« Just Words: The Results of Hate Speech Part II | Joe Wood's Blog | TPM Poll: What Should I Do With My Life? »

My White Aryan Resistance: Dissecting The Lone Nut in American Politics


I have two rifles; both are pre WWI, a 7mm and an 8mm Mauser rifle.

When I was 15, I got my first guns.

My best friend and I would go to our private range underground, and shoot .303 Enfield 1917, 7.62X54R Mosin Nagant, 6.5 Mannlicher-Carcano, and a .22 Remington LR.

We would wrap up fruit with duct tape, and make it explode. We would make head and shoulder targets. We would shoot phone books stacked in front of each other.  We would purposely buy hallow-points.

We would actually pretend to be Lee Harvey Oswald, and re-enact the JFK assassination. This was reinforced from our peers, who like us were in cliques within the counterculture of the Civil Air Patrol, Navy Sea Cadets, and NJROTC Academy, which we were in.

I kept a sign, "GUN CONTROL MEANS HITTING YOUR TARGET." 

This was reinforced at the local bowling alley near my Mom's house, where we sat and listened to men who fought in Korea, or in Guadacanal, or Vietnam. We met more of these right-wing extremist grndfather's at the local doughnut shop, and believe me, they love young talent.

Here, old men past their prime lectured on the way things used to be, how they believed and served their country, and how the country has become a fascist construct of Jews, Blacks, and Catholics.

They hung out at military surplus shops, which always were not far from the local KKK or WAR PO Box address.

They worked at gun shops, back in the day when there were plenty, and in almost every neighborhood.  They warned of the day when they would be closed, and the day their guns would be taken thereafter. 

Now there is only two in a neighboring county, and none in my own.

I got these guns at local gun shows, where young people (white) are not looked after nor deemed suspicious, and it is not hard to leave the premises with a gun at that age, chiefly due to the patrons collective views of gun control.

Antique weapons like mine, some of which I still posess, can be bought with cash, and no paperwork at all. They all fuction properly, have well-oiled actions and can shoot tight groupings at great distances. I have found them more reliable than those of more recent make.

There are racist groups which loosely function via PO Boxes, magazine clubs, and at gun shows and civil war re-enactments. There are some that recruit even at flea markets, selling nazi and confederate items as a front.

These people did not go away.

They believe that they are the true-blue red-blooded Americans, and that we are destroying their way of life.

They believe that for years the government has been run by communists, socialists, and Jews.  They believe that by using African-Americans and other minorities, that they are manipulating elections, and uprooting social cues and tradition.

Ask yourself; who is it that Rush Limbaugh is speaking to when he says that Al Queda better hurry up if they want to destroy America, because Obama is doing it first?  Who is he appealing to?  What is his point for phrasing it just this way?

He is speaking to those I met at truck stops and gun shows.  Those who ache for the good old days.

It is the same people Palin was warning last year when she said that Obama "pals around with terrorists."  It is these Americans that some on the extreme right are appealing to when they ask to see Obama's birth certificate, and imply that he is not really an American, or that he is a muslim.  It is these ones that Rush Limbaugh is comforting when he says, "I hope he fails."

It is those who believe that ACORN, Jews, and Socialism are responsible for Obama's agenda.

Who listens to Rush religiously?  Who hates the changes Obama has already made?

Who in America is bitter, and "cling to guns?"

The same people I used to know.  The old veterans and retired policemen who rose up in bars, lodges, and gun shows after Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma City, and cursed their own "government."  These are the people who join militias not to protect America, but to maintain their version of it, from of all entities, "the government."

Now the head of that government is a black man.

But these men wear no warning labels.  These are veterans, lifelong workers, union men, and grandfathers who proudly took care of their families.  These are the sons of Confederate Veterans, and sons of Union ones as well.  These are proud papa's, of small children who wear camo onesies, and proudly hold toy machine guns.  These are people who run a farm, drive a truck, or are now unemployed.  They go to church, vote, and are abreast of every issue that comes before our nation.  They are involved.

These are people who live both inside and outside of reality, of sanity, and of oblivion.  They live in the margins where only a loud yell and a loud bang can call attention to their fears, their hopes, their cause.

Langston Hughes said it best when he said, "What happens to a dream deferred?"

Though in the mind this typically conjures up the plights of African-Americans, it could just as easily apply to the white racist in 2009.  Or to the Anti-semetic.  Or to the militant right wing extremist.  Why: A black president, who is popular, and sucessful.  A bad economy.  The poet could have been talking about any man who feels he has lost, or has been denied his own beliefs, his own respect, his own sense of safety.  In 2009, whom in America is that?Who thinks he has lost his own voice?  His country?

What happens to a dream deferred?  What does it do; it explodes. 

Theirs is a dream too, dismal and dark though it is.  They believe that everything is set against them, and that it takes a hero to stop it.  They believe that their children will not enjoy the dream they once had for themselves, passed down from their ancestors, as God's chosen people.  They believe that the terrorists have won, that America has failed them, and that voting and speaking out only gets them blacklisted, and defeated. 

This is their POV.  This is why they see assassins like the one who killed Dr. Tiller as a hero.  Because he was to them like the young men who face down tanks with only rocks.  And they know they are losing the abortion debate, the race debate, the religion debate, the political debate.  As former President Bush once said, perhaps some people turn to terrorism out of desperation and hopelessness.  But as JFK once said, Americans have the right to disagree with the law, but not to disobey it. 

It is these forlorn sections of our own population that Rush Limbaugh resonates with the most.  That Cheney is a hero to.  In whom Palin is a new hope. 

The people who end up assassinating a political leader, or who blow up an abortion clinic, or shoot a doctor in  church.  These are the chosen instruments of history, the ones who act not out of means, but out of motive.  They are not crazy.  They are not insane.  They are subjugated to a higher aim, a higher sense of belonging and duty than to themself; they are the magic wand, that conquers the enemy, and saves the country from itself.

I of course, do not buy into that.  I can listen to Limbaugh, and be able not to expouse his beliefs and rhetoric as though it were the gospel of the Lord.  I can feel secure in my country, because I can see that the changes now are going in the fair and just direction for all.

Some can't.

John Wilkes Booth was an accomplished thespian, and was present at the hanging of John Brown.  He was rich, sucessful, and good looking.  But he wanted the Confederacy to prevail, and wanted to defeat any efforts for "Nigger Citizenship."  When they surrendered, he was heartbroken, and devastated.  So he said himself that he "acted nobly."  He thought himself a hero, who was killing a tyrant for his country.  He thought that we would celebrate him by now.

The examples could go on.  But these people who acted on behalf of God or Country believed they would be greeted as liberators, and seen as fulfilling a personal destiny out of despair, through violence.  These people stepped out from obscurity, and slayed Goliath.

This is what we are dealing with.  Not lone nut gunmen, which leads one to be dismissive, resign them to ridicule--which tends to lower our guard.  We misunderstand them, and they are our enemy.

The point is lost if we categorize them into lunatics, who simply do this out of a bizarre zealot moment of hubris, unrelated to society and the voices they hear from real origins, and not merely in their own head.

It doesn't always take a cult leader, a guru, or a conspiracy to cause a violent act perfected in the mind of a hopeless person.  Sometimes, in their mind--it takes a hero.  To some people, Charles Manson was inspiring, and heroic.  To many Germans, Hitler was a godlike personage of pride and honor.  Limbaugh is not important, unless you realize the thread of his message, and to whom it is meant for.  He doesn't enable people who are monsters, or terrorists, or criminals.  Though he has millions of listeners who are great honorable men and women, who will never commit a crime nor take everything he says seriously--there are a scattered grouping of Americans of every background who speak his language, and do his bidding, in all the hidden messages inherent in his messages to America.

Voices like his make a boring or tedious afternoon a bit light.  Or, it can bewilder, anger, and give talking points for a week.  But, it can also make lonely, hopeless men with no life, and no use aspire to be a "hero", and sacrifice something for a "higher good."  People who only talked BS with friends, joked over barstools, or made threats over a campfire, may find an outlet for their frustration, and a time for their purpose.  "The Government"--the G-men, are coming.  The war is lost, the world will change.  They will take your guns away, blacklist you, and suffocate you and your values out of existence.  It is you that must rise up.  This is what they will understand; this is the messages only they can hear. 

And this, as before--without ever leaving a trace backwards to what set them off, or gave them a push, a nod, or inspires something they lack in their empty lives--hope.  And people like you or I will say," He always talked about how he wanted to... but I never believed him."

Above all, someone like me who had a similar upbringing, and was put in the environment of aging veterans, truck drivers, and gun-loving neighbors has met the James Von Brunn's of the world, though we never knew what they were capable of.

We enjoyed their company at times, found them interesting, or just felt perhaps that we had no life, and no purpose.

I could have been a pawn in their game.

But luckily, I had a purpose.  I was a contributing member of the Southern Poverty Law Center, and an informant via Klanwatch.  

We still need help to stop these hateful events from ever taking fruition.    

It is as simple as passing along information that you may already have.  By infiltrating and reporting on mere chatter, on activities, or on veiled threats--it is their hope to make a dent in preventing hate crimes, to bring justice against those in racist/terrorist organizations successfully, and to encourage teaching tolerance in all of its forms in a multicultural society, full of diverse POV and beliefs. 

I felt it my responsibility as a true American to join the side that bends toward justice.   

 


20 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Bravo. A brilliant, heartfelt post that left me breathless. I couldn't agree with your last line more.

Thank you for this.

user-pic

Joe, I think you have written an outstanding essay. I find your insight on this matter very helpful. A couple of your points really stood out for me.

1. "They believe that everything is set against them, and that it takes a hero to stop it. They believe that their children will not enjoy the dream they once had for themselves, passed down from their ancestors, as God's chosen people.
They believe that the terrorists have won, that America has failed them, and that voting and speaking out only gets them blacklisted, and defeated."

Right-wingers are always talking about how patriotic they are. How American they are, and how un-American the rest of us are. Hannity and his radio show callers usually greet each other on-air with, "you're a great American". Yet, many of those same people would act to subvert our constitutional democratic processes or would sympathize with anyone who did. In reality, it is they who are un-American. For they don't really care about democracy or representative government. They only care about getting their way, the majority be damned. If they can't get their way through the ballot box they'll get it through the gun.

2. "The people who end up assassinating a political leader, or who blow up an abortion clinic, or shoot a doctor in church. These are the chosen instruments of history, the ones who act not out of means, but out of motive. They are not crazy. They are not insane. They are subjugated to a higher aim, a higher sense of belonging and duty than to themself; they are the magic wand, that conquers the enemy, and saves the country from itself."

This marks them as having exactly the same extremist mindset as any Al Qaeda terrorist or sympathizer. Weren't many of the 9-11 hijackers well educated middle-class types? They weren't insane. They were sacrificing for a higher purpose. As you would say, in their minds, they were heroes. Scary shit.

user-pic
"The Government"--the G-men, are coming. The war is lost, the world will change. They will take your guns away, blacklist you, and suffocate you and your values out of existence.

By fait accompli, how inaccurate is this appraisal for the downside America you describe? How baffling would it be for them to reach just those conclusions? With some press reaction since these latest shootings, on top of the DHS report, how outrageous is it for a large segment of this nation to see themselves cut away, isolated, defined as fools clinging to guns and God, at best, and, at worst, potential terrorists? The DHS report was impossibly broad in its categorizations of possible extremist fodder: immigration opponents, antigovernment groups, veterans. Where is the line between genuine concerns about vital issues, and fanatical mutation? Who will define the criteria that divides them? Will any distinction be made - or will all political heretics be lumped together on a reconfigured no-fly list? A report released to Missouri law enforcement red-flagged Ron Paul supporters as possible suspects; the last eight years have reminded us government is not a paragon of civil liberties protection.

This is a country of 300 million-plus people, Joe. If a radical, violent paramilitary Right was as virulent as SPLC accusations portray it, we already would be chin-deep in oceans of blood. Wouldn't we?

We need to be vigilent to prevent, if we can, the violence we've seen recently. But by constantly demonizing and ostracizing an American population unable to politically defend itself, we risk a self-fulfilling prophecy realizing itself. We are not in a position to continue telling people they are enemies in their own country. Our history is full of that, and its results always have been catastrophic.

user-pic

Awesome comment. Dovetailing nicely with your earlier blog on the subject.

user-pic

That is why I am a huge supporter of teaching tolerance.

We cannnot go after people simply because we might think they are capable of doing something. Nor should we ever tend to.

I have described in a previous post that I advocate reporting on serious threats, and employ intervention and friendly advice, and beyond that give them experiences that reveal the err in this judgement (racism) against others they might never let themselves get to know as people.

Most of the racists I have met are deep down not bad people, just misinformed ones. Once most people get to a certain stage of development, they realize their comfort zone can hinder their view of the world, and affect their relationship to it. Some never leave the comfort zone, because for them, life is always uncomfortable. So they take the path of least resistance. In the process, they are resisting life, and truth.

user-pic

Joe, I live in Michigan's outback and I run into some of those people, too. They seem as normal as you or me when the topic is on generalities. But there is always an edge--something is off--like a fuse waiting to be lit.

If the topic goes to any form of government, the DNR, the DMV, the IRS--the slow burn turns to a kind of awesome rage. Their language becomes coarse and violent, louder and more boisterous, but they can come down from it as quickly as they began. They see us as outsiders, so it could be that they keep their emotions in check because there are others around who don't necessarily agree with them. Most of us know by now not to argue with them. I can't say that they're always like that, but it happens often enough to make us wary.

The people I know are not loners. They gather together, and what they have in common is their rage against any kind of authority.

I can't imagine any one of them acting out their rage, but I can't promise that I'm right, either. I'm sure that's what most people think when they hear that someone they knew does the unimaginable.


user-pic

Joe, thanks for this. I've got to say, I'm still confused by this mindset. Most terrorist organizations I can understand - PLO, Al Qaeda, and even anti-abortion organizations - I can get my head around their grievances and strategies even as I don't condone their methods. But some of this contemporary right-wing extremism, I just don't get. What exactly gets one so angry one goes out and shoots people at a holocaust museum? And what is the point of it? What was McVeigh thinking when he blew up a few hundred innocent people? I don't see the method to their madness...

user-pic

I think it's confusing because it's undiagnosed and untreated mental illness. Not everyone with the same mindset and values has the same potential to act on their impulses.

user-pic

So the solution to domestic terrorism is health care reform? I'll buy...

user-pic

Not all vicious racists are violent. Very small percentage, I'd say. In fact, less than half of them will ever let anyone outside their comfort zone know their beliefs.

What gets them angry is how they feel everything slipping away. They identify peace and safety within certain parameters; culture revolving around and strengthening white people. When they turn on TV and see shows like Flavor flav, I love NY, Locked Up, and D.L. Hughley, then see a Black man in the oval office--it is too much to bear. They recall how content and strong they felt with Reagan, with the 700 club, with white culture being center stage. They have no idea how to function now, when they'd say they can't even walk down the street or go to a gas station without being reviled or disgusted with black culture. That is how they see 2009; as the ultimate result of civil rights. They see it as a bitter defeat, and a dismal failure for their country, as they know it. Hence the urgency to lash out against it, whenever possible.
It is desperation and gasping for air. They see only a culture that rewards the opposite of everything they stand for.

Trying to explain their POV, not mine.

Mine is completely different.

user-pic

Thanks again. Desidero's post and exchange with Jade helped flesh things out for me as well. But what you're saying here then pushes back the question to the issue of where this violent disgust and revulsion comes from. Is it a sense of lost self-esteem and of humiliation that congeals into a feeling of moral disgust? And if so, once it solidifies, what can be done about it? Their sense of alienation isn't going to go into abeyance with the direction the country is taking...

user-pic

Thanks for sharing your *inside* viewpoint on the issue, JW. I posted on the subject today myself, but you say it so much better. The focus of my post was the Missouri Information Analysis Center report that was leaked recently. I hate it when people self refer, but thought you might be interested in the report if you haven't seen it.

user-pic

Excellent post, Joe. The people you describe have always been with us (read the rantings of Huck Finn's drunken father in Mark Twain's masterpiece), but two phenomena have magnified their impact.

The first is the greater availability of automatic and semiautomatic weapons.

The second - far more potent and ominous - is the ability of the Internet to serve as a focal point that encourages individuals who would otherwise live out their revenge scenarios in fantasy to coalesce into a mutually reinforcing conspiracy - one that inspires the most extreme among them to act out the fantasies in murderous fashion.

Our legal system (and our Constitution) did not evolve with the Internet in mind, and the enormous challenge we face is the imperative to adjust in ways that protects our Constitutional rights while also protecting our very lives.

user-pic

Thank for this post, Joe. Great insight and well written. I live in the South and watch the same old group of people speaking of returning America to "glory". And you are right that these people are completely sane, and have functioned well in many areas of their life, and would go out of their way to help you if needed (provided you are white).

I think they believe the way they do based on loyalty. They were brought up believing a certain way, and if they were to change they way they thought, it would be dishonoring their parents, grandparents,etc. They are unable to separate that great people sometimes hold terrible prejudices.

user-pic

Yeah, well, as you quoted, Joe, from the slain President: "They are free to disagree with the law, but not to disobey it."

The times they have a-changed...always did, always will. I will play my violin as you write the portrait of their pain. I live among these people too. And San Fernando Curtadds wisdom to your study when he says: "We are not in a position to continue telling people they are enemies in their own country."

Hey, life goes on, and they will just have to deal with it. If they do not, we've got a court system that will. But there are some depraved motivations in the recesses of our species that law is powerless to correct or prevent.

Neil Young warned them years ago: "Don't forget what your good book says..." Maybe they would do better, as many of us might, to calm down and review the tolerance lesson found in Matthew, chapter 5.

Carey Rowland, author of Glass half-Full

user-pic

i believe self hate motivates the people you refer too.
rush is paid to create an enemy.

the person who kills seeks to destroy that enemy.

they need to destroy that enemy because they cant stand the pain of looking inward.

and once they kill they have given themselve the ability to stop looking inward.

the ones who dont kill seek comfort in like minded groups.

the end.

user-pic

These people followed their leader.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine

The Bush Administration not only declared war on other Nations, they sent out the message to their followers to make War in America. They beleived they heard the clarion call for a premptive strike for a just cause.

Now, that the genie is out of the bottle; who can put it back?

Democracy to these people is an obstruction.
Remember Bush said, "If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier," Bush said, pausing and then joking, "just so long as I'm the dictator. ..."

They'll have they’re War, and then they'll appoint their dictator, then claiming they saved America.

Rush is the new Paul Joseph Goebbels.
The others on the (Desert Fox)Network, are tools to deliver the message.

"The essential English leadership secret does not depend on particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous." Goebbels. Wikiquotes

user-pic

I learned to shoot at an early age. My grandfather taught me. We are not a hunting family, but a police/military one. We all own guns, enjoy target practice, and appreciate how dangerous they can be. I'm glad we have them, and if if forced to, I think I could shoot a person to protect my family. But never in my wildest dreams would I shoot a person for disagreeing with my political point of view, let alone an innocent who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

I know of 2 people who I would put in the "it wouldn't surprise me if I learned they had whacked out and shot up a (fill in the blank)" category. They are obsessed with the threat that Obama's election poses to this country. They e-mail unrelentingly about whatever the latest proof is that he will be responsible for the demise of our country. They make me nervous, but they've never made threats to do him bodily harm.

I live in fear that one of these crazies will act on their delusions. That is why I am so afraid of the sensational language on the parts of people like rush and palin... You just never know what it is that one of these "on the edge" people will hear that finally sends them over it.

Great post, Joe.

user-pic

Stilli wrote “You just never know what it is that one of these "on the edge" people will hear that finally sends them over it.

That’s true, what bothers me too, is that they throw so much out there knowing full well that SOMEONE WILL ACT. Making the news, which in turn; makes them money when they report the news they helped create.
They’ll talk about the mad person the perpetrator, never discusssiing they're role as instigators, they're uncontrolled speech led to violence and harm.

If these political and Radio personalities really cared about others well being, then there would be a conflict with their conscience. But having NO conscience there is no conflict.
.
With Rush he can claim plausible deniability. "I'm only an entertainer" "WE didn't pull the trigger"
No but some talk show hosts have lit somebody’s fuse.

(James 3:5-8) . . .So, too, the tongue is a little member and yet makes great brags. Look! How little a fire it takes to set so great a woodland on fire! 6 Well, the tongue is a fire. The tongue is constituted a world of unrighteousness among our members, for it spots up all the body and sets the wheel of natural life aflame and it is set aflame by Ge·hen′na. 7 For every species of wild beast as well as bird and creeping thing and sea creature is to be tamed and has been tamed by humankind. 8 But the tongue, not one of mankind can get it tamed. An unruly injurious thing, it is full of death-dealing poison. . .

Flame throwing talk shows, spotting up the body (politic) the tongue an unruly injurious thing full of death dealing poison.

If we have free speech yet it's illegal to yell fire in a crowded theater, why can't these fire brand or political personalities and radio personalities be charged with a crime?

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/resistance/2009/03/entertainer-limbaugh-a-model-t.php

user-pic

Limbaugh is reveling in his "relevence" lately, which is merely the same as the loud, screaming child on a plane, that gets everyone's attention not through persuasion or achievement, but out of a reaction to a noise.

He goes further than everyone else, and the people who attend to him do so, I believe, out of
either self-validation or boredom.

Leave a comment

Joe Wood

user-pic

Following: 0
Followers: 22

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs are not necessarily everyone's favorite, Mr. Nasby; take Joe Wood's for example
  • Favorite Books Bartleby the Scrivener, Grapes of Wrath, The Wrath of Khan, Kahn's Corn Dogs, Dog Day Afternoon, After the Rain, Rain is Cold, In Cold Blood, Blood For Sale, The Saledon Prophecy, Don Quixote, Coyotes are Ugly, Ugly/Grumpy, Grumpy Bird, Birdman of Alcatraz, Alcatraz Curious Moments Vol I, Curious George, George Killed His Skin Doctor, Dr. Suess
  • Favorite Quotes Any by Sam Waterston doing the "Old Glory Insurance Commercial"--"Robot's can come at any time." "Robots are strong, because they're made of metal."

Bio

Professor M. M. Quimby began in 1952 his program for elementary uses for Thermos Technology, and became the sole inventor of No. 5 Electronic Skin Salve. Joe Wood, however, is an artist/author in St. Louis, MO.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address