Yahwists, help me out here...what is it about the sight of hair that drives your boy to spitting and smiting?
I was considering Emma's timely and well-put remarks regarding western womens' problematic encounters with customs of mandatory head-covering in Muslim states. We concentrate, of course, on the several and variegated mandates of female modesty that always include the covering of the head.
While we click our tongues at this (without peradventure) obsessive preoccupation with female modesty (and, male, for that matter...) may we not pause and reflect how, across all of the Yahwist Cults,and for both sexes, hair is to be hidden, shaved, shaved and replaced with a wig (if you are some sort of crazed haredin chick) symbolically hidden (a skullcap), or otherwise obscured (a wimple, cassock, turban) and either mandatorily allowed to grow (the taliban beard and hair) or cut at the peril of the wearer (Samson) and never, ever, should Yahweh be confronted by uncovered hair in church, temple, or mosque. It'll drive him nuts.
So, I put it to you, Yahwists of whatever stripe. (You have your Old Testament, or Jewish Yahwists, Your New Testament, or Christian Yahwists, and your Koranic, or Muslim Yahwists), what is up with the hair thing?
















I dunno, how many stripes do Yawists have?
I was lost and now I am....? What?
I kind of started to cut my own hair. I mean recently.
I mean, it looks so bad and yet....it kind of fits in with three hundred dollar hair cuts.
I need no wig.
At any rate. Good for you.
Good post.
I think.
June 5, 2009 6:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
see below.
June 5, 2009 6:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
to cut my own hair
I recommend (speaking as your attorney...) that you let your freak flag fly
June 5, 2009 6:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
"You recording?" "Yeah, dude; all video, man." "This thing's dope." "Awesome audio and stuff." 1:10-1:20
Too cool except that old fart Crosby up there keeps singing over top of my recording.
June 5, 2009 8:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
old fart
Maybe so, but he didn't cut his hair...(and isn't that what counts, after all?)
June 5, 2009 10:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
And 123,000 views. Wha?
June 6, 2009 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wha?
120k were all Ozzie Osbourne--he kept forgetting in the middle of the song that he had heard it before...
June 6, 2009 1:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're right. Never thought about it, but it's true. Even today, older Catholic women reflexively wear hats to church. It's universal - Christians, Jews, Muslims.
There are erotic aspects to hair - especially women's hair. To me, anyway. That may be it. Maybe hair, in general, reminds some people - including, evidently, those in control of our sacred rituals - of pubic hair. Just an idea, however creepy.
In Rapunzel's Daughters: What Women's Hair Tells Us About Women's Lives, sociologist Rose Weitz proposes:
Here's the problem, though, now that the issue has been revealed: Because we're so militant and chauvinistic about all our dogmas, it won't be long before Hindus and Buddhists are slung on the wall, and forced to explain why they're not cool with the hidden-hair fetish...
June 5, 2009 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
erotic aspects to hair
Certainly this is a large component--the "immodesty" issue, as a characterization of behavior which might give rise in the male observer to "impure thoughts", but I think there is also something deeper at work--if you look at some of the medieval renderings of saints, with the radiating spokes extending from their heads to their halos, it bespeaks a noumenal transaction.
Taking the metaphor of hair as power (Samson) and as a quasi-divine/quasi-heroic attribute, (cf. the wind-blown hair surrounding and accentuating the face (we even do it today with models and big blowers...) I want to make the case that Yahweh doesn't want anyone else to have a nice "do" but him...
June 5, 2009 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The imposition of rules regarding hair styles, head coverings, dress, diet, and so forth, may seem frivolous. However, they have a very important function in allowing those in positions of religous or political authority to easily distinguish between compliant and rebellious individuals. The latter can then be singled out for punishment or execution.
See for example, the Queue, a hairstyle imposed by the Manchu rulers on the Han population. There was no significant religious aspect to this, so the use of hair style as a tool to establish the power relationship is clear.
June 5, 2009 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
to easily distinguish between compliant and rebellious individuals
This is definitely a recurrent theme, which (of course) is as likely to produce a shaved head for purposes of group identification (eg, Hare Krishna).
On that point, how to deconstruct the peculiar custom among haredin women of shaving their own hair, and then wearing a wig?.
In other words, you can be seen to have a full head of hair, it just can't be your own hair!
All religious practices which have ramifications in life outside the confines of the space dedicated to prayer serve, of course, the purpose of group identification. (and serve as a test of obedience, the more stringent and insane they appear to be to the rational observer.)
June 5, 2009 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know what it is with the hair thing, either. But, so many cultures have hair rules and what I'd like to know is what do you do with unruly hair in the first place? I mean, if it already won't behave, some stinkin' rules made up by complete strangers ain't gonna help make yer hair become a better citizen, is it?
:o)
All I know is this: according to the edicts of my Native Am. culture, if Mr.~flowerchild~ kicks it before I do, I am supposed to unbraid my hair and leave it unbraided for a year, the period of mourning.
June 5, 2009 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am supposed to unbraid my hair and leave it unbraided for a year
This, of course, is totally cool compared with the sorts of rules urging that hair be obscured.
The one-year duration is fascinating in comparison with Old Testament Yahwism that calls for a convening on the anniversary of a death at which time a commerative stone is unveiled and the period of mourning is (what a joke!) thought to close.
June 5, 2009 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
So if you think it's cool, religious mandates about what to do with your hair are cool, but if they're "Yahwist" they're not?
June 10, 2009 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
religious mandates about what to do with your hair are cool
totally cool compared(emphasis added...) with the sorts of rules urging that hair be obscured.
June 10, 2009 6:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it might come with monotheistic religions in general and not just those who follow יהוה (Yahweh). After all, Sikhs also have a thing about hair, don't they?
June 5, 2009 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
My assertion reminds me of the old physicist's proof that all odd numbers are prime: 3, 5, 7 are prime, 9 is an outlier, 11, 13 are prime. Proven!
June 5, 2009 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
יהוה
Wow! Where'd you get the cool Yud, He, Vauv, He?.
On the content, yeah, I was turning the Sikhs over in my mind; they have that ceremonial top knot that if cut will give the shorn permanent angst.
June 5, 2009 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just like you, in your reply to me, I merely copy-and-pasted it. In my case, I first did a Google search on YWHH.
June 8, 2009 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
head hair and face hair are out in the open for all to see, espcially the individual looking in the mirror. A change in hair is a change in not only outer appearance, but inner appearance.
Take recruit training. I had hair past my shoulders... and even before I sat in the barber's chair, I had a friend cut my hair so that I wouldn't stand out for abuse. Then you are shaved bald and kept bald (for Marines, at least) until the last 4 weeks (third phase), and then you are allowed a high reg. The grooming standards for male and female Marines is rather stringent. You can look them up: Marine Corps Order P1020.34G. The grooming standards for the face take up several pages. Facial hair for Marines is a recent phenomenon due to the donning and clearing of gas masks: facial hair prevents the seal.
The baldness had an effect of militant conformity by making us all the same: deindividuation. The effect was intimate because you look at yourself while shaving, and the impact is shocking until you acclimate.
For the religious, hair can connote sect, have symbolic import, and establish control. For women specifically, the desire is to control a woman's attractiveness (to only be unleashed at special occasions, especially marriage), and prevent the tendency towards vanity.
So, in other words, it is about control, uniformity, and the preservation of the existing social order. Hair is just as important in a boardroom as it is in a church. Remember when hippies had their hair cut by the police?
I hope this helps. Hair is more than "Yahwists."
June 5, 2009 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hair is more than "Yahwists."
Oh, to be sure. (It may well be that we can trace some of the conformity/rebellion issues subsumed in your remarks back to the earlier religious strictures--the more so as we regress in time to a period when virtually all social regulation was rooted in religion.
It's interesting (in the USMC context as you say) how the removal of hair can symbolize the erasure of individuality, no matter how determined the recruit may be to resist. Once you all look the same... (Remember Privates Joker and Gomer Pyle)
June 5, 2009 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
All I know is that it took a few centuries, but Catholic nuns finally figured out that they could stop wearing wacky headgear in imitation of female medieval and ancient dress and still maintain vows of chastity, not to mention, figure out many ways that they could dress to look extremely unattractive to not only the opposite sex but to any lesbians out there.
And also that once Catholic women stopped having to bobby pin little lace doilies on their heads to symbolically cover their evil and tempting head hair before entering a church, masses did not turn into lust festivals and most guys still seemed to be able to focus on the service.
Hair, hair, hair, hair, hair, hair, hair
Flow it, show it
Long as God can grow it
My hair
I want it long, straight, curly, fuzzy
Snaggy, shaggy, ratty, matty
Oily, greasy, fleecy
Shining, gleaming, streaming
Flaxen, waxen
Knotted, polka-dotted
Twisted, beaded, braided
Powdered, flowered, and confettied
Bangled, tangled, spangled, and spaghettied!
The really odd one I don't get is the Muslim and Orthodox Jewish male laws for covering head but letting the beard flow and grow.
And the Saddamist mustache in Iraqi regions, what the heck is that all about? Some kind of ancient tribal compromise with the "shaving is verbotin" thingie?
The strange part is that while a lot of Old Testament law/tradition, like dietary laws, at least has some folk wisdom to it, wearing full facial hair in hot lands doesn't seem to make much sense at all. I always wondered if that one originated in a political statement against those nasty shaving Romans.
June 5, 2009 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
For the youngsters, I need to add an edit to the above due to not proofing my code:
This paragraph should have been in italics as well:
I want it long, straight, curly, fuzzy
Snaggy, shaggy, ratty, matty
Oily, greasy, fleecy
Shining, gleaming, streaming
Flaxen, waxen
Knotted, polka-dotted
Twisted, beaded, braided
Powdered, flowered, and confettied
Bangled, tangled, spangled, and spaghettied!
as they are not my words, but from an ancient Broadway show tune that oldsters will recognize.
June 5, 2009 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the lyrics, AA -- saved me the trouble of looking them up, as it was my inclination, too, to post them.
Of interest, at least to me, is the modern version of hair disguise/mortification -- dying it, streaking it, highlighting and lowlighting it -- all at huge expense to the purse and to the basic health of both hair and scalp.
It is bad enough that older women persist in trying to block out gray, which can be lovely so long as it shines -- and, in fact, imo, nothing makes a woman look older or more tired than gray roots. But what really saddens me are the young girls, as young as twelve or thirteen -- with beautiful shining hair of whatever color or texture -- who destroy it with bleach and dye. Just saying -- one doesn't need a hat, a wig, or a mantilla these days to buy into the cultural mandate of hair disguise or disfigurement. It's a pity, that.
June 5, 2009 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
who destroy it with bleach and dye
Worse still--(I know that you will barely be able to comprehend, let alone believe this)--Some teenage girls with blonde hair, dye it BLACK!!! (I know--my daughter is one of them....)
What the fuck??
June 5, 2009 11:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dyl0j3WU6Y
June 5, 2009 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha. Thanks, DD. Enjoyed that. You?
June 5, 2009 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
most guys still seemed to be able to focus on the service.
That's what you think...
Orthodox Jewish male laws for covering head but letting the beard flow and grow.
This might be a good time to mention the idiosyncratic sideburns sported by stylish Hasidim.
I suppose they are, (once again) a symbolic nod towards the Sampson injunction--don't cut. In this case, cut what you want on top, but let the pais grow.
June 5, 2009 11:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
erotic aspects to hair
Certainly this is a large component--the "immodesty" issue, as a characterization of behavior which might give rise in the male observer to "impure thoughts", but I think there is also something deeper at work--if you look at some of the medieval renderings of saints, with the radiating spokes extending from their heads to their halos, it bespeaks a noumenal transaction.
Taking the metaphor of hair as power (Samson) and as a quasi-divine/quasi-heroic attribute, (cf. the wind-blown hair surrounding and accentuating the face (we even do it today with models and big blowers...) I want to make the case that Yahweh doesn't want anyone else to have a nice "do" but him...
June 5, 2009 11:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nuns unattractive?
Odd. Up here they're really hot. Sort of Stevie Nicks meets Hilary Swank. Mostly you see them driving round in their convertibles, hangin' out in the cafes, passing out free dope.
Good people, nuns.
June 6, 2009 1:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
passing out free dope
Oh, sure, man...the dope is free, but you have to stay for the service after you get high, and if the munchies kick in before the prayer breakfast is served, well, not a pretty picture at all....
June 6, 2009 1:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just seems to me that Americans can't let other cultures be themselves. The religious want to convert them, the secularists want to "free" them. Both seek to destroy what exists and replace it with what they believe is correct.
June 5, 2009 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
the secularists want to "free" them\
I just want to keep them off my back!
June 5, 2009 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
And this sets Americans apart from whom?
June 5, 2009 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
And *this sets Americans apart from whom?
*which "this"?
June 5, 2009 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't know much about Rastafarianism, I see.
June 5, 2009 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or the French I took.
June 5, 2009 9:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rastafarianism
Good point--Although Dreads are really just a Sampson theme redux.
Consider also: "Locks have also come to symbolize the Lion of Judah (emphasis added) and rebellion against Babylon."
Also, the women are enjoined to cover their heads, so the "noumenous" character of hair is, if anything, reified by the *Rastas.
*(And, may I say in passing, "I and I say thank you, Jah, for the ganja, ayree!")
June 5, 2009 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
screwed up quote:
Consider also: "Locks have also come to symbolize the Lion of Judah's flowing mane (emphasis added) and rebellion against Babylon."
June 6, 2009 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zipperupus seems to explain it pretty well for me. The thing is people got the hair they get, they dont get to pre-order it. Why do societies try to control it? Because it becomes a sign. To a hippy short hair signals something, to redneck long hair signals something.To the young, gray hair signals something, it should signal a person of longevity and wisdom,but it our culture sends the wrong signal,of weakness and overness. True wisdom is to let no one decide for you how your hair should be, and decide about no one by thier hair.
SIGN
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply
So I tucked my hair up under my hat and I went in to ask him why
He said you look like a fine upstanding young man, I think you'll do
So I took off my hat I said imagine that, huh, me working for you
woah!
Sign Sign everywhere a sign
Blocking out the scenery breaking my mind
Do this, don't do that, can't you read the sign
June 5, 2009 9:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Most people have occasional bad hair days, I have a bad hair life...maybe that's my problem.
June 5, 2009 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
a bad hair life
Ya' gotta work what you got--I recommend spiking jell for really incorrigible cases.
June 5, 2009 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
erotic aspects to hair
Certainly this is a large component--the "immodesty" issue, as a characterization of behavior which might give rise in the male observer to "impure thoughts", but I think there is also something deeper at work--if you look at some of the medieval renderings of saints, with the radiating spokes extending from their heads to their halos, it bespeaks a noumenal transaction.
Taking the metaphor of hair as power (Samson) and as a quasi-divine/quasi-heroic attribute, (cf. the wind-blown hair surrounding and accentuating the face (we even do it today with models and big blowers...) I want to make the case that Yahweh doesn't want anyone else to have a nice "do" but him...
June 5, 2009 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
jolleyroger dont you think that if Yahweh is capable of being God, He must be capable of being more than petty like we are, more understanding than we are, more accepting than we are?
June 5, 2009 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
if Yahweh is capable of being God
Well, that is the rub is it not?
As described, Yahweh is a buffoon, with the insecurities of a usurping monarch, the jealousies of a aging impotent man with a young beautiful wife, and the instincts of a gangster.
Utterly incapable of any sort of imitation of a deity.
June 5, 2009 11:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are so, like, dead
You beast!!!!
I saw Dickons thread!
June 5, 2009 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
You beast!!!!
Moi? Link? (I combed DD's Devolution, but couldn't find my errant post--unless you mean Aunt Sam's Blog)
June 5, 2009 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, yez
And
instant karma is gonna get you
=D
June 5, 2009 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
instant karma is gonna get you
Who on earth do I think I are--a superstar?
June 6, 2009 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well all right ya are.
June 6, 2009 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
are
Thank's for nuttin'! (clicked & cried...)
June 6, 2009 11:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
awwwwwww
June 6, 2009 11:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
awwwwwww
Oh, sure, make fun of me. I'm left with nothing to listen to but Pat Boone (in what deranged universe are *Jerry Garcia, Freddy Mercury and John Lennon gone, and that pre-embalmed fossil rolls on?? In biker gear yet!)
*They tell me that in another 12 years of so, I'll be able to get past three bars of Jerry without breaking down. Let me tell you, it is tiresome!
June 6, 2009 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
=D
I wasn't making fun
You rawk and I loooove you.
June 6, 2009 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wasn't making fun
I know.
Love ya too. (and actually, Pat Boone looks pretty good for being pre-embalmed...)
June 6, 2009 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's the white shoes, dude.
June 6, 2009 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
and the ink
June 7, 2009 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
and the ink
Is this a dagger which I see?
June 7, 2009 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Possibly here:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/wademorris/2009/06/daily-science-fix---philosophy-3.php
June 7, 2009 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
white shoes
I thought it was the white sport coat & pink carnation--no wait, that was Marty Robbins...
(bzzzt...bzzzt....bzzzt...ALARM ALARM ALARM...bzzt... self-dating alert, abort abort, delete...)
June 7, 2009 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
For a post about hair, yer blog's certainly got legs, dude.
June 6, 2009 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
legs
But where is Jeana Thomasina?
June 6, 2009 1:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
First off, you have the motivation of the Jewish practice of head covering completely wrong. It's got nothing to do with "God doesn't look the way hair looks." It's more an acknowledgment that our thoughts are dirty or imperfect as well as a simple mark of cultural identification. Kabbalist Jews (hardly qualifying as "Yahwist") also use Yarmulkes/Kippahs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarmulke -- Read that
Also, most Protestant custom holds that you should remove your hat or other head coverings in church. I suppose this would conversely suggest that you want to show off your thoughts to God. That "old Catholic ladies wear hats to church" reflects generational differences more than anything.
Numerous Buddhist sects also have regulations about hair, so this is not exclusive to Abrahamic religions.
June 10, 2009 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Kabbalist Jews (hardly qualifying as "Yahwist") also use Yarmulkes/Kippahs
Not Yahwists? Boy, you better ask them about that; I think they worship "He whose name may not be spoken...."
June 10, 2009 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink