<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>JohnWB&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/johnwb/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/johnwb/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/johnwb//3002</id>
   <updated>	2008-11-13T18:06:48Z	2008-10-25T03:58:09Z							</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.244224-comment:3286032</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/some_worry_obama_wont_act_swif.php#c3286032" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[JohnWB Commented on Worry Grows That Obama Won&apos;t Act Swiftly Enough On Health Care by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-13T18:06:48Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-13T18:06:48Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, KY--I was all set to say much the same thing if no one else had.</p>

<p>Obama's whole MO, from the primaries till now, has been to work against the grain of the 24-hour news cycle.  Nothing has changed, at least procedurally, yet everyone who was cool (now, in retrospect) with that strategy is suddenly not cool with the very same approach.  At one level, I get it: it's time for my guy to deliver, and he damn sure better deliver like <i>I</i> want him to--yesterday would not be too soon, either.  But: this--the way Obama works--is <i>also</i> what we signed up for by becoming supporters.</p>

<p>"Deliberate haste," he called it in his press conference last week.  Yessir.  Especially that "deliberate" part.  And, given that TNR post--and, for that matter, Obama's own list of first priorities for his administration--health care won't be an afterthought.  So, y'all chill already.  He's got this.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239843-comment:3250057</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/poll_palin_hasnt_done_herself.php#c3250057" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[JohnWB Commented on Poll: Palin Hasn&apos;t Done Herself Any Favors For 2012 by Eric Kleefeld]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-25T03:58:09Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-25T03:58:09Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Re Huckabee: At one point in the primaries, he said that if the Republican primaries went by the same rules as the Democrats' did, he'd have been the nominee.  He has broader support than any of the others did; in those last primaries, after McCain had won the nomination, Huckabee was still attracting embarrassingly large numbers of votes.  McCain basically won by default: he won the bigger states in a winner-take-all format.</p>

<p>Romney?  They seem to like pretty faces over there in GOP land.  </p>

<p>Who knows how much weight smarter conservative thinkers carry in the party these days; but if they carry much, they've already pretty much field-dressed Palin before this campaign has ended (and, by inference, McCain and whoever else thought she should be the Veep nominee).  Republicans have a long memory and don't forgive easily; four years of penance for her and her advocates is unlikely to be enough to atone for this horrible campaign. </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>JohnWB recommended Hillary Lead in IN Continues to Shrink... by GayIthacan</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/hillary-lead-in-in-continues-t.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.193563</id>
  <published>2008-05-07T01:27:55Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-07T01:27:55Z</updated>
	</entry>
	


</feed>

