« Ethics, journalism, the web and the profits of brokerage businesses – oh, and Paul Krugman | John Hempton's Blog | Modelling Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – Part 1 »

Stink boats and the forthcoming spectacular inventory bounce


Paul Krugman has been predicting a double-dip recession based on an inventory bounce. He figures that middle to latter part of this year will have an inventory bounce which will (briefly) make the economy look good again – but will not (in his Keynsian world view) bring back the fragile flower of true sustainable demand and hence will not result in sustained recovery.
That said – the inventory bounce might be very spectacular indeed. I wish to illustrate with an (admittedly) extreme example – the manufacturing of recreational motor boats (scornfully known in the Australian vernacular as “stink boats”).
Stink boats are obviously high value highly discretionary items – and they should be (and are) ground zero for the massive swings in discretionary consumption in the global economy. That said the issues in the stink boat industry are highly exacerbated by problems with “floor plan finance”. Floor plan finance is the provision of finance to dealers (cars, boats, RVs, manufactured houses etc) to finance trading stock on the dealer’s floors. Floor plan finance has become more difficult to obtain and (far) more expensive – so dealers are responding in the rational manner which is to cut back floor stock.
By far the most extreme illustration I have seen is Brunswick Corp – the world’s biggest recreational boat maker. The stock has been a wild ride going from $45 to sub $2 and back to $8. It is operationally and financially levered to the centre of the storm…
Anyway here are some annotated extracts from the last investor conference call…
End retail sales are down 25-40 percent – see this quote:

First, let me review some of the preliminary second quarter U.S. Marine industry data, starting with fiberglass, sterndrive, and inboard boats, which fell by 34%. In the prior two quarters, the rate of decline was higher, in the 45% to 47% range. In the second quarter of 2008, units fell by 35%. Outboard fiberglass boat retail unit demand fell 30% in the second quarter of 2009. In the previous two quarters, declines were higher, in the range of 40% to 41%. In the second quarter of 2008, units fell by 25%.
However the dealers are choosing to reduce their floor-stock at least in part driven by the financing costs for this…
Now let's turn to some key factors that influenced our wholesale demand, that is, the boats we sold to our dealer network. In addition to the underlying retail demand, another factor that is having an effect on overall wholesale demand is the availability and cost of floorplan financing. Several traditional floorplan lenders have exited the market, or materially reduced their exposure, and the remaining lenders have imposed stricter lending criteria as they seek to protect the quality of their loan portfolios. Although Brunswick dealers continue to benefit from the financing availability provided by BAC, our joint venture with GE, beginning April 1, dealers became subject to revised terms, including higher financing costs and loan curtailment payments. These changes translate to higher costs for dealers to carry inventory, which has led Brunswick and our dealers to reassess and ultimately reduce wholesale orders. This will ultimately lead to a healthier marine environment, with lower inventory levels held in the dealer system.

The net effect is that they have reduced their sales to dealers by 60 percent – see this quote:

In response to these market factors, and our strategy to do all we can to protect our dealer network, we have reduced the number of units that we sold to dealers nearly 60% in the second quarter versus last year. This is the same percentage decline experienced in the first quarter of 2009.

As a result of our reduced wholesale unit levels and the impact of higher discounts, Brunswick's boat segment sales declined by 77% in the second quarter, compared to the decline of 64% in the first quarter of 2009.

But it gets worse – the company has stripped itself of inventory –

As we execute our strategy to maintain high levels of liquidity, and assist the dealer network in this weak Marine market, our production rates during the quarter were well below our wholesale unit sales. This lower network production reflected about a 75% decline in units produced versus the second quarter of 2008. This compares to our 60% decline in the second quarter wholesale units, which I have previously mentioned. More importantly, in our fiberglass boat businesses, our production levels were about 13% of our retail demand, and in our engine business, overall production was reduced by approximately 65%, this follows a 75% reduction in the first quarter.

So what do we have

• End sales down 30 percent

• Dealer sales down 60 percent

• Production down 75 percent

Or – as they put it

We produced 13% of what the dealers actually retailed, in terms of even numbers.
Obviously these numbers are unsustainable and either retail sales have to dramatically fall from current levels (unlikely) or production has to grow dramatically...

How else do you spell inventory bounce?
My guess is that the inventory bounce here will be so big as to restore pricing power to (of all things) luxury recreational motor boats manufacturers.

This looks like a V-shaped recovery – at least for stink boat manufacturers.

Whilst there are inventory shortages in far more important industries (see this story from the WSJ about auto-dealer inventory shortages) they won’t quite be of the scale of Brunswick. But the risks to the inventory driven manufacturing economy are in my view (and quite surprisingly) to the upside.
Whether Professor Krugman is right - and the inventory bounce is followed by a double-dip - on that I will reserve judgement. But he is right such a large proportion of the time that when the euphoria of the inventory bounce is upon us I will be very nervous...

Read more at John Hempton's Weblog


9 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Krugman explained this inventory bounce very well in a piece last winter. But then he goes on to say, using your example here, that if retail sales do not improve, then the bounce will take the boat industry back to the 70% level of production compared to the pre-recession levels.

Basically, we will come out of this recession with lower consumption and lower employment. The good news, I suppose, is that the recession is over, the bad is that the American people are poorer. Maybe this is the beginning where we, 5% of the world's population, will no longer consume 30% of its resources.

user-pic

.Why would you be nervous? will not the inventory bounce look like a v shaped recovery of the economy in general to the average investor (and probably most brokers) so that it will be an opportunity to take a nice ride up the bounce and bail out when the bounce is over?

I'm not an investor; I'm a philosopher,so far be it for me to assuage Mr. Hempton's nervousness, but it seems that as long as you are reasonably sure WHAT will happen in the future, you cannot help but make money.

user-pic

It's more complicated than that:

... it seems that as long as you are reasonably sure WHAT will happen in the future, you cannot help but make money.
You need to know what will happen, when it will happen, and (this last part is the trickiest of all) when other investors will catch on.

I tend to do OK with the first, not so good with the second, and terrible with the third, myself. :-)

user-pic

The third should not be so difficult. The average investor ( a statistical fiction of course) has a quantifiable lag in their knowledge curve. I assume that when dealers start feeling that their new purchases are starting to sit on the shelf again is when you have the signal that "Mr. Average" will soon start bailing out himself. I know it is a small time window but my strategy would be to wait till Brunswick reaches a certain maximum increase in production and then sell like hell. OK, so you will say, how do you know it is at the max? You don't but that's where you have to give up the dream of catching a falling knife. Better safe than sorry would be my policy. But then again, I'm not an investor and maybe I don't see things as clearly as you. But the general idea is to stay one step ahead of "Ms Laggard". No?

user-pic

I learn something every day. Now I know what a stink boat is. In my neck of the woods (inlet on the bay would maintain the metaphor) we call them stink pots-- power boats to distinguish them from real boats--sloops, yawls, ketches, and the like. I'm sailing along, learning more about economics every day. Thankee.

user-pic

But how much of what we have learned, say in the case of how Wall Street or corporations conduct themselves, is something we could have done without?

That is, at some level I don't think people trusted them too much but now we've been enlightened of the depth of their ineptitude and corruption.

The problem with having this bit of information is now that we know it beyond a shadow of a doubt, what can we do about it? Having learned this, have we now incurred an obligation of some sort to rectify a condition that is most certainly harmful to the country? Isn't congress obliged, on our behalf, to take some action to remedy this?

This seems to me to be the elephant in the middle of the room problem. Why is it that so many people are reluctant to acknowledge this? What are we afraid of? Is the plain truth of what we have learned an indictment of our entire society and which leaves us in an awful predicament? Is it not evident we've learned we have a government where ethical and legal corruption are rampant?

These are things we have learned. The obvious questions that learning brings now need answers.

Just to be clear, the only authoritative and largely uncorrupted body that remains to provide those answers is citizens.

user-pic

That's how I've heard them called as well--but we're talking about Australians here, and sometimes it's hard to know what they're saying.

(Reminds one of the story of the little girl who hid her dolls when her parents' Australian friends came over because she didn't want shrimp thrown on her barbie.)

:)

user-pic

Of course, since stink pots are very much a discretionary item, there's also a chance (if the manufacturers time things wrong) that the demand will have switched to other forms of conspicuous consumption by the time production comes back up...

user-pic

Not only are they a discretionary item - but one reader on my own blog pointed out that they were a highly seasonal item - sold in the spring for the summer boating season.

The sell through was high last quarter - because - frankly - it is the good quarter.

The bounce is in his view next year - if they can survive that long.

This is - as stated absolutely levered to the eye of the storm.

John

Leave a comment

John Hempton

user-pic

Following: 0
Followers: 10

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address