Prez to Bibi: "I will shoot your shit right out of the sky"++BREZINSKI:go up and confront them
Prez knows that only under the whip will Bibi curb his zeal for showing Achmadinajad what a holocaust really looks like. Therefor, Bibi needs to internalize the truth that Prez is serious about forbidding a bomb run and will prevent disobedience.
Watch for the video clip where he leans over Bibi’s ear for 30 seconds, and watch for the color to drain from Bibi’s face.
That will tell us that the message is delivered.
“We will not permit an attack on Iran, and we will interpose our Air Force to stop it.”
Anything short of that level of clarity will foreshadow the hypocritical quest for deniability after the fact.
Update: My post was unencumbered by actual research—in fact Prez has already indicated his disinclination to tolerate a “surprise”.
The way to avoid unpleasant facts on the ground, is to reliably promise to create facts in the air…
Update Two: Me and Zbig—brothers under the skin (who knew??) Zbig says: “We’re no pussies…”
I love that phrase!
But...
The chance the US could intercept Israeli aircraft on the way to Iran is zero, and Obama is about as serious as a burp.
September 25, 2009 5:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
You have seen a map of the Middle East, right?
I am, shall we say, extremely dubious about Mr. Roger's claim, but please explain how you imagine the jets will get from Israel to Iran?
September 25, 2009 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
extremely dubious
I live in hope...I was attempting, perhaps in an excessively colorful fashion, to suggest the forcfulness with which I hope Prez will approach the subject.
Per contra anything short of this will be tacit complicity.
September 25, 2009 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would somebody please teach Karl how to google, assuming for a moment that he's teachable!
From 2007...
And hundreds of other sources likewise.
September 25, 2009 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
well, of course, in my scenario. (as someone mentioned upthread the actual agency is flatops) those top gun guys scramble from persian gulf locations and shoot down the bombers over turkey.
September 26, 2009 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Public chatter follows one course, and munitions follow another. The United States will be "shocked, shocked" if Israel attacks Iran, but meanwhile we have already provided exactly the right munitions in the form of GBU-39s, one fourth the weight and twice the penetrating power of standard bunker-busters, and just exactly right for delivery to Iran on an F-15I.
Israel can fly the F-15I at night right down on the deck all the way to Iran, and nobody can stop them on the way. With a payload of 8 GBU-39s, they can hollow out a small mountain, and those very, very accurate little monsters will walk right through a door for you, one after another.
September 26, 2009 4:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
You are seriously of the opinion that Israeli planes can fly undetected by the U.S. through Turkey, Iraq or Saudi-Arabia (and back)?
With very little respect, you should probably hold off your Google-based "analysis."
Yeah, Turkey could not stop them. Nor could the Saudis, and Iraq does not really have an air force or air defences of its own. But the U.S. can, if needed. Israel can only operate as it has with tacit approval of the U.S.
September 26, 2009 5:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh! I see now...they will fly at NIGHT! That solves everything, cause it is dark! You cannot see them in the dark! Wow, how come I did not think of that...
September 26, 2009 5:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for blowing a few more groundless opinions out your ass, with no references whatsoever, you simple-minded schmuck!
September 26, 2009 7:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Karl the Marxist" that stupid, dishonest clown, pretends to know it's silly to talk about bombing runs at night in the Middle East.
Isn't that right, "Karl the Marxist?"
Why would anyone, especially Israel, ever conduct a bombing run at night?
It's senseless!
Right, "Karl," you ignorant clown?
Except that's exactly when Israel conducted its "trial run" for a strike against Iran, way back in September 2007, when they took out a (supposed) Syrian nuclear site in the middle of the night.
But of course "Karl the Marxist" wouldn't know that, because he has no real interest in the Middle East whatsoever, and just shoots off his stupid mouth based on nothing.
So why did the Israelis fly that mission at night, "Karl," you stupid dishonest clown?
There's a very simple explanation, which would immediately occur to anyone who has ever approached within 500 miles of a war-zone, but "Karl the Marxist" couldn't figure it out if somebody held a gun to his pointy little head.
September 26, 2009 8:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your mix of arrogance and utter cluelessness is hilarious.
Syria (which neighbours Israel, as opposed to being an entire air-patrolled nation away) does have weaker air defences. Flying at night will help.
It will not help - enough - against the United States. Israel can surely bomb Syria all it wants if the U.S. approves, that is not the question.
So, tell me, master of all things war (that you can haphazardly Google without actually understanding it), how do you propose Israeli jets will get to Iran undetected by the U.S., if an order were given to monitor for and engage such incursions?
Your options are Turkey, Iraq and Saudi-Arabia. And do you happen to know, for example, where U.S. carrier groups are located?
September 26, 2009 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Israel can fly the F-15I at night right down on the deck all the way to Iran, and nobody can stop them on the way
General "Buck" Turgidson: If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low... oh you oughta see it sometime. It's a sight. A big plane like a '52... varrrooom! Its jet exhaust... frying chickens in the barnyard!
C'mon Root--try and convince me you weren't consciously channeling George C Scott...
September 26, 2009 7:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Always.
September 26, 2009 7:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Meanwhile the Iranian Air Force lost its only AWACS last Tuesday in a stupid mid-air collision at an airshow...
...and...
...wait for it...
...the wreckage of both planes...
...fell directly upon...
...the tomb of...
Ayatollah Khomeini!
Harharharhar!!!
The Iranians are doomed!
September 26, 2009 8:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
the wreckage of both planes...
...fell directly upon...
...the tomb of...
I've got a bad feeling about this....
September 26, 2009 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ruta exaggerates. It landed near his grave, not on it. Shit happens but this was the last of the three old Russian IL-76's they had flying. Chances are the Iranians probably have that ground based radar the Ukrainians supposedly built and sold to Saddam for $30,000 a pop that can even lock on a F-117 or a B-2. Wolfy was reportedly very upset with the Ukies and threatening them over that and a portable JDAM jammer just before the invasion in 2003. We missed Saddam every single time we targeted him with those things from day one of the war. Whose to say it was just bad intel?
AWACs are useful if you want to control your enemy's airspace. Iran doesn't really need them over their own territory. But what the hell, for the right price Cheney would find a way to get them one. Like Milo Minderbender he's a man who understands the necessity of a balance of power.
September 27, 2009 1:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love that phrase
Props to Melvin Van Peebles
September 25, 2009 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I am serious as a heart attack."
Look at the right wing position on healthcare... I am thinking that Likudniks and neoconservatives wouldn't take heart attacks seriously.
September 25, 2009 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, this is never going to happen.
September 25, 2009 7:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
this is never going to happen
I fear that you are correct, which means that Bibi is gonna do a "Thelma and Louise", right off of the cliff...
September 25, 2009 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
And can I have one of these too...?
September 25, 2009 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
What? You want a big horse cock?
Sorry, Obey. I know how I got mine, but I'm not sure they're handing out any more.
{He shooots.... He SCORRRRRRRRRRRES!!!!! Rooooaaaaaarrrrr Rooooaaaaaarrrrr!!!!! The fans go wild....}
September 25, 2009 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
ACK! ROTFLOLMAO!
September 25, 2009 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
What you need is a photo editor, Obey.
September 25, 2009 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I was going to go with this pic, but then I thought that might raise other worries about my interest in ponies. Oh well. Better just stay away from pony-arguments altogether... DAMM YOU Q!!!
;0)
September 25, 2009 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
That dude's gotta be from South Carolina.
September 25, 2009 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
She is cute.
September 25, 2009 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.newshounds.us/2005/05/06/bizarre_sex_habits_of_the_extreme_rightwing.php
anti-abortion extremist Neal Horsley was a guest on The Alan Colmes Show, a FOX News radio program. The topic was an interesting one - whether or not an internet service provider should allow Horsley to post the names of abortion doctors on his website. Horsley does that as a way of targeting them and one doctor has been killed. In the course of the interview, however, Colmes asked Horsley about his background, including a statement that he had admitted to engaging in homosexual and bestiality sex.
At first, Horsley laughed and said, "Just because it's printed in the media, people jump to believe it."
"Is it true?" Colmes asked.
"Hey, Alan, if you want to accuse me of having sex when I was a fool, I did everything that crossed my mind that looked like I..."
AC: "You had sex with animals?"
NH: "Absolutely. I was a fool. When you grow up on a farm in Georgia, your first girlfriend is a mule."
AC: "I'm not so sure that that is so."
NH: "You didn't grow up on a farm in Georgia, did you?"
AC: "Are you suggesting that everybody who grows up on a farm in Georgia has a mule as a girlfriend?"
NH: It has historically been the case. You people are so far removed from the reality... Welcome to domestic life on the farm..."
September 25, 2009 7:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was raised on a farm, glad we didn't have mule.
September 25, 2009 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe it was an Isaac Bashevis Singer story, (or maybe not), anyway, a man can be pious, give to charity, not beat his wife, but let him one time fuck a goat, and from then on, always, it's "there goes chaim yonkel-the-goat-fucker..."
September 25, 2009 8:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
You see, THIS is why there'll never be peace in the Middle East.
We started off with Obey wanting a horse's cock. There was no doubt about it. No confusion. He put up a picture of a horse... splayed on its back and showing... its cock. He then spoke plainly about it. "I, Obey," (quoth he of the lesser nether regions) "want one of these."
A simple enough request, you'd think. Many men don't have horse's cocks, while only a few do. You might think people would at least recognize Obey's honesty. Here is a man (yeah, still a full man, albeit provisioned with less than a full hamper for a long day's journey), who has shown... dare I say it? Of course I dare. Courage. He's shown COURAGE. Which one might think would be doubly admired in one but halfly gifted.
But, no. Not. Good. Enough. Not for you Middle Eastern political talkers.
First comes the treacherous Oceankat. Who, with a flick of the wrist, suggests a horse is (of course)... a mule. And so, Secretariat... becomes Francis. California? Pretty much... Arkansas West. And Jerusalem? So many toppled rocks, on (any other) desert hilltop. Why certainly, Oceankat. Thanks very much. My people will LOVE this pile of rubble, here on this anonymous scorched hilltop.
Which foxish behaviour - unsurpisingly, perhaps - brought out the other ghouls who inhabit these threads. The Kings, the Knights... Nay. Let me speak plainly. The KNAVES, the masters of chicanery and flimflammery and bamboozletry, led by the aptly named "Roger," come not just to shaft Obey (little more than a moment's work for this dark one), but an entire PEOPLE.
Watch as he waves his wand, folks... now turning his back and throwing the (once-secreted) powder into the air above the fire... then finally sweeping his cape as he shouts the magic name... ISAAC.... BASHEVIS... SINGER!
And POOF! That's right, POOF, I tell you! The once plainly-wished-for horse... has been reduced, not just to a talking-mule... but a garden... variety...
... Goat.
Let me ask you, "friend" Roger. If you really believe that this man, this Obey, half-loafed though he is (but still entirely capable of making toast)... should be satisfied.... with your offer.
That's right. YOU, jackal. Who would offer him...
GOAT COCK.
For shame.
September 25, 2009 9:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
GOAT COCK
Fancy a plushie shag then, do ya?
September 25, 2009 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
bamboozletry
five style points for finding yet another alternative to Josh's choice "bamboozement"; I like bamboozilation, bamboozilaniation, or, for the continental, "le bamboozle"
cf, "ridiculousness"--another Josh favorite.
Yes, it's true. His PhD is from Brown, but it's in History, not Creative Writing.
September 25, 2009 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Y'see? And people say my comments never contribute anything of value.
Why thank you, Roger. You're a gentleman, and a Bamboozletron.
September 26, 2009 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, this blog's getting derailed - can we get back on track?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3jsWbVg2lA&feature=related
September 26, 2009 1:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
No post of Roger's would be complete without some sort of discussion of unusual sexuality. The key is.... how to link it to the more narrow discussions of financial policy or the Middle East and such.
I think today's went rather well, thanks to Obey. (Who will never link to a horse picture ever again, needless to say.)
September 26, 2009 2:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
unusual sexuality
Who among us is wise enough to know what is unusual, and what is merely obscured...?
(I hate this fucking interface...)
September 26, 2009 3:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Best. Thread. Diversion. Ever.
September 28, 2009 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know!! It was AWESOME! And I'm sure Roger has already (tastefully) framed it. We had 7 people discussing horse/donkey/goat cocks, all at Obey's expense, with free videos, photos, songs and charming conversation... all of which meshed with the hallucinatory intent of the original post.
Heck of a team effort, I'd say.
September 28, 2009 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
quinn is upset by derailing, until he does it himself. Being an elite means never having to say you are sorry!
September 28, 2009 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're just pissed because Quinn cleans your clock whenever he feels like replying to you.
As does just about everyone else, you pitiful stalker.
September 28, 2009 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well Neo, all I can say is that some of us mammals would do more than just walk a mile for a Camel. hahahahaha
September 29, 2009 3:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. Just...Holy Fuck.
Donkey party anyone?
September 26, 2009 2:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jeebus!
Thank you thank you thank you EEEEEVER so much for keeping this subthread alive, Q.
I fight the good fight against the evil forces of 'moderation', and do they call me Obey the Hero? Fuck they do. I give informed input to policy discussion, and do they call me Obey the Wonk? Fuck they do.
I put up ONE picture of a horse-cock, and...
September 26, 2009 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Admit it man. What you're really waiting to hear is "Obey, the Horse-Cocked Hero." Admit it. A stadium full of adoring fans, shouting that at full volume, well... it'd do the ego a world of good! ;-)
September 26, 2009 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
No I think he wants: "Obey, the Horse-Cocked WONK HERO!"
September 26, 2009 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
With Queen you get astrophysics...
September 27, 2009 3:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
one of these too
With this post, we have a special--You don't get a pony, you get a unicorn
September 25, 2009 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I soo hope this is true...I saw Obama's irritation ...It is time to stop the old failed hawk! The ICC needs to deal with them quickly!
September 25, 2009 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
one of these too
I saw Obama's irritation
Truth to tell,I was pulling the fantasy out of my ass--point me to a visual aide.
September 25, 2009 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would be on par for the idiot in the White House, he previously advocated invading Pakistan, an ally, so attacking Israel would not be out of question for this moron in chief. I doubt if the Air Force would follow his orders, that would cause a real crisis.
September 25, 2009 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gad, but you are stupid.
Obama stated that if he had actionable intelligence on the whereabouts of Bin Laden, he would act. As a matter of fact, haven't there been cross-border incursions and bombings into Pakistan since Obama became President? You don't have to answer that.
And if you think the Air Force would ignore their chain of command, then you are beyond stupid. You would be irredeemably off your nut.
September 25, 2009 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Toothless Chihuahua is indeed off his nut - and more than likely, his meds. In fact, he's an inch from advocating a military coup, which is by any measure treason.
So much for Republican "patriotism", huh?
September 25, 2009 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
by any measure treason
It's only treason if the preznit is white...
September 25, 2009 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I doubt if the Air Force would follow his orders
Hmmm.Interesting, Apparently the IDF has no such qualms when it comes to firing on our shit
September 25, 2009 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's just the ticket. Don't threaten Bibi, just say after the fact, "Those were your bombers? Oh man I'm sorry they looked just like Pakistani F-16s headed for Tel Aviv! Let me tell you something Bibi, don't ever buy radar from Raytheon, they suck."
September 26, 2009 1:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Pakistani F-16s headed for Tel Aviv!
Did not that profound military thinker, Dr. Demento himself, put it wryly "stuff happens"?
September 26, 2009 3:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, I am pretty sure the Air Force (the Navy more likely but what the hell) is going to mutiny.
Fuckwit.
September 25, 2009 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
fuckwit
Actually, to the extent that one predicts other's conduct based upon what one reliably knows one would do oneself, Snapping Shitzu is more like a traitor...
September 25, 2009 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clever -
You have lately become truly a bore. You speak in hyperbolic terms and you get your facts wrong time and time again. Obama never said he would invade Pakistan. What he said was, he would go after actionable targets in Pakistan if the Pakistan leadership would not.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/01/AR2007080101233.html
As a saber rattling, damn the torpedos kind of guy I would think this statement would appeal to you.
Finally I know you get some inner pleasure of calling Obama an idiot after having to suffer through eight years of an actual idiot running the country and listening to folks calling him such, but nobody here is buying.
Except maybe David Farrar and if you want to lumped in with a wacko birther that's your choice.
September 25, 2009 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
His statement was fine to deliver in private to Pakistan, but to publicly threaten the only ally we have there, one where the gov't is under tremendous pressure from within, and is nuclear armed, is just stupid.
September 26, 2009 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
unusual sexuality
Who among us is wise enough to know what is unusual, and what is merely obscured...?
September 26, 2009 3:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is a crazy blog.
Talk of men wishing for horse cocks and flying an F-15 on the deck a distance of just shy of 1000 miles are both wishful thinking. And neither is likely to get you any place you'd really want to go.
September 26, 2009 7:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
would never happen. (Actually neither scenario would ever happen). But this daily chest thumping about how those of us who live way over here have the right to dictate to a foreign country how to respond to an "existential threat" to them is repulsive.
I am not old enough to remember Chamberlain's return to Britain (and to wild acclaim) having sold Czechoslovakia out in the interests of "peace in our time" but I have read enough to know it did not work out all that well.
September 26, 2009 8:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
to dictate to a foreign country how to respond to an "existential threat"
Not when their bombs say "Made in USA"--they can do what they want if they'll cut loose of our tit.
September 26, 2009 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Iran does not pose an existential threat to Israel. A serious threat yes, an existential threat no.
Israel, on the other hand, poses an existential threat to every other nation within 500 miles or more of its borders, as they are the only nuclear power within that radius.
September 28, 2009 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is that due to the "interoperability" of US/Israeli systems when it comes to data sharing, missile defense and air forces, there is no such thing as a "surprise".
In addition, providing the IAF with the proper codes IDing them as "friendlies" for a foray over Iraq may or may not be necessary. The Israelis have the technology to "blind/disable" all but the most sophisticated radar systems. The bombing of the Syrian whatchamacallit was a test run that was carried out with US participation. An Israeli route from the Med over Lebanon and Syria would be a viable option as would the use of Saudi (wink wink) airspace.
In fact, we have been and will be testing "interoperability" to the greatest extent, ever. The recent ( July) "Red Flag" joint US/UK/Israel joint exercises at the huge, remote desert/mountain Nellis AFB in Nevada were held to simulate an environment more similiar to Iran (in terrain and range) than the flat, confining Negev. The Brits are assumed to be an active member in the coalition and the head of the British military recently paid a first ever "secret" visit to Israel to talk turkey w/ his Israeli counterparts. More meetings are scheduled in Britain.
American naval and missile assets have been assembling in Israel in anticipation of what has been described as the largest-ever "Juniper Cobra" joint exercise scheduled for mid October. This following links to links an informative article that provides an overview and describes the assets involved:
http://www.sundayszaman.com/sunday/yazarDetay.do?haberno=187606
Granted, all of the above could be part and parcel of an mind-boggling costly & elaborate headfake in order to put pressure on Iran.
September 26, 2009 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well that was just enormously comforting...The Syrian episode is, alas, elucidative.
I will put you down as a "strong agree" to the following proposition: "If we don't shoot the Israelis down we might as well be making the run ourselves for all the difference there is between the USAF and the IAF...and we do not appear likely to be shooting them down anytime in the near future..."
September 26, 2009 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
You & Zbig imagine a scenario that I can't; rendering the whole proposition NA.
It would be far easier to pull the plug on the missile defense systems et al deployed for Israel's benefit. On their own, the Israelis would have little better than bupkes to counter Iran's retaliatory missiles.
In the right hands, interoperability is a double-edged sword.
September 26, 2009 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
retaliatory missiles
I was going to remonstrate that retaliation was what I thought Prez would be attempting to avoid by way of giving Bibi serious pause--I suppose you mean to reference some sort of M.A.D. inspired deterrance.
The problem with that is it gives the Lobby room to scream until the switch is turned back on--my "Prez goes all medieval on your ass" scenario is meant to back Bibi off privately.
September 27, 2009 2:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
You clearly - and erroneously - presume Israel has no missiles or bombers.
Can I get a pint or two of whatever you have been drinking?
September 28, 2009 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can I get a pint or two of whatever you have been drinking?
Sure.
Start with a shot of Arrow2 and follow up with a pint of Green Pine. I suggest the best locale to savor the results is somewhere along the CA coast between Santa Barbara and Point Magu.
September 28, 2009 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Threatening to shoot down Israeli jets? Obama would be impeached.
Far easier to threaten an inexplicable technical glitch that causes a system-wide "radio silence" as soon as our X-band radar installation in the Negev detects the launch of IAF squadrons.
Some of our ungrateful Israeli friends complained that they are forbidden access to the X-band installation (it's an official American base, the first and only in Israel) and that "the Americans will be able to see everything we do". Others saw a silver lining in the possibility that an Iranian (or Syrian) missile could strike the base, thus forcing US to declare war, too.
It will be interesting to see how "Juniper Cobra" works out...
September 27, 2009 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Threatening to shoot down Israeli jets?...impeached
Disclimer:I like your technical glitch scenario better than the one I spun out (albeit mine scans better) on a practical basis, anyway.
That said, and finding myself obliged to acknowledge the political forces arrayed against any attempt by any president seriously to jerk Israel's *chain, I will follow this road at least as far as to express my personal position that enforcing a prior overflight refusal from our puppet regime in Iraq (for instance) is no high crime or misdemeanor.
That said, why must we be joined at the hip to this colonial excresence? You know that **old joke, "How do you say Ulster in Hebrew? "Eretz Yisrael"...ba-da-bum
We are so joined at the hip that your formulation, while possibly constitutionally defenctive, is still a perfect assessment of political reality.
*And yes, I aim calling Israel our pit bull--you can call me "pisher, I'll call you Michael Vick...
**Disclaimer:It's not an old joke--I just made it up. Play along with me.
September 27, 2009 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or they'd just go USS Liberty on it, knowing that the price for attacking their "protector" and "ally" is unmeasurably small.
World War III, which Netanyahu seems hellbent on launching, is going to be loud and messy. World War IV, as Einstein commented, will likely be fought with sticks and stones.
September 28, 2009 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not to throw a monkey wrench into this discussion, but.........
Everyone assumes Israel would use JETS to strike Iran.
What if they decide to use something else? Something that no country (including the U.s.) can stop?
Hmmmmmmmmm?
Just askin'!
September 28, 2009 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I did not understand a single word of this diary.
Okay, that's not quite true. I understood two words: "Prez" and "Bibi". The remainder evades interpretation.
September 28, 2009 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink