp; <br /><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bil-browning/obama-will-name-bayh-his_b_116752.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bil-browning/obama-will-name-bayh-his_b_116752.html</a><br /><br />If Browning's prediction is true, then I predict that McCain will announce his VP choice on Thursday.</p>
<p>It will be Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>Here's my reasoning:</p>
<p>1. McCain has been paranoid about any media attention that Obama receives, thus not to be outdone he will once again follow Obama's lead.</p>
<p>2.&nbsp; McCain and his campaign have decided that their only winning strategy is to go negative.&nbsp; Surprisingly, some republicans have shown that they don't have the stomach to follow on McCain's bogus attacks on Obama.&nbsp; Romney on the other hand has shown to have no problem with following this line of attack, as he lacks any amount of character.<br /><br /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
