« February 12, 2006 - February 18, 2006 | Home | February 26, 2006 - March 4, 2006 »

Week of February 19, 2006 - February 25, 2006

Hysterical



The Boy Who Cried Wolf

by WILLIAM GREIDER The Nation

[posted online on February 23, 2006]

David Brooks, the high-minded conservative pundit, dismissed the Dubai Ports controversy as an instance of political hysteria that will soon pass. He was commenting on PBS, and I thought I heard a little quaver in his voice when he said this was no big deal. Brooks consulted "the experts," and they assured him there's no national security risk in a foreign company owned by Middle East Muslims--actually, by an Arab government--managing six major American ports. Cool down, people. This is how the world works in the age of globalization.

Of course, he is correct. But what a killjoy. This is a fun flap, the kind that brings us together. Republicans and Democrats are frothing in unison, instead of polarizing incivilities. Together, they are all thumping righteously on the poor President. I expect he will fold or at least retreat tactically by ordering further investigation. The issue is indeed trivial. But Bush cannot escape the basic contradiction, because this dilemma is fundamental to his presidency.

A conservative blaming hysteria is hysterical, when you think about it, and a bit late. Hysteria launched Bush's invasion of Iraq. It created that monstrosity called Homeland Security and pumped up defense spending by more than 40 percent. Hysteria has been used to realign US foreign policy for permanent imperial war-making, whenever and wherever we find something frightening afoot in the world. Hysteria will justify the "long war" now fondly embraced by Field Marshal Rumsfeld. It has also slaughtered a number of Democrats who were not sufficiently hysterical. It saved George Bush's butt in 2004.

 

 

A Farce in Several Acts


The Greatest Strategic Disaster in US History

Lmited Engagement..Closing Sooner Than You Think

On The Brink In Iraq
Robert Dreyfuss
February 24, 2006


With Iraq perched at the very precipice of an ethnic and sectarian holocaust, the utter failure of the Bush administration’s policy is revealed with starkest clarity. Iraq may or may not fall into the abyss in the next few days and weeks, but what is no longer in doubt is who is to blame: If Iraq is engulfed in civil war then Americans, Iraqis and the international community must hold President Bush and Vice President Cheney responsible for the destruction of Iraq.

The CIA, the State Department, members of Congress and countless Middle East experts warned Bush and Cheney— to no avail— that toppling Saddam could unleash the demons of civil war. They said so before the war, during it and in the aftermath, and each time the warnings were dismissed. Those warnings came from people like Paul Pillar, the CIA veteran who served as the U.S. intelligence community’s chief Middle East analyst, from Wayne White, the State Department’s chief intelligence analyst on Iraq and from two CIA Baghdad station chiefs who were purged for their analysis. Pillar, who wrote this month in Foreign Affairs that pre-war intelligence on Iraq was distorted by the Bush-Cheney team, is being excoriated by the right.
...”

It is all ugly and likely to get much uglier. So far, hundreds of Iraqis on all sides have died since Tuesday, scores and perhaps hundreds of mosques attacked, execution-style slayings proliferated, and ordinary Iraqis driven into hiding or into exile. A weekend curfew has Iraq on the knife’s edge.

Like the Sarajevo assassination that precipitated World War I, the attack on the mosque may trigger a war, but it won’t be the cause. The cause is far more deep-rooted, embedded in the chaos and bitterness that followed the U.S. invasion of Iraq and America’s deliberate efforts to stress sectarian differences in creating the Iraqi Governing Council and subsequent government institutions. If the current crisis doesn’t spark a civil war, be patient. The next one will.

The Siren Song of Sunk Cost


As Bush's Middle East Disaster continues to unfold to unremitting blows, we are sure to be heariing many variations on a dangerously fallacios argument.

Why jsut glancing at the papers today, the embattled Khalizad sound one such variant 'We've too much invested in Iraq. Iiraqi failures are our failures"

Well not quite Mister Ambassador. Now go get those Shia militias out of that Iraqified Security force...poor fella, I almost feel his pain 

 

The Sunk Cost Fallacy

by Werther*
April 22, 2004

*Werther is the pen name of a defense analyst who lives in Northern Virginia

Las Vegas has become the fastest-growing major city in the United States because it exploits the sunk cost fallacy. Not being fools, casino managers fix the odds in favor of the house, which means that on average, gamblers consistently lose to the house. And they keep on losing.

Some atavistic trait in human psychology causes human beings to value a past investment of money, effort or some intangible quality (e.g., "credibility" or "face") independent of the investment's probability of paying future dividends. At its most primitive, the trait makes us reluctant to leave the interminable line at the DMV: the more time we've "invested," the less likely we are to leave, regardless of how much longer we still have to wait and regardless of whether we could spend that time more profitably and come back another day. It is stubbornness; it is also the sunk cost phenomenon at work.

As a glance the newspaper will reveal, politicians are now trying out new rationales to anesthetize public unease about the rising tab at the Great Mesopotamian Casino. The old bromides about WMD, a self-financing occupation, peace between Israel and Palestine, and the grateful acclaim of the liberated now elicit at best a polite cough behind the hand.

Fortunately for our governing class, the sunk cost argument lies ready: "We've come this far; there's no turning back." Taxpayers have committed $121 billion and military families a much heavier cost, but the U.S. government has not accomplished a single major prewar objective save deposing the senile Saddam Hussein. Nevertheless, marvelous benefits will accrue (no less than Changing the World) if we "stay the course" and don't "cut and run" - ominous slogans from Vietnam, another classic example of sunk cost rationales. Even more ominous, the president's 13 April press conference contains this: "As I have said to those who have lost loved ones, we will finish the work of the fallen." There, in embryo, is sunk cost - not in money, but in precious lives.

And just where is the Loyal Opposition on this weighty issue? Showing his penchant for cutting-edge thinking, the Democratic presidential challenger has issued this breathtaking proposal: add more troops and delay the handover of Iraq to its ostensible owners. Like Bill Bennett in Vegas, his gambling strategy is to up the ante.

Now just where on earth do cynics get the idea that Democrats and Republicans are two heads of the same hydra?"

A popular government without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy, or perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." - James Madison, from a letter to W.T. Barry, August 4, 1822

They Warned Us ...


Acid flashbacks...I think the remorseless assault on the Bush ReaKtion have brought one one

 

Acid flashbacks..Bush has triggered ..
Money and Corruption  - Kinks 1973
(sung by chorus)

We are sick and tired
Of being promised this and that.
We work all day, we sweat and slave
To keep the wealthy fat.
They fill our heads with promises
And bamboozle us with facts,
Then they put on false sincerity
Then they laugh behind our backs.

1st chorus
Money and corruption
Are ruining the land
Crooked politicians
Betray the working man,
Pocketing the profits
And treating us like sheep,
And we’re tired of hearing promises
That we know they’ll never keep.

Money and corruption
(etc. repeat 1st chorus above)

Promises, promises, all we get are promises.
Show us a man who’ll understand us, guide us and lead us.

We are sick and tired
Of having to ask them cap in hand
We crawl on the floor
We beg for more,
But still we are ignored.
We’re tired of being herded
Like a mindless flock of sheep
And we’re tired of hearing promises
That we know they’ll never keep.

1st chorus
Money and corruption
Are ruining the land
Crooked politicians
Betray the working man,
Pocketing the profits
And treating us like sheep,
And we’re tired of hearing promises
We know they’ll never keep.

We’ve got to stand together
Every woman, every man,
Because money and corruption are ruining the land.
Show us a man who’ll be our saviour and will lead us.
Show us a man who’ll understand us, guide us and lead us.
Show us a man.
Workers of the nation unite.
Workers of the nation unite.
(mr. black sings)

I visualise a day when people will be free
And we’ll be living in a new society.
No class distinction, no slums or poverty
I have a vision of a new society.
And every home will have a stereo and tv,
A deep freeze, quadrasonic and a washing machine.
So workers of the nation unite.

I am your man
I’ll work out a five-year plan
So vote for me brothers
And I will save this land
And we will nationalise the wealthy companies
And all the directors will be answerable to me,
There’ll be no shirking of responsibilities
So people of the nation unite.

Union man I’ll work with you hand in hand
For we’re all brothers to our union man.
I am your man,
Oh God how I love this land,
So join together save the fatherland.

I visualize a day when people will be free
And we’ll be living in a new society.
No class distinction, no slums or poverty,
So workers of the nation unite,
Workers of the nation unite,
People of the nation unite

Bush Delivers Pep Talk to Puppets


  • Iraq govt warns of risk of endless civil war (Reuters)

  • Bush urges Iraqi leaders to calm violence (Reuters)

    I wonder if they were laughing during the combo phone lecture and pep talk? What slogans drew the biggest guffaws?
  • Let's roll to Tehran! What gang of nimrods

    The Flatulence of Failure



    Bush Outlines 'Forward Strategy for Freedom'



    Defends campaign to spread democracy worldwide and rejects notion that his policies are "backfiring" in the Middle East.

    Perfect. Stepped in last year's cow pie - again.
    Krugman sees a similar parallel between Bush warmongering and PortGate in his column today.

    Of course, in no case has Bush's democracy crusade made a scintilla of difference abroad His Wars on Iraq, Terror and the Palestine have contributed mightily to the stunning ascendancy of Political Islam from Baghdad to Cairo.

     

    But the gun was never aimed abroad. He pointed it at us.  Domestic sloganeering and ass covering for failure was all it ever amounted to.So in a twisted way, Bush speaks the truth.  His Democracy Campaign hasn't backfired abroad but at home

    RIP

      Forward Strategy for Freedom
      National Strategy for Victory


    War on Terror - War in Error


    The fundamental flaws  in Bush's War on Terror were obvious to some in 2001 (he "war" that isn't a war against a tactic not an enemy - wrong war, wrong place, wrong time)

     

    From the fundamentally flawed to fundamentally failed

    War on Terror  to  War in Error

    Sending a general to do a sheriff’s job

    By Andrew J. Bacevich American Conservative Magazine

    Small events sometimes reveal large truths. Last month’s U.S. missile strike in the remote Bajaur district of Pakistan was such an event. Aimed at taking out Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden’s chief deputy, the strike missed its intended target and killed as many as 18 residents of the small village of Damadola. But the episode did not end there: outraged Pakistanis rose up in protest; days of highly publicized anti-American demonstrations followed. In effect, the United States had handed Muslims around the world another grievance to hold against Americans.

    In stark, unmistakable terms, the Damadola affair lays bare the defects of the Bush administration’s response to 9/11. When President Bush in September 2001 launched the United States on a global war against terrorism, he scornfully abandoned the law-enforcement approach to which previous administrations had adhered. To all but the most militant true believers, it has become increasingly evident that in doing so Bush committed an error of the first order.

    "This is a strike at who we are."


    Dan Murphy of the Christian Science Monitor

    As citizens deserted the streets of Baghdad in the wake of the attack, many said they feared this could be a seminal moment in Iraq's low-intensity civil war.

    "The war could really be on now,'' says Abu Hassan, a Shiite street peddler who declined to give his full name. "This is something greater and more symbolic than attacks on people. This is a strike at who we are."

    .. ..

    "This could be a tipping point,'' says Juan Cole, a historian of Shiite Islam at the University of Michigan. "At some point, the Shiite street is going to be so fed up that they're not going to listen any more to calls for restraint."

    Ports schmorts..

    Iraq took another sharp dive into another circle of hell with the bombing of the Shiite mosque in Samarra...Shiites are in the streets en masse and have attacked a number of Sunni mosques already..all the while our pathetic Ambassador is blustering, bloviating, threatening to cut off aid unless the government cuts ties with Iran and gives up its poohlees

    So what are the democrats doing?

    PORTS

    The US political system and worldview are seriously wack and the democrats - a tossup as to whether they cut more pathetic figures than Khalilzad

    And how *could* I forget our criminally insipid WarLord who, after having carefully cultivated and exploited, American xenophobia, fear and ignorance, now whines that denying his shiek buddies in Dubai millions from control of US ports is racist and anti-Muslim

    Seriously wack this effing country's "leadership"

    Al-Aksariya - Not Winchester Cathedral


    Al-Askariya shrine: 'Not just a major cathedral'
    [Times UK]>

    The Shia Muslim shrine has existed in the middle of the ancient city of Samarra, one of the largest archaeological sites in the world, since 944, when it was built to house the tombs of two ninth century imams, direct descendants of the Prophet Muhammad.

    Ali al-Hadi, the tenth imam who died in 868 and his son Hassan al-Askari who died in 874, were buried at the end of the turbulent period during which Samarra was built as the new capital of the Abbasid empire, briefly taking over from Baghdad, then the largest city in the world.

    But the continued and intense religious importance of the site is connected to the 12th imam, the so-called "Hidden Imam" who Shias believe went into hiding in 878 under the al-Askariya shrine to prepare for his eventual return among men.

    According to Shia tradition, the Mahdi will reappear one day to punish the sinful and "separate truth from falsehood". For many years, a saddled horse and soldiers would be brought to the shrine in Samarra every day to be ready for his return, a ritual that was repeated in Hilla, about 100 miles to the south, where it was also thought that Mahdi might reappear.



    And Paul Wolfowitz urged the invasion of Iraq because they would be more receptive to US military presence, for unlike Saudi Arabia, Iraq didn't have any Muslim shrines.

    Civil War Exploding in Iraq


    There has been a civil war going on in Iraq ever since the CPA ceded authority (!) to an interim govermment  The US has since then defended two of the parties to this war (aka the "government of Iraq") as well as its chief sponsor, the Islamic Republic of Iran

    Today, the civil war that had been at slow boil is roiling, and we are caught in the middle of what Little Carmine Lupertazzi would call a "stagmire"

    Public opinion research by Bruce Jentleson and others establishes that the American public does not wish to invest blood and treasure in Civil Wars. So what are the Democrats railing about today

    PORTS

     Attack on Shia Shrine Could Trigger Massive Violent Reprisals
    An explosion in Iraq has destroyed the golden dome of one of the most revered shrines in Shia Islam, sparking nationwide protests and sectarian reprisals against Sunni mosques despite appeals for calm from government and religious leaders

    Has Jupiter Aligned With Mars???


     Planetary Alignment?

    Juan Cole came round this morning and called for a withdrawal timetable. Now from UPI...
     

    U.S. experts explore Iraq exit strategies

    WASHINGTON, DC, United States (UPI) -- More than 2,270 Americans have lost their lives in the ongoing war in Iraq. The recent elections there and the establishment of democracy have not solved the main problems. As the bloody insurgency continues, the search for a viable exit strategy has intensified.


    At the Washington D.C. launch of the Independent Institute, a non-partisan think-tank, analysts recently said U.S. withdrawal hinges on a successful counter-insurgency strategy, yet there was little agreement on the form this should take.

    Many observers believe a specific timetable for withdrawal would greatly diffuse the insurgency. Lawrence Korb, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress argued that timetabled extraction should remove the bulk of U.S. troops by 2008.

    Cole: Time for a Timetable


    I must say, as a fan of Juan Cole second to none, better late than never.  Last summer, we exchanged a number of emails in which I argued a timetable table for withdrawal would be salutary and that arguments that a fix timetable would encourage the insurgents were in Cole's words today "silly".

     

    Bringing the United Nations Back In -

    There will be anti-War protests in the coming month, as the 3-year anniversary of the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq approaches.
    I think it is time to demand a timetable for US withdrawal from Iraq. I suspect a majority of Iraqi parliamentarians want that. The Sunni Arabs demand it. The Sadrists demand it. It is time. Saying that the guerrillas would take advantage of a timetable, given the carnage we saw on Monday (see below) is frankly silly. They are taking advantage of the current situation. We have to create a new situation, with which they might be happier so that they stop blowing things up. Staying this course is untenable.
    But that step will not necessarily resolve the crisis

    A Trend?


    Iraqi Province Cuts Off U.S. Forces Mon Feb 20, 2:30 PM ET

    The governing council of Karbala province said Monday it was suspending contact with U.S. forces over the behavior of soldiers during a visit to the governor's office two days ago.

    The decision followed similar moves by leaders of Maysan and Basra provinces, which have frozen ties with British forces in southern Iraq.

    Karbala provincial spokesman Abdel Amir Hanoun complained that U.S. soldiers brought dogs inside the building when their commander visited provincial Gov. Aqeel al-Khazraji, considered an insult by the council.

    They also blocked roads leading to the governor's office, preventing council members and the governor from parking cars outside the building, Hanoun said. The governor instructed the council to suspend contacts until U.S. forces apologize, he said.

    The Karbala council is controlled by the Supreme Council of Islamic Revolution in Iraq, the country's largest Shiite party, and Dawa, the party of Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari.

     Juan Cole in yesterday's Informed Comment blogged a wide-raninging Al-Jazeera interview with Muqtada Sadr as he was listening to it. Well worth reading in its entirety, here's an excerpt:



    Muqtada says that he is not himself interested in holding political office. He says that each member of parliament represents all Iraqis. He says he only offers advice to the Sadrist bloc in parliament, which is responsible to the Iraqi people generally.
     

    The thirty Sadrist delegates must follow their own conscience. He said that each of the Sadrist MPs was free to support either Ibrahim Jaafari or Adil Abdul Mahdi. the important things was that they should support someone who insists on the departure of the occupation army.

    [Is Muqtada letting it slip that Ibrahim Jaafari gave the Sadrists private assurances that he would work toward withdrawal of US troops from Iraq?]


     

    Answer - Yes
    In fact, I will go futher. As I mentioned in an email to Dr. Cole last summer, I think Jafaari has been looking forward to doing just that and appreciates the power he holds over the US Occupation force. Granted, those who criticize him as weak/ineffectual. have a good point or so it seems but all that means is that Jafaari needs the reassurancce of power watching his back. That Sadr is close to being able to provide.

    Politics being a spectator sport and I a specatator, this Iraqi style game fascinates me no end.

    From the looks of things, no end is an apt metaphor for the current round of politics in Bush's New Iraq.

    Over There (Enrico Caruso)

    Johnnie, get your gun,
    Get your gun, get your gun,
    Take it on the run,
    On the run, on the run.
    Hear them calling, you and me,
    Every son of liberty.
    Hurry right away,
    No delay, go today,
    Make your daddy glad
    To have had such a lad.
    Tell your sweetheart not to pine,
    To be proud her boy's in line.
    (chorus sung twice)

    Johnnie, get your gun,
    Get your gun, get your gun,
    Johnnie show the Hun
    Who's a son of a gun.
    Hoist the flag and let her fly,
    Yankee Doodle do or die.
    Pack your little kit,
    Show your grit, do your bit.
    Yankee to the ranks,
    From the towns and the tanks.
    Make your mother proud of you,
    And the old Red, White and Blue.
    (chorus sung twice)

    Chorus
    Over there, over there,
    Send the word, send the word over there -
    That the Yanks are coming,
    The Yanks are coming,
    The drums rum-tumming
    Ev'rywhere.
    So prepare, say a pray'r,
    Send the word, send the word to beware.
    We'll be over, we're coming over,
    And we won't come back till it's over
    Over there.

    What If Cheney Had Apologized...


     

    Juan Cole asks:
    What if Cheney had Apologized for Iraq?
    Satire alert for the humorless. What would it have looked like if Vice President Richard Bruce Cheney had apologized for Iraq the way he apologized for shooting a hunting buddy?


    This is the original link



    [Imaginary] Transcript of Vice President Dick Cheney's interview Wednesday with Brit Hume of Fox News Channel, as released by the White House. Cheney addresses his illegal invasion of Iraq on false pretences, resulting in tens of thousands of dead.

    ...Q: Would you describe Iraq as a close friend, friendly acquaintance, what?

    A: No, I knew absolutely nothing about the place....

    posted by Juan @ 2/20/2006 06:17:00 AM

    What if Cheney had Apologized for Iraq?
    Then surely Big Bill's Little Hill would be next in line waiting in Brit Hume's Green Room
    Hillary Clinton a shrew?
    A profile in cowardice is more like it.

    LAT: The Senate Coverup Committee.


    LAT


    The United States Senate has a body called the Intelligence Committee, according to The Los Angeles Times an irony George Orwell would have truly appreciated. In a world without Doublespeak, the panel, chaired by GOP Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, would be known by a more appropriate name - the Senate Coverup Committee.

    « February 12, 2006 - February 18, 2006 | Home | February 26, 2006 - March 4, 2006 »

    John McCutchen

    user-pic

    Following:
    Followers:

    Posts
    Comments & Recommends


    Favorites

    All Reader Posts
    How to use myTPM

    Advertise Liberally
    Share
    Close Social Web Email

    "To" Email Address

    Your Name

    Your Email Address