This user has not started their blog yet!
- Re: the government ... already has the systems in place (thanks to Medicare) The public plan would not simply be
- Re: Because we cannot just walk away from our commitments, and cannot EVER return to the pre-WWI , isolationist days
- Re: Universal health care has not even been defined yet and some say it will cost $1.5 trillion over ten
- The comment above should conclude with: "Why shouldn't all of us pay something toward that goal? "
- Re: In return they will receive nothing. I don't call universal healthcare (meaning you will never be uninsured) "nothing". And
- Re: The wealthy apparently have to contribute nothing at all. ??? Granted nothing's firm yet, but the only ideas I
- Re: No factories move HERE, you'll notice. This is not true. Several foreign car manufacturers (for an example), both German
- Re: Secondly, universal health care is going to cost money - a lot of money. Why? I mean, why would
- I was one of those dillusioned independents in 1994, though I would use the word "disgusted" instead-- disgusted that the
- Re: Every single other developed country has what you term as a "unicorn." This is not true. Single-payer systems are
- Re: But, truth be told, I am paying them to do this Are you paying them for their time or
- Re: In the past, the decline of the hegemon and the rise of competing powers, coupled with a scramble for
- The weak link I see in this analysis is what is so attractive about the GOP to married people as
- Re: So how do we allow private insurance to stay competitive when it can only rely on voluntary customers for
- Re: Add to his arguement the sheer size of the collapse of the derivitives market, some $500-$700 TRILLION Money that
