Illinois Citizens Deserve Corrupt Government
The current
Which raises the question: How stupid or brainwashed are most
Here is the story behind the headlines. According to the
In November, two-thirds voted against having a convention. Twenty years earlier they also voted against one. But even with twenty more years of public corruption,
Those advocating passage of the convention measure included: Lieutenant Governor Pat Quinn, the Chicago Tribune, the Springfield State Journal Register, state representatives Mike Boland and Jack Franks, former state treasurer Judy Baar Topinka, political journalists Rich Miller and Scott Reeder, and several groups with websites.
Back in January 2008 this is what John Bambenek, who wrote a book supporting the convention, had the good sense to say: "Gov. Rod Blagojevich has done something remarkable in
A key argument in favor of convention was that the cost of a no-frills convention (around $23 million) would surely be repaid by the savings to taxpayers of constitutional amendments that could get the state out of the lobbyist-run budget crisis it was in. Not to mention the possibility of an amendment that could make it easier to get rid of corrupt governors and other officials by, for example, recall by citizens. How sensible, considering that even before the charges against the current governor three previous
Otto Kerner (D) governor 1961-1968 was convicted on 17 counts of bribery, conspiracy, perjury, and related charges. He was sentenced to three years in federal prison and fined $50,000. Daniel Walker (D) governor 1973-1977 was convicted of improprieties related to a savings and loan association. He reportedly received over a million dollars in fraudulent loans for his business and repairs on his yacht. He pleaded out to three felonies and was freed after 17 months in prison because he was supposedly frail and chronically ill, but is still living 20 years later and living near the ocean in
And consider this amazing statistic: From 1995 to 2004, 469 politicians from the federal district of Northern Illinois were found guilty of corruption.
And then there was the famous case of Rep. Dan Rostenkowski (D) who was indicted in 1994 on 17 felony charges, including the embezzlement of $695,000 in taxpayer and campaign funds. The longtime powerful House ways and means committee chairman plea-bargained his way down to just two counts of mail fraud and served only 17 months in a minimum-security prison.
So what did the opponents to the convention use to sway voters? And why did they oppose a convention? They lied a whole lot and tried to instill fear, and succeeded. But what they feared was losing political power that they had used for so long to corrupt state government. Opponents included most of the state's influential lobbying organizations: American Insurance Association, Associated Fire Fighters of Illinois, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, Chicago Urban League, Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, Citizen Action/Illinois, Illinois Association of Convenience Stores, Illinois Association of School Administrators, Illinois Business Round Table, Illinois Civil Justice League, Illinois Education Association, Illinois Farm Bureau, Illinois Federation of Teachers, Illinois Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Illinois Manufacturers Association, Illinois Petroleum Marketers Association, Illinois Retail Merchants Association, Illinois Retired Teachers Association, Illinois State AFL-CIO, Illinois State Chamber of Commerce, Illinois State Black Chamber of Commerce, Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, League of Women Voters of Illinois, Lincoln Park Chamber of Commerce, National Federation of Independent Businesses/Illinois, Peoria Area Chamber of Commerce, Police Benevolent and Protective Association of Illinois, SEIU Illinois, State University Annuitants Association, Taxpayers' Federation of Illinois, Tooling and Manufacturing Association, Union League Club of Chicago, Illinois Rifle Association. The convention was also opposed by House Speaker Michael Madigan (D) and former governor Jim Edgar (R) who both represented the corrupt status quo political establishment.
There is an important lesson from what happened in Illinois and several other states, as well as why the US Congress has refused to obey Article V of the federal constitution that prescribes a convention of state delegates to propose constitutional amendments when two-thirds of states ask for one, which has happened long ago. It is this: those with political power fear constitutional conventions that can truly reform our corrupt political system. What Americans need to constantly remember is that "we the people" must use constitutional conventions to improve our government and political system. All constitutions are meant to be revisited and amended if necessary.
We must not depend on electing individuals to public office to truly reform the system. We have a corrupt two-party plutocracy. It is time to stop believing the lies of both Democrats and Republicans. We can keep putting many of them in prison, but all that happens is that more corrupt and dishonest politicians get elected. Just as it has happened for the
Finally, you might ask whether Illinois Senator Barack Obama supported the 2008 convention proposal. What do you think? Obama's key advisor, David Axelrod, who crafted his "change" message, shared a multimillion dollar contract provided by opponents to the convention who feared change.
Contact Joel S. Hirschhorn through www.delusionaldemocracy.com





Call me a cynic, but if I were an Illinois citizen I would be thinking that a Constitutional Convention would be a forum to let the crooks codify what they're already doing. Why would anyone expect things to be improved?
December 14, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would you agree to let Bush re-write the Constitution?
December 14, 2008 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cville has a point but there could be no change without the convention. But Joel, you touch on other things here. Your research touches on the real issue. It is like community organizing gone awry. Your list of associations and unions is remarkable. How these people get along is beyond me. But Chicago is a city that does not work and they pretend that it does.
I don't have any answers and I am not in Illinois and I am not going to Illinois. What they need is State bureau of Investigation with all employes thereof coming from another state that has nothing to do with these associations.
I will hit your delusion blog later.
December 14, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I voted no.
* Opponents say the same politicians in charge of dysfunctional Springfield prior to the convention would set the ground rules that the convention delegates would follow. They argue the key to changing government is changing its leaders during elections. Because delegate elections would likely be expensive, many of the delegates likely would not be average people, but people supported by powerful legislators and special interest groups.[23]
* The APIC said the constitutional convention might cost taxpayers up to $80 million, extrapolated from the costs of the convention for the 1970 constitution.
http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Illinois_Constitutional_Convention_(2008)
December 14, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your criticism referring to Congress' refusal to follow U.S. Const, Art. 5 is thin. What, specifically, are you referring to?
December 15, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, CVilleDem, that's one of three reasons why I voted against it. If we know our leaders are not operating above board, then why would we let them tinker with our governing document??
Reason 2 was the projected cost (as Mageduley pointed out). This state has no money - we've now endured two nasty budget fights, and the university I work for just had to return $2.5 million in state funding. So, no, I didn't feel that dropping and est. $80 million on Con Con didn't seem wise just now.
Reason 3 was that Con Con has been the route other states have discussed for Constitutionalizing (is that a word) same sex marriage bans. With all the pre-election drama about Prop 8 and other states amending their Constitutions, it seemed like a Convention would be a great place for the religious crazies to turn out in droves and force through a ban.
I find it funny that your website is "delusionaldemocracy" because your arguments here are a little delusional. Until you live in a state and have a day-to-day feel for what's actually happening here, you really shouldn't judge. This post is as dumb as saying "All Californians are bigots and homophobes because they passed Prop 8," when we know that the issue is far more complex than that.
December 15, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
You have unfairly vilified Illinois citizens. I voted for the Constitutional Convention. However, unless a citizen was paying close attention to the "pro and con" arguments connected with this issue, he or she could have been completely in favor of cleaning up state politics and still voted against it. The ballot description was very general. Had it said, "should Gov. B. be removed from office," or "should we get rid of crooked politicians in Illinois" I suspect it would have passed. People generally do not pay close attention to referenda that are not sensational (e.g., Prop 8). There were numerous ads on television bemoaning the cost that would have been involved, but I saw none explaining the benefits it would have provided. There are many law abiding, intelligent and reform-minded citizens in Illinois who want things to get better. Stop generalizing.
December 15, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink