« Hooray on Specter, BUT... | Jesse Lava's Blog | The myth of a conservative public »

The church must grow up or fade away


Turns out most Americans who are leaving religion aren't especially upset about controversial policies (say, on homosexuality) or church scandals (say, pedophilic priests). Rather, they've just gradually drifted away.

It's not anger. It's not disheartenment. It's a shrug.

What that means is religion as it's being practiced today is becoming less and less relevant to people's lives -- providing little reason for people to get up on Sunday and join a church community. Given the intellectually vacuous and emotionally stale tenor of a lot of churches, I can't say I blame anyone for drifting. But given the great value that I've gained from Christianity -- the intimate community, the moral framework, the opportunity for regular reflection -- I can't help but feel dismayed.

We live in a different world than did our ancestors who had no scientific explanation for why the sun goes up and down and the tides go in and out. But we remain a people with a deep longing for human connection and spiritual fulfillment. We still want to be part of something greater than ourselves. And there continues to be a place for religious faith in modern life -- if it can grow with the times.

I can't speak to the state of affairs in faiths other than my own. But in Christianity, we must change our frame of reference. We must stop making religion about historical events and where we'll go when we die. Instead, Christianity must be about how to live life to the fullest -- right here, right now, in this world.

Faith no longer needs to answer questions about what's out there in the sky and what's below the earth's surface. But it does need to help us find our way in a world in which we spend our days gazing at computer and television screens, increasingly isolated from other human beings and detached from the products of our labor. It needs to remind us that there are still things worth revering and loving.

Rather than grasping at scientifically implausible straws, faith must do something far more profound: it must empower us to understand why we live.

Many churches are indeed going down this road. Wonderful things are happening in the emerging church movement and some progressive denominations. But most people don't even know that such options exist. Partly that might be because a lot of progressive Christians are so disgusted with conservatives' proselytizing that they are loathe engage in the practice themselves. But I think we can all agree that if something good is happening in our lives, we shouldn't be afraid to say so. That's what true "witness" is all about, after all.

Lenny Bruce liked to say that people are "leaving the church and going back to God." Let's hope that the people who are no longer getting satisfaction from the church manage to find what they need elsewhere. But for those of us who do associate with religion, let's work to make our faith the source of meaning and fulfillment that it was always meant to be.
 
This post first appeared at jesselava.com.

50 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I'll come back later perhaps and write at greater length. You may disagree with this, by my view of it is that God is in charge of "drawing people" - and how God does that is not yours or mine to know, but to be in awe of.

Holy Mystery, as I have often termed this here, comes to us in many ways. Personally designed to touch us. Sometimes in the way of people or churches. Sometimes in dreams or events in life. Sometimes through reading.

Churches may not be the only way....

user-pic

I'm not sure our views are inconsistent. You said that God can sometimes come in the way of people or churches. That's the very point I was making toward the end, though it seemed like you were saying I might disagree, so I'm confused.

user-pic

If we're on the same page, great! I just wasn't sure. Sorry if I confused you, Jesse. I like the post and I rec'd it.

user-pic

The biggest problem with not being part of a church is that many times it takes fellowship w/ other Christians to keep the fire alive. Some (but I would argue a minority) can keep the embers of their love for Christ burning brightly without it, but most require that weekly infusion of passion.

I have become so distraught over the behavior of Christians lately that I find myself staying away from church. I am finding myself concentrating on the failings of Christians rather than on the love of Christ. It makes it hard for me to pick up my Bible, or do a study, or even pray. I miss the closeness, but it's me who has moved away, not Him. I have to find a way to reconnect with other Christians, to keep my faith strong, but it is hard when their hypocrisy is all I can see.

user-pic

I think you just articulated what a huge number of people are feeling about church. One of the problems is there are so many kinds of Christians, and when a few fail, people get disgusted with everyone. I'd suggest trying to find a congregation that's equally disgusted with the hypocrisies of some of their fellow Christians. You might be surprised at how many there are.

user-pic

"I can't speak to the state of affairs in faiths other than my own. But in Christianity, we must change our frame of reference. We must stop making religion about historical events and where we'll go when we die. Instead, Christianity must be about how to live life to the fullest -- right here, right now, in this world."

Sounds like something from the Gnostics or the Palagian (sp) Heresy. As a reformed Catholic, I am drawn to the love of the Christ. The Charity of Christ.

This is just a fine examination of religion from a personal standpoint.

Not that you need it, but I hereby award you the Dayly Blog of the Day Award for this here TPMC site, given to all of you from all of me.


user-pic

Thanks Dick! There are actually a lot of Christians today who have this focus; they're just out-yelled by the conservatives. I mentioned the emerging church movement in my post (I attend an emerging church in Chicago that's technically Presbyterian but effectively non-denominational), and then there are a bunch of UCC churches and many others.

user-pic

"Rather than grasping at scientifically implausible straws, faith must do something far more profound: it must empower us to understand why we live."

Bingo.

Nicely stated.

user-pic

Something that has always struck me about religion, is that the codification of spiritual discovery into the accepted teachings of a church, inevitably loses much of the 'author(s)' intent during the process of translation. Churches and religions have come and gone, stayed and evolved for the large part of our recorded history. I agree with you that there is a very real impulse and need to move the focus of religion from the 'afterlife' to our real and present lives. Otherwise we could end up a bunch of rubes twiddling our thumbs, and quoting scripture while we wait for the rapture or reincarnation to take us to a higher plane, as our inattention to our world and lives, destroys this excellent experiment in consciousness.

user-pic

(Proverbs 19:22) . . .The desirable thing in earthling man is his loving-kindness; and one of little means is better than a lying man.

What is loving kindness?

user-pic

"the codification of spiritual discovery into the accepted teachings of a church, inevitably loses much of the 'author(s)' intent during the process of translation."

True, though I don't necessarily think that's a bad thing, in that every community needs to figure out it's own way to apply a religious tradition and make it meaningful.

user-pic

OK, I know I have a reputation for being pretty negative about religion, but I have an honest question and I am truly reaching out for an answer:

What if you really, truly, simply CAN'T believe?

I was brought up a Baptist, was baptized in a holy font when I was 13. I went to church at least 3 times a week and gladly joined in all events. Around the time I was an older teenager, I began to question the dogma. Over time I questioned it more and more to the point where by the time I was an adult I simply don't believe in god or the bible. I simply don't believe. My sister says that I do on some level, but I reminded her that I have 3 children whom I love more than life itself, and I have raised them as atheists. If I had my fingers crossed behind my back I would have introduced them to the church.

Recently (last week) my mother died. I really liked the minister of the church she went to and who did her service. I thought about asking him this question, but during the service it came to me what his answer would be: You get to live again. That is the bonus for believing.

That is fine if you intrinsically believe, but if you don't, it is not a reason to fake it. I can't fake it.

Wow! This is more than I ever thought I would say here, but here it is, and I think the death of my mother brought it out. I don't think she will be reborn, and I don't want to be reborn myself, so that is not an enticement to me. I just want to get an answer from someone as to why anyone should, could, can, believe in this amorphous being that is so personal and exclusionary that many on this earth refer to in one way or the other as "god."

user-pic

You and I have exchanged brickbats before over faith and lack thereof. There is nothing wrong with having spiritual faith or not having it... I believe in works over faith. The atheist who performs a mitzvah is worth ten prostelytizing ingrates, adjusted for inflation.

You are a good person with or without Dumbo's feather. Personally, I believe by choice tempered (contradiction coming) by upbringing and intrinsic need. I feel that crazy little thing called Love as a bottomless source of spontaneous novelty, and I choose to call that God, whose symbol and substance communicated this Love through Christ.

This could sound hippy-dippy to you, but hey, at least I am not a dittohead.

Bottom line:

"Be a lamp unto yourself." - Buddha

user-pic

I appreciate your comments. But I am still asking the same question; if a person simply cannot believe, what is there that can make that person believe? I'm not asking for proof; I realize that this is metaphysical -- there is just so much human history that makes it impossible to believe that the story is true. How could so many generations of people (from cave-men onward) be left out of the loop if that is the only way to salvation? What kind of god would do that to people?

It can't be based on reward, because that would require faking it.

I know there is no answer, and so I will stop here. It is simply not possible to answer my questions. I know you want to, and I know you are content with your answers. I am not.

user-pic

Ok, now I'm gonna get 'hippy-dippy' as zip would put it. I'm not a practitioner of any 'religion', though I've sat with several Buddhist groups over the years. This book provided a biochemical framework for me to imagine a tendency toward life in the universe, (It's not light reading if you don't have some background in basic biology). In it Nobel laureate de Duve makes a case for the inevitability of life given the chemical composition of the universe as we know it. For some reason I find this kind of comforting in and of itself. On some level life is the object of life. Throw some self conscious beings with opposable digits into the mix and if life is going to thrive, (as opposed to going up in a mushroom cloud), at some point a 'system' of ethics is required to bring the species to its' full potential. My best guess is that this is where the 'religion' comes in. By honoring the code you honor Life. And we get to take the 'experiment in consciousness' to another level. Without that, its 'Hola mushroom cloud, and hasta lluego self conscious species, (with opposable digit). Don't ask me to digress much more than this, for as I stated in my first comment on this blog, any more codification will undoubtedly lead to bull shit. Anyway, CVille, that 'Life force' is what I think a lot of people revere and call 'God', and any number of other names. You can take it in any number of ideological directions, but I prefer keeping it simple, kind of like Kurt Vonnegut described, (perhaps in 'Cat's Cradle'),when he described man as 'mud that got to sit up and look around". Beautiful. It works for me.

user-pic

Tiger's got to hunt,
Bird's got to fly.
Man's got to sit and wnder,
Why, why, why?

Tigers got to rest,
Birds got to land,
Man's got to say,
That he understands.

By some Vonnegut character in one of his books. It's been too long.

user-pic
Round, and round, and round we spin with feet of lead and wings of tin.
We could have a blog where we all just write in some of our favorite Vonnegut quotes.
user-pic

And the universe is a big place, maybe the biggest.

user-pic

No matter how corrupt, greedy, and heartless our government, our corporations, our media, and our religious and charitable institutions may become, the music will still be wonderful.

If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:

THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED
FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
WAS MUSIC

Amen.

user-pic

True terror is to wake up one morning and discover that your high school class is running the country.

user-pic

Quinn: You won't see this, after the bell, but I am moved by what you wrote. "I feel a change comin'on."
Amen.
Namaste.

user-pic

You don't have to believe in a god for any reason whatsoever. No one has to believe in the supernatural to lead a happy, progressive life.

My own personal opinion is that while religion was once a help in our evolution as human beings, it has now become a hindrance and holding us back in our development.

user-pic

CVille, first of all, my sincere condolences about your mother. I lost mine about...oh, I guess it's over 11 years ago now. And the truth is that I didn't become a Christian until after she died.

I will answer your question:

"What if you really, truly, simply CAN'T believe?"

I think that prevents you from being part of a belief-based faith -- that is, a faith that's based on whether you think certain miracles took place, whether there's an entity in the sky called God who has human attributes, etc.

But it does NOT prevent you from being part of the kind of faith that I'm talking about -- one that tries to find what's sacred in life, what's greater than ourselves, and connect to it. The great theologian Paul Tillich defined faith as having an "ultimate concern." That means some concern that subsumes all others. There are many ways of living an integrated life, choosing something to set your internal clock to, without believing in hocus pocus.

I think the issue is that this belief-focused form of faith is so deeply ingrained in your conception of religion that even when I write a post specifically attacking it, it's hard for you to see what I'm saying. I don't say that as criticism, but as recognition of how much you've internalized a form of religion that really has very little place in the modern world and has kept many people from experiencing the good that faith can do.

user-pic

On the other hand, it isn't necessary to believe that there is something "greater than ourselves" - it could be that we are greatness in and of ourselves and that we have the capability to be good without the promise of a future reward or punishment, but just for the sake of our species and our evolution as human beings.

user-pic

Did you read my post? I specifically said religion should not be about the promise of a future reward or punishment.

user-pic

No need to get snippy. First of all, I didn't say that you said that and secondly, the point I was making is that faith isn't necessary to live a happy, progressive life, that human beings are innately capable of greatness without it, that we are capable of answering the great questions of life such as why we are here and why things happen and attaining community without a faithbased group.

If you find community in a common belief in the supernatural, that is fine and it is perfectly fine to find community in other places. IMO, religion should be used to inform your character, not your neighbor's, but if anyone wants to testify, that's entirely up to him. I don't have to like the method of testifying, but I am always interested in how human beings think. If it brings you comfort believe in it, if you want to call it "god", go ahead and call it that, although that may be confusing to some people who have only one concept of god as a supernatural being, if you find that you are better able to reflect and find a philosophy of life with other like minded people, then I am glad for you.

user-pic

Thanks. Yeah, it is very helpful for me to have (a) symbols to rest my head on and represent core values and aspirations, (b) a narrative into which to put myself in order to better understand which direction to go, (c) a community to provide support and accountability as I try to fulfill those values and walk that path, and (d) a tradition of others who have used similar symbols and narratives so there's institutional wisdom. Moreover, I'm particularly drawn to the symbols, narratives, community, and traditions of progressive Christianity. So that's why it works for me. I'm not saying it has to work for everyone, but there are a lot of people who are not satisfied living a life without faith or spirituality, and I think it's important that they know this option exists.

As for how you're fine with "testifying" but might not like how it's always done, I may agree, though bear in mind that you, too, are testifying. We're all expressive, creative beings and it makes no more sense to say one should keep quiet about her faith than to say that one should keep quiet about about her non-faith -- or her politics, job, family, etc etc.

Also bear in mind that for many people -- particularly those for whom faith is not primarily about "belief" -- faith and spirituality are not of purely individual concern. It's not just something you believe or don't and should keep to yourself. It's a communal activity with social implications for how we live.

user-pic

No, I am not "testifying". I'm merely offering an opinion on your post. I don't need faith in order to offer an opinion and I don't think that faith in the supernatural means that the community needs to be involved in your belief, it may be nice to have others confirm and confer your belief, but it isn't necessary to share and proselytize others unless you need that confirmation and conferrence in the rightness of your belief.

user-pic

You are stating your own belief and why you have it. That's testifying. Do you think it's less legitimate for the religious to do the same? I can't tell.

I still don't think you're understanding the progressive conception of faith, because you keep putting it in terms of "belief" that something supernatural exists. The purpose of community in a progressive faith context is not to confirm your belief. Rather, the idea is (a) to support each other in living out one's faith, and (b) simply to experience faith together, since many faiths specifically focus on the value of community.

One of the interesting things about doing this post is that even though I wrote about how religion must stop being about X and start being about Y -- as many congregations are already doing -- several commenters have kept responding as if I was promoting X. Some ideas about religion are so deeply ingrained that even arguments explicitly proposing an alternative just don't register.

user-pic

Let me just emphasize one point, while I'm here.

You keep describing the kind of God that a certain breed of conservative evangelical believes in. And then you keep saying you couldn't believe in such an exclusionary, vengeful God. Please, hear me: I don't believe in such a God either! Nor does anyone in my congregation! There are many, many ways of thinking about God. You have had one particular notion drilled into your head, and although you and I have had this same conversation several times now, that old image of God sticks with you as the only one that a person could have.

Some people, for instance have a panentheistic view of God -- the God of Spinoza. Others have a non- or post-theistic view -- seeing God as a symbol for human aspirations. Many of our founding fathers had a more "deistic" conception of God, seeing him as the creator of the world but not really as one who intervenes in people's lives. And there are many, many more ways of seeing God than the one you can't shake.

Please let me know if you want me to re-list the books I've suggested in the past. Point being, you don't have to "believe" in the sense that you describe in order to have a meaningful faith. I certainly don't.

user-pic

CV, we share a similar story, only mine was Catholic. I spent so many years believing by consensus:

"It must be true, right. Look at all of the churches around the world. Everybody I know believes. Everybody goes to church, except those Asian and 3rd world people who don't know any better. But that is where missionaries come in..."

For so long when I was younger, this was the religious view.

It has been an interesting path to purge the metaphysical from my life. It is liberating when you know that you, personally, are in control of your own destiny.

I personally followed a similar path as Julia Sweeney who did an amazingly candid one woman show called "Letting Go Of God" which details her struggle, and ultimately ending, her faith in God. I think you may find it interesting and comforting as well.

Trailer here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geRUTfgTQlo&feature=related

She performed an excerpt of the show at TED here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtIyx687ytk

user-pic

But you, personally, aren't entirely in control of your destiny. That is a metaphysical belief because it isn't corroborated by facts. You can't control your birth or death, for starters. Nor can you control your initial enculturation that occurs while you are a helpless infant and semi-helpless child. The strucure of the mind itself is a vast repository of unconscious and repressed thoughts that impact life in a myriad of ways that aren't controlled by your conscious mind.

We also have a chain of ancestors that arrive to us individually in the form of family nurturing and genetic predispositions.

Are you able to eliminate religion from your life based on an equally religious notion that you are the master of your fate?

user-pic

Actually, I think I was a bit unclear. Let me try to rephrase.

I don't subscribe to everything happening for a "divine purpose". Once one realizes there is no religious "safety net" so to speak, people are a lot more careful and make choices a little more wisely since there is no "God's will" to blame their bad decisions on.

user-pic

I'm going to jump in here, CVille, hoping that Jesse will, as well, as I am sure our answers will be different.

I don't pretend that I have a complete understanding of the hows and whys of God. In fact, I would admit that I understand very little. I believe that God made us with an inability to be complete in this world. That we will always have a longing for more. And that what we are longing for is Him.

I have been an atheist. When I was an older teenager, the last thing I wanted to believe in was an invisible dude watching me do all the things I wouldn't have wanted my parents to know I was doing...and making me feel guilty about them. That followed me into adulthood. I was just having too much fun doing the things I was doing. Yet, having been raised to believe, I did have a nagging thought in the back of my mind about what if it its true? When I had children, I rationalized not raising them in church...they'll find God if they need him.

It wasn't until 9/11 when I knew that my son, who was in the Army might have to go to war that I knew there was no way I could get through it alone. That I needed back up. That if I didn't have the Invisible Dude backing me up, I wasn't going to get through it sane. I began praying for the first time in MANY years, and over a period of days, began to feel a glow of comfort so warm, that it was like being wrapped in a warm quilt and having my mother rock me in her lap. I began going to church, and it seemed that the Pastor had been peeking in the windows of my heart. He seemed to be speaking to me and me alone. Nearly everything he said, spoke to my deepest needs.

Within a month I accepted Christ and was baptized.

Since then there has been an ebb and flow in my relationship with God. When I stay in touch, He is with me always. My whole day seems to be spent sharing moments w/ Him, like I don't need to stop to pray, I'm in prayer w/ Him all day. When I pull back, like I have recently, He leaves me alone, per my request, that communing with Him stops. My life doesn't stop. I don't all of a sudden turn into a bad person...I'm just not as full. I begin to swear again, begin to be more self-centered, feel a little pissier...less like I have a servant's heart. I like the God-centered me more than I like the me-centered me.

I am not your typical Christian, I guess. I don't witness, per se, I just try to live my life in a way that I hope will make people want to check out this God-dude, or at least be a little less hostile to Him. I believe that, although it is God inspired, the Bible has been translated over and over from languages that don't have direct words that mean the same as ours, and leave open the possibility that those doing the translating didn't get it dead on... Whenever there is a difference in what I'm told it means, and what I believe God meant, I go with what I believe He meant. I believe in the God of love, that all we do in His name should be done in love. The very idea that God would condone torture, or not having health care in the richest country in the world, or starving people, or telling lies in His name, or forcing people to have babies they don't want, or giving people the desire for sexual intimacy then requiring them to not use it...these things make me crazy. I have to believe we need to err in favor of letting people work these things out with God Himself rather than us trying to work it out for them. I believe He knows our hearts. We need to concentrate on loving Him and each other, and let Him deal with us individually on the rest of it. If He wants you to stop doing something, and you are truly looking for what He wants you to do, He will convict you of that...you don't need me to tell you.

I'm getting way off track here...The bottom line, in my view is, if you seek Him, you will find Him.
If you WANT to believe in Him, you will find a way. There will be no need to fake it. Faking it doesn't work with God. It all starts with prayer. Lots of it.

I believe with all my heart that He loves you, whether you believe in Him or not.

user-pic

Thanks, Stilli, for such a personal and honest reply. I really can't comment beyond that, but I do appreciate your telling me about your experience.

user-pic

Thanks for listening, Jan, and for not telling me I'm full of %$#*...God works in mysterious ways. If you had told me 10 years ago I would be a believer I would have said "Fat chance!" and yet here I am...

user-pic

Beautiful story. You said you don't "witness," per se, but that sure sounds like it to me. :) Thanks for letting us see who you are.

user-pic

Faith based upon concrete evidence

The validity of God’s record of providing for his earthly creatures, yesterday and into the future
“faith follows the thing heard.”—Ro 10:17

Accurate fulfillment of its prophecies, (fall of Babylon, the rise of the Medes and Persians hundreds of years in advance. Builds faith in the reliability and assured expectation.
Faith is not credulity. Scientists have faith in the principles of their particular studies, basing new experiments on past discoveries, looking for new discoveries on the basis of proven truths.
The farmer planting seeds, has faith or an expectation, if proper procedures are followed the seeds will sprout and produce fruitage.
People have faith in tried and trusted friends.
Faith in the stability of the natural laws governing the universe actually constitutes a foundation for man’s plans and activities.
Cultivating faith produces results. Faith is strengthened.

(Romans 1:20) . . .For his invisible [qualities] are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable. . .
(2 Thessalonians 3:2) 2 and that we may be delivered from harmful and wicked men, for faith is not a possession of all people. . .
(2 Thessalonians 3:5) . . .May the Lord continue directing YOUR hearts successfully into the love of God. . .
(Galatians 5:19-23) . . .Now the works of the flesh are manifest, and they are fornication, uncleanness, loose conduct, 20 idolatry, practice of spiritism, enmities, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, contentions, divisions, sects, 21 envies, drunken bouts, revelries, and things like these. As to these things I am forewarning YOU, the same way as I did forewarn YOU, that those who practice such things will not inherit God’s kingdom.

22 On the other hand, the fruitage of the spirit is love, joy, peace, long-suffering, kindness, goodness, faith, 23 mildness, self-control. Against such things there is no law.

(2 Thessalonians 1:3) 3 We are obligated to give God thanks always for YOU, brothers, as it is fitting, because YOUR faith is growing exceedingly and the love of each and all of YOU is increasing one toward the other. . .
(Luke 17:5) 5 Now the apostles said to the Lord: “Give us more faith.. . .
(James 2:24-26) . . .YOU see that a man is to be declared righteous by works, and not by faith alone. 25 In the same manner was not also Ra′hab the harlot declared righteous by works, after she had received the messengers hospitably and sent them out by another way? 26 Indeed, as the body without spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead.
(1 Peter 1:6-7) . . .In this fact YOU are greatly rejoicing, though for a little while at present, if it must be, YOU have been grieved by various trials, 7 in order that the tested quality of YOUR faith, of much greater value than gold that perishes despite its being proved by fire, may be found a cause for praise and glory and honor. . .
(1 John 5:1-4) . . .Everyone believing that Jesus is the Christ has been born from God, and everyone who loves the one that caused to be born loves him who has been born from that one. 2 By this we gain the knowledge that we are loving the children of God, when we are loving God and doing his commandments. 3 For this is what the love of God means, that we observe his commandments; and yet his commandments are not burdensome, 4 because everything that has been born from God conquers the world. And this is the conquest that has conquered the world, our faith. . .
(Jude 3-4) . . .Beloved ones, though I was making every effort to write YOU about the salvation we hold in common, I found it necessary to write YOU to exhort YOU to put up a hard fight for the faith that was once for all time delivered to the holy ones. 4 My reason is that certain men have slipped in who have long ago been appointed by the Scriptures to this judgment, ungodly men, turning the undeserved kindness of our God into an excuse for loose conduct and proving false to our only Owner and Lord, Jesus Christ.
(1 Timothy 6:9-12) 9 However, those who are determined to be rich fall into temptation and a snare and many senseless and hurtful desires, which plunge men into destruction and ruin. 10 For the love of money is a root of all sorts of injurious things, and by reaching out for this love some have been led astray from the faith and have stabbed themselves all over with many pains. 11 However, you, O man of God, flee from these things. But pursue righteousness, godly devotion, faith, love, endurance, mildness of temper. 12 Fight the fine fight of the faith, get a firm hold on the everlasting life for which you were called and you offered the fine public declaration in front of many witnesses.
(Colossians 2:8) . . .Look out: perhaps there may be someone who will carry YOU off as his prey through the philosophy and empty deception according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary things of the world and not according to Christ;

Faith cannot be taken for granted. To maintain a firm faith requires putting up a hard fight for it. Resist faith destroying conduct, shunning faith-destroying philosophies and traditions of men, and, above all, looking “intently at the Chief Agent and Perfecter of our faith, Jesus

user-pic

Resistance, I know you mean well, but I think it's this view of faith -- this notion that the Bible accurately predicts events and tells history and so on...it's just exactly what cannot survive modernity. It might take a while, but eventually, it will lose its power, as it's already starting to do. This comment thread probably isn't the proper place to get into a debate about the specifics, but my own view is that there's just no intellectual merit at all to this perspective. Not trying to be a jerk; just my honest view.

user-pic

God doesn't change, that is why he is trustworthy.

The reason you have so many FALSE RELIGONS.

(Acts 20:29-30) 29 I know that after my going away oppressive wolves will enter in among YOU and will not treat the flock with tenderness, 30 and from among YOU yourselves men will rise and speak twisted things to draw away the disciples after themselves.

The people rejected the TRUTH, in favor of stories. Watering down the message to suit there feelings, instead of doing what pleased GOD.

(1 Timothy 4:1-3) . . .However, the inspired utterance says definitely that in later periods of time some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to misleading inspired utterances and teachings of demons, 2 by the hypocrisy of men who speak lies, marked in their conscience as with a branding iron; 3 forbidding to marry. . .
(2 Thessalonians 2:3) 3 Let no one seduce YOU in any manner, because it will not come unless the apostasy comes first and the man of lawlessness gets revealed, the son of destruction. . .
(2 Thessalonians 2:9-12) . . .But the lawless one’s presence is according to the operation of Satan with every powerful work and lying signs and portents 10 and with every unrighteous deception for those who are perishing, as a retribution because they did not accept the love of the truth that they might be saved. 11 So that is why God lets an operation of error go to them, that they may get to believing the lie, 12 in order that they all may be judged because they did not believe the truth but took pleasure in unrighteousness.
(1 John 2:18-19) . . .Young children, it is the last hour, and, just as YOU have heard that antichrist is coming, even now there have come to be many antichrists; from which fact we gain the knowledge that it is the last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they were not of our sort; for if they had been of our sort, they would have remained with us. But [they went out] that it might be shown up that not all are of our sort.

Going to Church because it makes one feel better, is no assurance that the form of worship is acceptable. Why waste your time and life building on the sand, only to be told Get away from me. Search out the truth,
(Matthew 11:29-30) . . .Take my yoke upon YOU and learn from me, for I am mild-tempered and lowly in heart, and YOU will find refreshment for YOUR souls. 30 For my yoke is kindly and my load is light.”

(Matthew 7:21-23) . . .“Not everyone saying to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of the heavens, but the one doing the will of my Father who is in the heavens will. 22 Many will say to me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and expel demons in your name, and perform many powerful works in your name?’ 23 And yet then I will confess to them: I never knew YOU! Get away from me, YOU workers of lawlessness.

(Matthew 7:24-27) . . .Therefore everyone that hears these sayings of mine and does them will be likened to a discreet man, who built his house upon the rock-mass. 25 And the rain poured down and the floods came and the winds blew and lashed against that house, but it did not cave in, for it had been founded upon the rock-mass. 26 Furthermore, everyone hearing these sayings of mine and not doing them will be likened to a foolish man, who built his house upon the sand. 27 And the rain poured down and the floods came and the winds blew and struck against that house and it caved in, and its collapse was great.”

If the Church you go to, does not teach the truth, then YOU will have identified the lawless ones, the treasonable ones, the Antichrist. (Revelation 18:4-6) . . .“Get out of her, my people, if YOU do not want to share with her in her sins, and if YOU do not want to receive part of her plagues. 5 For her sins have massed together clear up to heaven, and God has called her acts of injustice to mind. 6 Render to her even as she herself rendered. .

DO NOT SUPPORT THE FALSE.

user-pic

Do you really think that offering up a few grave-sounding platitudes and a bunch of Bible verses will convince anyone of anything? Please speak WITH people; engage them; don't just talk at them. Your efforts to persuade really just separate yourself, which is precisely the opposite of what the Gospel demands.

user-pic

Jesse Lava wrote Do you really think that offering up a few grave-sounding platitudes and a bunch of Bible verses will convince anyone of anything?

Jesus speaking (John 10:27-28) . . .My sheep listen to my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.

This conversation started because some were questioning how to acquire faith, using God’s own words the answer was clear.

If you'll notice, it is not I that is speaking. I purposely used a bunch of God's own inspired words, from his written word. If you want to find fault of not reaching the heart,
Please take it up with him. I figured that his words are enough authority, or should I be like Korah who thought he could do a better job.

(2 Timothy 3:12-4:5) 12 In fact, all those desiring to live with godly devotion in association with Christ Jesus will also be persecuted. 13 But wicked men and impostors will advance from bad to worse, misleading and being misled. 14 You, however, continue in the things that you learned and were persuaded to believe, knowing from what persons you learned them 15 and that from infancy

you have known the HOLY WRITINGS, which are able to make you wise for salvation through the faith in connection with Christ Jesus.

16 ALL SCRIPTURE IS INSPIRED of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be fully competent, completely equipped for every good work.

4 ……. preach the word,…..reprove, reprimand, exhort, ……..

3 For there will be a period of time when they will not put up with the healthful teaching, but, in accord with their own desires,

THEY WILL ACCUMULATE TEACHERS FOR THEMSELVES to have their ears tickled; 4 and they will turn their ears away from the truth, whereas they will be turned aside to false stories. 5 You, though, keep your senses in all things, suffer evil, do [the] work of an evangelizer, fully accomplish your ministry.

Jesus was persecuted because they did not approve of the message. It wasn’t what they wanted to hear, as you put it Jesse Lava wrote “a few grave-sounding platitudes and a bunch of Bible verses will convince anyone of anything?”

Your right, it failed to convince the Jewish Nation, to repent and turn around and LIVE. Despite all attempts by many messengers God’s words were ignored.

I do agree, that when we see people searching for answers to many of TODAYS PROBLEMS, THE BIBLE IS STILL THE BEST SOURCE OF INFORMATION. TESTED AND TRUE, FAITHFUL.

user-pic

Very good post Jesse

user-pic

A close friend told this shortly after our Christian country invaded Iraq. He was at Sunday service in the church he and his wife had attended for twenty-eight years along with their children. The preacher called on the congregation to pray for the protection and success of our soldiers as they did their duty in God's righteous cause and also for their families.
As they left the church and people shook hand with the preacher and praised his great sermon, my friend stepped up and asked if the following Sunday they could also pray for the people of Iraq. I don't remember the wording of the answer but the gist of it was “no”.
My friend then told the preacher that he would never set foot in that church again but would look for a church which spread the teachings of Jesus.
I don't think my friend had his faith diminished but he took one more step towards rejecting Christianity as taught and religion in general. I admired his reaction.

user-pic

I do think it was moral and courageous to stand up to the pastor like that.

user-pic

I was raised as an Episcopalian, which is to say within a church community that was more tolerant than are many other denominations; Episcopalians are, at least, remarkably Lite on "don't" dogma. I was also lucky that my parents' churchgoing pattern was not rigorous -- it ceased entirely during the summer -- nor did they require more than the basics of my sister and me.

But those basics did include confirmation. And I remember feeling really queasy about that when, at fifteen, it became part of the year's agenda. Like CVille, I just couldn't quell the notion that if there were good people around the world (and through the ages) who believed something else entirely (or nothing at all) then this whole step by Sacrament step, insider track to salvation business of Christianity seemed (to me) to be wishful thinking at best and contrived and exclusionary propaganda at worst. I was happy for the people who believed it -- because they seemed happy -- but because I didn't believe it (and hadn't since my first world history exposure in elementary school) going through the motions of commitment made me feel a total hypocrite.

When my parents began to press me about confirmation, I told them I really didn't want to do it, and explained why, expecting that they would say "Fine, we understand." But they surprised me. It became a big deal. I think because it was, to them, not solely a religious issue; rather, it was alarming to them that a young girl, their daughter, would resist: a) authority and b) conformity. And so, seeing the parental handwriting, if not the Holy Writ on the wall, I conceded. I went to a few classes; on the appropriate Sunday (wearing the then modesty-mandated mantilla and white gloves) I went through the brief ceremony, including, as I recall, taking communion for the first time (loved the idea of real wine, if not the actual taste, but hated the reality of the communal chalice still in use at the time). Afterwards, parents, parental friends and the Bishop beamed for photo ops in which I colluded, smiling sweetly and that was that. For them.

That night, I had what one might call a one night stand with Jesus, in that I had a vivid dream about "sleeping"with him. I can laugh, now, but then? Well, as you may imagine, at a virginal fifteen, that scared the... well, the bejesus out of me. (Waddaya think, TheraP? I now know that other woman have had the same dream, but what's it about? Was that just a logical extension of "giving myself" to Christ through confirmation? A "good" girl's mental act of "bad" girl rebellion? Just evidence of an adolescent brain trying to merge conflicting messages of body and spirit? Or, was it a sign that I had serious grandiosity issues? If the latter, I'm so glad I didn't know then about the concept of menage a trois; gad-- suppose I had dreamed of sleeping with the Father and the Son?)

Anyway, at that point completely (if privately) freaked, I told my parents that I wasn't going to church, anymore, period end. And they surprised me again by accepting that. So that other than sitting through numbing homilies and sermons at various schools thereafter, and attending requisite weddings, baptisms and funerals, I have spent the rest of my life happily church-free.

Which is not to say that I have spent my life without searching for the sense of certainty, contentment and community that truly religious and/or spiritual people seem to have.

For example, in my twenties, I consecutively married two (as it turned out, non-practicing) Quakers, partly because I so admired their communities of origin. The Friends' concept of living by rigorous ethical standards derived from a combination of inner meditation and group consensus I still find truly admirable -- a checks and balances structure of self-regulation augmented by a back-up reserve of group opinion. Also entirely admirable is the Friends' history of active commitment to the causes of equality (in gender as well as racial issues), tolerance, education, peace, and even to a "plain" ie., gracefully simple lifestyle. (Although I have to say it -- a Quaker wedding is a lengthy exercise in excruciating silence, rather than a sensory celebration; there, the Episcopalians win, hands down.)

I kept searching. Philosophy, Buddhism/Tich Nat Han, even AA -- you name it, I read about it, tried it out and tried to incorporate into my life the precepts of each that made sense, taught me something I didn't know before and seemed really valuable. Many of you have done the same or something similar.

All the while I had plenty of family and friends still urging me to return to the Christian fold. In some ways it was tempting. It was known; it came with community. I wavered, not in belief but in belief exhaustion. So it was an irony, during the last twenty years, watching as even the Episcopal church (at least in the South) was overtaken by the Evangelical movement. But even that had its moments of humor, however black.

For example, while wavering, a friend and I were, at the time, immersed in reading about Native American beliefs and practices. One day we saw a notice in the Charleston News and Courier that "a gathering of women" was to be held at a local hotel. We were elated; we had obviously misjudged our southern sistahs -- apparently more of us than we knew were exploring other expressions of spirituality.

We signed up with enthusiasm, arrived early to get good seats and watched in amazement as hordes of conservative women we knew filed in, one after another until the room was full. A well-known Republican chairwoman approached the microphone. She smiled, folded her hands in that classic clasp taught in "poise and posture," leaned into the microphone and said....." Ladies, please join me in saying.....'Praise Jesus!" My friend and I were aghast; we were trapped, not in an exploration of Native American beliefs, but in an Evangelical pep rally. And so we sat, and politely stood, and sat again through a two hour summons to...and I quote: "raise an army of women to save the souls of our those in the Lowcountry who are not yet Saved."

That, too, is funny in hindsight. But it was awful in the immediacy of the moment to see otherwise low-key women raised to a fever pitch of zealotry.

The good news is that, years later, some of those same women quietly found their way to Obama's Charleston campaign headquarters, surprising themselves and each other by independently arriving at opinions that would have scandalized their families, and themselves, in the not too distant past.

People evolve. Let's hope organized religion does as well.

user-pic

Amen.

user-pic

I believe organized religion should become disorganized. The church of John should gain prominence over the church of Peter. The internet allows us to expand our community, expand our awareness, and practice what we preach. Even without the internet, we are saturated with knowledge and can choose to incorporate diverse aspects of the sacred and profane into our lives.

The times will be troubling as the world realigns and discovers new social strata. But I will say this: society as organized by the traditional churches is a failure. You are required to accept contradictions and hypocrisies that require too much cognitive dissonance in this time of knowledge.

Instead of wishing for the churches to modernize, we should evolve and bring the evolution to our communities and let the churches adapt or fade. It wouldn't be the first time that an organized religion has vanished into quaint mythology.

user-pic

"Instead of wishing for the churches to modernize, we should evolve and bring the evolution to our communities and let the churches adapt or fade."

For those who belong to a church, those two things aren't contradictory. Indeed, I'm proposing that churches adapt to social evolution AND wishing they'd modernize. Those two things seem basically the same to me.

user-pic

I talked about this very issue in my book and describe how it should be faith that drives people rather than religion. I have found that those who are faithful are worth investing time in while those who are religious only give me a headache. Too often I feel that people try to make a particular religion their church, rather than looking at the bigger picture: i.e. humanity. How much better this world could be if we weren’t so concerned with whose Jesus was better than someone else’s Jesus. If we quit nit picking and focus largely on how our faith can impact humanity, the world could be better place.

Leave a comment

Jesse Lava

user-pic

Following: 32
Followers: 34

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Website: www.jesselava.com
  • Location Cambridge, MA
  • Party Democrat
  • Politics Progressive, with some curveballs

Favorites

Bio

I'm a grad student at Harvard University pursuing a dual degree in public policy and theological studies. To (help) pay the (massive) bills, I do communications consulting for progressive causes.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address