No photos yet of the Cheneys giving Celtic and Capri a tour of the undisclosed location.
By your leave, I'll disagree. Not about the Flintstones, entirely, but about the Jetsons: the show had a peculiarly 1950s view of the future, with its design emphasis on tail fins and on pointy spires with their irrelevant halos. It was tomorrow viewed through the lens of the pop culture of the day before yesterday. What I'm not just hoping, but (for a change) honestly thinking about our soon-to-be President is that he doesn't come from that place at all, but will have a classicist's view of our founding principles coupled with a truly forward-thinking view of where we as a nation need to go. ...Not that I expect to agree with the man about all his decisions; but I do expect to be able to follow his argument and find a reasoned justification for them, however much I might disagree with his reasoning.
(For the record, my disagreement with the "Flintstones" analogy is that as with all Hanna-Barbera cartoons, the characters are essentially nice people who want to be liked. This administration, on the other hand, is populated by ideologues and/or idiots who just want to win.)
What would you prefer? Flintstones meets Blade Runner?
Caveman meets Alien?
That would just give people the chance to call Obama "foreign"
. . . You're traveling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind; a journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That's the signpost up ahead — your next stop, the Twilight Zone.
I laughed so hard I actually started burping.
Did you hear that Wally Cleaver has his sculpture being shown in the Louvre?
Are you suggesting a "Leave it to Beaver" meets "Shaft" allegory?
Tony Dowd - that is something at the Louvre...it was a neat looking piece as welol
No photos yet of the Cheneys giving Celtic and Capri a tour of the undisclosed location.
November 10, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
By your leave, I'll disagree. Not about the Flintstones, entirely, but about the Jetsons: the show had a peculiarly 1950s view of the future, with its design emphasis on tail fins and on pointy spires with their irrelevant halos. It was tomorrow viewed through the lens of the pop culture of the day before yesterday. What I'm not just hoping, but (for a change) honestly thinking about our soon-to-be President is that he doesn't come from that place at all, but will have a classicist's view of our founding principles coupled with a truly forward-thinking view of where we as a nation need to go. ...Not that I expect to agree with the man about all his decisions; but I do expect to be able to follow his argument and find a reasoned justification for them, however much I might disagree with his reasoning.
(For the record, my disagreement with the "Flintstones" analogy is that as with all Hanna-Barbera cartoons, the characters are essentially nice people who want to be liked. This administration, on the other hand, is populated by ideologues and/or idiots who just want to win.)
November 11, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
What would you prefer? Flintstones meets Blade Runner?
November 11, 2008 5:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Caveman meets Alien?
November 11, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would just give people the chance to call Obama "foreign"
November 11, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
. . . You're traveling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind; a journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That's the signpost up ahead — your next stop, the Twilight Zone.
November 11, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I laughed so hard I actually started burping.
November 11, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did you hear that Wally Cleaver has his sculpture being shown in the Louvre?
November 11, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you suggesting a "Leave it to Beaver" meets "Shaft" allegory?
November 11, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tony Dowd - that is something at the Louvre...it was a neat looking piece as welol
November 13, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink