« GOP: Obama's health care plan would be too effective | Jesse Lava's Blog | Conservative hypocrisy on faith »
Texas justice, via Orwell
Texas judge Sharon Keller is could be removed from the bench for being a callous witch who wouldn't keep her office open for an extra hour to allow a death row inmate to file a last-minute appeal. The guy was executed three hours later.
Among this monster's other judicial exploits:
Keller's apologists in Texas claim she's "the ideal judge" because she's a "fair and impartial umpire" who insists on rendering "a dispassionate opinion." Apparently the Texas legal system is so far gone that a judge can be called objective despite having campaigned for her position specifically as a "pro-prosecution" candidate. In Texas, a proud and open bias against defendants is considered no bias at all.
Talk about hating what America stands for.
Among this monster's other judicial exploits:
In 1998, Judge Keller wrote the opinion rejecting a new trial for Roy Criner, a mentally retarded man convicted of rape and murder, even though DNA tests after his trial showed that it was not his semen in the victim.Any judge who values a false sense of finality over accuracy and justice in a murder case should probably be in jail herself.
"We can't give new trials to everyone who establishes, after conviction, that they might be innocent," she later told the television news program "Frontline." "We would have no finality in the criminal justice system, and finality is important."
Keller's apologists in Texas claim she's "the ideal judge" because she's a "fair and impartial umpire" who insists on rendering "a dispassionate opinion." Apparently the Texas legal system is so far gone that a judge can be called objective despite having campaigned for her position specifically as a "pro-prosecution" candidate. In Texas, a proud and open bias against defendants is considered no bias at all.
Talk about hating what America stands for.
Advertisement












"If I owned both Hell and Texas, I would live in Hell and rent out Texas."
- General Phil Sheridan
March 7, 2009 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
AN HOMAGE TO FINALITY
Q once said:
Can we not just take
Five minutes to wish others well
But she could
Not a short time take
To delay the sounding of the death knell.
This all reminds me of the two bush brothers in the Texas Mansion laughing during a plea for mercy in a death case.
March 7, 2009 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keller is probably the worst. I say "probably" because you never know with these people. The whole Texas judiciary is rotten to the core. Remember that the state the Texas Republicans (the Turps, as I like to call them) have created here is the state they wanted to create for the whole country. Sure, things are bad now. But if these creeps had gotten their way, things would have been incalculably worse.
March 7, 2009 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Molly Ivins used to call Texas the National Laboratory for Bad Government.
March 7, 2009 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Molly Ivins would have been quite unhappy that a woman judge was called a "witch" in any context, unless she had written it.
March 7, 2009 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gosh, I miss Molly Ivins! I'm sure she would have something especially pithy to say about our pro-prosecutor judge, Sharon Keller. The man may have been guilty as dirt but he did have the right to be heard before being killed. Goodness knows we have sent enough innocent men and women around these parts to prison and even the death watch.
If the outcomes don't drive you nuts in Texas, the attitudes will. Signed, a northern liberal way out of place in the Dallas environs.
March 7, 2009 6:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
You can read the charges against Keller from the State Commission on Judicial Conduct on http://www.SharonKiller.com
March 7, 2009 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the only silver lining I've found from the economic crisis, it seems that executions have become too expensive for many states. There goes the 'saving the taxpayers' money' rationale we hear so much about.
In Hard Times, Executions Become Question of Cost
March 7, 2009 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
The right result for the wrong reasons. Why not? Why not Seashell. Good cite.
March 7, 2009 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tha only reason execusions are so spensive is cuz we have to put the poor little babys to sleep with a big spensive drug rig and doctors and such. Now if we still had hangins...
But ya’ll are right, mehbe Texas is like Hell. But that’s all cuz them lilly-livered librels are givin away are God-given resources to tha imgrants and four-eyed Yankee eggheads (prolly of the He-brew pursuasion) that come lookin fer jobs here after they awready done fouled up thar own nest. Least we know ya don’t shit where ya sleep unlike are southern amigos.
So if yer gonna sit in front of yer compooter whining bout things, why doncha help out by watchin tha border like are good Govenor Perry has asked us to-
texasborderwatch
Whats great is ya’ll can choose yer own camera and who ya wanna catch– them dirty Mescan hippie dope dealers or them other brown devils who make Texas a Hell cuz they swim over here and take are jobs and cain’t even talk English! This is surely worth the millions were spendin even though it dint work the first time they did it two years ago. America fer Americans!
March 7, 2009 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
shouldn't dat be 'merruhca fer 'merruhcans?
March 7, 2009 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
You betcha, son. I woulda ended with a simple “USA” but wasn’t sure I was spellin it right. Now I hope you boys been moniterin the border. I coulda swore I saw some movement on camera 112 where it sez: “Look for individuals on foot carrying backpacks.” Itsa known hikin area far them colledge hippies. And member our state motto, "Access to Texas denied."
March 7, 2009 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
The NYTIMES today has a piece on this - Criner wasn't executed - then Gov. GW Bush did pardon him later. But the nut of the post is accurate and the article is worth the read.
March 8, 2009 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't say Criner was executed. I noted Criner as one of Keller's "other" exploits, different from the one with which I began the post.
March 8, 2009 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The idea that a person cannot be executed just because they are innocent isn’t new. It was ratified by the Rhenquist Court in the mid-‘90s against a man whose brother admitted to killing the state trooper he was convicted of killing ( Herrera VS. Collins). I couldn't believe then, and still can’t, how the law would allow the execution of an innocent person.
Keller’s a devout member of a Church that holds “sanctity of life’ as one of its highest precepts. Is devotion a pick and choose proposition (one from column A…)? Of course, the Church goes back and forth on the contradictions in its regard for life when it concerns, say, abortion as opposed to war or criminal punishment. (And apropos of nothing, Keller's family owns the chain of hamburger stands that were always a popular drive-through for quick stop-and-go purchases of cheap cases of beer- at least, it was a well-known source amongst underage kids back in the day).
But if there was ever an indisputable argument against the death penalty, or extreme caution at least, it is the revelation of the large population of wrongfully convicted revealed by the perfection of DNA testing (I believe the Innocence Project initially found that over 25% of those it tested, mostly rape cases, were innocent). In the ‘30s and ‘40s, a many received the death penalty for rape. Oddly, it seems that 90% of rapists at that time were black! Of course, Keller is just a small part of a”‘justice” system that GW put in place here when he became governor and continued to install nationally. The “Bush legacy” that will take decades to undo.
March 8, 2009 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Is devotion a pick and choose proposition (one from column A…)?"
Yes, it absolutely is. The difference between theological liberals and conservatives is that liberals essentially admit to picking and choosing while conservatives pretend to adhere strictly to the Bible's (or the Catholic Church's) perfect moral code.
March 8, 2009 10:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
FYI, my latest post is based on your comment: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/jesselava/2009/03/conservative-hypocrisy-on-fait.php
March 9, 2009 3:59 AM | Reply | Permalink