« Who's Zoomin' Who On This Myth of the 60 Vote Threshold? | SleepinJeezus's Blog | Where's the outrage? An anthem for the working class »

Viral Demagoguery Informs CNN "News" Story About Gitmo Vaccines


It seems CNN and Anderson Cooper's AC360 are in the tank and falling further behind in the ratings wars. It further seems that this has presented reason for the "Cable News Network" to emulate Fox News in a desire to manufacture controversy and report it as news rather than simply report on events as they are presented. How else to explain the decision to run with their story headlined H1N1 Vaccines to be Offered to Guantanamo Bay Detainees.

To their credit, CNN does not invent facts in this instance to create a controversy out of whole cloth such as Fox Noose has done on issues ranging from Death Panels to Liz Cheney's credibility as a national security expert. Nevertheless, they have diligently whipped up the emotional "I hate Arabs and other terrorists" crowd by reporting this Dog-Bites-Man story as a newsworthy item and then use it as bait for the usual demagogues to construe it as a controversial attack on American sensibilities.

First the facts as reported in the article:

1.) "The Pentagon will offer the H1N1 vaccination to detainees at the U.S. facility at Guantanamo Bay, officials there said Friday."
2,) "...the decision (is) based on U.S. government assessments that people held in detention facilities are at high risk for the pandemic"
3.) "Base officials had not received the vaccinations and did not know when they were expected to arrive"

End of story.

Pretty unremarkable stuff, no? One would expect that we provide detainees with standard medical care such as flu vaccinations in keeping with our commitment to the Geneva Conventions (if not out of simple belief in humanitarian principles). And, as the article points out, Guantanamo is waiting for its delivery of the vaccine just like virtually every other health care outlet in the country.

But then CNN takes the story a bit further and includes comment from an intellectually challenged demagogue (Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan), who reacts predictably with a dehumanizing swipe at the detainees and a tour through some kind of parallel universe that haunts his grasp on reality.

"As long as Americans must wait to receive the vaccine, the detainees in Guantanamo Bay should not be given preferential treatment to receive the H1N1 vaccination," Stupak said in a letter to Secretary of the Army John McHugh. "Until this shortage is addressed, I urge Pentagon officials to reconsider this decision to vaccinate terrorist detainees ahead of Americans who are waiting."

The real story here is that an elected Congressional Representative would be so quick to pander to the "I hate Arabs and other terrorists" crowd as to totally misread a simple news account about providing unexceptional medical care to prisoners in our keeping.

But you'll find none of that in the CNN article.

Indeed, on the Friday edition of AC360 John King interviewed Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) about the health care debate, and just couldn't resist baiting him with an opening question about the "controversial decision" to provide vaccinations to Gitmo prisoners. On cue, the mad dog teabagger Republican foamed at the mouth in outrage over this manufactured travesty wherein Gitmo prisoners are supposedly being given preferential treatment over the rest of us Americans who just hate what Obama is doing to this country.

King was satisfied with the response for its "newsworthiness," and so offered no correction to the abhorrent misrepresentation of the facts of this story. Having raised the issue as a legitimate controversy of his own making, I suppose it would have been difficult for King to ask in follow-up "Excuse me, Mr. Pence, but where have you seen it reported that the detainees were to be given the vaccine ahead of anyone else now waiting for it to be delivered?"

If they wish to present themselves as a legitimate news outlet, CNN has a responsibility to point out any facts that get in the way of a good story. Indeed, in this case it is incumbent upon a journalist to actually point out the way in which a non-controversial action undertaken by the government is being manipulated by demagogues to spread fear and resentment among the populace.

CNN has instead chosen to become a willing tool of the hate-mongering demagogues as a rather transparent means to boost their ratings. It is Lou Dobbs gone viral, and there is no vaccine that will protect us from the diseased "journalism" at CNN that now competes with Fox to appeal to our basest fears, prejudices, intolerance, and tribalism as a means by which they can capture and hold our attention.

My wish for Fox and now CNN is a pox on both their houses, because the pandemic they otherwise invite with their diseased "journalism" leads directly to fascism as the only way in which to protect us from "the other" they so willfully vilify. And THAT'S a developing news story they are incapable of reporting for reason that they've already surrendered journalistic integrity for the reward of higher ratings in an entertainment medium.

Hatred. Intolerance. Fear. Anger. Demagoguery. Tribalism.

CNN will be there to report it as it happens.

Pictures at Eleven.


13 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

It's early here, and your story just made my stomach hurt, Jeezus.

'Hatred. Intolerance. Fear. Anger. Demagoguery. Tribalism.'

Those who are so quick to suck in the HIFADT are ever so troubling; but those who promulgate the manufactured narratives for profit are nefarious bastards. How do they sleep at night, we ask?
--Quite well, is the answer. They do not have consciences.

user-pic

A neo-con with a conscience would be a rare bird, indeed. You simply cannot screw things up so completely at cost of hundreds of thousands of lives and suffer any pangs of guilt. Instead, you simply pretend it really doesn't matter or you invent an alternative reality wherein you can be installed as a hero.

What I find especially troubling about any of these "Gitmo Tales for Demagogues" is the way in which the focus always seems to be upon Khalid Sheik Mohammed and not upon the Uighurs or other innocents who are so wrongfully held in permanent custody.

I guess it's a case of having found themselves kidnapped and "renditioned" to Gitmo, these otherwise innocent people are now guilty by association.

Real heroes, these neo-cons such as Kristol and the Cheneys. There simply isn't any principle they won't sacrifice in the name of national security.

user-pic

Gee whiz....and libruls are always being accused of knee-jerk responses. Methinks pots and kettles are having a conversation.

This is from Stupak's website: http://www.house.gov/apps/list/speech/mi01_stupak/morenews/20091029vaccine.html

He is my rep and I mentioned elsewhere this week that he is a moderate dem in a solid red district. It's almost like he can't help saying stuff like he did if he want's any hope of being re-elected in 2010. And really, I'd have a problem voting for him myself if he wasn't so good with environmental issues. We shall see, though.

Good post, Sleepin. Wrecked.

user-pic

From ProgressivePunch.org

Stupak, Bart D MI-1 from a district they rate as leaning Republican, in the last session voted 71.66% of the time with progressives on crucial cotes, his lifetime score on crucial votes is 57.14, on votes in general in the last session he has voted with the progressives 81.28% of the time and has a life time score o general votes of 91.69.

You can go to their site and check out what the specific votes were about.

user-pic

I'm guessing that the progressive credentials listed here are intended to excuse Stupak's stupidity in this instance.

I think otherwise.

If he is truly progressive, he knows better than to pander to the intolerance and ignorance of those who would share his degree of alarm over this manufactured controversy. And he needs to be called out for his demagoguery, regardless of his status as a supposedly progressive Democrat.

user-pic

Decisions to vaccinate need to be made on epidemiological, not political, grounds. End of story.

user-pic

Or, failing to have an ethical sense, on the basis of self-interest: Can you imagine the uproar in the Moslem world if prisoners in Guantanamo started dying of swine flu?

user-pic

To amplify, after a bit more thought:

I got slammed for recommending, in a local paper's comment section, that the vaccinations be administered to kids (especially day care kids), day care workers, and first responders first, because they are the primary vectors for contagion. Of course, the "me-firsters" went ballistic. How little they know...

user-pic

Thanks, Grouch. I know you share my inability to identify with those who are so extremely self-centered. My definition of civic responsibility, taught early on by some pretty progressive nuns, simply won't accommodate such selfish disregard for others.

user-pic

Oh, and by the way....

Go Packers!

user-pic

So you know, SJ - and since I was taught by Jesuits, how interestingly coincidental - my two favorite teams in the NFL (though I'm really not much of a football fan in any meaningful sense) are (1) Whoever is playing the Vikings, and (2) Whoever is playing the Packers.

I'm hoping it ends in a tie.

user-pic

I have had two of my loved-ones assigned to care for the prisoners at Gitmo. It is my hope that "every" person, prisoner or staff, be inoculated. I was on a light cruiser that was hit by a virus in the Mediterranean. Within 24 hours, 1\3 of 1000 sailors were not fit for duty. The ship was quarantined from any ports while extra medical personnel, medical supplies and pallets of toilet paper were airlifted to us. Personnel in confined spaces, no matter what their religious beliefs may be, are extremely susceptible to rapidly spreading infectious diseases. The fact that the inoculation was even addressed is indicative of just how pathetic our MSM has become.

user-pic

It is funny how a particular story will gripe me. And maybe there is something else going on and I let it go.

See, you take the particular and simply parse it. King pisses me off like this all the time. And unless you parse the particular, you really cannot grab him by the nape of the neck and shake him.

Slippery.

THEY DO THIS ALL THE TIME.

They being MSM. Scarborough does it in the morning on the so-called liberal network all the time.

You caught them Sleepin, and what pisses me off is that there is a snowball's chance in hell that some larger web page would get into this 'incidence' of pandering.

Leave a comment

SleepinJeezus

user-pic

Following: 102
Followers: 51

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Junction of Principles and Opinions, somewhere in Wisconsin
  • Party Democrat
  • Politics Progressive Liberal - Clarence Darrow; Bob LaFollette; Saul Alinsky; FDR New Deal; Henry Wallace; James Groppi; Catonsville 9; Harold Washington; Tip O'Neill; Ann Richards; Studs Terkel; Molly Ivins; Mahatma Ghandi; Mother Jones

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs www.fightingbob.com
  • Favorite Books The Jungle - Sinclair; Grapes of Wrath - Steinbeck; Reveille for Radicals - Alinsky; Darrow for the Defense - Stone; Trout Fishing in America / Revenge of the Lawn - Brautigan;
  • Favorite Quotes

    "Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?" - Old Irish saying

    "Just because that Union Driver is making more money than you doesn't necessarily mean he's overpaid." - My Father, a tavernkeeper, responding to a customer's complaint about a fellow tradesman.

    We Can Be Together - Jefferson Airplane

    Misery's the river of the world - everybody row! Tom Waits

    "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him." Jonathan Swift

Bio

I slept with the lions

and Marilyn Monroe

had breakfast in the eye

of a hurricane

fought Rocky Marciano,

played Minnesota Fats

burned hundred-dollar bills,

I've eaten Mulligan stew

got drunk with Louis Armstrong

what's that old song?

I taught Mickey Mantle

everything that he knows

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address