Now that the election is over we need to make a few final comments on the unresolved issue of Trig Palin's parentage.

I still believe that Mooselini is not the mother but what we learned from her during the campaign certainly opens another explanation to some credibility.

In August we assumed Palin was a normal politician and we learned she is an ignorant, incurious, inexperienced, small town mayor whose appeal and image are all about looks and being like a bitchy high school girl. The findings from the Legislatures 268 page ethics report confirm all the behavioral issues in spades and recent reports on her ignorance of the most basic civics, the role of the VP et al tell the rest of the story.

Clearly Palin is a ruthlessly ambitious narcissist who continues to focus on herself and not people who helped her or her family. Her rogue behavior the last few weeks with the McCain campaign shows her real stripes which we learned she displayed in throwing every person in AK who ever helped her or got in her way.

Obviously the trip to TX at 8 months pregnant was totally politically motivated for both the VP job she was lobbying for and had hired a publicist to help her with. Alll the attendees were governors that were on the VP list and the meeting was with oil/gas execs and was very secretive. Clearly her pipeline agenda was furthered here as well.

To her the trip and her behavior in flying home was clearly worth the risk and we have seen now in her past behavior around her ex brother in law Wooten, Walt Monegan and a number of questionable ethics issues like expenses, office renovations et al that everything is all about her.

As such the conclusion that Palin putting her unborn, downs diagnosed child at risk was either purposeful or simply driven by her ego and narcissism is at least a plausible option. Her intellectual ignorance probably did not help here either.

2 months ago I refused to believe any adult would purposely behave as she did and endanger an unborn baby. Now it is at least an option that fits with the narcissistic, self centered, overly ambitious woman we have learned a lot about.

I am not ready to say she endangered Trig's life on purpose, she probably assumed that God would protect them or her witch doctor preacher would....or not.

I doubt we will ever know for sure but it is clear that Palin is capable of anything as long as it helps her further her own blind ambition.

We have all read the stories on the poor McCain ground game but now the facts come out.

Quotes abounded as to how many calls they were making etc and my suspicions were that these included robo calls and were in all likelihood mostly robo calls. God knows that is all we got and we got several a day last week here in GA.

From Marc Ambinder:

At the National Press Club on Wednesday, RNC chairman Mike Duncan crowed about how the Republican National Committee and the McCain campaign had contacted 30 million individual voters directly.  (This figure includes those robocalls.)

Impressive.

But the Obama campaign / Democratic National Committee turnout program contacted more than double that amount -- about 68 million, according to a Democratic officials.

Now I have managed sales people all my life and this strikes me like the difference in the ones that failed vs. the ones that succeeded. it is pretty simple and a good analogy here.

The failures would count sales calls as those where they left messages or left behind a brochure and could never understand why they failed. Their sales pipelines would include things that were wishes and hopes not hard and fast facts they got from their customers.

Those that succeeded actually were relentless in directly talking to prospects and following up until they did. Messages did not count. Their pipelines tended to be smaller but had facts to back up their inclusion on a report.

Most of the Obama calls were in person and tracked in detail as to whether messages were left, direct contact, number of contacts etc.. I know as I made a lot of them online and in our office. Sounds like a really well managed sales organization.

Meanwhile we see this latest where the RNC guy "crowed" over their results and heard Rick Davis bragging about how they mad 3-4X more "voter contacts: in Ohio the week before the election than Bush did in 2004.

Hmmm, who won? I do not even think they realize that their methodology, tracking and metrics were wrong and all along they were kidding themselves, their supporters and the media that touching people with recorded hate messages was productive.

I'll bet Rove and Bush actually counted things differently too...and they won as well.

In one word - Alot! ....and the MSM is just plain ignorant in ignoring these factors as they still try to make this a horserace.

First, while the latest round of polls - esp. Mason Doxon show a tighening in a lot of states of 2-3 pts and the national polls have swung back 2-3 points from earlier in the week. How can tis be happening? Simple. The timing of state polls lag the daily trackers by 3-4 days.

So by Tuesday the state polls are likely to have swung back a bit as voting starts and at this point 1-3 points is important.

Second, state polls generally do not have cell phone voters included. Selzer, one of the best local Midwest pollsters does and they show huge Obama leads in MN and IA and a tie in IN.

The cell phone effect impacts young voters and minorities the most and is worth 2.8 pts on average according tofivethirtyeight.com.

Third, party ID is 7-9 points to the Democratic side and that alone if turnout holds as we are seeing in the early voting this is a huge wildcard.

Fourth, early voting trends are now indicative of a strong democratic trend, huge African American turnout and the young voters showing up in the states like GA,NC,NC,CO and FL where we have the best stats. Most polls are using outmoded turnout and voter demographics from prior elections and this easrly voting is pointing strongly that these assumptions are not the foundation for this election.

Fifth, the ground game comparisons between the enormous Obama campaign resources and McCain's haphazard, poorly organized efforts relying on local Republican state parties are what it is all about now. McCain has scaled back his ground game to run more ads and I guess robocalls.

GOTV is what works the last few days not ads to get turnout not ads that people are tired of. A good ground game is worth 2-3 pts and a great one like Obama's is worth 3-4 pts. McCain has neither. The vaunted 72 hour strategy of the Bush years is not as well deployed and will not help McCain like it helped Bush.

Sixth, turnout is a function of the above and enthusiasm and McCain's supporters are not enthusiastic. Early voting typically has been a Republican edge, especially in FL where this year Dems have a solid lead. With lack of enthusiasm comes 2 issues - one is simply staying home if the election appears lost and the second is soft support switching to go with the winner which Ed Rollins, Reagan's campaign manager, on CNN just said is worth 2-3 pts in an election like this.

Quantifying this impact is hard but again a point or two is deadly in close states.

Seventh and lastly, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE BRADLEY EFFECT. Any reputable media outlets even discussing this is wasting good air and if anything there will be an Obama Effect where people vote secretly for him once in the voting booth, especially in the South.

Any combination of these factors creates an embarrassing defeat for McCain.

None of this means that we should let up at all but this election is headed to a blowout. Lots of the battleground states will be tight but if any state is within five points for McCain he is in trouble and any state where Obama is leading in the final poll averages will go Obama's way.

My projection is that Barack will win 393 electoral votes - winning every battleground state including IN and GA narrowly, with ND and AZ still options for him.

Remember as theye say on the PGA Tour - "it's not an art show its a math contest" -  and on Tuesday you will need your calculator to add up the Obama electoral avalanche.

NC has 1 more day of early voting and the numbers speak for themselves. Obama is banking votes at a furious pace.

Total - 2,350,712 (+294,000)

• 2004 General Election Turnout - 3.55 Million - Bush won by 436,000 votes
• 2004 - 923,000 African American votes, 618K already in 2008

Non White % - 30.4% - AA - 26.3 - Target is 20%+ to win the election - this has dropped 1.4% the last week.

Dem early votes up 3.2% and Republicans down 7.4%, Indeps. up 4.1%

<30 voters continue to grow and now are 13.9% of the vote. In 2004 they were 14% so the youth vote is coming out and should overperform 2004 handily.

66.2% of the total 2004 vote has been reached already when 30.8% voted early!!

1,314,000 more NC voters have voted early this year already than voted early in 2004.

Early voting ended yesterday and nearly 2 million Georgians voted, 60% of the 2004 election total and 3X the 2004 early vote percentage!!! These numbers are so huge that they setup a Democratic win if they can keep up the turnout on election day which seems very likely.

GA - Final Early Voting Stats

Total - 1,994,990 (+227,000) - nearly triple the average of the last 2 weeks.

• 2004 General Election Turnout - 3.3 Million

African American/Latino/Asian - 700K/ 15K / 11K - 726 K -  82,000 African American votes Thurs. alone!!

• 833K (25%) African Americans Voted in 2004 - 88/12 for Kerry
  
• 128k Latinos (4%) voted in 2004 - 56/44 for Bush. If Latinos go 2-1 for Obama as the polls indicate this could add another 75-100,000 votes for Obama. Latinos will be election day voters it appears.

AA - 35.1%, 700K vs. 833K (25%)  in all of 2004. A 40% increase thus far. If this 35% figure holds up that is nearly 400,000 additional AA votes alone.

Non White % - 36.5% - Holding steady - Target is 30%+ to win the election - this number is the key to watch and after 2 full weeks looks like a trend.

We are now at 60.2% of the total 2004 vote when 20.2% voted early an 300% increase.

1.45 Million more people have already voted early than in 2004.

Hold on for a GA going blue surprise!!!

As I blogged before our GOTV office is in the middle of historic, all black and poor, SW Atlanta, near Morehouse, Morris Brown, Clark and Spelman colleges.

One of the things that I have been doing is giving Obama/Biden picture buttons that I bought to any child that I see. I tell each of them that they can be President someday if they study hard like Barack did and the parents or grandparents with them beam and often tell me that the kids are on honor roll etc...Great fun..

If cars stop at the light in front of our office and I see kids in them I go up to the car and hand out buttons.

Yesterday I had 3 or 4 little ones (ages 2-4?) in car seats and EVERY single one knew "Obama" by his picture when their Mom asked them whose picture was on the button.

EVERY SINGLE ONE!!! ..."Obama"

One of my favorite stories was five year old twin boys who when I went up to their car one of the boys saw my Obama button, pointed at it and said - "That's my President" - and told me that he had voted for Obama at kindergarten.

Imagine what Obama as President for 8 years will mean to these kids as they go to school and start to learn about history, government etc.?

Have I met a future President yet? Who knows but the one thing that I think we can guarantee is that Barack Obama as President will have a huge impact on black children ( and really all kids) as a role model and that alone may be his greatest legacy 30, 40, 50 years hence when our future leaders trace their interest in politics and public service back to the election of 2008 and Barack Obama.