« Fat people who drive too fast without seatbelts and the national mandate. | Joe Monster's Blog | I'm for the investigations because »
No exclusion or discrimination= no insurance
My suggestion that lifestyle choices like Sweet Tea or smoking increase risks to personal health was met with some hostility. In reality land, we'll absolve everyone of their responsibility to eat well, move around as if they were alive, and avoid ingesting concentrated toxins by outlawing risk and pre-existing conditions from insurance companies' gambling methods. Moral Hazard.
I'm ignoring the legions of people born without the muscle proteins to allow them to walk a few miles once in a while, or to digest. Forget the injuries leaving a normally active person bed-ridden. It's the big, fat, normal, mediocre middle of the bell curve we need to consider.
I'm also consciously ignoring the fact that Detroit, MI and Chester, PA have no supermarkets. We're not talking about opening US Federal Supermarkets. The Burka, the impending caning of a 32-year old mother of two in Malaysia for drinking a beer came up at breakfast this morning, and my five-year-ld daughter said, "Why don't they just leave?" The boy, 8, was confused for a while. The truth is that people are portable, and if the landscape is barren they should move. Change.
I'm focusing instead on the idiots in southern California whose neighborhood burns every year, and they rebuild with insurance money. At some level, all insurance is a gamble, and beyond that level it's not a gamble at all. There is no risk of a flood along the Mississippi flood plain, there is certainty. Now think of the mouth-breathing, gasping obese adults who can't climb a flight of stairs and their families. How long does it take to gain 200 pounds?
There's a non-insurance solution to most health problems, and that is to go back in time to when you were being raised, and pay attention to health class and demand your parents stop feeding you TV dinners. Get into a habit of movement.
If we're talking about including everybody at equal risk, then we aren't planning to retain the insurance company model at all, and the only way to use that insurance model is to start making guidances about lifestyle.
Only the Public Option can do that, and it can't do that here. So what has to happen is a simple Feddie Med insurer, with income-based premiums, providing 100% coverage to all the uninsured who choose to participate. Only then the commercial sector will be forced to compete, and only in this way can a system emerge without destroying its vital components.
I'm ignoring the legions of people born without the muscle proteins to allow them to walk a few miles once in a while, or to digest. Forget the injuries leaving a normally active person bed-ridden. It's the big, fat, normal, mediocre middle of the bell curve we need to consider.
I'm also consciously ignoring the fact that Detroit, MI and Chester, PA have no supermarkets. We're not talking about opening US Federal Supermarkets. The Burka, the impending caning of a 32-year old mother of two in Malaysia for drinking a beer came up at breakfast this morning, and my five-year-ld daughter said, "Why don't they just leave?" The boy, 8, was confused for a while. The truth is that people are portable, and if the landscape is barren they should move. Change.
I'm focusing instead on the idiots in southern California whose neighborhood burns every year, and they rebuild with insurance money. At some level, all insurance is a gamble, and beyond that level it's not a gamble at all. There is no risk of a flood along the Mississippi flood plain, there is certainty. Now think of the mouth-breathing, gasping obese adults who can't climb a flight of stairs and their families. How long does it take to gain 200 pounds?
There's a non-insurance solution to most health problems, and that is to go back in time to when you were being raised, and pay attention to health class and demand your parents stop feeding you TV dinners. Get into a habit of movement.
If we're talking about including everybody at equal risk, then we aren't planning to retain the insurance company model at all, and the only way to use that insurance model is to start making guidances about lifestyle.
Only the Public Option can do that, and it can't do that here. So what has to happen is a simple Feddie Med insurer, with income-based premiums, providing 100% coverage to all the uninsured who choose to participate. Only then the commercial sector will be forced to compete, and only in this way can a system emerge without destroying its vital components.
Advertisement













You know you are describing the coop idea right?
Freddie Mac is a nonprofit entity with a government mandate and uses private financial companies to actually service the loans. The idea currently being considered seems to follow along the same lines for those who are uninsured, self-employed or have small businesses with under 20 employees.
I totally agree that lifestyle choices, even if only to choose moderation over indulgence, would lower health care costs more than any of the pending reforms. I would even take it a step further to say that democratic legislators have failed to change 1970s era subsidy programs that ensure our poisonous food supply.
It isn't that there aren't enough grocery stores. It's the type of food that is typically available even if you have access to a supermarket. That "food" stuff is a direct result of subsidies for commodity corn that allow for a cheap filler that keep prices for crappy food artificially low while real food producers get tagged as "elitist" because their costs are higher and that is reflected in the price of their products.
Our insane relationship with high-fructose corn syrup and corn-fed meats has to stop before it kills the two-thirds of the country that can't seem to help themselves, either through biology or through psychology.
August 25, 2009 8:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Grocery stores are a market creature, and there aren't any in Detroit or Chester. I'm sure that's true around the country, but people stay there and eat what's convenient instead of uprooting their families and moving on.
I want to fix a problem with the health reform discussion: it's all connected, and we're only talking about paying for insurance companies so they can pay for doctors. Society suffers from health problems, maybe 80% caused by inconvenience or ignorant behavior.
I like the Co-op idea very much, but I hate the superstition that insurance is anything more appropriate as a basis of hope than a casino.
August 25, 2009 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think most of the health problems are directly related to government food policies rather than ignorance or inconvenience. When everything that can purchased on American shelves relies in corn and corn byproducts, something is drastically wrong no matter where you live or shop.
August 25, 2009 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
We're all going to feel rather stupid when they finally discover that obesity is a communicable disease caused by a virus, bacteria or prion.
But until they do, put down the Twinkie, turn off your phone, and go for a walk.
August 25, 2009 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink