Who Needs the NY Times? You Do. Still.
At times it's good to pause and admire what the New York Times does wonderfully well, when it does do it. I've excoriated the blunderbuss of Eighth Avenue often enough to say credibly, I hope, what TPM contributors and readers already know but need to affirm: Sometimes the Times reminds us that serious journalism requires more than instant videos, twitter alerts, reader feeds, and bolt-of-lightning insights; it requires climbing a tenement's stairs the second time to be sure of what's there, or making that last call to a possible source on one's list, or seeing the look on a campaign manager's face as you pop your question.
At times there's no substitute for an experienced reporter's going there and bringing both public memory and professional skill to the job -- especially when the story seems obvious and familiar. Telling the truth always takes time and resources to .
Corporate bottom-lining now cuts against giving reporters what they need, and media like TPM are striving to fill the breach and often succeeding. But three very different pieces in yesterday's Times show what it is we're all hoping to achieve.











